Variation in Interpretation of Provocative Tests for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.

PURPOSE: We studied variation in interpretation of specific symptoms during clinical tests for carpal tunnel syndrome to estimate the degree to which surgeons consider pain without paresthesia characteristic of median neuropathy. METHODS: We invited all upper-extremity surgeon members of the Science of Variation Group to complete a scenario-based experiment. Surgeons read 5-10 clinical vignettes of patients with variation in patient demographics and random variation in symptoms and signs as follows: primary symptoms (nighttime numbness and tingling, constant numbness and loss of sensibility, pain with activity), symptoms elicited by a provocative test (Phalen, Durkan, or Tinel) (tingling, pain), and location of symptoms elicited by the provocative test (index and middle fingers, thumb and index fingers, little and ring fingers, entire hand). RESULTS: Patient factors associated with surgeon interpretation of provocative tests as negative included pain rather than paresthesia during the Phalen, Durkan, or Tinel test and location of symptoms in the entire hand rather than the median nerve distribution. CONCLUSIONS: Specialists do not consider pain without paresthesia or a noncharacteristic symptom distribution as characteristic of carpal tunnel syndrome. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Awareness that elicitation of pain with Phalen, Durkan, and Tinel tests is regarded by specialists as relatively uncharacteristic of median neuropathy can help limit the potential for both overdiagnosis and overtreatment of median neuropathy as well as underdiagnosis and undertreatment of mental and social health contributions to illness (notable correlates of the intensity and distribution of pain).

Does lidocaine reduce pain intensity during corticosteroid injection? A double-blind randomized controlled equivalence trial.

Of the strategies considered to limit the discomfort of corticosteroid injection, one is to inject without lidocaine to reduce the total volume and avoid acidity. In a Bayesian trial, adults receiving corticosteroid injections were randomized to receive 0.5 mL of triamcinolone with or without 0.5 mL of lidocaine. Serial analysis was performed until a 95% probability of presence or absence of a 1.0-point difference in pain intensity on the 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale was reached. Injections with lidocaine were associated with a median of 2.4-point lower pain intensity during injection with a 95% probability of at least a 1-point reduction. The 95% probability was confirmed in 90% of the repeated analysis (36/40). Lidocaine is associated with lower immediate pain intensity during corticosteroid injection for hand and wrist conditions.Level of evidence: I.

Steroid versus placebo injections and wrist splints in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials compared the effectiveness of corticosteroid injections with placebo injections and wrist splints for carpal tunnel syndrome, focusing on symptom relief and median nerve conduction velocity. Within 3 months of the corticosteroid injection, there was a modest statistically significant difference in symptom relief compared to placebo injections and wrist splints, as measured by the Symptom Severity Subscore of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire; however, this did not meet the minimum clinically important difference. Pain reduction with corticosteroids was slightly better than with wrist splints, but it also failed to reach clinical significance. Electrodiagnostic assessments showed transient changes in distal motor and sensory latencies in favour of corticosteroids at 3 months, but these changes were not evident at 6 months. The best current evidence suggests that corticosteroid injections provide minimal transient improvement in nerve conduction and symptomatology compared with placebo or wrist splints.

Mental health is strongly associated with capability after lower extremity injury treated with free flap limb salvage or amputation.

BACKGROUND: Knowledge about factors associated with long-term outcomes, after severe traumatic injury to the lower extremity, can aid with the difficult decision whether to salvage or amputate the leg and improve outcome. We therefore studied factors independently associated with capability at a minimum of 1 year after amputation or free flap limb salvage. METHODS: We included 135 subjects with a free flap lower extremity reconstruction and 41 subjects with amputation, between 1991 and 2021 at two urban-level 1 trauma centers with a mean follow-up of 11 ± 7 years. Long-term physical functioning was assessed using the Physical Component Score (PCS) of the Short-Form 36 (SF36) and the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) questionnaires. Independent variables included demographics, injury characteristics, and the Mental Component Score (MCS) of the SF36. RESULTS: Greater mental health was independently and strongly associated with greater capability, independent of amputation or limb reconstruction. Mental health explained 33% of the variation in PCS and 57% of the variation in LEFS. Injury location at the knee or leg was associated with greater capability, compared to the foot or ankle. Amputation or limb reconstruction was not associated with capability. DISCUSSION: This study adds to the growing body of knowledge that physical health is best regarded through the lens of the bio-psycho-social model in which mental health is a strong determinant. This study supports making mental health an important aspect of rehabilitation after major lower extremity injury, regardless of amputation or limb salvage.

Diagnosis of Mild-to-moderate Idiopathic Median Neuropathy at the Carpal Tunnel Based on Signs and Symptoms is Discordant From Diagnosis Based on Electrodiagnostic Studies and Ultrasound.

BACKGROUND: Although idiopathic median neuropathy at the carpal tunnel (IMNCT) is objective and verifiable, distinction of normal and abnormal nerves is imprecise and probabilistic. The associated symptoms and signs (carpal tunnel syndrome [CTS]) vary, particularly for nonsevere (mild and moderate) median neuropathy. Discordance between diagnosis of mild or moderate median neuropathy at the carpal tunnel using symptoms and signs and diagnosis based on objective tests is a measure of the potential for overdiagnosis and overtreatment. QUESTION/PURPOSE: What is the difference in the estimated prevalence of mild-to-moderate IMNCT using nonsevere signs and symptoms compared with the estimated prevalence using electrodiagnostic studies (EDS) and ultrasound (US)? METHODS: We used data from an existing cross-sectional data registry. To create this registry, between January 2014 and January 2019, we considered all new adult English-speaking people who had an EDS that included the median nerve or people with a diagnosis of CTS who did not have surgery yet. A small and unrecorded number of people declined participation. The cross-sectional area of the median nerve at the distal wrist crease using US in people who already had EDS was measured. People with a diagnosis of CTS underwent both EDS and US. The six signs and symptoms of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome 6 (CTS-6, a validated tool to estimate the probability of IMNCT using ratings of symptoms and signs of CTS) were recorded. This resulted in a registry of 185 participants; we excluded 75 people for obvious, severe IMNCT (defined as nonrecordable nerve conduction velocity, thenar atrophy, or greater than 5 mm 2-point discrimination). Three of the 110 qualifying patients had missing information on ethnicity or race, but we accounted for this in our final analysis. Without a reference standard, as is the case with IMNCT, latent class analysis (LCA) can be used to establish the probability that an individual has specific pathophysiologic findings. LCA is a statistical method that identifies sets of characteristics that tend to group together. This technique has been used, for example, in diagnosing true scaphoid fractures among suspected fractures based on a combination of demographic, injury, examination, and radiologic variables. The prevalence of mild-to-moderate IMNCT was estimated in two LCAs using four signs and symptoms characteristic of mild-to-moderate IMNCT, as well as EDS and US measures of median neuropathy. RESULTS: The estimated prevalence of mild-to-moderate IMNCT based on signs and symptoms was 73% (95% CI 62% to 81%), while the estimated prevalence using EDS and US measurements was 51% (95% CI 37% to 65%). CONCLUSION: The notable discordance of 22% between the estimated prevalence of mild-to-moderate IMNCT using signs and symptoms and prevalence based on EDS and US criteria, and the overlapping CIs of the probability estimations, indicate considerable uncertainty and a corresponding notable potential for underdiagnosis or overdiagnosis. When signs and symptoms suggest mild-to-moderate median neuropathy and surgery is being considered, patients and clinicians might consider additional testing, such as EDS or US, to increase the probability of actual median neuropathy that can benefit from surgery. We might benefit from a more accurate and reliable diagnostic strategy or tool for mild-to-moderate IMNCT; this might be the focus of a future study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, diagnostic study.

Correspondence of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire with severity of median neuropathy.

The Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire is one of the most popular patient-reported outcome measures designed specifically for people with idiopathic median neuropathy at the carpal tunnel. We used electrophysiological and ultrasound measures of median neuropathy from one hand in 185 people to create a single measure of median neuropathy severity as a continuum (through exploratory factor analysis). We assessed if our single measure of median neuropathy severity is independently associated with Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire item groupings. Median neuropathy severity measured as a continuum had modest independent associations with Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire magnitude of capability (adjusted R2 0.063) and paraesthesia intensity (adjusted R2 0.12) items but not with items related to pain intensity. Considering the lack of association of Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire pain items with objective pathophysiology, combined with their notable association with mental health measures in previous studies, it is probably best to omit items related to pain.Level of evidence: III.

Volar Plate Advancement and Abductor Pollicis Brevis Tenodesis for Thumb Metacarpophalangeal Joint Hyperextension Correction.

First carpometacarpal (CMC1) osteoarthritis can be accompanied by the collapse of the first ray, with hyperextension of the first metacarpophalangeal (MCP1) joint. It is suggested that failure to address substantial MCP1 hyperextension during CMC1 arthroplasty may diminish post-operative capability and increase collapse reoccurrence. An arthrodesis is recommended in case of severe MCP1 joint hyperextension (>400). We describe a novel combination of a volar plate advancement and abductor pollicis brevis tenodesis to address MCP1 hyperextension at the time of CMC1 arthroplasty as an alternative to joint fusion. In 6 women, mean MCP1 hyperextension with pinch before surgery was 450 (range 300-850) and improved to 210 (range 150-300) of flexion with pinch six months after surgery. No revision surgery has been necessary to date, and there were no adverse events. Long-term outcome data is needed to establish the longevity of this procedure as an alternative to joint fusion, but early results are promising.

Are Radiographic Characteristics Associated With Outcome in Surgically Treated Distal Radius Fractures?

PURPOSE: Evidence to date shows that distal radius fracture displacement measured on radiographs does not correlate with patient-reported outcomes. Quantitative 3-dimensional computed tomography (CT) (Q3DCT) potentially captures fracture displacement more accurately. We aimed to assess the independent association between radiographic, CT, and Q3DCT measures of residual displacement and change in disability, quality of life, range of motion (ROM), and grip strength 12 weeks and 1 year after volar plating of intra-articular distal radius fractures. METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of data from a prospective multicenter trial. Seventy-one patients underwent volar plating of their AO Foundation/Orthopaedic Trauma Association type B or C distal radius fracture and were available at 12 weeks; 67 (94%) were available at 1 year. We recorded demographics, postoperative periapical radiographs (radial height, ulnarward inclination, ulnar variance, gap, and step off), lateral radiographs (palmar tilt, scapholunate angle, teardrop angle, and anteroposterior distance), postoperative CT scans (gap [coronal, sagittal and axial]) and step off [sagittal and coronal]), and in 3-dimensional models (number of articular fragments, mean fragment articular surface area, 3-dimensional fragment displacement, and gap surface area). Radiographs and CT scans were obtained within 10 working days after fracture fixation. Outcome measures were change in Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) scores, EuroQol Group 5-Dimension questionnaire (EQ5D) results, grip strength, and composite wrist ROM at 12 weeks and 1 year compared to preinjury level. RESULTS: At 1 year, greater recovery in PRWE scores was independently associated with older age. Greater recovery in composite ROM at 1 year was associated with injury to the dominant side and less step-off on posteroanterior radiographs. CONCLUSIONS: Less posteroanterior step-off was associated with a small improvement in composite wrist ROM at 1 year. This should be considered when counseling patients on the risks and benefits of surgical treatment when radiographic and CT measures of displacement fall within the range found in this study, and in older, low-demand patients. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic II.

The origin and course of the infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve: An anatomical study.

Nerve injury of the saphenous nerve or infrapatellar branch seems to be a frequent complication following knee surgery or trauma. Denervation results vary, and in some cases, no pain relief is achieved. This might be due to anatomic variation. The purpose of this anatomical study is to identify the variation in the course of the infrapatellar branch and saphenous nerve. We dissected 18 cadavers from adult donors. Medial to the knee, the saphenous nerve and infrapatellar branch were identified and followed proximally to the point where the infrapatellar branch branched from the saphenous nerve. The location where the infrapatellar branch came off from the saphenous nerve relative to the knee joint and where it passed the knee joint were measured. A total of 23 infrapatellar branches were found. We identified 10 branches between 0-10 cm proximal to the knee joint, 3 branches at 10-20 cm, and 9 branches at >20 cm. Between the patella and semitendinosus tendon, the knee joint was crossed by 5 branches in the anterior, 15 in the middle, and 2 in the posterior one-third. The origin of the infrapatellar branch and the location at which it passes the knee are highly variable. This, in addition to people having multiple branches, might explain why denervation is frequently unsuccessful. Based on the anatomical findings, we propose a more proximal diagnostic nerve block to help differentiate between a distal-middle or proximal origin of the infrapatellar branch. Appropriate placement of the nerve block might help identify people who benefit from denervation.

The Interobserver Reliability of Grading of Distal Radius Volar Plate Prominence.

PURPOSE: The 3-category rating of volar plate prominence in relation to the most volar edge of the distal radius (the watershed line) on lateral radiographs was reliable among a small group of surgeons and associated with the probability of flexor tendon irritation and potential rupture. Classifications are often less reliable when tested among a large group of practicing surgeons in different environments. METHODS: In this survey-based experiment, an international group of 115 fracture and upper extremity surgeons viewed 1 of 4 sets of 24 lateral radiographs (96 unique lateral radiographs) of patients with distal radius fractures who underwent volar plating in the practice of a single surgeon using 2 types of plates. Surgeons were asked to rate the following metrics: (1) the grade of plate prominence according to Soong, (2) whether the plate was more prominent than the watershed line, (3) whether the plate was separate from the bone distally, and (4) whether there is more than 5° of dorsal angulation of the distal radius articular surface. RESULTS: The interobserver agreement of the classification was "fair" (κ = 0.32; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.27-0.36), and grading was more reliable among surgeons who do not supervise trainees. Volar prominence was less reliable (κ = 0.034; 95% CI = 0.013-0.055) than plate separation from bone (κ = 0.50; 95% CI = 0.42-0.59) and more than 5° of dorsal angulation (κ = 0.42; 95% CI = 0.35-0.48). CONCLUSIONS: Among a large number of international practicing surgeons, the classification of volar plate prominence in 3 categories was fair. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The diagnosis of plate prominence might develop toward criteria with moderate reliability, such as separation of the plate from the bone and residual angulation of the distal radius.

Surgeons' Recommendations for Neurodiagnostic Testing With High Pretest Probability of Idiopathic Median Neuropathy at the Carpal Tunnel.

PURPOSE: The utility of electrodiagnostic tests (EDx) for patients with a high pretest probability of idiopathic median neuropathy at the carpal tunnel (IMNCT) based on characteristic symptoms and signs is debated. Decision-making and care strategies could be informed by a better understanding of factors associated with surgeon recommendations for electrodiagnostic testing. METHODS: Ninety-one upper-extremity surgeons participated in an online, survey-based experiment. Participants viewed 7 vignettes of patients with carpal tunnel syndrome, with the following factors randomized in each vignette: patient age, gender, magnitude of incapability, symptom intensity and the presence of nocturnal symptoms, palmar abduction weakness, and positive provocative tests results. We sought patient and surgeon factors associated with ordering EDx and surgeon-rated comfort with performing carpal tunnel release (CTR) without EDx. RESULTS: Surgeons recommended EDx for over half of the patient vignettes, with notable variation (median, 57%; interquartile range, 14-100), and felt relatively neutral, on average, offering CTR without EDx. Twenty-six (29%) out of 91 surgeons ordered EDx for all patient scenarios, and 18 surgeons (20%) did not order testing for any scenario. A lower likelihood of EDx was associated with older age and positive provocative tests results. Greater surgeon comfort offering CTR without EDx was associated with older patients, the presence of nocturnal symptoms, palmar abduction weakness, and positive provocative tests results. CONCLUSIONS: Upper-extremity surgeons are neutral regarding diagnosing IMNCT based on electrodiagnostic evidence of pathology and are relatively more comfortable offering surgery without EDx in older patients that present with key aspects of carpal tunnel syndrome. There is notable variation in care, with half of all surgeons always or never ordering EDx. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Future studies can investigate whether a treatment strategy offering surgery to patients with a high pretest probability of IMNCT and only using EDx in intermediate probability scenarios can limit use of testing without affecting patient health.

Surgeon Ratings of the Severity of Idiopathic Median Neuropathy at the Carpal Tunnel Are Not Influenced by Magnitude of Incapability.

BACKGROUND: Accurately distinguishing the severity of pathophysiology from the level of symptom intensity and incapability is a foundation of effective treatment strategies under the biopsychosocial paradigm of illness. With respect to idiopathic median neuropathy at the carpal tunnel (the symptoms and signs of which are referred to as carpal tunnel syndrome), surgeons who are more likely to recommend surgery based on the magnitude of symptoms and incapability rather than the severity of neuropathy may be underappreciating and undertreating mental health opportunities and overtreating mild, and on occasion unmeasurable, disease. A survey-based experiment that randomizes elements of the patient presentation can help determine the relative influence of magnitude of incapability on ratings of pathology severity. QUESTION/PURPOSE: What factors are associated with severity rating of idiopathic median neuropathy at the carpal tunnel on an 11-point ordinal scale? METHODS: One hundred eight hand and wrist members of the Science of Variation Group (among approximately 200 participants who complete at least one survey-experiment a year related to the upper extremity on average) reviewed seven scenarios of fictional median neuropathy with seven randomized variables: age, gender, limitations of daily activity (incapability), Tinel and Phalen test results, duration of numbness episodes, prevention of numbness with nocturnal splint immobilization, constant numbness, and weakness of palmar abduction. Participants had a mean age of 51 ± 10 years, 90% (97 of 108) were men, and 74% (80 of 108) were subspecialized in hand surgery. Surgeons were asked to rate the severity of idiopathic median neuropathy at the carpal tunnel on a on an 11-point ordinal scale. Factors associated with rated severity were sought in multilevel ordered logistic regression models. Fifteen surgeons did not complete all of their assigned randomized scenarios, resulting in a total of 675 ratings. RESULTS: After controlling for potentially confounding variables such as magnitude of incapability, factors associated with severity rating on the 11-point ordinal scale included palmar abduction weakness (odds ratio 11 [95% confidence interval 7.7 to 15]), longer duration of symptom episodes (OR 4.5 [95% CI 3.3 to 6.2]), nocturnal numbness in spite of splint immobilization (OR 3.2 [95% CI 2.3 to 4.3]), constant numbness (OR 2.5 [95% CI 1.9 to 3.4]), positive Tinel and positive Phalen test results (OR 2.2 [95% CI 1.6 to 2.9]), and older age (OR 1.6 [95% CI 1.2 to 2.1]). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that surgeons rate the severity of idiopathic median neuropathy at the carpal tunnel based on evidence of worse pathophysiology and are not distracted by greater incapability. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Surgeons who consider greater incapability as an indication of more severe pathology seem to be practicing outside the norm and may be underappreciating and undertreating the unhelpful thoughts and feelings of worry or despair that consistently account for a notable amount of the variation in symptom intensity and magnitude of incapability.

Joint Distraction for Thumb Carpometacarpal Osteoarthritis: 2-Year Follow-up Results of 20 Patients.

Background Joint distraction is a fairly new treatment for patients with symptomatic thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis (CMC1 OA). A previous pilot study of five patients showed that CMC1 joint distraction is technically feasible. The current study presents the results of CMC1 joint distraction in 20 patients with a 2-year follow-up period. Purposes The primary study aim was to assess if patients with CMC1 OA have better physical function and less pain 2 years after CMC1 joint distraction. Second, we assessed the number of patients who achieved a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in patient-reported outcome measures at each follow-up time point. Furthermore, this study sought differences on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the CMC1 joint before and after distraction. Adverse events were noted and reported. Methods Twenty patients (median age of 54 years) with symptomatic CMC1 OA and an established indication for a trapeziectomy were enrolled. An external distractor device was placed over the CMC1 joint and left in situ for 8 weeks. Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score, Michigan Hand Outcome Questionnaire (MHQ), visual analogue scale (VAS), and grip strength were recorded preoperatively and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Results Two years after joint distraction, physical function and pain scores had improved significantly compared with baseline: DASH from 48 to 17, MHQ from 56 to 83, and VAS for pain from 50 to 18 mm. Fourteen of 19 patients (74%) reached an MCID in DASH and MHQ scores. One patient was not satisfied with treatment outcome and chose to proceed with a trapeziectomy 14 months after initial distraction therapy. Conclusions This study demonstrates that CMC1 joint distraction can postpone more invasive surgical interventions (e.g., trapeziectomy) for at least 2 years. Larger comparative studies are needed to assess the value of CMC1 joint distraction in the treatment of CMC1 OA. Level of Evidence This is a Level IV, prospective case series study.

Cognitive Biases in Orthopaedic Surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Cognitive biases are known to affect all aspects of human decision-making and reasoning. Examples include misjudgment of probability, preferential attention to evidence that confirms one's beliefs, and preference for certainty. It is not known whether cognitive biases influence orthopaedic surgeon decision-making. This study measured the influence of a few cognitive biases on orthopaedic decision-making in hypothetical vignettes. The questions we addressed were as follows: Do orthopaedic surgeons display the cognitive biases of base rate neglect and confirmation bias in hypothetical vignettes? Can anchoring and framing biases be demonstrated? METHODS: One hundred ninety-six orthopaedic surgeons completed a survey consisting of three vignettes evaluating base rate neglect, five evaluating confirmation bias, and two separate vignettes each randomly exposing half of the group to different anchors and frames. RESULTS: For the three vignettes evaluating base rate neglect, 43% (84 of 196) chose answers consistent with base rate neglect in vignette 1, 88% (173 of 196) in vignette 2, and 35% (69 of 196) in vignette 3. Regarding confirmation bias, 51% (100 of 196) chose an answer consistent with confirmation bias for vignette 1, 11% (22 of 196) for vignette 2, 22% (43 of 196) for vignette 3, 22% (44 of 196) for vignette 4, and 29% (56 of 196) for vignette 5. There was a measurable anchoring heuristic (56% versus 34%; a difference of 22%) and framing effect (77% versus 61%; a difference of 16%). CONCLUSION: The influence of cognitive biases can be documented in patient vignettes presented to orthopaedic surgeons. Strategies can anticipate cognitive bias and develop practice debiasing strategies to limit potential error.