The impacts of partnering with cancer patients in palliative care research: a systematic review and meta-synthesis.

Background: Palliative care (PC) is an added layer of support provided concurrently with cancer care and serves to improve wellbeing and sustain quality of life. Understanding what is meaningful and a priority to patients, their families, and caregivers with lived experience of cancer and PC is critical in supporting their needs and improving their care provision. However, the impacts of engaging cancer patients within the context of PC research remain unknown. Objective: To examine the impacts of engaging individuals with lived experience of cancer and PC as partners in PC research. Methods: An a priori systematic review protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021286744). Four databases (APA PsycINFO, CINAHL, EMBASE, and MEDLINE) were searched and only published, peer-reviewed primary English studies aligned with the following criteria were included: (1) patients, their families, and/or caregivers with lived experience of cancer and PC; (2) engaged as partners in PC research; and (3) reported the impacts of engaging cancer PC patient partners in PC research. We appraised the quality of eligible studies using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP) and GRIPP2 reporting checklists. Results: Three studies that included patient partners with lived experience of cancer and PC engaged at all or several of the research stages were identified. Our thematic meta-synthesis revealed impacts (benefits and opportunities) on patient partners (emotional, psychological, cognitive, and social), the research system (practical and ethical) and health care system (service improvements, bureaucratic attitudes, and inaction). Our findings highlight the paucity of evidence investigating the impacts of engaging patients, their families and caregivers with lived experience of cancer and PC, as partners in PC research. Conclusions: The results of this review and meta-synthesis can inform the more effective design of cancer patient partnerships in PC research and the development of feasible and effective strategies given the cancer and PC context patient partners are coming from.

Patient navigation programs in Alberta, Canada: an environmental scan.

BACKGROUND: Patient navigation is a complex intervention that has garnered substantial interest and investment across Canada. We conducted an environmental scan to understand the landscape of patient navigation programs within the health care system in Alberta, Canada. METHODS: We included patient navigation programs within Alberta Health Services (AHS) and Alberta's Primary Care Networks (PCNs). Key informants were asked in October 2016 to identify existing programs and their corresponding program contacts. These program contacts were invited to complete a telephone-based survey from October 2016 to July 2017, to provide program descriptions and eligibility criteria, and to identify gaps in navigation. Programs were included if they engaged patients on an individual basis, and either facilitated continuity of care or promoted patient and family empowerment. We tabulated results and calculated summary statistics for program characteristics. RESULTS: Ninety-five potentially eligible programs were identified by key informants. The response rate to the study survey was 73% (n = 69). After excluding programs not meeting inclusion criteria, we included a total of 58 programs in the study: 43 AHS programs and 15 PCN programs. Nearly all programs (93%, n = 54) delivered navigation via an individual acting as a navigator. A minority of programs also included nonnavigator components, such as Web-based resources (7%, n = 4) and process or structural changes to facilitate navigation (22%, n = 13). Certain patient subgroups were particularly well-served by patient navigation; these included patients with cancer, substance use disorders or mental health concerns, and pediatric patients. Gaps identified in navigation fell under 4 domains: awareness, resources, geographic distribution and integration. INTERPRETATION: Patient navigation programs are common and have extended beyond cancer care, from which the construct originated; however, gaps include a lack of awareness and inequitable access to the programs. These findings will be of interest to those developing and implementing patient navigation interventions in Alberta and other jurisdictions.

Risk of Depression in Patients With Psoriatic Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Previous systematic reviews have assessed the prevalence and odds ratio (OR) of depression for patients with psoriatic disease. Due to probable bidirectional effects, prevalence and prevalence ORs are difficult to interpret. No prior reviews have quantified the relative risk (RR) of depression following a diagnosis of psoriatic disease. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the RR of depression in individuals with psoriasis and in psoriatic arthritis (PsA), clear-to-moderate psoriasis, and moderate-to-severe psoriasis subgroups. METHODS: Observational studies investigating the risk of depression in adults with psoriatic disease were systematically searched for in Medline, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and CINAHL databases; 4989 unique references were screened. Studies that reported measures of incident depression in psoriasis patients were included. Thirty-one studies were included into the systematic review, of which 17 were meta-analyzed. Random effects models were employed to synthesize relevant data. Sources of heterogeneity were explored with subgroup analysis and meta-regression. RESULTS: Seventeen studies were included in meta-analyses. The pooled RR of depression in psoriasis patients compared to nonpsoriasis controls was 1.48 (95% CI: 1.16-1.89). Heterogeneity was high (I2 = 99.8%). Subgroup analysis and meta-regression did not indicate that PsA status or psoriasis severity (clear-to-mild, moderate-to-severe) were sources of heterogeneity. No evidence of publication bias was found. CONCLUSIONS: This review demonstrates that the risk of depression is greater in patients with psoriasis and PsA. Future research should focus on developing strategies to address the mental health needs of this patient population for depression, including primary prevention, earlier detection, and treatment strategies.

Long-term risk of cardiovascular mortality in lymphoma survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Cardiovascular disease has been identified as one of the late complications of cancer therapy. The purpose of this study was to quantify the long-term risk of cardiovascular mortality among lymphoma survivors relative to that of the general population. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted. Articles were identified in November 2016 by searching EMBASE, MEDLINE, and CINAHL databases. Observational studies were included if they assessed cardiovascular mortality in patients with lymphoma who survived for at least 5 years from time of diagnosis or if they had a median follow-up of 10 years. A pooled standardized mortality ratio (SMR) was estimated using a DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model. The Q and I2 statistics were used to assess heterogeneity. Funnel plots and Begg's and Egger's tests were used to evaluate publication bias. Of the 7450 articles screened, 27 studies were included in the systematic review representing 46 829 Hodgkin and 14 764 non-Hodgkin lymphoma survivors. The pooled number of deaths attributable to cardiovascular disease among Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin disease was estimated to be 7.31 (95% CI: 5.29-10.10; I2  = 95.4%) and 5.35 (95% CI: 2.55-11.24; I2  = 94.0%) times that of the general population, respectively. This association was greater among Hodgkin lymphoma survivors treated before the age of 21 (pooled SMR = 13.43; 95% CI: 9.22-19.57; I2  = 78.9%). There was a high degree of heterogeneity and a high risk of bias due to confounding in this body of literature. Lymphoma survivors have an increased risk of fatal cardiovascular events compared to the general population and should be targeted for cardiovascular screening and prevention campaigns.

Weekend Surgical Care and Postoperative Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies.

BACKGROUND: An association between weekend health care delivery and poor outcomes has become known as the "weekend effect." Evidence for such an association among surgery patients has not previously been synthesized. OBJECTIVE: To systematically review associations between weekend surgical care and postoperative mortality. METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and references of relevant articles for studies that compared postoperative mortality either; (1) according to the day of the week of surgery for elective operations, or (2) according to weekend versus weekday admission for urgent/emergent operations. Odds ratios (ORs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for postoperative mortality (≤90 d or inpatient mortality) were pooled using random-effects models. RESULTS: Among 4027 citations identified, 10 elective surgery studies and 19 urgent/emergent surgery studies with a total of >6,685,970 and >1,424,316 patients, respectively, met the inclusion criteria. Pooled odds of mortality following elective surgery rose in a graded manner as the day of the week of surgery approached the weekend [Monday OR=1 (reference); Tuesday OR=1.04 (95% CI=0.97-1.11); Wednesday OR=1.08 (95% CI=0.98-1.19); Thursday OR=1.12 (95% CI=1.03-1.22); Friday OR=1.24 (95% CI=1.10-1.38)]. Mortality was also higher among patients who underwent urgent/emergent surgery after admission on the weekend relative to admission on weekdays (OR=1.27; 95% CI=1.08-1.49). CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative mortality rises as the day of the week of elective surgery approaches the weekend, and is higher after admission for urgent/emergent surgery on the weekend compared with weekdays. Future research should focus on clarifying underlying causes of this association and potentially mitigating its impact.

Incidence, correlates, and chest radiographic yield of new lung cancer diagnosis in 3398 patients with pneumonia.

BACKGROUND: One reason chest radiographs are recommended after pneumonia is to exclude underlying lung cancer. Our aims were to determine the incidence and correlates of new lung cancer and the diagnostic yield of new lung cancer by chest radiography in patients with pneumonia. METHODS: We conducted a population-based cohort study of patients with chest radiography-confirmed pneumonia, who were discharged alive from hospitals and emergency departments in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. Patients were enrolled from 2000 through 2002 and followed up for 5 years. We determined incidence of new lung cancer and receipt of chest radiographs within 90 days, 1 year, and 5 years. Multivariable proportional hazards analyses were used to determine independent correlates of lung cancer. RESULTS: There were 3398 patients; 59% were 50 years or older, 52% were male, and 17% were smokers. Half (49%) were admitted to hospital. At 90 days, 36 patients (1.1%) had new lung cancer; at 1 year, 57 patients (1.7%); and over 5 years, 79 patients (2.3%). The median time to diagnosis was 109 days (interquartile range, 27-423 days). Characteristics independently associated with lung cancer included age 50 years or older (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 19.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5.7-63.6), male sex (aHR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.1-2.9), and smoking (aHR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.0-3.0). Of the patients, 1354 (40%) had follow-up chest radiographs within 90 days, and the diagnostic yield of lung cancer was 2.5%; if radiographs were restricted to patients 50 years or older, the yield would have been 2.8%. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of new lung cancer after pneumonia is low: approximately 1% within 90 days and 2% over 5 years. Routine chest radiographs after pneumonia for detecting lung cancer are not warranted, although our study suggests that patients 50 years or older should be targeted for radiographic follow-up.