RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Genetic testing (GT) companies have developed patient education videos to supplement or replace pre-test genetic counseling (GC) by certified genetic counselors (CGC). The aim of this study was to assess the quality of these videos compared to the standard of care (SOC). METHODS: Videos from four major GT companies were selected from an internet search identifying pre-test patient education videos. A scoring rubric with 22 questions and 36 total points was devised to assess quality metrics, as described by the National Cancer Institute and National Society of Genetic Counselors. Twenty-two individuals with varying genetics expertise (3 gynecologic oncologists, 3 academic generalists, 4 CGC, a genetics community health worker, 3 cancer care navigators, and 8 medical students) scored each video. Scorers were blinded to others' assessments. RESULTS: Invitae had the highest median score (26/36), followed by Myriad (22/36), Ambry (17.5/36), and Color (15/36). All videos scored highly in explaining DNA basics, cancer development, and hereditary cancer predisposition. All addressed benefits of GT but failed to address potential disadvantages. All scored poorly in explaining medical terms and different GT options. There was variability in addressing patient concerns including cost, privacy, and procedure. CONCLUSIONS: There is significant variation in the content of pre-test patient education videos between GT companies. None of the videos met the SOC for pre-test GC, and none addressed disadvantages of GT, possibly due to a conflict of interest. With improvement in content, accessibility, and use of interactive platforms, these videos may serve as an adjunct to in-person pre-test GC.
Assuntos
Aconselhamento Genético/métodos , Testes Genéticos/métodos , Neoplasias/genética , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/métodos , Aconselhamento Genético/ética , Aconselhamento Genético/normas , Testes Genéticos/ética , Testes Genéticos/normas , Humanos , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/normas , Gravação de Videoteipe/ética , Gravação de Videoteipe/normasRESUMO
As the most common lethal autosomal recessive disorder in North America, cystic fibrosis (CF) is an obvious candidate for general population carrier screening. Although the identification of the causative gene has made detection of asymptomatic carriers possible, the extreme heterogeneity of its mutations has limited the sensitivity of the available DNA screening tests and has called into question their utility when they are applied to patients with no family history of the disease. The purpose of this study was to determine the technical feasibility, patient acceptance and understanding, and psychosocial impact of large-scale CF carrier screening in an ethnically diverse pregnant population. A total of 4,739 pregnant women attending prenatal clinics located in both an academic medical center and a large HMO were invited in person to participate. Of this group, 3,543 received CF instruction and assessments of knowledge and mood, and 3,192 underwent DNA testing for the six most common CF mutations, by means of a noninvasive PCR-based reverse-dot-blot method. Overall participation rates (ranging from 53% at the HMO to 77% at the academic center) and consent rates for DNA testing after CF instruction (>98%) exceeded those of most other American studies. The PCR-based screening method worked efficiently on large numbers of samples, and 55 carriers and one at-risk couple were identified. Understanding of residual risk, anxiety levels, and overall satisfaction with the program were acceptable across all ethnic groups. Our strategy of approaching a motivated pregnant population in person with a rapid and noninvasive testing method may provide a practical model for developing a larger CF screening program targeting appropriate high-risk groups at the national level, and may also serve as a paradigm for population-based screening of other genetically heterogeneous disorders in the future.
Assuntos
Fibrose Cística/diagnóstico , Testes Genéticos/métodos , Heterozigoto , Mutação , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase/métodos , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos , Adolescente , Adulto , California , Fibrose Cística/etnologia , Fibrose Cística/psicologia , Demografia , Etnicidade/genética , Feminino , Seguimentos , Frequência do Gene , Aconselhamento Genético , Sistemas Pré-Pagos de Saúde , Humanos , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido , Conhecimento , Gravidez , Psicologia Social , Projetos de PesquisaRESUMO
In this study we examined the relations among psychosocial factors associated with pregnant women's attitudes toward genetic carrier testing for cystic fibrosis (CF). A sample of 511 pregnant women attending various health clinics for general prenatal care were educated about CF. Women's health beliefs, coping styles, and attitudes toward CF carrier screening were assessed. Results from structural equation modeling analyses indicated that women who perceived themselves as more likely to be carriers of the CF gene and who perceived greater benefits of screening were positively inclined toward genetic screening. Perceived barriers to screening were negatively associated with women's attitudes toward CF genetic testing. In addition, the findings suggest that some types of avoidant coping styles may indirectly influence one's decision to undergo genetic screening through perceptions of risk, benefits, and barriers. Given the advent of genetic screening options for many diseases, in this study we address some issue in women's attitudes toward prenatal screening that are relevant to a variety of genetic screening programs.
Assuntos
Adaptação Psicológica , Atitude Frente a Saúde , Fibrose Cística/prevenção & controle , Triagem de Portadores Genéticos , Testes Genéticos/psicologia , Adulto , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Análise Fatorial , Feminino , Humanos , Funções Verossimilhança , Modelos Psicológicos , Gravidez , Estudos de AmostragemRESUMO
Population-based screening for cystic fibrosis carrier mutations presents a number of challenges for genetic counselors, owing primarily to the inability of current DNA testing technology to identify all possible mutations and the difficulty involved in conveying the concept of residual risk to those patients who test negative. To address these issues, we are conducting a pilot study, as part of a consortium established by the National Center for Human Genome Research, to explore the efficacy, acceptance, and psychosocial impact of various approaches to carrier screening in an ethnically diverse Southern California population. This article reports the patient instructional and screening strategies we developed in the initial phase of the project in order to optimize our chances of answering these questions and delivering this service on a large scale.