Reduced retear rates yet similar clinical outcomes following arthroscopic partial repair of large and massive irreparable rotator cuff tears with biceps augmentation compared to repairs without biceps augmentation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: To compare the clinical outcomes between arthroscopic partial rotator cuff repair with biceps augmentation (BA) and partial repair (PR) without BA. METHODS: This systematic review included studies comparing outcomes of arthroscopic repair for large to massive irreparable rotator cuff tears with and without the BA. The focus was on postoperative clinical results and retear rates. Mean differences were used to express continuous outcomes, while odds ratios (ORs) were employed for dichotomous outcomes. RESULTS: Ten studies (733 shoulders, all level 3 evidence) were included. The BA group showed a significant reduction in retear rates (OR = 0.40, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.20-0.77, P = 0.007) and comparable postoperative outcomes across various measures: American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, visual analogue scale for pain, University of California-Los Angeles shoulder score, active forward flexion motion and active external rotation at the arm-at-side position compared to the PR group. Subgroup analysis of two BA techniques-rerouting and supplementation following supraglenoid tenotomy-showed no significant differences in ASES score for either technique versus PR. However, rerouting significantly lowered retear rates (OR = 0.21, 95% CI: 0.12-0.36, p < 0.001), while supplementation showed similar retear rates to PR (OR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.37-2.02, n.s.). CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic partial rotator cuff repair with BA for large to massive irreparable rotator cuff tears is a reliable technique, resulting in improved postoperative outcomes. BA using supplementation following supraglenoid tenotomy showed similar clinical outcomes and range of motion but with lower retear rates compared to the PR group. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

The Posteromedial Approach for Harvesting Hamstring Autografts Results in Fewer Incidents of Saphenous Nerve Injury Compared to the Conventional Anteromedial Approach: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: The hamstring autograft can be harvested using various skin incisions, such as vertical, transverse, and oblique incisions, and from different localizations, including anteromedial and posteromedial harvest sites. The aim of this study was to compare studies on the anteromedial and posteromedial approaches for hamstring autograft harvest in terms of clinical outcomes, saphenous nerve injury, infection, operative time, graft length, incision length, range of motion, and patient satisfaction. Methods: Following the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, a search was conducted in PubMed and Scopus, focusing on studies comparing anteromedial and posterior approaches for hamstring harvest. This study was registered with the PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42023450249). Methodological quality was evaluated using the Modified Coleman Methodology Score. Odds ratios (ORs) and mean differences (MDs) quantified dichotomous and continuous outcomes, respectively. Results: Five articles, involving 405 knees, underwent analysis. Four studies were level 3 evidence, while 1 was level 1. The anteromedial hamstring harvest showed higher rates of saphenous nerve injury (OR, 9.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.19-43.65; p = 0.003) and longer operative times, with an MD of about 13 minutes (MD, 13.33; 95% CI, 0.68-25.97; p = 0.04), compared to the posteromedial approach. The anteromedial method yielded a longer semitendinosus graft, with an MD of about 17 mm (MD, 17.57; 95% CI, 7.17-27.98; p = 0.0009). However, no significant differences existed in range of motion, flexion contracture, unintentional graft harvest, infection rates, and patient-reported outcomes. Notably, the posteromedial group reported higher cosmetic satisfaction, with 92% being very satisfied, compared to the anteromedial group with 80% (p = 0.005). However, overall satisfaction levels were similar between the 2 groups (p = 0.35), with a very satisfied rate of 72% for the anteromedial group and 78% for the posteromedial group. Conclusions: The anteromedial hamstring harvest showed greater saphenous nerve injury and longer operative times compared to the posteromedial approach, along with a longer graft. However, no significant differences were observed in the range of motion, flexion contracture, graft harvest, infection, or patient outcomes.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing cyst wall preservation against cyst wall resection during arthroscopic popliteal cyst decompression.

