Outcomes of patients with COVID-19 supported by venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for greater than 90 days.

Objective: To determine the characteristics and outcomes of patients requiring prolonged (>90 days) venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) support for refractory Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-associated respiratory failure. Methods: A retrospective, observational analysis of consecutive patients requiring VV ECMO for COVID-19-associated respiratory failure was performed at a single institution between March 2020 and January 2022. Data were collected from the medical records. Patients were predominantly cannulated and supported long-term with a single, dual-lumen cannula in the internal jugular vein with the tip positioned in the pulmonary artery. All patients were managed with an awake VV ECMO approach, emphasizing avoidance of sedatives, extubation, ambulation, physical therapy, and nutrition. Patients requiring >90 days of ECMO were identified, analyzed, and compared to those needing a shorter duration of support. Results: A total of 44 patients were supported on VV ECMO during the study period, of whom 36 (82%) survived to discharge. Thirty-one patients were supported for <90 days, of whom 28 (90%) were discharged alive. Thirteen patients required >90 days of ECMO. All patients were extubated. Eight patients (62%) survived to discharge, with 1 patient requiring lung transplantation prior to decannulation. All survivors were free from mechanical ventilation and alive at a 6-month follow-up. Of the 4 patients who died on prolonged ECMO, 2 developed hemothorax necessitating surgery and 2 succumbed to fatal intracranial hemorrhage. Conclusions: Patients treated with VV ECMO for COVID-19-associated respiratory failure may require prolonged support to recover. Extubation, ambulation, aggressive rehabilitation, and nutritional support while on ECMO can yield favorable outcomes.

Characteristics and outcomes of patients with COVID-19 supported by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A retrospective multicenter study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine characteristics, outcomes, and clinical factors associated with death in patients with COVID-19 requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support. METHODS: A multicenter, retrospective cohort study was conducted. The cohort consisted of adult patients (18 years of age and older) requiring ECMO in the period from March 1, 2020, to September 30, 2020. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality after ECMO initiation assessed with a time to event analysis at 90 days. Multivariable Cox proportional regression was used to determine factors associated with in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: Overall, 292 patients from 17 centers comprised the study cohort. Patients were 49 (interquartile range, 39-57) years old and 81 (28%) were female. At the end of the follow-up period, 19 (6%) patients were still receiving ECMO, 25 (9%) were discontinued from ECMO but remained hospitalized, 135 (46%) were discharged or transferred alive, and 113 (39%) died during the hospitalization. The cumulative in-hospital mortality at 90 days was 42% (95% confidence interval [CI], 36%-47%). Factors associated with in-hospital mortality were age (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.31; 95% CI, 1.06-1.61 per 10 years), renal dysfunction measured according to serum creatinine level (aHR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.01-1.45), and cardiopulmonary resuscitation before ECMO placement (aHR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.01-3.46). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with severe COVID-19 necessitating ECMO support, in-hospital mortality occurred in fewer than half of the cases. ECMO might serve as a viable modality for terminally ill patients with refractory COVID-19.

Comparative Propensity Matched Outcomes in Severe COVID-19 Respiratory Failure-Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation or Maximum Ventilation Alone.

OBJECTIVE: Does extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) improve outcomes in ECMO-eligible patients with COVID-19 respiratory failure compared to maximum ventilation alone (MVA)? SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: ECMO is beneficial in severe cases of respiratory failure when mechanical ventilation is inadequate. Outcomes for ECMO-eligible COVID-19 patients on MVA have not been reported. Consequently, a direct comparison between COVID-19 patients on ECMO and those on MVA has not been established. METHODS: A total of 3406 COVID-19 patients treated at two major medical centers in Chicago were studied. One hundred ninety-five required maximum ventilatory support, and met ECMO eligibility criteria. Eighty ECMO patients were propensity matched to an equal number of MVA patients using detailed demographic, physiological, and comorbidity data. Primary outcome was survival and disposition at discharge. RESULTS: Seventy-one percent of patients were decannulated from ECMO. Mechanical ventilation was discontinued in 75% ECMO and 16% MVA patients. Twenty-five percent of patients in the ECMO arm expired, 21% while on ECMO, compared with 74% in the MVA cohort. Mortality was significantly lower across all age and BMI groups in the ECMO arm. Sixty-eight percent ECMO and 26% MVA patients were discharged from the hospital. Fewer ECMO patients required long-term rehabilitation. Major complications such as septic shock, ventilator associated pneumonia, inotropic requirements, acute liver and kidney injuries are less frequent among ECMO patients. CONCLUSIONS: ECMO-eligible patients with severe COVID-19 respiratory failure demonstrate a 3-fold improvement in survival with ECMO. They are also in a better physical state at discharge and have lower overall complication rates. As such, strong consideration should be given for ECMO when mechanical ventilatory support alone becomes insufficient in treating COVID-19 respiratory failure.

A Fully Magnetically Levitated Left Ventricular Assist Device - Final Report.

BACKGROUND: In two interim analyses of this trial, patients with advanced heart failure who were treated with a fully magnetically levitated centrifugal-flow left ventricular assist device were less likely to have pump thrombosis or nondisabling stroke than were patients treated with a mechanical-bearing axial-flow left ventricular assist device. METHODS: We randomly assigned patients with advanced heart failure to receive either the centrifugal-flow pump or the axial-flow pump irrespective of the intended goal of use (bridge to transplantation or destination therapy). The composite primary end point was survival at 2 years free of disabling stroke or reoperation to replace or remove a malfunctioning device. The principal secondary end point was pump replacement at 2 years. RESULTS: This final analysis included 1028 enrolled patients: 516 in the centrifugal-flow pump group and 512 in the axial-flow pump group. In the analysis of the primary end point, 397 patients (76.9%) in the centrifugal-flow pump group, as compared with 332 (64.8%) in the axial-flow pump group, remained alive and free of disabling stroke or reoperation to replace or remove a malfunctioning device at 2 years (relative risk, 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.78 to 0.91; P<0.001 for superiority). Pump replacement was less common in the centrifugal-flow pump group than in the axial-flow pump group (12 patients [2.3%] vs. 57 patients [11.3%]; relative risk, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.11 to 0.38; P<0.001). The numbers of events per patient-year for stroke of any severity, major bleeding, and gastrointestinal hemorrhage were lower in the centrifugal-flow pump group than in the axial-flow pump group. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with advanced heart failure, a fully magnetically levitated centrifugal-flow left ventricular assist device was associated with less frequent need for pump replacement than an axial-flow device and was superior with respect to survival free of disabling stroke or reoperation to replace or remove a malfunctioning device. (Funded by Abbott; MOMENTUM 3 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02224755.).

Two-Year Outcomes with a Magnetically Levitated Cardiac Pump in Heart Failure.

BACKGROUND: In an early analysis of this trial, use of a magnetically levitated centrifugal continuous-flow circulatory pump was found to improve clinical outcomes, as compared with a mechanical-bearing axial continuous-flow pump, at 6 months in patients with advanced heart failure. METHODS: In a randomized noninferiority and superiority trial, we compared the centrifugal-flow pump with the axial-flow pump in patients with advanced heart failure, irrespective of the intended goal of support (bridge to transplantation or destination therapy). The composite primary end point was survival at 2 years free of disabling stroke (with disabling stroke indicated by a modified Rankin score of >3; scores range from 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating more severe disability) or survival free of reoperation to replace or remove a malfunctioning device. The noninferiority margin for the risk difference (centrifugal-flow pump group minus axial-flow pump group) was -10 percentage points. RESULTS: Of 366 patients, 190 were assigned to the centrifugal-flow pump group and 176 to the axial-flow pump group. In the intention-to-treat population, the primary end point occurred in 151 patients (79.5%) in the centrifugal-flow pump group, as compared with 106 (60.2%) in the axial-flow pump group (absolute difference, 19.2 percentage points; 95% lower confidence boundary, 9.8 percentage points [P<0.001 for noninferiority]; hazard ratio, 0.46; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.31 to 0.69 [P<0.001 for superiority]). Reoperation for pump malfunction was less frequent in the centrifugal-flow pump group than in the axial-flow pump group (3 patients [1.6%] vs. 30 patients [17.0%]; hazard ratio, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.03 to 0.27; P<0.001). The rates of death and disabling stroke were similar in the two groups, but the overall rate of stroke was lower in the centrifugal-flow pump group than in the axial-flow pump group (10.1% vs. 19.2%; hazard ratio, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.27 to 0.84, P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with advanced heart failure, a fully magnetically levitated centrifugal-flow pump was superior to a mechanical-bearing axial-flow pump with regard to survival free of disabling stroke or reoperation to replace or remove a malfunctioning device. (Funded by Abbott; MOMENTUM 3 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02224755 .).

