Tyrosine-protein kinase SYK-related gene signature in baseline immune cells associated with adjuvant immunotherapy-induced immune-related adverse events in melanoma.

PURPOSE: Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) shows benefits in adjuvant (AT) and neoadjuvant (NAT) melanoma treatments. However, ICI frequently induces severe immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Unlike metastatic disease, where irAEs are a clinical trade-off for treatment that improves survival, the toxicity burden from ICI in AT is a substantial clinical problem urging for irAE-predictive biomarkers. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We assessed post-surgical, pre-ICI treatment peripheral CD4+ and CD8+ T cells from clinical trial patients (CheckMate-915) treated with AT nivolumab (NIVO, n=130) or ipilimumab/nivolumab (COMBO, n=82). Performing RNA-seq differential gene expression analysis we tested baseline differences associated with severe (grade 3-5) irAEs and constructed an irAE-predictive model using LASSO-regularized logistic regression. RESULTS: The analysis of predicted protein-protein interactions among differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in peripheral CD4+ cells revealed significant enrichment of the spleen tyrosine kinase (SYK) pathway, associated with severe irAEs in COMBO-treated patients. This gene-expression signature predicted severe-irAE COMBO patients (chi-square p-value=0.001) with 73% accuracy and was independent of disease recurrence (p=0.79). The irAE-predictive model incorporating this gene-expression signature demonstrated 82% accuracy (chi-square p-value=8.91E-06). CONCLUSIONS: We identified baseline gene-expression differences in key immune pathways of peripheral blood T cells from COMBO-treated patients with grade 3-5 irAEs, and defined a SYK-related gene signature correctly identifying ~60% of COMBO-treated patients with grade 3-5 irAE. This finding aligns with our previous work linking anti-CTLA-4 irAEs with a germline variant associated with high SYK expression. This gene signature may serve as a baseline biomarker of severe grade 3-5 irAE risk, which is especially important in AT.

Combination anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 therapy generates waves of clonal responses that include progenitor-exhausted CD8+ T cells.

Combination checkpoint blockade with anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 antibodies has shown promising efficacy in melanoma. However, the underlying mechanism in humans remains unclear. Here, we perform paired single-cell RNA and T cell receptor (TCR) sequencing across time in 36 patients with stage IV melanoma treated with anti-PD-1, anti-CTLA-4, or combination therapy. We develop the algorithm Cyclone to track temporal clonal dynamics and underlying cell states. Checkpoint blockade induces waves of clonal T cell responses that peak at distinct time points. Combination therapy results in greater magnitude of clonal responses at 6 and 9 weeks compared to single-agent therapies, including melanoma-specific CD8+ T cells and exhausted CD8+ T cell (TEX) clones. Focused analyses of TEX identify that anti-CTLA-4 induces robust expansion and proliferation of progenitor TEX, which synergizes with anti-PD-1 to reinvigorate TEX during combination therapy. These next generation immune profiling approaches can guide the selection of drugs, schedule, and dosing for novel combination strategies.

Development, Characterization, and Radiation Dosimetry Studies of 18F-BMS-986229, a 18F-Labeled PD-L1 Macrocyclic Peptide PET Tracer.

PURPOSE: In cancer immunotherapy, the blockade of the interaction between programmed death-1 and its ligand (PD-1:PD-L1) has proven to be one of the most promising strategies. However, as mechanisms of resistance to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibition include variability in tumor cell PD-L1 expression in addition to standard tumor biopsy PD-L1 immunohistochemistry (IHC), a comprehensive and quantitative approach for measuring PD-L1 expression is required. Herein, we report the development and characterization of an 18F-PD-L1-binding macrocyclic peptide as a PET tracer for the comprehensive evaluation of tumor PD-L1 expression in cancer patients. PROCEDURES: 18F-BMS-986229 was characterized for PD-L1 expression assessment by autoradiography or PET imaging. 18F-BMS-986229 was utilized to evaluate tumor PD-L1 target engagement in competition with a macrocyclic peptide inhibitor of PD-L1 (BMS-986189) over a range of doses using PET imaging. A whole-body radiation dosimetry study of 18F-BMS-986229 in healthy non-human primates (NHPs) was performed. RESULTS: In vitro autoradiography showed an 8:1 binding ratio in L2987(PD-L1 +) vs. HT-29 (PD-L1-) tumors, more than 90% of which could be blocked with 1 nM of BMS-986189. Ex vivo autoradiography showed that 18F-BMS-986229 detection was penetrant over a series of sections spanning the entire L2987 tumor. In vivo PET imaging in mice demonstrated a 5:1 tracer uptake ratio (at 90-100 min after tracer administration) in L2987 vs. HT-29 tumors and demonstrated 83%-93% specific binding of BMS-986189 within those dose ranges. In a healthy NHP dosimetry study, the resultant whole-body effective dose was 0.025 mSv/MBq. CONCLUSION: 18F-BMS-986229 has been preclinically characterized and exhibits high target specificity, low background uptake, and a short blood half-life supportive of same day imaging in the clinic. As the PET tracer, 18F-BMS-986229 shows promise in the quantification of PD-L1 expression, and its use in monitoring longitudinal changes in patients may provide insights into PD-1:PD-L1 immuno-therapy treatment outcomes.

Adjuvant Therapy of Nivolumab Combined With Ipilimumab Versus Nivolumab Alone in Patients With Resected Stage IIIB-D or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 915).

PURPOSE: Ipilimumab and nivolumab have each shown treatment benefit for high-risk resected melanoma. The phase III CheckMate 915 trial evaluated adjuvant nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus nivolumab alone in patients with resected stage IIIB-D or IV melanoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, phase III trial, 1,833 patients received nivolumab 240 mg once every 2 weeks plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg once every 6 weeks (916 patients) or nivolumab 480 mg once every 4 weeks (917 patients) for ≤ 1 year. After random assignment, patients were stratified by tumor programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and stage. Dual primary end points were recurrence-free survival (RFS) in randomly assigned patients and in the tumor PD-L1 expression-level < 1% subgroup. RESULTS: At a minimum follow-up of approximately 23.7 months, there was no significant difference between treatment groups for RFS in the all-randomly assigned patient population (hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.77 to 1.09; P = .269) or in patients with PD-L1 expression < 1% (hazard ratio, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.73 to 1.14). In all patients, 24-month RFS rates were 64.6% (combination) and 63.2% (nivolumab). Treatment-related grade 3 or 4 adverse events were reported in 32.6% of patients in the combination group and 12.8% in the nivolumab group. Treatment-related deaths were reported in 0.4% of patients in the combination group and in no nivolumab-treated patients. CONCLUSION: Nivolumab 240 mg once every 2 weeks plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg once every 6 weeks did not improve RFS versus nivolumab 480 mg once every 4 weeks in patients with stage IIIB-D or stage IV melanoma. Nivolumab showed efficacy consistent with previous adjuvant studies in a population resembling current practice using American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition, reaffirming nivolumab as a standard of care for melanoma adjuvant treatment.

A multi-omic single cell sequencing approach to develop a CD8 T cell specific gene signature for anti-PD1 response in solid tumors.

Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has led to durable clinical responses in multiple cancer types. However, biomarkers that identify which patients are most likely to respond to ICB are not well defined. Many putative biomarkers developed from a small number of samples often fail to maintain their predictive status in larger validation cohorts. We show across multiple human malignancies and syngeneic murine tumor models that neither pretreatment T cell receptor (TCR) clonality nor changes in clonality after ICB correlate with response. Dissection of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes pre- and post-ICB by paired single-cell RNA sequencing and single-cell TCR sequencing reveals conserved and distinct transcriptomic features in expanded TCR clonotypes between anti-PD1 responder and nonresponder murine tumor models. Overall, our results indicate a productive anti-tumor response is agnostic of TCR clonal expansion. Further, we used single-cell transcriptomics to develop a CD8+ T cell specific gene signature for a productive anti-tumor response and show the response signature to be associated with overall survival (OS) on nivolumab monotherapy in CheckMate-067, a phase 3 clinical trial in metastatic melanoma. These results highlight the value of leveraging single-cell assays to dissect heterogeneous tumor and immune subsets and define cell-type specific transcriptomic biomarkers of ICB response.

Frontline Science: OX40 agonistic antibody reverses immune suppression and improves survival in sepsis.

A defining feature of protracted sepsis is development of immunosuppression that is thought to be a major driving force in the morbidity and mortality associated with the syndrome. The immunosuppression that occurs in sepsis is characterized by profound apoptosis-induced depletion of CD4 and CD8 T cells and severely impaired T cell function. OX40, a member of the TNF receptor superfamily, is a positive co-stimulatory molecule expressed on activated T cells. When engaged by OX40 ligand, OX40 stimulates T cell proliferation and shifts the cellular immune phenotype toward TH1 with increased production of cytokines that are essential for control of invading pathogens. The purpose of the present study was to determine if administration of agonistic Ab to OX40 could reverse sepsis-induced immunosuppression, restore T cell function, and improve survival in a clinically relevant animal model of sepsis. The present study demonstrates that OX40 agonistic Ab reversed sepsis-induced impairment of T cell function, increased T cell IFN-γ production, increased the number of immune effector cells, and improved survival in the mouse cecal ligation and puncture model of sepsis. Importantly, OX40 agonistic Ab was not only effective in murine sepsis but also improved T effector cell function in PBMCs from patients with sepsis. The present results provide support for the use of immune adjuvants that target T cell depletion and T cell dysfunction in the therapy of sepsis-induced immunosuppression. In addition to the checkpoint inhibitors anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1, OX40 agonistic Ab may be a new therapeutic approach to the treatment of this highly lethal disorder.

A novel small molecule inhibitor of hepatitis C virus entry.

Small molecule inhibitors of hepatitis C virus (HCV) are being developed to complement or replace treatments with pegylated interferons and ribavirin, which have poor response rates and significant side effects. Resistance to these inhibitors emerges rapidly in the clinic, suggesting that successful therapy will involve combination therapy with multiple inhibitors of different targets. The entry process of HCV into hepatocytes represents another series of potential targets for therapeutic intervention, involving viral structural proteins that have not been extensively explored due to experimental limitations. To discover HCV entry inhibitors, we utilized HCV pseudoparticles (HCVpp) incorporating E1-E2 envelope proteins from a genotype 1b clinical isolate. Screening of a small molecule library identified a potent HCV-specific triazine inhibitor, EI-1. A series of HCVpp with E1-E2 sequences from various HCV isolates was used to show activity against all genotype 1a and 1b HCVpp tested, with median EC50 values of 0.134 and 0.027 µM, respectively. Time-of-addition experiments demonstrated a block in HCVpp entry, downstream of initial attachment to the cell surface, and prior to or concomitant with bafilomycin inhibition of endosomal acidification. EI-1 was equally active against cell-culture adapted HCV (HCVcc), blocking both cell-free entry and cell-to-cell transmission of virus. HCVcc with high-level resistance to EI-1 was selected by sequential passage in the presence of inhibitor, and resistance was shown to be conferred by changes to residue 719 in the carboxy-terminal transmembrane anchor region of E2, implicating this envelope protein in EI-1 susceptibility. Combinations of EI-1 with interferon, or inhibitors of NS3 or NS5A, resulted in additive to synergistic activity. These results suggest that inhibitors of HCV entry could be added to replication inhibitors and interferons already in development.

Mechanistic characterization and molecular modeling of hepatitis B virus polymerase resistance to entecavir.

BACKGROUND: Entecavir (ETV) is a deoxyguanosine analog competitive inhibitor of hepatitis B virus (HBV) polymerase that exhibits delayed chain termination of HBV DNA. A high barrier to entecavir-resistance (ETVr) is observed clinically, likely due to its potency and a requirement for multiple resistance changes to overcome suppression. Changes in the HBV polymerase reverse-transcriptase (RT) domain involve lamivudine-resistance (LVDr) substitutions in the conserved YMDD motif (M204V/I +/- L180M), plus an additional ETV-specific change at residues T184, S202 or M250. These substitutions surround the putative dNTP binding site or primer grip regions of the HBV RT. METHODS/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: To determine the mechanistic basis for ETVr, wildtype, lamivudine-resistant (M204V, L180M) and ETVr HBVs were studied using in vitro RT enzyme and cell culture assays, as well as molecular modeling. Resistance substitutions significantly reduced ETV incorporation and chain termination in HBV DNA and increased the ETV-TP inhibition constant (K(i)) for HBV RT. Resistant HBVs exhibited impaired replication in culture and reduced enzyme activity (k(cat)) in vitro. Molecular modeling of the HBV RT suggested that ETVr residue T184 was adjacent to and stabilized S202 within the LVDr YMDD loop. ETVr arose through steric changes at T184 or S202 or by disruption of hydrogen-bonding between the two, both of which repositioned the loop and reduced the ETV-triphosphate (ETV-TP) binding pocket. In contrast to T184 and S202 changes, ETVr at primer grip residue M250 was observed during RNA-directed DNA synthesis only. Experimentally, M250 changes also impacted the dNTP-binding site. Modeling suggested a novel mechanism for M250 resistance, whereby repositioning of the primer-template component of the dNTP-binding site shifted the ETV-TP binding pocket. No structural data are available to confirm the HBV RT modeling, however, results were consistent with phenotypic analysis of comprehensive substitutions of each ETVr position. CONCLUSIONS: Altogether, ETVr occurred through exclusion of ETV-TP from the dNTP-binding site, through different, novel mechanisms that involved lamivudine-resistance, ETV-specific substitutions, and the primer-template.

Comprehensive evaluation of hepatitis B virus reverse transcriptase substitutions associated with entecavir resistance.

UNLABELLED: Virologic resistance emerging during entecavir (ETV) therapy for hepatitis B virus (HBV) requires three substitutions in the viral reverse transcriptase (RT), signifying a high barrier to resistance. Two of these substitutions are associated with lamivudine resistance (LVDr) in the tyrosine-methionine-aspartate-aspartate (YMDD) motif (rtM204V and rtL180M), whereas the other occurs at one or more positions specifically associated with ETV resistance (ETVr): rtT184, rtS202, or rtM250. Although a variety of substitutions at these primary ETVr positions arise during ETV therapy, only a subset give rise to clinical virologic breakthrough. To determine the phenotypic impact of observed clinical and potential new ETVr substitutions, a comprehensive panel of clones containing every possible amino acid at the three primary ETVr positions in LVDr HBV was constructed and analyzed in vitro. A range of replication capacities was observed for the panel, but none of the mutations rescued replication of the LVDr mutant to the wild-type level. More clones with residue rtS202 substitutions were severely impaired than those at rtT184 or rtM250. A wide variety of ETV susceptibilities was observed, ranging from approximately eight-fold (no increase over the LVDr parent) to greater than 400-fold over the wild-type. A correlation was identified between clinically observed substitutions and those displaying higher in vitro replication and resistance, especially those from virologic breakthrough patients. CONCLUSION: The high number of tolerated and resistant ETVr substitutions is consistent with models predicting that the mechanism for ETVr is through enhancement of LVDr changes in the RT deoxyribonucleotide triphosphate (dNTP)-binding pocket.

Entecavir for treatment of hepatitis B virus displays no in vitro mitochondrial toxicity or DNA polymerase gamma inhibition.

Therapy with nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) can be associated with mitochondrial toxicity. In vitro studies have been used to predict the predisposition for and characterize the mechanisms causing mitochondrial toxicity. Entecavir (ETV) is an approved deoxyguanosine nucleoside for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection that exhibits potent activity against viral reverse transcriptase. We assessed the potential for mitochondrial toxicity of ETV in long-term cultures of HepG2 hepatoma cells by measuring mitochondrial function (through lactate secretion), levels of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), and levels of mitochondrial proteins COX II and COX IV. Furthermore, we tested the activity of ETV-triphosphate (ETV-TP) against mitochondrial DNA polymerase gamma (Pol gamma) in vitro. ETV concentrations as high as 100 times the maximal clinical exposure (C(max)) did not affect cell proliferation, levels of lactate, mitochondrial DNA, or mitochondrial proteins throughout the 15-day culture. The lack of mitochondrial toxicity was consistent with the finding that ETV-TP was not recognized by mitochondrial DNA Pol gamma and failed to be incorporated into DNA or inhibit the polymerase assay at the highest levels tested, 300 microM. Combinations of ETV with each of the other HBV NRTI antivirals, adefovir, tenofovir, and lamivudine at 10 times their respective C(max) levels also failed to result in cellular or mitochondrial toxicity. In summary, cell culture and enzymatic studies yielded no evidence that would predict mitochondrial toxicity of ETV at exposure levels in excess of those expected to be achieved clinically.

Inhibition of hepatitis B virus polymerase by entecavir.

Entecavir (ETV; Baraclude) is a novel deoxyguanosine analog with activity against hepatitis B virus (HBV). ETV differs from the other nucleoside/tide reverse transcriptase inhibitors approved for HBV therapy, lamivudine (LVD) and adefovir (ADV), in several ways: ETV is >100-fold more potent against HBV in culture and, at concentrations below 1 microM, displays no significant activity against human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Additionally, while LVD and ADV are obligate DNA chain terminators, ETV halts HBV DNA elongation after incorporating a few additional bases. Three-dimensional homology models of the catalytic center of the HBV reverse transcriptase (RT)-DNA-deoxynucleoside triphosphate (dNTP) complex, based on the HIV RT-DNA structure, were used with in vitro enzyme kinetic studies to examine the mechanism of action of ETV against HBV RT. A novel hydrophobic pocket in the rear of the RT dNTP binding site that accommodates the exocyclic alkene moiety of ETV was predicted, establishing a basis for the superior potency observed experimentally. HBV DNA chain termination by ETV was accomplished through disfavored energy requirements as well as steric constraints during subsequent nucleotide addition. Validation of the model was accomplished through modeling of LVD resistance substitutions, which caused an eightfold decrease in ETV susceptibility and were predicted to reduce, but not eliminate, the ETV-binding pocket, in agreement with experimental observations. ADV resistance changes did not affect the ETV docking model, also agreeing with experimental results. Overall, these studies explain the potency, mechanism, and cross-resistance profile of ETV against HBV and account for the successful treatment of naive and LVD- or ADV-experienced chronic HBV patients.