INTRODUCTION: The optimal arthroscopic management for popliteal cyst decompression remains uncertain, with ongoing debate between preserving the cyst wall or completely removing it. The purpose of this study is to compare the outcomes and complications of arthroscopic popliteal cyst decompression with cyst wall preservation and cyst wall resection. METHODS: A systematic review adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines was conducted. It encompassed studies that focused on arthroscopic popliteal cyst decompression, considering both cyst wall preservation and cyst wall resection. The quality assessment of the included studies was carried out using the Methodology Index for Non-Randomized Research criteria. Following this, meta-analyses were conducted, employing odds ratios (ORs) for dichotomous outcomes and calculating mean differences (MDs) for continuous outcomes. RESULTS: Four articles included a collective of 214 knees. Each of these studies presented level 3 evidence. The comparison between the cyst wall preservation group and the cyst wall resection group revealed similar clinical outcomes based on the Rauschning and Lindgren grade (grade 0 [OR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.37-1.19, p = 0.17]; grade I [OR = 1.33, 95% CI: 0.66-2.67, p = 0.43]; grade II [OR = 1.39, 95% CI: 0.46-4.14, p = 0.56]; grade III [OR = 3.46, 95% CI: 0.13-89.95, p = 0.46]) and Lysholm score (MD = 0.83, 95% CI: -0.65-2.32, p = 0.27). However, MRI results indicated a significant improvement in the cyst wall resection group (cyst disappearance [OR = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.28-0.90, p = 0.02]; cyst shrinkage or decrease in size [OR = 1.41, 95% CI: 0.78-2.55, p = 0.26]; cyst persistence or recurrence [OR = 7.63, 95% CI: 1.29-45.08, p = 0.02]). Nevertheless, the operative time for cyst resection was significantly longer compared to cyst preservation (MD = -14.90, 95% CI: -21.96 - -7.84, p < 0.0001), and the cyst wall resection group experienced significantly higher complications than the cyst wall preservation group (OR = 0.24, 95% CI: 0.06 to 1.02, p = 0.05). CONCLUSION: During arthroscopic popliteal cyst decompression, cyst wall resection led to longer operative times and higher complication rates but lower recurrence rates and better MRI outcomes. The functional outcomes after surgery were found to be similar.

Hip External Rotation Decreases Ischiofemoral Distance: A Positive Correlation Between Cadaveric and Fluoroscopic Studies.

PURPOSE: To determine the effect of hip external rotation or extension/adduction on minimizing the ischiofemoral distance (IFD) and assess the correlation between cadaveric and fluoroscopic IFD measurements in different hip positions. METHODS: This cadaveric study involved 33 hip joints from 17 embalmed cadavers. IFD, the distance between the lesser trochanter and lateral ischium, was measured in different hip positions: neutral, external rotation at 30°, and external rotation at 60° with the hip in both neutral extension and adduction as well as 10° hip extension and 10° hip adduction. Differences in IFD related to positions and correlation between cadaveric and fluoroscopic measurements were analyzed. RESULTS: IFD measurements showed that the greatest reduction occurred at 60° of external hip rotation, with a significant difference observed only between neutral and 60° external rotation in cadaveric groups (7.60 ± 4.68 vs 5.05 ± 3.48, 95% CI, 0.14-4.96; P = .036). No substantial difference was observed between the extension and adduction positions. Positive correlations were observed between cadaveric and fluoroscopic measurements, especially in the neutral position (r = 0.492, P = .004), external rotation at 30° (r = 0.52, P = .002), external rotation at 60° (r = 0.419, P = .015), and the extension/adduction positions combined with neutral rotation (r = 0.396, P = .023). CONCLUSIONS: The IFD significantly decreased with increasing degrees of hip external rotation, particularly at 60°. No significant reduction was observed in the extension/adduction positions. In addition, positive correlations were observed between cadaveric and fluoroscopic measurements for specific hip positions: neutral rotation, external rotation at 30° and 60°, and extension/adduction at 10° with neutral rotation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Surgeons can use this knowledge to improve hip impingement assessment through radiography, focusing on positions in which IFD reduction is most notable. Understanding the relationship between hip positions and IFD can enhance the diagnosis of ischiofemoral impingement syndrome and benefit patient care and outcomes.