Acoustic Characterization of Axial Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Operation In Vitro and In Vivo.

The use of left ventricular assist devices (LVADs), implantable pumps used to supplement cardiac output, has become an increasingly common and effective treatment for advanced heart failure. Although modern continuous-flow LVADs improve quality of life and survival more than medical management of heart failure, device malfunction remains a common concern. Improved noninvasive methods for assessment of LVAD function are needed to detect device complications. An electronic stethoscope was used to record sounds from the HeartMate II axial flow pump in vitro and in vivo. The data were then uploaded to a computer and analyzed using two types of acoustic analysis software. Left ventricular assist device acoustics were quantified and were related to pump speed, acoustic environment, and inflow and outflow graft patency. Peak frequency values measured in vivo were found to correlate strongly with both predicted values and in vitro measurements (r > 0.999). Plots of the area under the acoustic spectrum curve, obtained by integrating over 50 Hz increments, showed strong correlations between in vivo and in vitro measurements (r > 0.966). Device thrombosis was found to be associated with reduced LVAD acoustic amplitude in two patients who underwent surgical device exchange.

Results of the destination therapy post-food and drug administration approval study with a continuous flow left ventricular assist device: a prospective study using the INTERMACS registry (Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support).

OBJECTIVES: A post-approval (PA) study for destination therapy (DT) was required by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to determine whether results with the HeartMate (HM) II (Thoratec, Pleasanton, California) left ventricular assist device (LVAD) in a commercial setting were comparable to results during the DT multicenter pivotal clinical trial. BACKGROUND: New device technology developed in the clinical research setting requires validation in a real-world setting. METHODS: The PA study was a prospective evaluation of the first 247 HM II patients identified pre-operatively as eligible for DT in the national INTERMACS (Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support) registry. Patients were enrolled from January to September 2010 at 61 U.S. centers and followed for 2 years. A historical comparison group included patients (n = 133 at 34 centers) enrolled in the primary data cohort in the DT pivotal trial (TR). Survival rates and adverse events for the PA group were obtained from the INTERMACS registry. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar for PA versus TR. Forty-five percent of PA patients were in INTERMACS profiles 1 to 2 and 28% were in profile 3. Adverse events in the PA group were similar or lower than those in the TR group, including improvements in device-related infection (0.22 vs. 0.47) and post-operative bleeding requiring surgery (0.09 vs. 0.23) events per patient-year. Kaplan-Meier survival at 2 years was 62% (PA group) versus 58% (TR group). PA group survival at 1 and 2 years was 82 ± 5% and 69 ± 6% for INTERMACS profiles 4 to 7 (n = 63) versus 72 ± 3% and 60 ± 4% for profiles 1 to 3 (n = 184). The median length of stay after surgery was reduced by 6 days in the PA group versus the TR group. CONCLUSIONS: Results in a commercial patient care setting for the DT population supported the original pivotal clinical trial findings regarding the efficacy and risk profile of the HM II LVAD. Survival was best in patients who were not inotrope-dependent (INTERMACS profiles 4 to 7).

The development of aortic insufficiency in continuous-flow left ventricular assist device-supported patients.

BACKGROUND: Significant aortic insufficiency (AI) after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) placement affects device performance and end-organ perfusion. This study examined the development and progression of AI after implantation of continuous-flow LVAD. METHODS: Seventy-nine patients undergoing Heart Mate II (Thoratec Corp, Pleasanton, CA) LVAD implantation for predominantly destination therapy (n = 69 [87%]) were examined. Preoperative and postoperative echocardiograms for all patients were reviewed at the intervals of 0 to 3, 3 to 6, 6 to 12, 12 to 18, and 18 to 24 months. AI was graded on an interval scale of 0, none; 0.5, trivial; 1, mild; 1.5, mild to moderate; 2, moderate; 2.5, moderate to severe; and 3, severe. Development and progression of AI were analyzed. RESULTS: The incidence of significant AI (mild or greater) was 52% (n = 41). Median time to AI development was 187 days. The median duration of VAD support was 761 days. Mild AI developed in 41 patients (52%). No severe AI developed. In the Cox regression model (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]), aortic valve closure (2.51 [1.06 to 5.89]; p = 0.03), and age (1.04 [1.008 to 1.08]; p = 0.01) were independent predictors of AI development. There was no difference in mortality rates in the two groups (p = 0.40 by log-rank test). A mixed-model linear regression analysis showed a significant overall progression of AI over time (ß ± standard error, 0.06 ± 0.02; p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: AI develops over time in a significant number of Heart Mate II LVAD patients. AI is more common in patients with closed aortic valves and in the older age group. As more patients require long-term VAD support, the development of AI will need careful attention and monitoring.

Prospective clinical study of a novel left atrial appendage occlusion device.

PURPOSE: This Food and Drug Administration-approved investigational device exempt trial assessed the safety and efficacy of a novel device for external left atrial appendage (LAA) exclusion. DESCRIPTION: Delivery tool and implant consisting of connectors imbedded in a compliant, soft silicone applied to the base of the LAA flush with the external wall was assessed. EVALUATION: Patients in this prospective, multicenter trial were undergoing elective, nonendoscopic cardiac operations. A core laboratory independently assessed all intraprocedural and 90-day transesophageal echocardiograms. Sixty patients (37 men), aged 33 to 86 years, enrolled. The mean LAA application time was 27 seconds. Transesophageal echocardiograms at 90 days were available in 54 patients, and no leaks were detected. The residual LAA cavity exceeded 6 mm in 5 patients. One delivery device failed to close, and an adjunctive suture was required to complete LAA exclusion. One patient required adjunct sutures at a small tear site related to manual manipulation after fastener application. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrated safety and efficacy of this LAA exclusion device, offering an alternative to manual suturing or staples with or without reinforcement.

Incidence and management of gastrointestinal bleeding with continuous flow assist devices.

BACKGROUND: Continuous flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVADs) have emerged as the standard of care for patients in advanced heart failure (HF) requiring long-term mechanical circulatory support. Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding has been frequently reported within this population. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 101 patients implanted with the Heart Mate II from January 2005 to August 2011 was performed to identify incidence, etiology, and management of GI bleeding. Univariate and multivariate regression analysis was conducted to identify related risk factors. RESULTS: A significant incidence of GI bleeding (22.8%) occurred in our predominantly destination therapy (DT) (93%) population. Fifty-seven percent of the patients with bleeding episodes bled from the upper GI (UGI) tract (with 54% bleeding from gastric erosions and 37% from ulcers/angiodysplasias), whereas 35% of patients bled from the lower GI (LGI) tract. Previous history of GI bleeding (odds ratio [OR], 22.7; 95% CI, 2.2-228.6; p=0.008), elevated international normalized ratio (INR) (OR, 3.9; CI, 1.2-12.9; p=0.02), and low platelet count (OR, -0.98; CI, 0.98 -0.99; p=0.001) were independent predictors of GI hemorrhage. Recurrent bleeding was more common in older patients (mean, 70 years; p=0.01). The majority of bleeders (60%) rebled from the same site. Management strategies included temporarily withholding anticoagulation, decreasing the speed of LVADs, and using octreotide. Octreotide did not impact the amount of packed red blood cells used, rebleeding rates, length of hospital stay, or all-cause mortality. Only 1 patient died as a direct consequence of GI bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple factors account for GI bleeding in patients on CF-VADs. A previous history of bleeding increases risk significantly and warrants careful monitoring.

Platelet activation in heart failure patients supported by the HeartMate II ventricular assist device.

OBJECTIVE: Thromboembolic events have been observed in heart failure (HF) patients supported by long-term mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices. It has been hypothesized that these adverse events may be the result of platelet activation associated with high rotational speeds common to axial flow pumps. In this study, markers of platelet activation were investigated in HF patients supported by a HeartMate II left ventricular assist device (LVAD). METHODS: The study group consisted of 34 HF patients supported by a HeartMate II axial flow LVAD implanted for destination therapy (DT). This patient population was 94% male (31 M, 3 F), supported by LVAD for 30 to 723 days (average 268 days), and with an anticoagulation regimen of Coumadin (0-8 mg daily dose) and aspirin (0-325 mg daily dose). Platelet adhesion markers (soluble P-selectin and solube CD40 ligand), platelet count (PC), hematocrit (Hct), and creatinine (Cr) were measured. RESULTS: The soluble P-selectin marker was within normal platelet activity limits for all end points. The soluble CD40 ligand marker indicated platelet inactivity for all end points. Despite high shear stresses associated with a high-speed axial flow pump, the HeartMate II had no discernable effect on platelet activation. Current clinical doses of aspirin also appear to have little effect on platelet activation. Platelet count, hematocrit, and creatinine were normal in these patients over duration of support. CONCLUSIONS: There were no discernable changes in platelet activation markers soluble P-selectin and soluble CD40 ligand in HF patients support by HeartMate II LVAD independently of length of support, anti-platelet, and anti-coagulation regimens.

