RESUMO
Background: Cosmetic plastic surgery in the United States is underutilized by African American and Hispanic populations compared with their White and Asian counterparts. This study evaluated whether microeconomic spending traits as a representation of financial stability can inform trends in cosmetic procedure volumes by racial group. Methods: Annual volumes for the top five cosmetic surgical and cosmetic minimally invasive procedures by racial/ethnic group from 2012 to 2020 were collected from the American Society of Plastic Surgeons' annual reports. Factor analysis was used to calculate inflexible and flexible consumer spending by racial/ethnic groupings from the US Bureau of Labor Statistics' consumer expenditure data. All four factors were calculated across US Bureau of Labor Statistics-defined racial/ethnic groupings and standardized so they could be interpreted relative to each other. Results: Compared with the other groupings, the White/Asian/other grouping spent significantly more on average for inflexible consumer spending (P = 0.0097), flexible consumer spending (P < 0.0001), cosmetic surgical procedures (P < 0.0001), and cosmetic minimally invasive procedures (P = 0.0006). In contrast, African American people spent significantly less on average for all four factors (all P < 0.01). For Hispanic people, values were significantly less on average for flexible consumer spending (P = 0.0023), cosmetic surgical procedures (P < 0.0001), and cosmetic minimally invasive procedures (P = 0.0002). Conclusions: This study demonstrates that inflexible and flexible consumer spending follow trends in utilization of cosmetic surgical and minimally invasive procedures by racial/ethnic groups. These microeconomic spending inequities may help further contextualize the racial/ethnic variation in access to cosmetic surgery.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The Hospital Price Transparency final rule requires hospitals to publish pricing information about provided items and services via two methods: a comprehensive machine-readable file (MRF), and a display tool of selected shoppable services. Using MRFs on hospital websites, we examined trends in pricing transparency and variation in association with community-level socioeconomic factors for three common hand surgery procedures among AAMC-affiliated hospitals. METHODS: Available discount cash prices and payer-specific negotiated prices for CPT codes 64721, 26615, and 25111 were recorded. Multivariate analysis was used to stratify hospitals into two groups based on their area's median household income, percent uninsured, and GPCI practice expense scores. Generalized linear mixed effects modeling was used to evaluate price variability against community-level financial characteristics of the patient population. RESULTS: Of hospitals that met selection criteria, a majority did not display discount cash prices and payer-specific negotiated prices for the three procedures. Hospitals in lower-income and higher percentage uninsured areas tended to charge a higher average payer-specific negotiated price for CPT code 25111. They also tended to have greater variation in payer-specific negotiated prices than hospitals found in higher-income and lower percentage uninsured areas. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that considerable pricing variation and incomplete transparency exists for CPT codes 64721, 26615, and 25111 among AAMC-affiliated hospitals. Patients in lower-income and higher-percentage uninsured areas are more exposed to a higher variability and average of negotiated prices than those in higher-income areas, which may translate to higher out-of-pocket costs for those with higher coinsurance and less socioeconomic prowess.