Similar Healing Rates of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair With and Without Bone Marrow Stimulation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

BACKGROUND: Bone marrow stimulation (BMS) techniques such as microfracture, nanofracture, and the crimson duvet procedure expose the bone marrow of the proximal humerus to the rotator cuff tendon footprint. The effect of performing BMS on tendon healing is a subject of interest. PURPOSE: To compare studies on arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with BMS versus without BMS for rotator cuff tears according to healing rates and clinical and radiological outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: The 2020 PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines were followed in conducting a search. Studies that compared arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with and without BMS were included if they provided postoperative patient-reported outcomes and healing rates. Dichotomous outcomes were expressed as mean differences (MDs), while continuous outcomes were expressed as odds ratio. RESULTS: Included were 5 studies (N = 499 shoulders); 4 studies had level 1 evidence, and 1 study had level 2 evidence. The healing rate of rotator cuff repair was similar between the 2 groups (ie, with and without BMS) (odds ratio, 1.58 [95% CI, 0.63 to 4.00]; P = .33). Furthermore, there were no significant differences in the postoperative Constant score (MD, 1.41 [95% CI, -0.58 to 3.39]; P = .16), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (MD, 0.77 [95% CI, -1.43 to 2.96]; P = .49), or range of motion for forward flexion (MD, 2.45 [95% CI, -0.66 to 5.57]; P = .12) and external rotation (MD, 0.81 [95% CI, -2.35 to 3.97]; P = .62) at the final follow-up between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: The healing rate of rotator cuff repair was similar, regardless of whether BMS was performed or not. Additionally, there was no significant difference in postoperative patient-reported outcome scores, range of motion, and complications. REGISTRATION: CRD42023388427 (PROSPERO).

Traditional suture tape versus multiple high-strength sutures for augmentation of anterior cruciate ligament primary repair: A time-zero biomechanical study.

Background/objective: During the initial stages of rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) surgery, a pivotal role is played in ensuring effective recuperation and averting complications. An often-employed strategy to tackle ACL laxity during this period involves the incorporation of synthetic materials for reinforcement. The objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness of conventional suture tape and multiple high-strength sutures as augmentation techniques for ACL repair. Methods: Ten preserved cadaveric knees embalmed using the Thiel method were segregated into two groups, each containing five knees. In one group, traditional suture tape was employed for augmentation, while the other group utilized multiple high-strength sutures. Each knee underwent a cyclic load of 1000 sine wave cycles, succeeded by an axial distraction load until failure ensued. The resultant displacement and ultimate load at failure were assessed to contrast the efficacy of the two augmentation techniques. Results: The group utilizing multiple high-strength sutures exhibited a significantly higher load to failure at time-zero (1690.7 N) compared to the suture tape group (987.6 N) (P = .003). Furthermore, the multiple high-strength sutures group demonstrated significantly reduced displacement after 1000 cyclic loads (6.6 mm) in comparison to the suture tape group (16.3 mm) (P < .001). Conclusions: Multiple high-strength sutures show better biomechanical properties for the augmentation of ACL repair at time-zero. Both suture tape and multiple high-strength sutures had ultimate load-to-failure values higher than the natural ACL loads. Therefore, these substances might serve as augmentation options to prevent the ACL's gradual elongation, a critical concern particularly in the initial stages of rehabilitation.

Clinical Outcomes, Union Rates, and Complications of Screw Versus Button Fixation in the Bristow-Latarjet Procedure for Anterior Shoulder Instability: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: The Latarjet procedure is a common procedure for treating critical glenoid bone loss in anterior shoulder instability. Implants such as the screw and cortical button are widely used. The aim of this study was to compare studies on screw versus button fixation techniques in the Bristow-Latarjet procedure for anterior shoulder instability in terms of clinical outcomes, union rates, and complications. Methods: The PubMed, Scopus, and Embase databases were searched to find comparative studies that reported outcomes of using screw versus button fixation in the Bristow-Latarjet procedure following the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies that directly compared the screw and button fixation techniques and provided postoperative patient-reported outcomes, union rates, or complications were included. The Methodology Index for Non-Randomized Research (MINORS) criteria were used to assess the quality of the included studies. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated for dichotomous outcomes whereas mean differences were calculated for continuous outcomes. Results: Five articles included a total of 877 shoulders. All five studies had level 3 evidence. There was no statistically significant difference between the two techniques using the Walch-Duplay score, visual analog scale for pain, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Simple Shoulder Test, range of motion, and graft union rates. However, the button fixation technique had statistically significantly higher recurrence rates than the screw fixation technique (OR, 0.24; 95% confidence interval, 0.10-0.58; p = 0.001). Conclusions: The screw fixation technique had statistically significantly lower recurrence rates than the button fixation technique. However, there was no significant difference between screw and button fixation techniques regarding postoperative patient-reported outcomes, range of motion, graft union rates, nerve injury rates, infection rates, and reoperation rates.

