The multi-faceted nature of 15 CFTR exonic variations: Impact on their functional classification and perspectives for therapy.

BACKGROUND: The majority of variants of unknown clinical significance (VUCS) in the CFTR gene are missense variants. While change on the CFTR protein structure or function is often suspected, impact on splicing may be neglected. Such undetected splicing default of variants may complicate the interpretation of genetic analyses and the use of an appropriate pharmacotherapy. METHODS: We selected 15 variants suspected to impact CFTR splicing after in silico predictions on 319 missense variants (214 VUCS), reported in the CFTR-France database. Six specialized laboratories assessed the impact of nucleotide substitutions on splicing (minigenes), mRNA expression levels (quantitative PCR), synthesis and maturation (western blot), cellular localization (immunofluorescence) and channel function (patch clamp) of the CFTR protein. We also studied maturation and function of the truncated protein, consecutive to in-frame aberrant splicing, on additional plasmid constructs. RESULTS: Six of the 15 variants had a major impact on CFTR splicing by in-frame (n = 3) or out-of-frame (n = 3) exon skipping. We reclassified variants into: splicing variants; variants causing a splicing defect and the impairment of CFTR folding and/or function related to the amino acid substitution; deleterious missense variants that impair CFTR folding and/or function; and variants with no consequence on the different processes tested. CONCLUSION: The 15 variants have been reclassified by our comprehensive approach of in vitro experiments that should be used to properly interpret very rare exonic variants of the CFTR gene. Targeted therapies may thus be adapted to the molecular defects regarding the results of laboratory experiments.

Functional characterization and phenotypic spectrum of three recurrent disease-causing deep intronic variants of the CFTR gene.

BACKGROUND: The CFTR genotype remains incomplete in 1% of Cystic Fibrosis (CF) cases, because only one or no disease-causing variants is detected after extended analysis. This fraction is probably higher in CFTR-Related Disorders (CFTR-RD). Deep-intronic CFTR variants are putative candidates to fill this gap. However, the recurrence, phenotypic spectrum and full molecular characterization of newly reported variants are unknown. METHODS: Minigenes and analysis of CFTR transcripts in nasal epithelial cells were used to determine the impact on CFTR splicing of intronic variants that we previously identified by next generation sequencing of the whole CFTR locus. Phenotypic data were collected in 19 patients with CF and CFTR-RD, in whom one of the deep intronic variants has been detected. RESULTS: Three deep-intronic variants promoted the inclusion of pseudo-exons (PE) in the CFTR transcript, hindering the synthesis of a functional protein. The c.2989-313A > T variant, detected in four patients with CF or CFTR-RD from three different families, led to the inclusion of a 118 bp PE. The c.3469-1304C > G variant promoted the inclusion of a 214 bp-PE and was identified in five patients with CF from four families. Haplotype analysis confirmed that this variant was associated with one CF chromosome of African origin. The most represented variant in our cohort was the c.3874-4522A > G, detected in 10 patients with various phenotypes, from male infertility to CF with pancreatic insufficiency. CONCLUSION: These three deep intronic CFTR variants are associated with a large phenotypic spectrum, including typical CF. They should be included in CF diagnostic testing and carrier screening strategies.