Evaluating the safety and efficacy of medical management in extracranial pseudoaneurysms: a comparative study.

OBJECTIVE: As endovascular interventions become safer and their use more prevalent for treating extracranial pseudoaneurysms, fewer pseudoaneurysms are treated with medical therapy alone. This study aimed to assess the indications for intervention and the safety of medical management. METHODS: A dual-center retrospective analysis was conducted on patients diagnosed with extracranial carotid and vertebral pseudoaneurysms between December 2006 and June 2023. RESULTS: Of 145 pseudoaneurysms, 121 (83%) received medical therapy, 22 (15%) were treated endovascularly, and 2 (1.4%) were treated with open surgery. In the medical group, there were 2 (1.9%) complications, one unrelated to the pseudoaneurysm. In the intervention group, there were 3 (16%) complications, with 1 patient requiring two retreatments and sacrifice of the vessel. Major trauma (OR 4.0, 95% CI 1.3-14; p = 0.02), use of digital subtraction angiography as the initial imaging modality (OR 9.8, 95% CI 2.5-42; p < 0.01), and a maximum lesion diameter > 6 mm (OR 5.3, 95% CI 1.4-25; p = 0.03) proved to be significant in the decision to intervene. At a median follow-up of 18.1 months, 94.7% of the lesions treated with intervention healed completely compared with 19% of aneurysms in the medical group. Among those medically managed that did not resolve, the median change in diameter was -0.4 mm (IQR -1.8 to 0.4 mm). Age ≤ 50 years and aneurysm maximum diameter ≤ 6 mm predicted healing at follow-up in the medical group with 92% specificity and 65% sensitivity (area under the curve 0.87). At follow-up, 98% of patients were functionally independent (modified Rankin Scale score ≤ 2). CONCLUSIONS: Medical management alone is safe for most extracranial pseudoaneurysms, resulting in significantly fewer complications than endovascular intervention. Maximum diameter ≤ 6 mm and age ≤ 50 years were significant predictors of pseudoaneurysm resolution with medical therapy alone. Lesions that do not heal do not cause further symptoms or require additional intervention.

Superficial Temporal Artery Size Changes After Encephaloduroarteriosynangiosis for the Treatment of Moyamoya Disease.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Surgery is the mainstay of stroke prevention in patients with symptomatic moyamoya disease (MMD). We present the results of a single-center retrospective study of indirect revascularization surgery for adult MMD, emphasizing angiographic outcomes, including dilation of the superficial temporal artery and formation of new collaterals. METHODS: A prospectively maintained database of procedures performed for MMD was reviewed. Adult patients treated with indirect revascularization and with long-term angiographic follow-up were included. Preoperative and postoperative angiographic images and baseline and procedural characteristics were analyzed. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to test the hypothesis that the superficial temporal artery increases in diameter postoperatively. RESULTS: We identified 40 hemispheres in 27 patients, of which 35 had a sufficient angiographic follow-up. Bilateral procedures were performed on 16 patients. Most patients were female (72.5%), with a median age of 43 years old. The most common clinical presentation was ischemic stroke in 59.3% of cases. All patients underwent an encephaloduroarteriosynangiosis for treatment. A follow-up angiogram was performed at a median of 13.8 months postoperatively, showing superficial temporal artery (STA)-derived collaterals in 71.4% and collateral ingrowth via the burr holes in 61.8% of cases. Disease progression was evident in 34.3% of hemispheres. The normalized STA diameter was significantly increased postoperatively (2.4 to 3 mm; P < 0.05). A univariate analysis revealed that transdural collaterals and hyperlipidemia may affect collateral ingrowth from the STA, and no other patient- or procedure-related factors, including replacement of the bone flap, impacted on this. CONCLUSIONS: A significant increase in STA diameter on follow-up angiography after encephaloduroarteriosynangiosis was found; however, this was not directly associated with STA collateral development. Rates of postoperative transient ischemic attacks were low, and no patients had a new ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke at last follow-up. The presence of transdural collaterals and the absence of hyperlipidemia were associated with STA collateral development on follow-up angiography, but the causality of this finding is unclear.

A Novel Scoring System Predicting Aneurysm Incomplete Occlusion After Flow Diversion: A 10-Year Experience.

BACKGROUND: Factors impacting the rate of aneurysm occlusion after flow diversion (FD) have been well described in the literature. In this article, we sought to evaluate those variables to develop and validate a scoring system predicting aneurysm incomplete occlusion after FD. METHODS: Retrospective review of patients with intracranial aneurysms treated with FD at a single institution between March 2013 and March 2023. Multivariable logistic regression model was developed using factors associated with aneurysm incomplete occlusion. The ABC scoring system consisted of: Age (<60 years old: 0, 60-69 years: 1, 70-79: 2, and ≥80: 3), Branch coming out of the aneurysm dome/neck (yes: 2, no: 0), and Cigarette smoking history (never smoker: 1, current or past smoker: 0). The scoring system performance was evaluated with receiver operating characteristic curve and calculating the area under the curve. RESULTS: A total of 449 patients with 563 aneurysms treated in 482 procedures were evaluated. Most cases were females (81.7%) with a median age of 59 years old. At a median follow-up of 13.2 months, 84.0% of aneurysms were completely or near-complete occluded. The scoring system had an area under the curve of 0.71. A value ≥ 2, reached a sensitivity of 74.4%, a specificity of 60.9%, a likelihood ratio+ of 1.90, and proved to be reliable in predicting the risk of incomplete occlusion (odds ratio = 4.53; 95% confidence interval: 2.73-7.54; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The proposed ABC scoring system can be used to evaluate the risk of aneurysm incomplete occlusion after treatment with FD, identifying patients who would benefit from adjunctive coiling or alternative treatment modalities.

The evolution and future directions of bypass surgery.

Cerebral bypass surgery is one of the most complex and elegant procedures in neurosurgery. It involves several meticulous steps that test the skills of even the most prepared neurosurgeons. This surgery has transcended its traditional role in arterial stenosis and atherosclerosis, expanding its applications to include flow preservation techniques for complex conditions such as aneurysms, tumors, and vascular malformations. The decreased number of procedures performed across many hospitals reflects the development of newer endovascular therapies but is also due to the results of the extracranial-intracranial bypass study, the Carotid Occlusion Surgery Study, and the Carotid and Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion Surgery Study, which have raised questions about the efficacy of cerebral bypass surgery for individuals with carotid artery occlusion who are prone to ischemic stroke. Despite this, there is still a potential benefit of bypass surgery for patients with hemodynamic impairment refractory to medical management. Also, revascularization in moyamoya vasculopathy is an effective strategy for preventing ischemic and hemorrhagic events in both children and adults. Additionally, innovations in the technique, such as the flow-regulated bypass and intraoperative flow assessment, aim to minimize perioperative morbidity. Despite bypass surgery being less performed in this current era, the teaching and development of these skills are still encouraged for future neurosurgeons, as a role for bypass will exist for the foreseeable future.

Anterior choroidal artery aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes and ischemic complications following surgical and endovascular treatment.

OBJECTIVE: Anterior choroidal artery (AChA) aneurysms account for 2%-5% of all intracranial aneurysms. Treatment considerations include microsurgical clipping, flow diversion, or coiling with or without adjunctive devices. AChA aneurysms pose challenges in treatment due to the origination of the aneurysm from the origin or proximal segment of the AChA. The AChA is particularly susceptible to vasospasm and occlusion during treatment with devastating neurological deficits, including hemiparesis, hemianesthesia, lethargy, neglect, and hemianopia. In this study, the authors performed a meta-analysis to quantify the outcomes and complication rates across treatment modalities for AChA aneurysms and to identify risk factors reported in the literature. METHODS: The authors performed a systematic review of AChA aneurysms treated with surgical clipping, endovascular coiling, or flow diversion and reported in the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane search databases. Single-arm meta-analyses of the selected outcomes were performed in RStudio. RESULTS: Literature review yielded 25 studies that met the inclusion criteria. In total, 1627 patients were included in the analysis, with 554 males, 1009 females, and 64 unspecified. The rate of any complication in the full cohort was 11.6%, with a rate of ischemic complications of 5.5% and a favorable recovery rate of 90.3% of all patients treated. In total, 1064 patients underwent surgical clipping, 443 were treated with coiling, and 120 patients with flow diversion. In clipped patients, the rate of total surgical complications was 17.6%, with an ischemic complication rate of 9.4%. The rate of good functional recovery, defined on the basis of a Glasgow Outcome Scale score of 4-5 or modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2, was 88.0%, and complete obliteration was achieved in 84.5% of surgically clipped aneurysms. The complication rate in coiled patients was 10.3%, with an ischemic complication rate of 3.0%. Good functional recovery was achieved in 88.6% of coiled patients and complete aneurysm obliteration in 74.1%. Flow diversion resulted in a complication rate of 1.3%, with 0.7% rate of ischemic complications. Good functional recovery was achieved in 98.4% of patients and complete aneurysm obliteration in 79.0% in the flow diversion group. Aneurysm morphological features that impacted the complication rate were also identified to augment quantitative data and to help guide treatment selection for AChA aneurysms. CONCLUSIONS: Flow diversion showed significantly lower total and ischemic complications and improved outcomes compared to clipping and coiling. There may be differences in outcomes between treatment types, especially when considering the varied patient presentations that guide treatment selection.

The Neurovascular Disease Management Course: A Medical Student Opportunity for Early Exposure and Technical Development in Vascular Neurosurgery.

BACKGROUND: As endovascular neurosurgery techniques continue to evolve, medical students in the United States have widely varying exposures to the field, particularly with respect to opportunities for hands-on experiences. Current medical school curricula could benefit from a novel and adaptive course on vascular neurosurgery to increase student exposure earlier in their training. METHODS: We launched a yearly hands-on vascular neurosurgery course for medical students and residents. The day-long course is a combination of lectures focused on neurovascular disease and management accompanied by hands-on sessions where students practiced fundamental microsurgery and angiography techniques using real microscopes and angiography simulators. We surveyed the students before and after each of the 2 courses. The survey following the second annual course included quiz questions the students had not previously seen. RESULTS: Over 2 courses, we had 149 attendees, 71.8% of which were first and second-year medical students representing fifteen institutions. The average survey completion rate was 41.4% for the 4 surveys across the 2 courses. Attendees' interest in pursuing a surgical specialty (t = 1.815, P = 0.039) along with their comfort with neuroanatomy (t = 8.780, P ≤ 0.001) and neurosurgical disease (t = 6.133, P ≤ 0.001) was significantly elevated after the completion of the second course. Responses to the post-survey showed a good grasp of the fundamentals with 68% of attendees answering 70% of the quiz questions correctly. CONCLUSIONS: An interactive course on vascular neurosurgery may be an effective vehicle to provide medical students with exposure to the field and the opportunity to learn the fundamentals.

Association between cervicocerebral artery dissection and tortuosity - a review on quantitative and qualitative assessment.

Cervicocerebral artery dissection stands out as a significant contributor to ischemic stroke in young adults. Several studies have shown that arterial tortuosity is associated with dissection. We searched Pubmed and Embase to identify studies on the association between arterial tortuosity and cervicocerebral artery dissection, and to perform a review on the epidemiology of cervicocerebral artery tortuosity and dissection, pathophysiology, measurement of vessels tortuosity, strength of association between tortuosity and dissection, clinical manifestation and management strategies. The prevalence of tortuosity in dissected cervical arteries was reported to be around 22%-65% while it is only around 8%-22% in non-dissected arteries. In tortuous cervical arteries elastin and tunica media degradation, increased wall stiffness, changes in hemodynamics as well as arterial wall inflammation might be associated with dissection. Arterial tortuosity index and vertebrobasilar artery deviation is used to measure the level of vessel tortuosity. Studies have shown an independent association between these two measurements and cervicocerebral artery dissection. Different anatomical variants of tortuosity such as loops, coils and kinks may have a different level of association with cervicocerebral artery dissection. Symptomatic patients with extracranial cervical artery dissection are often treated with anticoagulant or antiplatelet agents, while patients with intracranial arterial dissection were often treated with antiplatelets only due to concerns of developing subarachnoid hemorrhage. Patients with recurrent ischemia, compromised cerebral blood flow or contraindications for antithrombotic agents are usually treated with open surgery or endovascular technique. Those with subarachnoid hemorrhage and intracranial artery dissection are often managed with surgical intervention due to high risk of re-hemorrhage.

Embolization Prior to Radiosurgery in Treatment of Arteriovenous Malformations: Defining Radiosurgery Target Dose with Nidal Volume Reduction.

INTRODUCTION: Arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) can be treated with observation, surgery, embolization, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), or a combination of therapies. SRS has been used for AVMs that pose a high risk of surgery, such as in deep or eloquent anatomic locations. Smaller AVMs, <3 cm, have been shown to have higher rates of complete obliteration after SRS. For AVMs that are a larger size, embolization prior to SRS has been used to reduce the size of the AVM nidus. In this study we analyzed embolization prior to SRS to reduce nidal volume and describe imaging techniques to target for SRS post embolization. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all patients at a single academic institution treated with embolization prior to SRS for treatment of AVMs. We then used contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to contour AVM volumes based on pre-embolization imaging and compared to post-embolization imaging. Planned AVM volume prior to embolization was then compared to actual treated AVM volume. RESULTS: We identified 11 patients treated with embolization prior to SRS from 2011-2023. Median AVM nidal volume prior to embolization was 7.69 mL and post embolization was 3.61 ML (P < 0.01). There was a 45.5% obliteration rate at follow up in our series, with 2 minor complications related to radiosurgery. CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort, embolization prior to SRS resulted in a statistically significant reduction in AVM nidal volume. Therefore, embolization prior to SRS can result in dose reduction at time of SRS treatment allowing for decreased risk of SRS complications without higher embolization complication rates.

Factors Associated with Extended Hospitalization in Patients Who Had Adjuvant Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization After Conventional Surgery for Chronic Subdural Hematomas.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to evaluate the length of stay (LOS) in patients who had adjunct middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) for chronic subdural hematoma after conventional surgery and determine the factors influencing the LOS in this population. METHODS: A retrospective review of 107 cases with MMAE after conventional surgery between September 2018 and January 2024 was performed. Factors associated with prolonged LOS were identified through univariable and multivariable analyses. RESULTS: The median LOS for MMAE after conventional surgery was 9 days (interquartile range = 6-17), with a 3-day interval between procedures (interquartile range = 2-5). Among 107 patients, 58 stayed ≤ 9 days, while 49 stayed longer. Univariable analysis showed the interval between procedures, type of surgery, MMAE sedation, and the number of complications associated with prolonged LOS. Multivariable analysis confirmed longer intervals between procedures (odds ratio [OR] = 1.52; P < 0.01), ≥2 medical complications (OR = 13.34; P = 0.01), and neurological complications (OR = 5.28; P = 0.05) were independent factors for lengthier hospitalizations. There was a trending association between general anesthesia during MMAE and prolonged LOS (P = 0.07). Subgroup analysis revealed diabetes (OR = 5.25; P = 0.01) and ≥2 medical complications (OR = 5.21; P = 0.03) correlated with a LOS over 20 days, the 75th percentile in our cohort. CONCLUSIONS: The interval between procedures and the number of medical and neurological complications were strongly associated with prolonged LOS in patients who had adjunct MMAE after open surgery. Reducing the interval between the procedures and potentially performing both under 1 anesthetic may decrease the burden on patients and shorten their hospitalizations.

Educational Limitations of ChatGPT in Neurosurgery Board Preparation.

Objective This study evaluated the potential of Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT) as an educational tool for neurosurgery residents preparing for the American Board of Neurological Surgery (ABNS) primary examination. Methods Non-imaging questions from the Congress of Neurological Surgeons (CNS) Self-Assessment in Neurological Surgery (SANS) online question bank were input into ChatGPT. Accuracy was evaluated and compared to human performance across subcategories. To quantify ChatGPT's educational potential, the concordance and insight of explanations were assessed by multiple neurosurgical faculty. Associations among these metrics as well as question length were evaluated. Results ChatGPT had an accuracy of 50.4% (1,068/2,120), with the highest and lowest accuracies in the pharmacology (81.2%, 13/16) and vascular (32.9%, 91/277) subcategories, respectively. ChatGPT performed worse than humans overall, as well as in the functional, other, peripheral, radiology, spine, trauma, tumor, and vascular subcategories. There were no subjects in which ChatGPT performed better than humans and its accuracy was below that required to pass the exam. The mean concordance was 93.4% (198/212) and the mean insight score was 2.7. Accuracy was negatively associated with question length (R2=0.29, p=0.03) but positively associated with both concordance (p<0.001, q<0.001) and insight (p<0.001, q<0.001). Conclusions The current study provides the largest and most comprehensive assessment of the accuracy and explanatory quality of ChatGPT in answering ABNS primary exam questions. The findings demonstrate shortcomings regarding ChatGPT's ability to pass, let alone teach, the neurosurgical boards.

Defining light transmission aggregometry cutoff values for clopidogrel and aspirin resistance in flow diversion treatment of intracranial aneurysms.

OBJECTIVE: Concern about thromboembolic events after flow diversion (FD) warrants dual antiplatelet therapy for 3 to 6 months. Platelet function tests are routinely performed prior to the procedure to detect clopidogrel responsiveness, as resistance is associated with CYP2C19 gene polymorphisms. This study aimed to identify optimal cutoff values in light transmission aggregometry (LTA) for clopidogrel and aspirin as predictive indicators of thromboembolic complications. METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective analysis of aneurysms treated with FD between 2013 and 2023 at a single academic institution. Patients with LTA data for adenosine diphosphate (ADP) and arachidonic acid (ARA) were included, excluding those with aborted procedures. Receiver operating characteristic curves were plotted for ADP and ARA assays to determine optimal cutoff values. RESULTS: A total of 442 patients harboring 552 aneurysms treated in 485 procedures were selected for this analysis. Complete and near-complete aneurysm occlusion on the last radiological follow-up was achieved in 81.8% of aneurysms in a median last imaging follow-up of 13.9 months. A good functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score ≤ 2) was achieved in 96.3% of patients on the last follow-up. Thromboembolic complications occurred in 4.9% of procedures, and intracranial hemorrhagic complications in 1.9%. For the ADP assay, a value ≥ 40% reached a sensitivity of 82.1% and a specificity of 42.9% with a positive likelihood ratio (LR) of 1.50. For the ARA assay, a value ≥ 13.5% reached a sensitivity of 82.1% and a specificity of 45.6% with a positive LR of 1.51. CONCLUSIONS: This study analyzed the largest FD-treated cohort in which optimal LTA platelet function thresholds for clopidogrel were evaluated and is the first to assess LTA values for aspirin. The authors found that values ≥ 40% for clopidogrel and ≥ 13.5% for aspirin were optimal for predicting thromboembolic complications after FD in treating aneurysms.

Comparison of Thromboembolic Events Between Pipeline Embolization Device (PED) Shield and PED/PED Flex: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The pipeline embolization device (PED) Flex with Shield technology is a third-generation flow diverter used for intracranial aneurysm treatment designed to decrease thrombogenicity through a phosphorylcholine coating. Herein, we aim to compare the rate of thromboembolic events in PED with Shield technology and PED without it through propensity score matching. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of aneurysms treated with PED first-generation/PED Flex and PED with Shield between 2013 and 2023 at a single academic institution. Patients were matched through propensity score by controlling for confounding factors including age, smoking history, diabetes, previous subarachnoid hemorrhage, modified Rankin Scale pretreatment, location, aneurysm size, previous treatment, and clopidogrel or aspirin resistance. After matching, we evaluated for periprocedural and postoperative thromboembolic events. Data analysis was performed using Stata 14. RESULTS: A total of 543 patients with 707 aneurysms treated in 605 procedures were included in the analysis. From these, 156 aneurysms were treated with PED with Shield (22.07%) and 551 (77.93%) without Shield technology. Propensity score matching resulted in 84 matched pairs. The rate of thromboembolic events was 3.57% for PED Shield and 10.71% for PED first-generation/PED Flex ( P = .07), while retreatment rates were 2.38% for PED Shield and 8.32% for PED Flex ( P = .09). Complete occlusion at first ( P = .41) and last imaging follow-up ( P = .71), in-stent stenosis ( P = .95), hemorrhagic complications ( P = .31), and functional outcomes ( P = .66) were comparable for both groups. CONCLUSION: This is the first study in the literature performing a propensity scored-matched analysis comparing PED with PED with Shield technology. Our study suggests a trend toward lower thromboembolic events for PED Shield, even after controlling for aspirin and clopidogrel resistance, and a trend toward lower aneurysm retreatment rates with PED Shield, without reaching statistical significance.

Complications of Endovascular and Open Aneurysm Surgery in the Era of Flow Diversion.

The techniques used for treatment of intracranial aneurysms have progressed dramatically over the decades. The introduction of modern endovascular techniques and the continued refinement of progressively less invasive neurosurgical approaches have contributed to steadily improving clinical outcomes. Moreover, innovations such as flow-diverting stents have achieved dramatic success and have gained rapid widespread adoption. Particularly in lesions for which the application of conventional treatment techniques is difficult, flow diversion technology has revolutionized aneurysm management. This review provides a discussion on the morbidity and mortality encountered in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms in the modern era. Common adverse events faced in the management of these lesions with open surgery and various endovascular techniques are highlighted.

Effect of Statin on Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes of Intracranial Aneurysms Treated With Pipeline Embolization: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Studies have shown that use of statin can improve radiographic and clinical outcomes in patients receiving treatment for coronary artery or peripheral vascular stenosis. Statins are thought to be effective by reducing arterial wall inflammation. The same mechanism may have an influence on the efficacy of pipeline embolization device (PED) for intracranial aneurysm treatment. Although this question has been of interest, there is a lack of well-controlled data in the literature. The objective of this study is to analyze the effect of statins on outcomes of aneurysms treated with pipeline embolization through propensity score matching. METHODS: Patients who underwent PED for unruptured intracranial aneurysms at our institution between 2013 and 2020 were identified. Patients on statin treatment vs those who were not were matched through propensity score by controlling for confounding factors including age, sex, current smoking status, diabetes, aneurysm morphology, volume, neck size, location of aneurysm, history of treatment for the same aneurysm, type of antiplatelet therapy, and elapsed time at last follow-up. Occlusion status at first follow up and last follow-up, and incidence of in-stent stenosis and ischemic complications during the follow-up period were extracted for comparison. RESULTS: In total, 492 patients with PED were identified, of whom 146 were on statin therapy and 346 were not. After one-to-one nearest neighbor matching, 49 cases in each group were compared. At last follow-up, 79.6%, 10.2%, and 10.2% of cases in the statin therapy group and 67.4%, 16.3%, and 16.3% in the nonstatin group were noted to have Raymond-Roy 1, 2, and 3 occlusions, respectively ( P = .45). No significant difference was observed in immediate procedural thrombosis ( P > .99), long-term in-stent stenosis ( P > .99), ischemic stroke ( P = .62), or retreatment ( P = .49). CONCLUSION: Statin use does not affect occlusion rate or clinical outcomes in patients treated with PED treatment for unruptured intracranial aneurysms.

Reduced recurrence of chronic subdural hematomas treated with open surgery followed by middle meningeal artery embolization compared to open surgery alone: a propensity score-matched analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) is an emerging endovascular treatment technique with proven promising results for chronic subdural hematomas (cSDHs). MMAE as an adjunct to open surgery is being utilized with the goal of preventing the recurrence of cSDH. However, the efficacy of MMAE following surgical evacuation of cSDH has not been clearly demonstrated. The authors sought to compare the outcomes of open surgery followed by MMAE versus open surgery alone. METHODS: Patients who underwent surgical evacuation alone (open surgery-alone group) or MMAE along with open surgery for cSDH (adjunctive MMAE group) were identified at the authors' institution. Two balanced groups were obtained through propensity score matching. Primary outcomes included recurrence risk and reintervention rate. Secondary outcomes included decrease in hematoma size and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at last follow-up. Variables in the two groups were compared by use of the Mann-Whitney U-test, paired-sample t-test, and Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: A total of 345 cases of open surgery alone and 52 cases of open surgery with adjunctive MMAE were identified. After control for subjective confounders, 146 patients treated with open surgery alone and 41 with adjunctive MMAE following open surgery with drain placement were included in the analysis. Before matching, the rebleeding risk and reintervention rate for open surgery trended higher in the open surgery alone than the open surgery plus MMAE group (14.4% vs 7.3%, p = 0.18; and 11.6% vs 4.9%, p = 0.17, respectively). No significant differences were seen in duration of radiographic or clinical follow-ups or decreases in hematoma size and mRS score at last follow-up. After one-to-one nearest neighbor propensity score matching, 26 pairs of cases were compared for outcomes. Rates of recurrence (7.7% vs 30.8%, p = 0.038) and overall reintervention (3.8% vs 23.1%, p = 0.049) after open surgery were found to be significantly lower in the adjunctive MMAE group than the open surgery-alone group. With one-to-many propensity score matching, 76 versus 37 cases were compared for open surgery alone versus adjunctive MMAE following open surgery. Similarly, the adjunctive MMAE group had significantly lower rates of recurrence (5.4% vs 19.7%, p = 0.037) and overall reintervention (2.7% vs 14.5%, p = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS: Adjunctive MMAE following open surgery can lower the recurrence risks and reintervention rates for cSDH.

Surpass Intracranial Aneurysm Embolization System Pivotal Trial to Treat Large or Giant Wide-Neck Aneurysms - SCENT: 3-year outcomes.

BACKGROUND: To report the 3-year safety and effectiveness of the Surpass Streamline flow diverter in the SCENT trial (Surpass Intracranial Aneurysm Embolization System Pivotal Trial to Treat Large or Giant Wide-Neck Aneurysms). METHODS: The Surpass Streamline flow diverter device was evaluated in a multicenter, prospective, single-arm, non-randomized interventional trial including patients with uncoilable or previously treated but failed aneurysms of the intracranial internal carotid artery. 3-year outcomes were tabulated with descriptive statistics and compared with 1-year outcomes. RESULTS: Of 180 patients in the modified intent-to-treat (mITT) cohort, 36-month clinical and angiographic follow-up was available in 134 and 117 cases, respectively. Effectiveness endpoint of complete aneurysm occlusion without clinically significant stenosis or retreatment was met in 71.8% (79/110, 95% CI 62.4% to 80.0%) of cases. Safety composite endpoint was 12.2% (22/180) over the 3-year period, with two major safety events (ipsilateral ischemic strokes) occurring between 12-36 months. Complete aneurysm occlusion was noted in 77.8% (91/117), and 99.1% (116/117) of the patients demonstrated adequate aneurysm occlusion (complete occlusion or neck residual). There were four cases (2.2%) of aneurysm rupture, all occurring within the first month of the index procedure. Target aneurysm retreatment rate was 2.8% (5/180). CONCLUSION: The present findings support the long-term safety and effectiveness of the Surpass Streamline flow diverter device. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01716117.

Prospective study on embolization of intracranial aneurysms with the pipeline device (PREMIER study): 3-year results with the application of a flow diverter specific occlusion classification.

BACKGROUND: The pipeline embolization device (PED; Medtronic) has presented as a safe and efficacious treatment for small- and medium-sized intracranial aneurysms. Independently adjudicated long-term results of the device in treating these lesions are still indeterminate. We present 3-year results, with additional application of a flow diverter specific occlusion scale. METHODS: PREMIER (prospective study on embolization of intracranial aneurysms with pipeline embolization device) is a prospective, single-arm trial. Inclusion criteria were patients with unruptured wide-necked intracranial aneurysms ≤12 mm. Primary effectiveness (complete aneurysm occlusion) and safety (major neurologic event) endpoints were independently monitored and adjudicated. RESULTS: As per the protocol, of 141 patients treated with a PED, 25 (17.7%) required angiographic follow-up after the first year due to incomplete aneurysm occlusion. According to the Core Radiology Laboratory review, three (12%) of these patients progressed to complete occlusion, with an overall rate of complete aneurysm occlusion at 3 years of 83.3% (115/138). Further angiographic evaluation using the modified Cekirge-Saatci classification demonstrated that complete occlusion, neck residual, or aneurysm size reduction occurred in 97.1%. The overall combined safety endpoint at 3 years was 2.8% (4/141), with only one non-debilitating major event occurring after the first year. There was one case of aneurysm recurrence but no cases of delayed rupture in this series. CONCLUSIONS: The PED device presents as a safe and effective modality in treating small- and medium-sized intracranial aneurysms. The application of a flow diverter specific occlusion classification attested the long-term durability with higher rate of successful aneurysm occlusion and no documented aneurysm rupture. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02186561.

Evaluating the concordance of functional MRI-based language lateralization and Wada testing in epilepsy patients: A single-center analysis.

BACKGROUND: For patients with drug-resistant epilepsy, surgery may be effective in controlling their disease. Surgical evaluation may involve localization of the language areas using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) or Wada testing. We evaluated the accuracy of task-based fMRI versus Wada-based language lateralization in a cohort of our epilepsy patients. METHODS: In a single-center, retrospective analysis, we identified patients with medically intractable epilepsy who participated in presurgical language mapping (n = 35) with fMRI and Wada testing. Demographic variables and imaging metrics were obtained. We calculated the laterality index (LI) from task-evoked fMRI activation maps across language areas during auditory and reading tasks to determine lateralization. Possible scores for LI range from -1 (strongly left-hemisphere dominant) to 1 (strongly right-hemisphere dominant). Concordance between fMRI and Wada was estimated using Cohen's Kappa coefficient. Association between the LI scores from the auditory and reading tasks was tested using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. RESULTS: The fMRI-based laterality indices were concordant with results from Wada testing in 91.4% of patients during the reading task (κ = .55) and 96.9% of patients during the auditory task (κ = .79). The mean LIs for the reading and auditory tasks were -0.52 ± 0.43 and -0.68 ± 0.42, respectively. The LI scores for the language and reading tasks were strongly correlated, r(30) = 0.57 (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that fMRI is generally an accurate, low-risk alternative to Wada testing for language lateralization. However, when fMRI indicates atypical language lateralization (e.g., bilateral dominance), patients may benefit from subsequent Wada testing or intraoperative language mapping.

Treatment of large and giant posterior communicating artery aneurysms with the Surpass streamline flow diverter: results from the SCENT trial.

BACKGROUND: The Surpass flow diverter was developed to treat intracranial aneurysms not amenable to standard treatment. Indications for use allow placement in the internal carotid artery to the terminus, including the communicating artery segment. METHODS: The Surpass Intracranial Aneurysm Embolization System Pivotal Trial to Treat Large or Giant Wide Neck Aneurysms (SCENT) trial is an international, multicenter, prospective, non-randomized trial comparing the outcomes of Surpass flow diverter treatment with historic control designed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Surpass for the treatment of wide neck (≥4 mm) large or giant intracranial aneurysms ≥10 mm. The primary effectiveness endpoint is the percentage of subjects with 100% aneurysm occlusion without significant stenosis of the parent artery and without retreatment of the target aneurysm at 12 months. The primary safety endpoint is the percentage of subjects experiencing neurologic death or major ipsilateral stroke at 12 months. We report the effectiveness and safety of flow diversion in the subgroup of posterior communicating artery (PComA) aneurysms. RESULTS: Of the 180 patients treated, 38 harbored a PComA aneurysm. Mean aneurysm size was 12.2 mm and mean neck width was 4.8 mm. The mean number of Surpass devices used was 1.1 per procedure, with 94.7% of aneurysms treated with one flow diverter. The 12 month primary effectiveness rate was 73.7% (28/38). At 36 months, 68.4% (26/38) of aneurysms remained completely occluded. The 12 month major ipsilateral stroke or neurological death rate was 10.5%. No patients with PComA occlusion after flow diverter placement (54.5%) had clinical sequelae. CONCLUSIONS: SCENT demonstrated acceptable 12 month effectiveness of flow diversion in PComA aneurysms. Despite associated PComA occlusions in many cases, arterial occlusions were clinically silent. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov. Unique identifier: NCT01716117.