Efficacy of intentional undersized thoracic endovascular repair for Stanford type B aortic dissection.

OBJECTIVE: Thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair (TEVAR) is widely used for the treatment of aortic dissection. Endograft oversizing is a risk factor for stent graft-induced new entry tears and retrograde type A aortic dissection. However, there is no clear consensus on the optimal graft size selection for Stanford type B acute or subacute aortic dissection (TBAD). Herein, we examined the safety and efficacy of TEVAR using an intentionally undersized endograft to treat TBAD. METHODS: This retrospective chart review study included 82 patients who underwent TEVAR for acute or subacute Stanford TBAD between 2015 and 2022. We measured the true lumen diameter just distal to the subclavian artery and opted for a stent graft of the same diameter. In instances where deformation resulting from false lumen pressure displacement was pronounced, we measured the diameter at the site just proximal to the subclavian artery. Patients' characteristics, procedural, in-hospital, and follow-up data, and aortic remodeling were analyzed. The aortic diameter was analyzed using one-way analysis of variance followed by Dunnett's test. Survival and freedom from reintervention were estimated using Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS: The follow-up rate was 98.4%. The mean age was 58.3 ± 12.3 years, and 76 were men (92.7%). The mean diameters of the stent graft and native proximal landing zone were 30.9 ± 3.2 mm and 30.8 ± 3.0 mm, respectively. The oversize rate of the stent graft in relation to the native proximal aortic diameter was 0.3% ± 4.7%. In-hospital mortality was observed in one patient, retrograde type A aortic dissection in one patient, distal stent graft-induced new entry tear in zero patients, and type 1a endoleak in 22 patients (26.8%). Type 1a endoleaks, characterized by antegrade false lumen blood flow originating from the primary entry, in 12 patients spontaneously disappeared within 1 year of follow-up. According to aortic remodeling, 59 patients (86.8%) achieved complete aortic remodeling at the aortic arch level and 51 (75.0%) at the eighth thoracic vertebral level. The diameters of the aortic arch and descending aorta were significantly reduced compared with the postoperative measurements (P <.001). Survival rates were 97.5% and 93.6% at 1 and 3 years, respectively. Freedom from reintervention was 84.7% and 84.7% at 1 and 3 years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Intentionally undersized TEVAR was safe and achieved acceptable aortic remodeling despite a high rate of type 1a endoleaks. A type 1a endoleak was acceptable as it primarily diminished during the mid-term follow-up.

Delayed migration due to shortening of the lower part of AFX endograft's main body in angled fusiform abdominal aortic aneurysm.

We encountered two fusiform abdominal aortic aneurysm cases with delayed AFX endograft (Endologix Inc) migration >4 years after placement. These cases showed shortening and slight angulation of the main body in the anteroposterior direction. We speculate that the potential mechanism relates to the AFX portion that is easily shortened at the bifurcation of its stent structure. This portion might contribute to delayed migration after slight angulation of the main body. Preoperative three-dimensional computed tomography should be performed from the anteroposterior and lateral views. Although the AFX is useful for narrow bifurcations, one should consider the patient's anatomy before deciding to use an AFX endograft.

[Transient Left Ventricular Dysfunction after Giant Coronary Aneurysm Resection and Repair of Coronary Arteriovenous Fistula with Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting:Report of a Case].

Coronary artery aneurysm with coronary arteriovenous fistula is a relatively rare clinical setting. We report a surgical case of a 69-year-old male with a giant coronary artery aneurysm, finding coronary arteriovenous fistula on computed tomography (CT). We performed complete aneurysm excision and coronary artery bypass grafting with the left internal thoracic artery to the posterolateral branch. The fistula was located between the giant aneurysm on the circumflex artery and the coronary vein close to the coronary sinus, closed with aneurysm sac. The postoperative CT found no residual aneurysm and fistula. However, the great cardiac vein was thrombosed, and the impeded venous flow by the thrombus seemed to reduce the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Four months after the operation, the LVEF improved to the preoperative level.

[Splenic Injury during Replacement of the Thoracoabdominal Aorta].

Extraperitoneal approach is commonly employed for thoracoabdominal aortic repair via Stoney incision. It is supposedly rare to encounter abdominal visceral bleeding during that procedure. However, the spleen may spontaneously adhere to the adjacent peritoneum, which could induce incidental injury to the spleen by its anterior mobilization during extraperitoneal approach. Unless we bare its potential risk in mind, bleeding from the spleen may be overlooked, which results in hemodynamic deterioration. We have experienced 3 cases of splenic injury that necessitated hemostatic maneuvers for bleeding during and just after the thoracoabdominal aortic repair.

Two Cases of Endovascular Repair with the Stent Graft for Retrograde Type A Acute Aortic Dissection with Complications.

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is used to treat retrograde type A acute aortic dissection (RTAAD). In case 1, a 52-year-old man, who was conservatively managed, reported worsening back pain. Emergency TEVAR was performed 7 days after onset. After deploying two GORE Conformable TAG (CTAG) in the descending aorta, his symptoms disappeared. In case 2, a 52-year-old man with progressive worsening resistant hypertension, renal dysfunction, and respiratory failure despite maximal medical therapy underwent TEVAR 8 days after onset. A CTAG was deployed from the left subclavian artery under rapid pacing, and two Zenith Dissection stents were placed, which resolved complications. In both cases, after 6 months, computed tomography (CT) scan showed complete resorption of the false lumen in the ascending aorta. TEVAR for RTAAD with complete thrombosis of false lumen in the ascending aorta can be an alternative to surgery when the primary tear is located in descending aorta.

[Surgical Embolectomy for Acute Massive Pulmonary Thromboembolism Requiring Percutaneous Cardiopulmonary Support after Thoracoabdominal Aorta Replacement].

A 48-year-old man was admitted to our hospital and underwent thoracoabdominal aorta replacement. Eight days postoperatively, he developed severe dyspnea and transient drop in blood pressure suddenly following walk rehabilitation. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography showed thrombi in the bilateral main pulmonary artery. Respiratory failure and unstable hemodynamics developed, which required percutaneous cardiopulmonary support (PCPS). Because catheter embolectomy and thrombolytic therapy via pulmonary artery catheter were not effective, surgical thrombectomy was performed. PCPS was successfully removed on the following day. The patient was extubated on postoperative day 10 and discharged without complications on day 46 following rehabilitation. It is important to save a critically ill patient with acute pulmonary embolism requiring PCPS, and surgical treatment should be performed without delay in such patients.