Similar outcomes between transtendon repair and tear completion repair techniques for partial articular-sided supraspinatus tendon avulsion lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to review studies comparing transtendon repair (TTR) with tear completion repair (TCR) techniques for partial articular-sided supraspinatus tendon avulsion (PASTA) lesions according to postoperative patient-reported outcomes and complications. METHODS: Databases, including PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane, were searched for studies published between 2008 and 2022 that directly compared the postoperative patient-reported outcomes and complications of the TTR and TCR techniques for PASTA lesions. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated for dichotomous outcomes, while mean differences (MDs) were calculated for continuous outcomes. RESULTS: A total of seven studies (497 shoulders) were analysed. No statistically significant differences in the postoperative clinical outcomes at the final follow-up were observed between the TTR and TCR techniques for PASTA lesions. The overall retear rates of the TTR and TCR techniques were 7.7% and 11.6%, respectively (corresponding healing rates were 92.3% and 88.4%), whereas the overall occurrence rates of adhesive capsulitis were 4.7% and 3.3%, respectively. Furthermore, no significant difference was observed in postoperative range of motion (forward flexion, MD = - 1.22, 95% confidence interval (95%CI) - 5.28 to 3.34, n.s.; external rotation, MD = - 1.39, 95% CI - 3.19 to 0.42, n.s.), overall retear rate (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.29-1.08, n.s.), and occurrence rate of adhesive capsulitis (OR 1.11, 95% CI 0.35-3.52, n.s.) between the two techniques. CONCLUSION: Both techniques improve clinical outcomes while having a low complication rate and a high rate of healing. No significant difference in clinical outcomes was observed between the two techniques. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

How to Decrease Suture Tangling When Performing Supraspinatus Repair With a Single-Working Portal Technique.

Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is one of the most common procedures in shoulder surgery. Some complications occur related to portal incisions, such as infection, bleeding, increased surgical time, and surgical scar. By using 1 lateral working portal with decreased suture tangling, surgical complications can be reduced and rehabilitation and patient satisfaction can be enhanced.

Comparison of a Platelet-Rich Plasma Injection and a Conventional Steroid Injection for Pain Relief and Functional Improvement of Partial Supraspinatus Tears.

BACKGROUND: Partial supraspinatus tendon tears have frequently been treated using a subacromial corticosteroid injection or surgery. The clinical use of a platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection is an alternative treatment method for the condition, despite the paucity of evidence of its efficacy. PURPOSE: To compare pain relief, functional improvement, and complications after an intratendinous PRP injection versus a subacromial corticosteroid injection for partial supraspinatus tears. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. METHODS: A total of 32 patients with partial supraspinatus tears were randomly assigned to receive a leukocyte-poor PRP (LP-PRP) injection or a corticosteroid injection. One patient withdrew from the PRP group, leaving 15 patients in the PRP group and 16 patients in the corticosteroid group. The ultrasound-guided procedures were performed by a single experienced pain physician. Pain relief and functional improvement were evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS) and the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), respectively. Treatment efficacy and complications were documented, and the 2 groups were compared at 1- and 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: There were no differences in VAS and OSS scores between the PRP and corticosteroid groups at 1-month follow-up. However, the PRP group had better scores than the corticosteroid group had on both the VAS and OSS at 6-month follow-up (VAS: 14.5 ± 15.4 vs 37.5 ± 24.9, respectively; OSS: 16.2 ± 3.9 vs 25.0 ± 10.2, respectively; P < .01 for both). Both groups showed significant improvement in VAS and OSS scores from before treatment to 1-month follow-up (mean difference, 35.67 and 11.47 points, respectively, for the PRP group; mean difference, 29.69 and 11.13 points, respectively, for the corticosteroid group; P < .01 for all). The VAS and OSS scores did not change significantly at 6-month follow-up in the corticosteroid group; however, the PRP group showed continued improvement in both VAS and OSS scores between 1- and 6-month follow-up (mean difference, 15.87 and 7.40 points, respectively; P < .01 for both). There were no complications in either group. CONCLUSION: An injection using either a corticosteroid or LP-PRP resulted in a similar reduction in pain and improvement in function at 1 month in patients with a partial supraspinatus tear. However, PRP showed superior benefits over the corticosteroid at 6-month follow-up.

A cadaveric study of the location and morphology of the central patellar ridge for bone-patellar tendon-bone graft.

INTRODUCTION: The central ridge of the patella is the thickest area of patella and varies among patients. This cadaveric study identified the location and thickness of the bone at the central patella ridge for bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) harvesting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty cadaveric knees were assessed. First, the morphology, length, width, and location of the central patellar ridge were recorded. Then, we transversely cut the patella 25 mm from the lower pole and measured the thickness of the anterior cortex, cancellous bone, and cartilage from both the mid-patella and the central ridge location. Finally, the depth of the remaining cancellous bone at the mid-patella was compared to the bone at the central ridge. RESULTS: The location of the central-patellar ridge deviated medially from the mid-patella in 46 samples with an average distance of 4.36 ± 1 mm. Only 4 samples deviated laterally. The mean patella length was 41.19 ± 4.73 mm, and the width was 42.8 ± 5.25 mm. After a transverse cut, the remaining cancellous bone was significantly thicker at the central ridge compared to the bone at the mid-patella. CONCLUSIONS: Most of the central patellar ridge deviated medially, approximately 4 mm from the mid-patella. Harvesting the graft from the central ridge would have more remaining bone compared to the mid-patella.

Relationship of plasma and synovial fluid vascular endothelial growth factor with radiographic severity in primary knee osteoarthritis.

PURPOSE: Recent evidence suggests that angiogenesis and inflammation contribute to the development and progression of osteoarthritis (OA). The purpose of this study was to investigate vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) levels in plasma and synovial fluid of patients with knee OA and to determine the relationship of VEGF levels with disease severity in knee OA. METHODS: A total of 100 subjects were enrolled in this study (80 knee OA patients and 20 healthy controls). Plasma and synovial fluid VEGF levels were analysed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. VEGF expressions in synovial membrane and articular cartilage samples were assessed using immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: VEGF level in synovial fluid of knee OA patients was tenfold higher than that in paired plasma (P < 0.001). Both plasma and synovial fluid VEGF exhibited a positive correlation with radiographic severity (r = 0.454 and r = 0.727, P < 0.001, respectively). VEGF expression was highly detectable in synovial lining cells and articular chondrocytes of knee OA patients. CONCLUSIONS: VEGF levels in both plasma and synovial fluid were positively correlated with the severity of knee OA. Therefore, VEGF may be useful for monitoring OA severity and could play a substantial role in the development and progression of knee OA.

Correlation of graft position, knee laxity and clinical outcome: comparison with native anterior cruciate ligament using magnetic resonance imaging study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the sagittal obliquity of anterior cruciate ligament graft with normal native anterior cruciate ligament in contralateral knee, to determine the effect of sagittal obliquity and axial femoral tunnel graft placement on stability and functional knee score (Lysholm), and to measure size of graft after complete ligamentization. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Seventy single tunnel quadruple hamstring anterior cruciate reconstructed knee in unilateral ACL injury patients were evaluated at 18 months after surgery. At follow up, patients were evaluated including measurement of knee laxity by using side to side different on KT 1000 arthromeres and clinical outcome by completed Lysholm functional knee questionnaires. Sagittal T1 weighted magnetic resonance image with complete dimension of graft from origin to insertion on each side of knee were depicted to compare the obliquity by measuring the intersection angle of the graft line with the tibial plateau plane. The axial femoral tunnel was determined by angle between anteroposterior axis of distal femur and long axis of femoral tunnel. The diameter of graft was also measured. RESULTS: Graft obliquity was average 58 degrees with range between 41 degrees and 69 degrees. In contralateral native ACL obliquity was average 50 degrees with range between 33 degrees and 63 degrees. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (p < 0.0001). Average axial femoral tunnel was 36 degrees with range between 10 degrees and 56 degrees. Knee laxity (KT-1 000 arthrometer; average pre-op = 6, post-op = 3) and Lysholm knee scores (average score; pre-op 55, post-op score 89) were significantly improved after surgery (p < 0.01). There was no correlation between degree of sagittal obliquity and axial femoral tunnel with knee laxity and functional score in this series. Graft size was increased in average 8% after 18 months post-operatively. CONCLUSION: ACL grafts in patients with appropriate tibial tunnel placement were more vertical than native ACL. There was no significant effect of degree of sagittal obliquity and axial femoral tunnel to antero-postero stability and knee score. ACL graft size was increased in diameter during post-operative period. Graft-notch distance should be considered during operation.