Massive aortic thrombus in patient with mechanical prosthetic valve supported with left ventricular assist device.

A 54-year-old left ventricular assist device (LVAD)-supported patient with mechanical prosthetic valves was planned for LVAD exchange using cardiac computed tomography(CCT) for preoperative evaluation. The CCT revealed massive thrombus in the ascending aorta. The surgery was done without thromboembolic complications. We reinforces the utility of CCT as a preoperative assessment in this specific case.

Reducing emboli in cardiac surgery: does it make a difference?

Particulate embolization remains a serious complication of cardiac surgery. Adverse events associated with particulate embolization affect patient morbidity and long-term survival, and increase the length of hospital stay and the cost of health care. Today, atherosclerosis plays a role in at least two-thirds of all adverse events after coronary artery revascularization, and postoperative stroke is the second most common cause of operative mortality. Because many lower-risk patients now undergo interventional revascularization, higher-risk patients are now typically referred for surgical revascularization. These patients are older and sicker, and have multiple comorbidities, making them more susceptible to adverse events. For these high-risk patients, surgeons should be proactive in attempting to reduce the possibility of emboli. Patients must be carefully assessed before surgery to determine their risk, and if the risk is high, surgeons should consider using newer, innovative devices, and techniques in their operative strategy that have proven to be effective in mitigating some of the potential embolic adverse events. A multifaceted, preventive strategy can make a difference, not only in reducing particulate emboli, but also in reducing morbidity and in lowering the economic burden on the health-care system. This brief review will address three areas of focus that are important for the prevention of particulate embolization: (i) prevalence and morbidity of atherosclerotic disease; (ii) risk factors for adverse neurologic events; and (iii) prevention/mitigation of adverse events for patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

Reducing the effects of the systemic inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass: can single dose steroids blunt systemic inflammatory response syndrome?

The use of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is associated with the development of a significant systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) which can affect patient outcomes. Multiple pathways are involved in initiating and maintaining SIRS. We studied whether a single dose of steroids (dexamethasone) after the induction of anesthesia could blunt the SIRS from CPB. A prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo control trial of 28 patients (13 study vs. 15 control). The study group received 100 mg of dexamethasone whereas the control group received sterile saline. Inclusion criteria were the following: elective coronary artery bypass grafting, less than 80 years old, normal ejection fraction, no acute myocardial infarction. Serum levels of C3a, interleukin (IL)-6, and plasma norepinephrine (PNE) were measured after intubation, 30 minutes after initiation of CPB, 24 and 72 hours after termination of bypass. The study group demonstrated significantly lower levels of IL-6 (p = 0.0005) at 24 hours and PNE (p = 0.05) at 72 hours post-CPB. There were no differences in the C3a levels between the groups. No infections occurred in either group. A single dose of dexamethasone reduces IL-6 and PNE levels associated with CPB. Despite the significant reductions in IL-6 and PNE, there was no effect on clinical outcomes. Additional studies are needed to demonstrate a clinically significant effect on patient outcomes.

Embol-X intra-aortic filtration system: capturing particulate emboli in the cardiac surgery patient.

We sought to evaluate the effectiveness of using an intra-aortic filtration system for the prevention of particulate emboli transport and the minimization of significant postoperative complications associated with particulate emboli. Between October of 2000 and October 2001, a total of 146 patients were enrolled at Advocate Christ Medical Center as part of the multi-institutional randomized trial (1289 patients at 22 centers). A total of 74 patients (51%) received the Embol-X intra-aortic filter and 72 patients (49%) were enrolled in the control group. Patients were evaluated for neurological deficit, myocardial infarction, renal insufficiency/failure, limb ischemia, and death at 12-hour, 24-hour, 72-hour, 7-day, and 30-day postoperative intervals. All filters received histological examination for particulate matter. Particulate matter was isolated in 70 (94.5%) of the filters successfully deployed. There was no statistically significant difference in the device related events between the filter and conventional cannulation groups (9/74 = 12.1% vs. 7/72 = 9.7%). Although not clinically evident, the primary event for both groups was ascending aortic intimal tears. There was one death in each of the groups not related to the filter or cannula used. The use of the Embol-X intra-aortic filter system has proven to be a safe and effective means to reduce the introduction of particulate emboli into the systemic circulation. Clearly, the reduction of particulate matter by as much as 95% justifies its use in cardiac surgery patients identified with an increased pre-operative embolic risk.

Prospective study on cardiopulmonary bypass prime reduction and its effect on intraoperative blood product and hemoconcentrator use.

PURPOSE: Evaluate the feasibility and clinical significance of crystalloid prime reduction during the initiation of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) using a modified bridge on the cardioplegia delivery system. METHODS: Prospective trial of crystalloid prime reduction using a standard Duraflow-coated CPB circuit and Vanguard 2:1 cardio plegia delivery system. Standard prime volume was 1500 cc of Plasmalyte. Prime was reduced via the bridge in the cardioplegia system during initiation of CPB. Packed red blood cells (PRBC) were transfused for hematocrit (Hct) less than 24% while rewarming. A hemoconcentrator was used if the patient's circulating blood volume exceeded 150% of calculated. All data were prospectively collected. RESULTS: Two hundred and twenty-two consecutive patients undergoing cardiac surgery utilizing CPB were evaluated. There were 107 patients with normal prime volume (NPV) and 115 patients with reduced prime volume (RPV). There was no significant difference in sex, mean age, weight, body surface area (BSA), pre-op Hct, procedure time or procedure between the two groups. There was no difference in total crystalloids infused by the anesthetists (average NPV 1205 cc versus RPV 1148 cc). The average RPV was 622 cc (range 400-1100 cc) or a 59% reduction. Post-op Hct revealed no difference (NPV 28% versus RPV 29%). There was a 24% reduction in patients requiring PRBC (NPV n=23 versus RPV n=18). The use of hemoconcentrators was reduced by 49% (NPV n=18 versus RPV n =11). The average urine output for both groups exceeded 100 cc/hour while on CPB. CONCLUSION: Using a modified cardioplegia delivery system is a safe and effective method of CPB prime reduction. A RPV resulted in fewer patients requiring PRBC transfusions and fewer hemoconcentrators used. Based on our experience, we would recommend attempting to reduce prime volume in all patients undergoing CPB.

Minimally invasive mitral valve repair using the da Vinci robotic system.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive mitral valve repair with a shortened hospital stay and quick return to an active lifestyle is the ultimate goal for robotically assisted surgery. We evaluated our da Vinci robotically assisted mitral valve repair experience toward achieving this goal. METHODS: All procedures were performed with peripheral cardiopulmonary bypass, transthoracic aortic cross-clamp, and antegrade cardioplegia. Two ports and a 4-cm intercostal incision in the right chest were used for access. All patients had a ring annuloplasty, and all but 1 had a posterior leaflet resection. The entire repair and all knot tying were performed robotically. RESULTS: Between October 2001 and October 2002, 25 patients (18 men) underwent robotic mitral valve repair. The mean age was 56 years (range, 37 to 81 years). There were no incisional conversions, deaths, strokes, or reoperations for bleeding. Twenty-one (84%) of 25 patients were extubated in the operating room. Overall mean study times were as follows: procedure, 199.7 minutes (range, 140 to 287 minutes); cardiopulmonary bypass, 126.6 minutes (range, 89 to 186 minutes); and cross-clamp, 87.7 minutes (range, 58 to 143 minutes). Eight (32%) patients were discharged home in less than 24 hours, with an average length of stay of 2.7 days. Comparing the first 10 patients to the last 15 there was a significant reduction of times: total operating room time, 318.5 versus 275.1 minutes; cross-clamp, 97.6 versus 81.1 minutes; leaflet resection or repair, 26.2 versus 15.6 minutes; annuloplasty ring, 31.9 versus 24.8 minutes; and length of stay, from 4.2 days to 1.67 days. Five patients had postoperative atrial fibrillation. Two (8%) patients ultimately required mitral valve replacement for recurrent mitral insufficiency. CONCLUSIONS: Mitral valve repair can be successfully performed with the da Vinci robotic system. Long-term follow-up is needed to determine the durability of the repair compared with a standard sternotomy approach.