A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing the Accuracy and Clinical Outcome of Pedicle Screw Placement Using Robot-Assisted Technology and Conventional Freehand Technique.

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). OBJECTIVE: This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed with the aim of exploring the differences in pedicle screw positioning accuracy, surgical time, length of hospital stay, postoperative back and leg Visual Analog Scale, revision surgeries, and intraoperative radiation time and exposure between robot-assisted technology and conventional freehand technique based on RCTs. METHODS: Several databases, including the Cochrane library, PubMed, and EMBASE were systematically searched to identify potentially eligible articles. Meta-analysis was done using STATA 13 software. The odds ratios and 95% CIs were calculated for the studied categories. RESULTS: Seven RCTs involving 290 patients (1298 pedicle screws) in the robot-assisted group and 288 patients (1348 pedicle screws) in the conventional freehand group were analyzed. The results revealed that grade (A) and grade (A+B) screw accuracies were significantly superior in the robot-assisted group (P = .008 and P = .009, respectively). Overall surgical duration and number of revision surgeries were significantly higher in the robot-assisted group (P = .014 and P < .0001, respectively). Intraoperative radiation time and dosage were significantly lower in the robot-assisted group (P < .0001 and P = .036, respectively). CONCLUSION: It was demonstrated that robot-assisted technology is superior to the conventional freehand technique in terms of grade (A) and grade (A+B) screw accuracies and in the reduction of intraoperative radiation time and dosage. On the other hand, the freehand technique showed superior results in terms of overall surgical duration and revision surgery rates.

Surgical complications and re-operation rates in spinal metastases surgery: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to review the incidence of complications and unplanned re-operations after surgery for metastatic spinal tumors. BACKGROUND: The spinal column is the most common osseous site for metastatic spread. The goals of the treatment of spinal metastases are largely palliative. The surgical aims include establishing a diagnosis, providing stability, relieving neurological compression and deterioration, decreasing pain and increasing patient independence. Patients with spinal metastases who undergo surgery are considered high risk, with higher morbidity and mortality rates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review was undertaken; PubMed and Embase databases were searched between (2010-2020) for relevant publications in English language with the following search items: metastasis OR metastases AND spine AND surgery AND complications OR revision. Using a standard PRISMA template, 2293 articles were identified. Full-text articles of interest were assessed for inclusion criteria of greater than 30 patients. RESULTS: A final number of 19 articles fully met the search criteria. Four were level II evidence, and the remaining were level III/IV. Surgical site infection 6.5% (135/2088) was reported as the main complication following surgery for spinal metastases followed by neurological deterioration 3.3% (53/1595) and instrumentation failure 2.0% (30/1501). Re-operation rate was 8.3% (54/651), with SSI (27.8%) being the most common reason for revision surgery. CONCLUSION: Patients with spinal metastases frequently present with complex therapeutic challenges requiring multidisciplinary team assessment. Surgical site infection (6.5%) was the main reason for a re-operation in patients undergoing surgery for spinal metastases.

Surgical approaches to L5 corpectomy: a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Surgical approaches to pathologies of the L5 vertebra constitute a significant challenge. Our aim was to review the efficacy and safety of the surgical approaches to L5 corpectomy and reconstruction across the range of presenting pathology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines, and databases were searched from 1970 to January 2020. The search inclusion criteria were L5 Corpectomy AND/OR Spondylectomy AND/OR Vertebrectomy. The outcome measures studied were length of surgery, blood loss, fusion or failure of fusion/instrumentation, complications and mortality. RESULTS: Initial 36 articles were identified, and final 6 studies met our inclusion criteria. The mean reported blood loss was 2265 ml (400-4700 ml) and was higher for the two-stage posterior-anterior surgery group than the posterior-only surgery group (mean 3230 mls vs. 1260 mls) but not the operative time. All surgical approaches shared high fusion rates (94%) and relatively low complication rates (11.7%). However, surgical strategies incorporating an anterior approach were notable for vascular complications (4-7%), as well as perioperative mortality (9%) not seen in the posterior-only surgery group. CONCLUSION: Where there is clinical and circumstantial equipoise regarding the choice of surgical approaches for a L5 corpectomy, this review indicates a reported mean blood loss of 2265 ml (400-4700 ml), high fusion rates (94%) and relatively low complication rates (11.7%). It is difficult to make direct comparisons between approaches due to small case series, the variability in primary pathology, clinical intent and surgeon experience.

Clinical outcomes of sacroplasty for metastatic sacral tumours: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

STUDY DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome and safety of sacroplasty for patients with secondary metastatic lesions to the sacrum. METHODS: Several databases, including the Cochrane library, PubMed and EMBASE, were systematically searched to identify potentially eligible articles in English language. All the above databases were searched until December 2019. The search strategy was based on the combination of the following keywords: sacroplasty AND secondary tumours OR metastasis OR metastases. The reference list of the selected literature was also reviewed and a standard PRISMA template utilised. RESULTS: From a total of 102 articles initially identified, a final seven studies were identified as meeting the inclusion criteria. A total of 107 patients from these studies were included. The follow-up ranged from immediate post-operatively to 30.5 months. The mean preoperative VAS was 8.38 (range 6.9-9.3), which improved significantly to 3.01 (range 1.12-4.7) post-operatively (p < 0.001). The most frequent complication reported was cement leakage, which occurred in 26 patients (25.4%), but without any neurological or other adverse sequelae. CONCLUSIONS: Sacroplasty in the management of secondary sacral tumours is a safe procedure that can achieve a significant reduction in pain, as quantified by VAS scores, and low complication rate.

Impact of pedicle subtraction osteotomy on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measures in patients undergoing surgery for adult spinal deformity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. BACKGROUND: Three-column osteotomies (3-CO) have gained popularity in the last decade as part of the armamentarium for the surgical correction of sagittal imbalance in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD). Three-column osteotomies in the form of pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) may be necessary to achieve adequate correction for severe and rigid spinal deformity. Studies reporting improvement in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) with validated outcome measures after PSO surgery are sparse and currently consist of small series. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the improvement in HRQOL measures following PSO for adult spinal deformity. METHODS: Two independent reviewers conducted a systematic review of the English literature between period 1996 and 2019 for articles reporting outcome of PSO in patients with ASD according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Inclusion criteria were studies consisting of patient-reported outcome Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Scoliosis Research Society 22 or 24 (SRS) outcomes after PSO surgery for adult spine deformity patients (18 years or older) with a minimum follow-up of 1 year. RESULTS: Eight studies with 431 PSOs were included in the meta-analysis. The results showed a statistically significant improvement in ODI in PSO (P < 0.0001), and the mean clinically important difference was achieved with both ODI (50.46 (45.5-55.4) preoperatively to 32.78 (29.7-39) postoperatively) and SRS (2.49 (2.38-2.7) preoperatively to 3.26 (2.8-4.1) postoperatively) scores. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis did find improvements in the health-related quality of life in patients undergoing PSO surgery for adult spinal deformity.