Molecular tumor board in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Comprehensive genomic profiling is becoming increasingly important in the management of patients with metastatic breast cancer (mBC). Real-world clinical outcomes from applying molecular tumor boards (MTBs) recommendations in this context remain limited. Accordingly, we conducted a retrospective, single-institution analysis to evaluate the clinical impact of discussing patients affected by mBC at the MTB. METHODS: Clinicogenomic data of patients affected by mBCs referred to the European Institute of Oncology MTB between August 2019 and December 2023 were reviewed. Genomic alterations were classified by ESCAT framework. Clinical outcomes of patients showing actionable alterations and receiving molecular-matched therapy (MMT) were compared to those receiving standard therapy (ST). RESULTS: Ninety-six patients were included. Following MTB discussion, genetic counseling was recommended in 27% (n = 26) of patients, while additional molecular analyses were requested in 25% (n = 24) cases. Fifty-six patients (58%) displayed at least one actionable alteration. For patients with available follow-up (n = 50), 32 (64%) received MMTs and 18 (36%) ST. No differences in real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) (4.07 months [95% CI 2.14-8.28] vs. 3.12 months [95% CI 1.51-NE], P = 0.8) and 12-month overall survival (OS) (58% [95%CI 43-78] vs. 57% [95%CI 34-97), P = 0.9) were observed between the MMT- and ST-group. Level I ESCAT alterations yielded longer rwPFS (5.82 months [95% CI 3.12-8.41]) compared to ESCAT II (2.14 months [95%CI 1.61-NE]) and ESCAT III (2.10 months [95% CI 2.04-NE]; P = 0.03). Twenty-four percent of patients showed a PFS2/PFS1 ratio > 1.3 from MMT. CONCLUSION: Molecular tumor boards can provide additional treatment options for patients affected by mBC. Besides treatment recommendations, MTBs also have the utility to assess the validity of discussed genomic reports and to identify alterations worthy of genetic counseling.

Genomic tests for risk stratification in patients with early human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) genomic tests, particularly focusing on the most recent developments and looking at the future prospects of this field, yet to be thoroughly explored. RECENT FINDINGS: HER2DX is a multifeatured assay, retrospectively proved to add prognostic information and to predict pathological complete response (pCR) in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer (EBC) undergoing neoadjuvant treatment containing HER2-directed agents. Preliminary data have shown that the assay maintains its predictive capabilities even in the context of chemotherapy-free, anti-HER2 neoadjuvant regimens, potentially selecting patients suitable for treatment de-escalation, having highly HER2-driven malignancies. SUMMARY: Multigene prognostic assays have become essential tools in the management of EBC, providing crucial information for risk stratification.

Immune and Gene-expression Profiling in Estrogen Receptor Low and Negative Early Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The cut-off of < 1% positive cells to define estrogen receptor (ER) negativity by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in breast cancer (BC) is debated. We explored the tumor immune microenvironment and gene-expression profile of patients with early-stage HER2-negative ER-low (ER 1-9%) BC, comparing them to ER-negative (ER < 1%) and ER-intermediate (ER 10-50%) tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Among 921 patients with early-stage I-III, ER ≤ 50%, HER2-negative BCs, tumors were classified as ER-negative (n = 712), ER-low (n = 128), or ER-intermediate (n = 81). Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) were evaluated. CD8+, FOXP3+ cells, and PD-L1 status were assessed by IHC and quantified by digital pathology. We analyzed 776 BC-related genes in 116 samples. All tests were 2-sided at < 0.05 significance level. RESULTS: ER-low and ER-negative tumors exhibited similar median TILs, significantly higher than ER-intermediate tumors. CD8/FOXP3 ratio and PD-L1 positivity rates were comparable between ER-low and ER-negative groups. These groups showed similar enrichment in Basal-like intrinsic subtypes and comparable expression of immune-related genes. ER-low and ER-intermediate tumors showed significant transcriptomic differences. High TILs (≥30%) were associated with improved relapse-free survival (RFS) in ER-low (5-year RFS 78.6% vs 66.2%, log-rank p = .033, hazard ratio (HR) 0.37 [95% CI 0.15-0.96]) and ER-negative patients (5-year RFS 85.2% vs 69.8%, log-rank p < .001, HR 0.41 [95% CI 0.27-0.60]). CONCLUSIONS: ER-low and ER-negative tumors are similar biological and molecular entities, supporting their comparable clinical outcomes and treatment responses, including to immunotherapy. Our findings contribute to the growing evidence calling for a reevaluation of ER-positive BC classification and management, aligning ER-low and ER-negative tumors more closely.

Clinical impact of drug-drug interactions on abemaciclib in the real-world experience of AB-ITALY study.

Abemaciclib demonstrated clinical benefit in women affected by HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer (aBC). Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) can lead to reduced treatment efficacy or increased toxicity. This retro-prospective study aimed to evaluate outcomes, DDIs' impact, and toxicities of abemaciclib combined with endocrine therapy in a real-world setting. Patients from 12 referral Italian hospitals with HR+/HER2- aBC who received abemaciclib were included. Clinical data about comorbidities, concurrent medications, outcomes, and adverse events (AE) were collected. Drug-PIN® (Personalized Interactions Network) is a tool recognizing the role of multiple interactions between active and/or pro-drug forms combined with biochemical and demographic patient data. The software was used to define the Drug-PIN score and Drug-PIN tier (green, yellow, dark yellow, and red) for each patient. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify predictors of patients' PFS or toxicity. One hundred seventy-three patients were included. 13% of patients had >75years. The overall response rate (ORR) was 63%. The general population's median PFS (mPFS) was 22 months (mo), while mOS were not reached. Patients treated with abemaciclib in combination with AI and fulvestrant had a mPFS of 36 and 19 mo, respectively. The most common toxicities were diarrhea, asthenia, and neutropenia detected in 63%,49%, and 49% of patients. The number of concomitant medications and comorbidities were not associated with survival outcomes (22 vs 17 mo, p = 0.068, p = 0.99). Drug-PIN tier from dark yellow to red and Drug-PIN score >12 were associated with shorter PFS compared to no/low-risk DDIs and score <12 (15 vs 23, p = 0.005, p = 0.0017). Drug interaction was confirmed as an independent biomarker in a multivariate model (p = 0.02). No difference in any grade AE, severe toxicities, and diarrhea were detected among different age subgroups. No association was found between Drug-PIN score or Drug-PIN tier and overall toxicity (p = 0.44), severe AEs (p = 0.11), or drug reduction (p = 0.27). The efficacy and safety of abemaciclib plus ET were confirmed in a real-world setting, even in the elderly population and patients with comorbidities. Evaluation of DDIs with Drug-PIN appears to be an independent predictor of PFS.

PARP Inhibitors for Breast Cancer Treatment: A Review.

Importance: Poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have revolutionized the treatment of patients with germline BRCA1/2-associated breast cancer, representing the first targeted therapy capable of improving outcomes in patients with hereditary tumors. However, resistance to PARP inhibitors occurs in almost all patients. Observations: This narrative review summarizes the biological rationale behind the use of PARP inhibitors in breast cancer, as well as the available evidence, recent progress, and potential future applications of these agents. Recent studies have shown that the benefit of PARP inhibitors extends beyond patients with germline BRCA1/2-associated metastatic breast cancer to patients with somatic BRCA1/2 variants and to those with germline PALB2 alterations. Moreover, these agents proved to be effective both in the metastatic and adjuvant settings. However, patients with metastatic breast cancer usually do not achieve the long-term benefit from PARP inhibitors observed in other tumor types. Mechanisms of resistance have been identified, but how to effectively target them is largely unknown. Ongoing research is investigating both novel therapeutics and new combination strategies to overcome resistance. PARP1-selective inhibitors, by sparing the hematological toxic effects induced by the PARP2 blockade, are promising agents to be combined with chemotherapy, antibody-drug conjugates, and other targeted therapies. Conclusions and Relevance: Although the efficacy of PARP inhibitors is well established, many questions persist. Future research should focus on identifying predictive biomarkers and therapeutic strategies to overcome resistance. Integrating well-designed translational efforts into all clinical studies is thereby crucial to laying the groundwork for future insights from ongoing research.

Beyond PD(L)-1 Blockade in Microsatellite-Instable Cancers: Current Landscape of Immune Co-Inhibitory Receptor Targeting.

High microsatellite instability (MSI-H) derives from genomic hypermutability due to deficient mismatch repair function. Colorectal (CRC) and endometrial cancers (EC) are the tumor types that more often present MSI-H. Anti-PD(L)-1 antibodies have been demonstrated to be agnostically effective in patients with MSI-H cancer, but 50-60% of them do not respond to single-agent treatment, highlighting the necessity of expanding their treatment opportunities. Ipilimumab (anti-CTLA4) is the only immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) non-targeting PD(L)-1 that has been approved so far by the FDA for MSI-H cancer, namely, CRC in combination with nivolumab. Anti-TIM3 antibody LY3321367 showed interesting clinical activity in combination with anti-PDL-1 antibody in patients with MSI-H cancer not previously treated with anti-PD(L)-1. In contrast, no clinical evidence is available for anti-LAG3, anti-TIGIT, anti-BTLA, anti-ICOS and anti-IDO1 antibodies in MSI-H cancers, but clinical trials are ongoing. Other immunotherapeutic strategies under study for MSI-H cancers include vaccines, systemic immunomodulators, STING agonists, PKM2 activators, T-cell immunotherapy, LAIR-1 immunosuppression reversal, IL5 superagonists, oncolytic viruses and IL12 partial agonists. In conclusion, several combination therapies of ICIs and novel strategies are emerging and may revolutionize the treatment paradigm of MSI-H patients in the future. A huge effort will be necessary to find reliable immune biomarkers to personalize therapeutical decisions.

ESR1 mutations in HR+/HER2-metastatic breast cancer: Enhancing the accuracy of ctDNA testing.

Activating mutations of the estrogen receptor alpha gene (ESR1) are common mechanisms of endocrine therapy (ET) resistance in hormone receptor-positive (HR + )/Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Recent clinical findings emphasize that both old and new generations of selective ER degraders (SERDs) demonstrate enhanced clinical effectiveness in patients with MBC who have detectable ESR1 mutations via liquid biopsy. This stands in contrast to individuals with MBC carrying these mutations and undergoing conventional endocrine monotherapies like aromatase inhibitors (AIs). Liquid biopsy, particularly the analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), has emerged as a promising, minimally invasive alternative to conventional tissue-based testing for identifying ESR1 mutations. Within the context of the PADA-1 and EMERALD trials, distinct molecular methodologies and assays, specifically digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) and next-generation sequencing (NGS), have been employed to evaluate the mutational status of ESR1 within ctDNA. This manuscript critically examines the advantages and indications of various ctDNA testing methods on liquid biopsy for HR+/HER2-negative MBC. Specifically, we delve into the capabilities of ddPCR and NGS in identifying ESR1 mutations. Each methodology boasts unique strengths and limitations: ddPCR excels in its analytical sensitivity for pinpointing hotspot mutations, while NGS offers comprehensive coverage of the spectrum of ESR1 mutations. The significance of meticulous sample handling and timely analysis is emphasized, acknowledging the transient nature of cfDNA. Furthermore, we underscore the importance of detecting sub-clonal ESR1 mutations, as these variants can exert a pivotal influence on predicting both endocrine therapy resistance and responsiveness to SERDs. In essence, this work discusses the role of ctDNA analysis for detecting ESR1 mutations and their implications in tailoring effective therapeutic strategies for HR+/HER2- MBC.

The CDK4/6 inhibitors biomarker landscape: The most relevant biomarkers of response or resistance for further research and potential clinical utility.

Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6is) in combination with Endocrine Therapy (ET) represent the standard frontline therapy for patients with Hormone Receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic Breast Cancer (mBC). Clinical activity and efficacy of CDK4/6is-based therapies have been proven both in the endocrine sensitive and resistant settings. Therapy resistance eventually underpins clinical progression to any CDK4/6is-based therapies, yet there is a lack of validated molecular biomarkers predictive of either intrinsic or acquired resistance to CDK4/6is in clinical practice. As the "post-CDK4/6is" landscape for the management of HR-positive/HER2-negative mBC is rapidly evolving with the introduction of novel therapies, there is an urgent need for the definition of clinically relevant molecular biomarkers of intrinsic/acquired resistance mechanisms to CDK4/6is. This narrative review outlines the role of currently approved CDK4/6is-based therapies, describes the most relevant molecular biomarkers of CDK4/6is-resistance, and ultimately provides a perspective on the clinical and research scenario.

Clinicopathological features and survival outcomes of luminal-like breast tumors with estrogen receptor loss at metastatic recurrence: A case-control study.

INTRODUCTION: Estrogen receptor (ER) loss at metastatic relapse occurs in up to 20% of luminal-like primary breast tumors. Data about clinicopathological features associated with ER loss and its prognostic significance are limited. METHODS: In a nested-case-control study, we compared clinicopathological characteristics and clinical outcomes between a cohort of 51 patients with primary ER+ /HER2- and paired triple-negative metastasis (LUM-TN) and two control cohorts of paired early-metastatic ER+ /HER2- (LUM-LUM, n = 50) and triple-negative (TN-TN, n = 49) breast cancers. Stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) were assessed according to the TILs Working Group recommendations as continuous and discrete variables with cutoffs (20%, 40%). RESULTS: LUM-TN tumors had lower ER expression than LUM-LUM tumors, but lower grade and Ki67 than TN-TN cases. Median distant-metastasis free survival was similar for LUM-TN and LUM-LUM cohorts, but significantly longer than in TN-TN cases (log-rank P < 0.001). LUM-TN and TN-TN cohorts had a comparable survival from the time of metastatic recurrence, which was significantly shorter than in patients with LUM-LUM tumors (log-rank P < 0.001). High TILs were associated with worse outcomes in patients with ER loss (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Breast tumors with ER loss at metastatic relapse have intermediate features and outcomes compared with metastatic luminal-like and ab initio triple-negative tumors. Further investigation on the biological mechanisms underpinning the loss of ER expression is ongoing.

Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes across Breast Cancer Subtypes: Current Issues for Biomarker Assessment.

Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) represent a surrogate biomarker of anti-tumor, lymphocyte-mediated immunity. In early, triple-negative breast cancer, TILs have level 1B of evidence to predict clinical outcomes. TILs represent a promising biomarker to select patients who can experience a better prognosis with de-intensified cancer treatments and derive larger benefits from immune checkpoint inhibitors. However, the assessment and the validation of TILs as a biomarker require a prospective and rigorous demonstration of its clinical validity and utility, provided reproducible analytical performance. With pending data about the prospective validation of TILs' clinical validity to modulate treatments in early breast cancer, this review summarizes the most important current issues and future challenges related to the implementation of TILs assessments across all breast cancer subtypes and their potential integration into clinical practice.

Innovative Therapeutic Approaches for Patients with HER2-Positive Breast Cancer.

Overexpression of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), a transmembrane tyrosine kinase receptor, has been described in about 15-20% of breast cancer (BC) and is associated with poor outcomes. Trastuzumab is the first anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody (mAB) that blocks receptor activity but it also activates immune response against cancer cells, thus, revolutionizing the prognosis of patients with HER2-positive BC. Over the years, new therapies have been developed, including other mAbs and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) that required multimodal approaches with chemotherapy to optimize their anticancer activity. This chapter gives a comprehensive overview of the last advancements including new approaches and future combinations, which seem to be very promising in overcoming resistance to the traditional anti-HER2 treatments. A modern therapeutic algorithm should include treatment options based on tumour patterns and a patient-centred approach. A proper patient's selection is crucial to derive maximal benefits from a treatment strategy and emerging biomarkers should be integrated along with the HER2 status, which is currently the only validated biomarker in the context of HER2-positive disease. These biomarkers might include molecular features with reported prognostic/predictive significance, such as phosphatidylinositol 3' -kinase (PI3K) or mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways, programmed cell death protein ligand 1 (PD-L1), and tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), which all affect prognosis and response to treatments.

Combination immunotherapy strategies for triple-negative breast cancer: current progress and barriers within the pharmacological landscape.

INTRODUCTION: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a breast cancer subtype characterized by poorer prognosis. Despite that TNBC can display immunogenic features, anti-PD(L)1 monotherapy strategies have resulted in disappointing results, underscoring the need to optimize their use in TNBC. Among many, combining immunotherapy with other agents to exploit the synergistic effect of different drugs has been explored. Such a combination approach led to the approval of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) plus chemotherapy in both metastatic and early setting. Nevertheless, primary or secondary resistance to ICIs remains a major hurdle to overcome, with a major need to explore novel combination strategies. AREAS COVERED: This review summarizes the biological rationale, current evidence, and ongoing clinical trials of immunotherapy combined with novel immunotherapeutics, chemotherapy, targeted compounds, and antibody-drug conjugates. EXPERT OPINION: The treatment landscape of TNBC is in continuous changes. ICIs are now part of the clinical practice; however, several unmet needs still remain, including the need to overcome resistance and prolong benefit of ICIs. Exploiting synergism between different agent has emerged as an attractive strategy to extend the benefit obtained with ICIs. The goal of future research will be to unveil the mechanisms underlying resistance to ICIs and to identify better biomarkers for patient selection.

The triple negative breast cancer drugs graveyard: a review of failed clinical trials 2017-2022.

INTRODUCTION: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) accounts for 15-20% of breast cancers (BC) and has the worst prognosis. It is characterized by the absence of both hormone receptor (HR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). TNBC has more limited therapeutic options compared to other subtypes, meaning that there is still a long way to go to discover target treatments. AREAS COVERED: Our review aims to summarize phase II/III clinical trials enrolling patients with TNBC that have been published between 2017 and 2022 but failed to reach their primary endpoint. We here try to emphasize the limitations and weaknesses noted in negative studies and to point out unexpected results which might be useful to enhance the therapeutic approach to TNBC disease. EXPERT OPINION: A deeper understanding of the mechanisms behind TNBC heterogeneity allowed to enhance the knowledge of new prognostic and predictive biomarkers of response. However, it is also through several failed clinical trials that we were able to define new therapeutic approaches which improved TNBC patients' clinical outcomes. Nowadays, we still need to overcome several difficulties to fully recognize different intracellular and extracellular pathways that crosstalk in TNBC and the mechanisms of resistance to identify novel tailored-patients' therapies.

An Example of Personalized Treatment in HR+ HER2+ Long Survivor Breast Cancer Patient (Case Report).

BACKGROUND: Personalized therapy is becoming increasingly popular in oncological scenarios, not only based on molecular pharmacological targets, but also preventing any drug-drug-gene interaction (DDGI), which could lead to severe toxicities. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), the individual germline sequence variations in genes involved in drug metabolism, are correlated to interindividual response to drugs and explain both efficacy and toxicity profiles reported by patients. CASE PRESENTATION: We present the case of a woman suffering from triple-positive breast cancer; she had early-stage disease at the onset and after four years developed metastatic disease. During her history, she presented different toxicities due to antineoplastic treatments. Particularly, hypertransaminasemia was found during every line of treatment. Nevertheless, we were able to guarantee the patient an excellent therapeutic adhesion thanks to the supportive treatments and the reduction of drug dosage. Moreover, we conducted a simultaneous analysis of the patient's biochemical and genomic data thanks to Drug-PIN software, and we found several significant SNPs of the main enzymes and transporters involved in drug metabolism. CONCLUSION: Our case report demonstrated the relevance of DDGI in clinical practice management of a patient treated for advanced breast cancer, suggesting the role of Drug-PIN software as an easy-to-use tool to prevent adverse events during cancer treatment and to help physicians in therapeutic algorithms. However, further studies are needed to confirm these results.

Statins and immunotherapy: Togetherness makes strength The potential effect of statins on immunotherapy for NSCLC.

BACKGROUND: Recent researches suggested that statins, beside their role in inhibiting endogenous cholesterol synthesis and in cardiovascular prevention, could influence several processes in cancer biology. In fact, a recent meta-analysis demonstrated that statins could positively influence OS in lung cancer patients. AIM: There is a lack of large cohort studies that could support a potential antineoplastic role of statins in clinical practice. We collected data from 162 patients treated with immunotherapy for Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) in first- and second-line setting to investigate the impact of these drugs on survival parameters. METHODS AND RESULTS: In our observational study, we enrolled 162 patients who received immunotherapy for lung cancer between October 2015 and April 2020. We used descriptive statistics to analyze patients' baseline features. Tumor response was evaluated using RECIST version 1.1 guidelines. Uni and multivariate analysis were conducted to investigate the relationship between statin use and response to immunotherapy, using the χ2 -test. We used Kaplan-Meier curves to estimate OS and PFS in statin and nonstatin users. We included 122 patients in the final analysis. Median PFS was 17.57 months in the statin group and 9.57 months in the nonstatin group, with a P = <.001. Moreover, median OS was superior in the statin-users group, with a statistically significant difference (19.94 vs 10.94 months, P = <.001). CONCLUSION: Although in our study, statin use positively correlates with PFS and OS in lung cancer patient treated with immunotherapy, these results require a further validation with randomized clinical trials.