Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop ; 165(5): 520-532.e3, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38276930

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to investigate the 2-year postoperative change and influencing factors of the upper airway after mandibular advancement with maxillary setback surgery for patients with a skeletal Class II relationship. METHODS: Fifty-seven participants who underwent mandibular advancement with maxillary setback surgery were enrolled consecutively. Cone-beam computed tomography was performed preoperatively, 3 months postoperatively (T1), and 2 years (T2) postoperatively. All parameters were measured using Dolphin Imaging software (Dolphin Imaging and Management Solutions, Chatsworth, Calif). RESULTS: The total volume (V), minimum cross-sectional area (CSAmin), and glossopharynx increased significantly in both the short-term (V, 13.33%; CSAmin, 33.03%; glossopharynx, 26.73%) and long-term (V, 10.19%; CSAmin, 23.18%; glossopharynx, 18.27%) after the surgery. Mandibular advancement, mandibular width increase, preoperative CSAmin, and body mass index (BMI) significantly affected 2-year postoperative V increases. Mandibular advancement and BMI significantly affected 2-year postoperative glossopharynx increases. Backward movement of point PNS may lead to a reduction of the nasopharynx; however, downward movement of point PNS, upward movement of point A, and increased maxillary width may compensate for this effect by increasing the likelihood of the nasopharynx opening. Furthermore, mandibular body length at T1 is positively associated with relapse rate ([T2 - T1] / T1) of V and CSAmin. CONCLUSIONS: Mandibular advancement amount, mandibular width increase, preoperative CSAmin, and BMI are the 4 factors for long-term V changes. Patients with a longer mandibular body length might have a lower relapse rate.


Assuntos
Tomografia Computadorizada de Feixe Cônico , Má Oclusão Classe II de Angle , Avanço Mandibular , Maxila , Humanos , Avanço Mandibular/métodos , Má Oclusão Classe II de Angle/cirurgia , Má Oclusão Classe II de Angle/diagnóstico por imagem , Feminino , Masculino , Seguimentos , Maxila/cirurgia , Adulto , Faringe/diagnóstico por imagem , Faringe/anatomia & histologia , Adulto Jovem , Resultado do Tratamento , Cefalometria , Fatores de Tempo , Adolescente
2.
BMC Ophthalmol ; 23(1): 137, 2023 Apr 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37016343

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To compare post-treatment recurrence between ranibizumab injection and laser photocoagulation (LP) for type 1 retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), and explore the associated risk factors. METHODS: The clinical data of ROP infants treated with LP or ranibizumab in a NICU of China from October 2007 to November 2021 were retrospectively analyzed and compared, such as general condition, degree of ROP, therapeutic effectiveness and post-treatment recurrence. The dependent variable was recurrence after ROP treatment. Univariate and regression analysis of risk factors was performed. RESULTS: Of the 298 ROP infants (556 eyes), 58% of the eyes were treated with LP and the other 42% with ranibizumab. There was no significant difference in gestational age at birth, birth weight, sex, delivery mode, prenatal corticosteroids, ROP diagnosed before admission or after admission, and the duration of oxygen therapy between the two groups. However, the ratio of type 1 ROP and aggressive retinopathy of prematurity (A-ROP) in ranibizumab group was higher than that in LP group. The number of treatments, recurrence rate and recurrence interval in ranibizumab group were higher than those in LP group. However, there was no difference in the recurrence rate between the two groups after stratified analysis by the lesion area and the presence or absence of A-ROP. There was no significant difference in the final lesion regression between the two groups. Regression analysis showed that plus disease and ROP located in zone I were independent risk factors for post-treatment recurrence. CONCLUSION: There is no significant difference in the recurrence rate of ROP between ranibizumab injection and LP, and recurrence is mainly related to the severity of ROP. In half of our patients treated with A-ROP recurrences occur.


Assuntos
Ranibizumab , Retinopatia da Prematuridade , Recém-Nascido , Lactente , Humanos , Ranibizumab/uso terapêutico , Inibidores da Angiogênese/uso terapêutico , Retinopatia da Prematuridade/tratamento farmacológico , Retinopatia da Prematuridade/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Injeções Intravítreas , Fotocoagulação a Laser , Idade Gestacional , Lasers , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA