Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Pain ; 21(11-12): 1125-1137, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32006701

RESUMO

Abdominal and peritoneal pain after surgery is common and burdensome, yet the lack of standardized diagnostic criteria for this type of acute pain impedes basic, translational, and clinical investigations. The collaborative effort among the Analgesic, Anesthetic, and Addiction Clinical Trial Translations, Innovations, Opportunities, and Networks, American Pain Society, and American Academy of Pain Medicine Pain Taxonomy (AAAPT) provides a systematic framework to classify acute painful conditions. Using this framework, a multidisciplinary working group reviewed the literature and developed core diagnostic criteria for acute abdominal and peritoneal pain after surgery. In this report, we apply the proposed AAAPT framework to 4 prototypical surgical procedures resulting in abdominal and peritoneal pain as examples: cesarean delivery, cholecystectomy, colorectal surgical procedures, and pancreas resection. These diagnostic criteria address the 3 most common surgical procedures performed in the United States, capture diverse surgical approaches, and may also be applied to other surgical procedures resulting in abdominal and peritoneal pain. Additional investigation regarding the validity and reliability of this framework will facilitate its adoption in research that advances our comprehension of mechanisms, deliver better treatments, and help prevent the transition of acute to chronic pain after surgery in the abdominal and peritoneal region. PERSPECTIVE: Using AAAPT, we present key diagnostic criteria for acute abdominal and peritoneal pain after surgery. We provide a systematic classification using 5 dimensions for abdominal and peritoneal pain that occurs after surgery, in addition to 4 specific surgical procedures: cesarean delivery, cholecystectomy, colorectal surgical procedures, and pancreas resection.


Assuntos
Dor Abdominal/diagnóstico , Dor Aguda/diagnóstico , Medição da Dor/métodos , Dor Pós-Operatória/diagnóstico , Peritônio/patologia , Sociedades Médicas , Dor Abdominal/classificação , Dor Abdominal/etiologia , Dor Aguda/classificação , Dor Aguda/etiologia , Congressos como Assunto/normas , Consenso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Medição da Dor/normas , Dor Pós-Operatória/classificação , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Parcerias Público-Privadas/normas , Sociedades Médicas/normas , Estados Unidos
2.
Anesthesiology ; 122(3): 659-65, 2015 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25536092

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Postoperative opioid-induced respiratory depression (RD) is a significant cause of death and brain damage in the perioperative period. The authors examined anesthesia closed malpractice claims associated with RD to determine whether patterns of injuries could guide preventative strategies. METHODS: From the Anesthesia Closed Claims Project database of 9,799 claims, three authors reviewed 357 acute pain claims that occurred between 1990 and 2009 for the likelihood of RD using literature-based criteria. Previously cited patient risk factors for RD, clinical management, nursing assessments, and timing of events were abstracted from claim narratives to identify recurrent patterns. RESULTS: RD was judged as possible, probable, or definite in 92 claims (κ = 0.690) of which 77% resulted in severe brain damage or death. The vast majority of RD events (88%) occurred within 24 h of surgery, and 97% were judged as preventable with better monitoring and response. Contributing and potentially actionable factors included multiple prescribers (33%), concurrent administration of nonopioid sedating medications (34%), and inadequate nursing assessments or response (31%). The time between the last nursing check and the discovery of a patient with RD was within 2 h in 42% and within 15 min in 16% of claims. Somnolence was noted in 62% of patients before the event. CONCLUSIONS: This claims review supports a growing consensus that opioid-related adverse events are multifactorial and potentially preventable with improvements in assessment of sedation level, monitoring of oxygenation and ventilation, and early response and intervention, particularly within the first 24 h postoperatively.


Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides/efeitos adversos , Revisão da Utilização de Seguros , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/induzido quimicamente , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Insuficiência Respiratória/induzido quimicamente , Insuficiência Respiratória/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Anestesia/efeitos adversos , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico , Insuficiência Respiratória/diagnóstico
3.
Ultrasound Med Biol ; 39(1): 111-6, 2013 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23200180

RESUMO

We tested the hypothesis that neuropathic tissue is more sensitive to stimulation by intense focused ultrasound (iFU) than control tissue. We created a diffusely neuropathic paw in rats via partial ligation of the sciatic nerve, whose sensitivity to iFU stimulation we compared with sham-surgery and normal control paws. We then applied increasing amounts of iFU (individual 0.2 s pulses at 1.15 MHz) to the rats' paws, assaying for their reliable withdrawal from that stimulation. Neuropathic rats preferentially withdrew their injured paw from iFU at smaller values of iFU intensity (84.2 W/cm(2) ± 25.5) than did sham surgery (97.7 W/cm(2) ± 11.9) and normal control (> 223 W/cm(2)) animals, with greater sensitivity and specificity (85% for neuropathic rats and 50% each of sham surgery and normal control rats). These results directly support our hypothesis as well as Gavrilov's idea that doctors may some day use iFU stimulation to diagnose patients with neuropathies.


Assuntos
Neuralgia/fisiopatologia , Limiar da Dor , Ultrassom , Animais , Membro Posterior , Temperatura Alta , Luz , Neuralgia/diagnóstico , Ratos , Ratos Sprague-Dawley , Nervo Isquiático
4.
Anesth Analg ; 107(4): 1380-3, 2008 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18806055

RESUMO

Patients taking high-dose opioids chronically for tumor-related or neuropathic pain may develop pain that is refractory to opioids. One option for control of such pain is the use of the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist ketamine. We describe a case of opioid-refractory pain that responded to a low-dose IV infusion of ketamine in the inpatient setting. The patient was then successfully transitioned to oral memantine for long-term outpatient management, in a novel use of this oral NMDA receptor antagonist. We present recent findings from basic research on pain mechanisms to explain why opioid tolerance, as in this patient, may contribute to the analgesic benefit of NMDA receptor antagonists.


Assuntos
Analgésicos/administração & dosagem , Ketamina/administração & dosagem , Lipossarcoma/complicações , Memantina/administração & dosagem , Dor Intratável/tratamento farmacológico , Receptores de N-Metil-D-Aspartato/antagonistas & inibidores , Neoplasias da Coluna Vertebral/complicações , Adulto , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Tolerância a Medicamentos , Humanos , Lipossarcoma/secundário , Masculino , Medição da Dor , Dor Intratável/etiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA