Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd ; 1682024 Apr 16.
Artigo em Holandês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38630073

RESUMO

About 20% of adults experience excessive daytime sleepiness or severe fatigue. Causes include somatic conditions, psychiatric disorders, and medication or drug use. Treatment depends on the underlying cause. If sleepiness persists despite optimal treatment of the underlying condition, exclusion of other causes, and behavioral interventions, wakefulness-promoting agents may be considered. However, no established pharmacological strategy exists for symptomatic treatment. Modafinil and stimulants like methylphenidate may offer some benefit based on experiences with narcolepsy or idiopathic hypersomnia. Studies in specific patient groups (e.g., multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, traumatic brain injury, cancer-related fatigue) show variable results. The use of wakefulness-promoting agents is discouraged for addressing unexplained fatigue, as seen in the context of chronic fatigue syndrome.


Assuntos
Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas , Estimulantes do Sistema Nervoso Central , Promotores da Vigília , Adulto , Humanos , Promotores da Vigília/uso terapêutico , Estimulantes do Sistema Nervoso Central/uso terapêutico , Modafinila/uso terapêutico , Terapia Comportamental
2.
Muscle Nerve ; 62(2): 247-253, 2020 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32369630

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The best treatment strategy for mild ulnar neuropathy at the elbow (UNE) is not known, due to lack of trials comparing surgery vs conservative treatment. METHODS: We recruited patients with clinical symptoms and signs of mild UNE and an electrophysiologically or sonographically confirmed diagnosis. Patients were randomly allocated to either in situ decompression or conservative treatment. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with subjective symptom improvement at short-term (3 months) and long-term (6-12 months) follow-up. RESULTS: One hundred seventeen patients were included: 56 and 61 patients were allocated to surgery and conservative treatment, respectively. A larger proportion of surgically treated patients showed improvement at short-term follow-up (85% vs 50%; odds ratio, 5.6; P < .001), but no differences were observed at long-term follow-up. DISCUSSION: In situ decompression for mild UNE may result in faster relief of symptoms when compared with conservative treatment, but at long-term follow-up no differences were observed.


Assuntos
Tratamento Conservador/métodos , Descompressão Cirúrgica/métodos , Cotovelo , Neuropatias Ulnares/terapia , Potenciais de Ação , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Eletrodiagnóstico , Feminino , Humanos , Hipestesia/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Debilidade Muscular/fisiopatologia , Condução Nervosa , Parestesia/fisiopatologia , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Neuropatias Ulnares/diagnóstico por imagem , Neuropatias Ulnares/fisiopatologia , Ultrassonografia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA