Cumulative pemetrexed dose increases the risk of nephrotoxicity.

INTRODUCTION: Pemetrexed is a pharmacotherapeutic cornerstone in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. As it is primarily eliminated by renal excretion, adequate renal function is essential to prevent toxic exposure. There is growing evidence for the nephrotoxic potential of pemetrexed, which even becomes a greater issue now combined immuno-chemotherapy prolongs survival. Therefore, the aim of this study was to describe the incidence of nephrotoxicity and related treatment consequences during pemetrexed-based treatment. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in the Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch, the Netherlands. All patients that received at least 1 cycle of pemetrexed based therapy were included in the dataset. The primary outcome was defined as a ≥25 % reduction in eGFR. Additionally, the treatment consequences of decreased renal function were assessed. Logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for nephrotoxicity during treatment with pemetrexed. RESULTS: Of the 359 patients included in this analysis, 21 % patients had a clinically relevant decline in renal function after treatment and 8.1 % of patients discontinued treatment due to nephrotoxicity. Cumulative dose (≥10 cycles of pemetrexed based therapy) was identified as a risk factor for the primary outcome measure (adjusted OR 5.66 (CI 1.73-18.54)). CONCLUSION: This study shows that patients on pemetrexed-based treatment are at risk of developing renal impairment. Risk significantly increases with prolonged treatment. Renal impairment is expected to become an even greater issue now that pemetrexed-based immuno-chemotherapy results in longer survival and thus longer treatment duration.

Pharmacokinetically-guided dosing of pemetrexed in a patient with renal impairment and a patient requiring hemodialysis.

OBJECTIVES: Pemetrexed is indicated for non-small cell lung cancer and mesothelioma. Dosing is based on body surface are (BSA), while renal function is the only determinant for exposure and thus toxicity. BSA-based dosing introduces large variability in exposure and may lead to (hemato)toxicity in patients with impaired renal function. Therefore, pemetrexed is contraindicated in renal impairment. The presented cases provide proof-of-concept for pharmacokinetically-guided dosing of pemetrexed in a haemodialysis patient and a patient with mild renal impairment. METHODS: The pharmacokinetic target was an area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of 123-205 mg·h/L. Using a previously developed population pharmacokinetic model, individual pharmacokinetics were estimated. RESULTS: Both patients had an exposure above target after the initial dose, but a proportional dose reduction resulted in a therapeutic exposure in both patients (185 and 166 mg·h/L, respectively), that was well-tolerated. Interestingly, a threefold increase in systemic clearance of pemetrexed was observed during hemodialysis (from 1.00 L/h to 3.01 L/h), which approximates the population clearance of pemetrexed. CONCLUSION: Altogether, we showed that pharmacokinetically-guided dosing of pemetrexed may be a feasible strategy for patients with lung cancer and renal impairment.

A pharmacological rationale for improved everolimus dosing in oncology and transplant patients.

AIMS: Everolimus is a drug from the class of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors used for both immunosuppressant and oncological indications. We postulate that there is room for improvement of dosing, as the optimal immunosuppressive dose in calcineurin-free regimens is unknown and since the once daily dosing regimen for oncological indications is often associated with treatment-limiting toxicity. METHODS: We developed a mechanistic population pharmacokinetic model for everolimus in cancer and transplant patients and explored alternative dosing regimens. RESULTS: We found that formulation did not influence bioavailability and that use of >20 mg prednisolone daily increased everolimus clearance. In transplant patients, the approved dose of 0.75-1 mg twice daily (BID) results in subtherapeutic trough levels (<6 µg l-1 ) and that a higher starting dose of 2.25-3 mg BID is required. CONCLUSION: For oncological indications, our results encourage the investigation of dosing everolimus 3.75 mg BID in terms of superiority in safety and noninferiority in efficacy.

Towards better dose individualisation: metabolic phenotyping to predict cabazitaxel pharmacokinetics in men with prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Cabazitaxel is approved for treatment of castration-resistant metastatic prostate cancer. The current dosing strategy of cabazitaxel is based on body surface area (BSA). Body surface area is known as a poor predictor for total systemic exposure to drugs, since it does not take into account variability in activity of metabolising enzymes, necessary for clearance of drugs. As exposure to cabazitaxel is related to treatment response, it is essential to develop a better individualised dosing strategy. METHODS: Ten patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, who received cabazitaxel dosed on BSA as a part of routine palliative care, were enrolled in this study. Midazolam was administered as phenotyping probe for cytochrome P450 isoenzyme 3A (CYP3A). The relationship between midazolam and cabazitaxel clearance was investigated using non-linear mixed effects modelling. RESULTS: The clearance of Midazolam highly correlated with cabazitaxel clearance (R=0.74). Midazolam clearance significantly (P<0.004) explained the majority (∼60%) of the inter-individual variability in cabazitaxel clearance in the studied population. CONCLUSIONS: Metabolic phenotyping of CYP3A using midazolam is a promising strategy to individualise cabazitaxel dosing. Before clinical application, a randomised study is warranted.

Drug composition matters: the influence of carrier concentration on the radiochemical purity, hydroxyapatite affinity and in-vivo bone accumulation of the therapeutic radiopharmaceutical 188Rhenium-HEDP.

INTRODUCTION: (188)Rhenium-HEDP is an effective bone-targeting therapeutic radiopharmaceutical, for treatment of osteoblastic bone metastases. It is known that the presence of carrier (non-radioactive rhenium as ammonium perrhenate) in the reaction mixture during labeling is a prerequisite for adequate bone affinity, but little is known about the optimal carrier concentration. METHODS: We investigated the influence of carrier concentration in the formulation on the radiochemical purity, in-vitro hydroxyapatite affinity and the in-vivo bone accumulation of (188)Rhenium-HEDP in mice. RESULTS: The carrier concentration influenced hydroxyapatite binding in-vitro as well as bone accumulation in-vivo. Variation in hydroxyapatite binding with various carrier concentrations seemed to be mainly driven by variation in radiochemical purity. The in-vivo bone accumulation appeared to be more complex: satisfactory radiochemical purity and hydroxyapatite affinity did not necessarily predict acceptable bio-distribution of (188)Rhenium-HEDP. CONCLUSIONS: For development of new bisphosphonate-based radiopharmaceuticals for clinical use, human administration should not be performed without previous animal bio-distribution experiments. Furthermore, our clinical formulation of (188)Rhenium-HEDP, containing 10 µmol carrier, showed excellent bone accumulation that was comparable to other bisphosphonate-based radiopharmaceuticals, with no apparent uptake in other organs. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Radiochemical purity and in-vitro hydroxyapatite binding are not necessarily predictive of bone accumulation of (188)Rhenium-HEDP in-vivo. IMPLICATIONS FOR PATIENT CARE: The formulation for (188)Rhenium-HEDP as developed by us for clinical use exhibits excellent bone uptake and variation in carrier concentration during preparation of this radiopharmaceutical should be avoided.

Fatal interstitial lung disease associated with high erlotinib and metabolite levels. A case report and a review of the literature.

INTRODUCTION: Erlotinib is an agent in the class of oral epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Although this class of agents is considered to be relatively safe, the most serious, but rare, adverse reaction is drug-associated interstitial lung disease (ILD). This potentially fatal adverse reaction has been often described with gefitinib, but has been less well described for erlotinib. We here describe a case report of fatal interstitial lung disease in a Caucasian man associated with erlotinib and high erlotinib and metabolite plasma levels and discuss it in the context of all documented cases of erlotinib associated ILD. METHODS: Our case was described and for the literature review a Pubmed and Google Scholar search was conducted for cases of erlotinib associated ILD. The retrieved publications were screened for relevant literature. RESULTS: Besides our case, a total of 19 cases of erlotinib-associated ILD were found. Eleven out 19 cases had a fatal outcome and in only one case erlotinib plasma concentrations were measured and found to be high. CONCLUSION: Erlotinib-associated ILD is a rare, serious and often fatal adverse reaction. Most likely, the cause for erlotinib-associated ILD is multifactorial and high drug levels may be present in patients without serious adverse reactions. However, considering the pharmacology of EGFR inhibitors, high drug and metabolite levels may play a role and future studies are warranted to identify risk factors and to investigate the role of elevated levels of erlotinib and its metabolites in the development of pulmonary toxicity.