Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Mol Ther ; 25(12): 2620-2634, 2017 Dec 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28967558

RESUMO

Oncolytic virotherapy may be a means of improving the dismal prognosis of malignant brain tumors. The rat H-1 parvovirus (H-1PV) suppresses tumors in preclinical glioma models, through both direct oncolysis and stimulation of anticancer immune responses. This was the basis of ParvOryx01, the first phase I/IIa clinical trial of an oncolytic parvovirus in recurrent glioblastoma patients. H-1PV (escalating dose) was administered via intratumoral or intravenous injection. Tumors were resected 9 days after treatment, and virus was re-administered around the resection cavity. Primary endpoints were safety and tolerability, virus distribution, and maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Progression-free and overall survival and levels of viral and immunological markers in the tumor and peripheral blood were also investigated. H-1PV treatment was safe and well tolerated, and no MTD was reached. The virus could cross the blood-brain/tumor barrier and spread widely through the tumor. It showed favorable pharmacokinetics, induced antibody formation in a dose-dependent manner, and triggered specific T cell responses. Markers of virus replication, microglia/macrophage activation, and cytotoxic T cell infiltration were detected in infected tumors, suggesting that H-1PV may trigger an immunogenic stimulus. Median survival was extended in comparison with recent meta-analyses. Altogether, ParvOryx01 results provide an impetus for further H-1PV clinical development.


Assuntos
Terapia Genética , Vetores Genéticos/genética , Glioblastoma/genética , Glioblastoma/terapia , Parvovirus H-1/genética , Terapia Viral Oncolítica , Vírus Oncolíticos/genética , Idoso , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Expressão Gênica , Terapia Genética/efeitos adversos , Terapia Genética/métodos , Vetores Genéticos/administração & dosagem , Vetores Genéticos/imunologia , Glioblastoma/mortalidade , Glioblastoma/patologia , Humanos , Linfócitos do Interstício Tumoral/imunologia , Linfócitos do Interstício Tumoral/metabolismo , Linfócitos do Interstício Tumoral/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Terapia de Alvo Molecular , Terapia Viral Oncolítica/efeitos adversos , Terapia Viral Oncolítica/métodos , Radioterapia , Linfócitos T/imunologia , Linfócitos T/metabolismo , Linfócitos T/patologia , Transgenes , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
PLoS One ; 10(5): e0127070, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26011531

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: An extensive retrospective study spanning several seasons was undertaken to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the BD rapid influenza diagnostic test (RIDT) in comparison with the RT-PCR assay. METHODS: A total of 2,179 respiratory samples were tested in parallel by in-house RT-PCR and the RIDT. During the 2003-2004, 2006-2007, 2007-2008, and 2008-2009 (n=1671) seasons, the BD Directigen Flu A+B test was used, and during the 2010-2011, 2011-2012 and 2012-2013 (n=508) seasons, the BD Directigen EZ Flu A+B test b was used. RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV for the BD Directigen Flu A+B test calculated for types A and B together were 39%, 99%, 98%, and 56%, respectively. For the BD Directigen EZ Flu A+B test, these values were 47%, 100%, 100%, 55%, respectively. The sensitivity of the BD Directigen Flu A+B test did not differ significantly from season to season or between types A (44%) and B (37%). The sensitivity of the BD Directigen EZ Flu A+B test calculated for type A only was 59%, which was considerably higher than the sensitivity of this test for type B (23%). The sensitivity of the RIDT was approximately 40-50% in children and teenagers, but it was only 18.% in adults aged 20 years and older. The specificity of both RIDTs was very high (>99%) during all seasons. CONCLUSIONS: Due to their rapid turnaround time, RIDTs can help guide decisions about the clinical management of influenza. Because of the high specificity, a positive result can be interpreted as a true positive, and antiviral therapy as well as appropriate measures to prevent the transmission of influenza can be initiated. The best sensitivity of the RIDT is achieved in children. However, even in this group, the RIDT will only recognize influenza infection in approximately half of the cases, and influenza should still be considered in patients with negative results; negative RIDT results must be confirmed by PCR.


Assuntos
Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina/métodos , Influenza Humana/diagnóstico , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Pacientes Ambulatoriais , Estações do Ano , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Animais , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Cães , Alemanha/epidemiologia , Células Hep G2 , Humanos , Lactente , Células Madin Darby de Rim Canino , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase em Tempo Real , Padrões de Referência , Adulto Jovem
3.
J Virol Methods ; 178(1-2): 124-8, 2011 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21939689

RESUMO

A plaque reduction neutralisation test (PRNT) is still regarded as the gold standard for the investigation of anti-measles immunity. In this study, an alternative simplified automatable focus reduction neutralisation test (AFRNT) based on the classical PRNT was developed. The AFRNT uses the conventional Edmonston strain of measles, immunoperoxidase staining with monoclonal antibodies, and automated plaque counts performed with AID ViruSpot software. The assay is performed in 96-well plates, requires 2 days, and is fully automatable. The AFRNT was evaluated in comparison with PRNT and Enzygnost anti-measles enzyme immunoassay (EIA). A total of 130 samples, which included two available WHO international anti-measles standards, sera from 90 patients, and 38 different lots of immunoglobulin products, were tested. Overall, good agreement was observed between EIA and both neutralisation tests; however, the EIA values for the immunoglobulin products and international standards were slightly but significantly higher than those of the neutralisation tests. The Bland-Altman analysis showed excellent agreement between AFRNT and PRNT. AFRNT is a fully automatable high-throughput neutralisation assay, which can be performed with measles and other types of viruses, including wild-type strains. It is perfectly suited for epidemiological and vaccine studies.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador/métodos , Vírus do Sarampo/imunologia , Testes de Neutralização/métodos , Ensaio de Placa Viral/métodos , Anticorpos Antivirais/imunologia , Ensaios de Triagem em Larga Escala/métodos , Humanos , Técnicas Imunoenzimáticas/métodos , Fatores de Tempo
4.
J Med Microbiol ; 57(Pt 8): 1000-1006, 2008 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18628502

RESUMO

A convenient rapid culture assay (RCA) for the detection of enteroviruses was evaluated against RT-PCR using 576 stool and 102 cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples. One hundred and ninety stool samples were also tested by conventional cell culture (CCC). The RCA used immunoperoxidase staining of cell culture plates with a blend of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against enterovirus VP1 on the second and sixth days after inoculation. This blend was composed of 5D8/1 (Dako) and four 'in-house' mAbs. CCC was performed using fluorescence staining with the Enterovirus Screening Set (Chemicon International) for culture confirmation. Detection of enteroviruses by the RCA was more successful in colonic carcinoma (CaCo-2) and rhabdomyosarcoma (RD) cells than in human embryonic lung fibroblasts, HEp2 and A549 cells. The performance of CCC in RD cells was hindered by rapid cell degeneration and non-specific staining of cells during culture confirmation. The sensitivity of the RCA compared to RT-PCR in stool samples was found to be 71 % (115/161) on the second day and 87 % (140/161) on the sixth day. The sensitivity of the RCA in CSF samples was 38 % (22/58) after 2 days and 59 % (34/58) after 6 days. The specificity of the RCA was 100 %. All CCC-positive samples were positive by the RCA. CCC required 3-14 days for virus recovery. In conclusion, the RCA has the same sensitivity as CCC, significantly shortens the time required for the detection of enteroviruses, and prevents pitfalls associated with using RD cells for CCC. For diagnosis of aseptic meningitis in CSF samples, RT-PCR should be performed.


Assuntos
Enterovirus/genética , Enterovirus/isolamento & purificação , Anticorpos Monoclonais , Linhagem Celular , Linhagem Celular Tumoral , Líquido Cefalorraquidiano/virologia , Criança , Enterovirus/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Infecções por Enterovirus/diagnóstico , Fezes/virologia , Humanos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Via Transcriptase Reversa
5.
J Med Virol ; 79(7): 956-62, 2007 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17516529

RESUMO

From 2000 to 2005, a total of 1,096 enterovirus infections were diagnosed either by isolation of virus from cell culture or by RT-PCR (5'non-coding region (NCR)). Typing of viruses (n = 674) was carried out by immunofluorescence with monoclonal antibodies, neutralization test or molecular methods. Seasons with high enterovirus activity were characterized by high prevalence of echovirus 30 (62.2% in 2000, 25.5% in 2001) and echovirus 13 (34.5% in 2001). In contrast, in the 2003 season, which had very low enterovirus activity, these types were rare. During this season, cell culture sensitivity (human colonic carcinoma cells and human embryonic lung fibroblasts (HEL)) was exceptionally low. In order to determine the type of "non-cultivable" enteroviruses, purified RNA from selected stool samples was subjected to direct molecular typing. VP1/2A-specific fragments were amplified by RT-PCR, cloned and sequenced. The predominant virus identified was coxsackie A. Consequently, rhabdomyosarcom cells were introduced into the daily routine, which improved the isolation of enteroviruses. Echovirus 30 was again most commonly isolated during seasons 2004 and 2005 with increasing enterovirus activity. In conclusion, high prevalence of echovirus 30 and 13 is indicative of seasons with high enterovirus activity. The type of circulating enteroviruses may influence isolation of enterovirus from cell culture. RT-PCR (VP1/2A) combined with cloning and sequencing of amplicons is a useful tool for viral typing directly from stool samples. In cases of severe enterovirus infection, virological diagnosis should not solely rely on virus isolation from cell culture.


Assuntos
Infecções por Enterovirus/epidemiologia , Infecções por Enterovirus/virologia , Sequência de Bases , Linhagem Celular , DNA Viral/genética , Enterovirus/classificação , Enterovirus/genética , Enterovirus/isolamento & purificação , Genótipo , Alemanha/epidemiologia , Humanos , Epidemiologia Molecular , RNA Viral/genética , RNA Viral/isolamento & purificação , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Via Transcriptase Reversa , Cultura de Vírus
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA