Diagnosis and treatment of bacterial peritonitis in patients with gastrointestinal cancer: an observational multicenter study.

Background: Bacterial peritonitis (BP) in patients with gastrointestinal (GI) cancer has been poorly described, and its prevalence is unknown. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate in patients with both GI cancer and ascites the prevalence of BP, associated features, mechanisms, prognosis, and the diagnostic performance of neutrophil count in ascites. Design: A retrospective, multicenter, observational study. Methods: All patients with GI cancer and ascites who underwent at least one paracentesis sample analyzed for bacteriology over a 1-year period were included. BP was defined by a positive ascites culture combined with clinical and/or biological signs compatible with infection. Secondary BP was defined as BP related to a direct intra-abdominal infectious source. Results: Five hundred fifty-seven ascites from 208 patients included were analyzed. Twenty-eight patients had at least one episode of BP and the annual prevalence rate of BP was 14%. Among the 28 patients with BP, 19 (65%) patients had proven secondary BP and 17 (59%) patients had multi-microbial BP, mainly due to Enterobacterales. A neutrophil count greater than 110/mm3 in ascites had negative and positive predictive values of 96% and 39%, respectively, for the diagnosis of BP. The median survival of patients with BP was 10 days (interquartile range 6-40) after the diagnosis. Conclusion: BP is not rare in patients with GI cancer and is associated with a poor short-term prognosis. When a patient with GI cancer is diagnosed with BP, a secondary cause should be sought. Further studies are needed to better define the best management of these patients.

A Simple and Reliable 2D-Shear Wave Elastography and UltraSound Coefficient Attenuation Parameter Technique in Chronic Liver Diseases.

BACKGROUND: The performance and reliability criteria for Aixplorer MACH30 (SS) in chronic liver diseases (CLD) have not been validated. AIMS: The objectives were to define the optimal procedure, the accuracy for fibrosis and steatosis diagnosis, and the reliability criteria using SS. METHODS: Patients had 2D-shear wave elastography (SWE) and ultraSound-guided controlled attenuation parameter (SCAP) performed in triplicate at the mid-axillary line (MAL), posterior axillary line (PAL), and anterior axillary line (AAL). Performances of SWE and SCAP were defined using transient elastography (TE ≥ 9.5 kPa) and CAP (≥ 275 dB/m) using Fibroscan (FS) as reference and validated with liver biopsy (LB). RESULTS: FS and SS data from 203 CLD patients were analyzed (55 ± 14 years; 59% male; MASLD 58%). Median TE and CAP were 6.4 kPa (2.5-66.9) and 270 dB/m (141-400). The best technique for the diagnosis of advanced fibrosis and significant steatosis was the median of three SWE values and three SCAP values at MAL, PAL, and AAL with an AUROC of 0.96 [95% CI 0.93-0.98] and 0.91 [95% CI 0.86-0.95]. Only skin-to-liver distance ≥ 2.4 cm (p = 0.012, 95% CI 1.37-13.38) was independently associated with discordance. The accuracy of SWE (≥ 8.5 kPa) and SCAP (≥ 0.44) was analyzed in 58 patients with LB. The PPV and NPV were 50% and 94%, and 71% and 88% for fibrosis and steatosis, respectively. CONCLUSION: A reliable diagnosis of advanced fibrosis and significant steatosis can be obtained with the median of three measurements in different liver portions using SS. The only non-reliable criterion is skin-to-liver distance ≥ 2.4 cm.

Portal hypertension is associated with poorer outcome and clinical liver decompensation in patients with HCC treated with Atezolizumab-Bevacizumab.

BACKGROUND: Portal hypertension (PHT) often complicates hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment and prognosis. We aimed to assess PHT's impact on AtezoBev outcomes and identify predictors of acute variceal bleeding (AVB) and clinical ascites occurrence. METHODS: A prospective cohort of 200 HCC patients treated with AtezoBev was studied alongside a retrospective cohort of 123 patients treated with Sorafenib. We assessed factors influencing progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), AVB and clinical ascites development, focusing on PHT parameters, and comparing outcomes within and between the two cohorts (time-dependent Cox model and adjusted survival curves). RESULTS: Among the AtezoBev cohort, 10% experienced AVB, 24% had high-risk esophageal varices (EV) and 46% vascular invasion. Median PFS and OS in the AtezoBev cohort was 5.13 and 12.2 months. AVB (HR=1.81;[95%CI:1.03-3.17]) and clinical ascites occurrence (HR=2.29;[95%CI:1.52-3.45]) were independently associated with mortality. AVB incidence was 12% at 12 months in AtezoBev patients and EV, history of AVB<6months and vascular invasion were independently associated with AVB. The Sorafenib cohort had shorter median PFS and OS, with similar AVB incidence and only EV were associated with AVB. CONCLUSIONS: PHT-related events significantly affect not only liver decompensation but also OS in AtezoBev-treated patients. We suggest a more widespread use of NSBB to prevent liver decompensation, with intensified prophylaxis for high-risk patients.

Comment on Wu et al. Baveno VII Criteria Is an Accurate Risk Stratification Tool to Predict High-Risk Varices Requiring Intervention and Hepatic Events in Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Cancers 2023, 15, 2480.

We read with great interest the original research conducted by Wu et al [...].

No correlation between MASLD and poor outcome of Atezolizumab-Bevacizumab therapy in patients with advanced HCC.

INTRODUCTION: It has been suggested that in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) of metabolic aetiology, the efficacy of immunotherapy may be reduced. The aim was to investigate the impact of metabolic-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and metabolic risk factors (MRF) on the outcomes of Atezolizumab-Bevacizumab (AtezoBev). METHODS: We collected data from 295 AtezoBev-treated patients, starting in 2020. MASLD was defined by the current/past presence of MRF, namely BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2, type 2 diabetes, arterial hypertension or dyslipidaemia and no other cause of liver disease (daily alcohol ≤30 g in males and ≤20 g in females). The influence of baseline characteristics on progression (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was assessed by uni/multivariate analysis using the Cox model. RESULTS: Risk factors for cirrhosis were viral infection in 47%, excessive alcohol consumption in 45% and MASLD in 13%. In the whole cohort, 27% had 1 MRF, 23% had 2 MRF, 15% had 3 MRF and 6% had 4 MRF. Median PFS and OS were 6.5 and 15.6 months, respectively, and similar in patients with or without MASLD in Log rank analysis. The number of MRF or MALSD was not associated with PFS or OS in the univariate analysis. Factors associated with PFS in multivariate analysis included ALBI grade 3 (HR = 1.60, p = .03), AFP (HR = 1.01, p = .01) and metastasis (HR = 1.77, p < .001). During follow-up, 10% of patients experienced immune-related adverse events, with age and female gender, but not MRF or MASLD, as independent predictors. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that the presence of MASLD or the number of MRF did not lead to worse outcomes in advanced HCC patients treated with AtezoBev.

Enhanced therapeutic outcomes with atezolizumab-bevacizumab and SIRT combination compared to SIRT alone in unresectable HCC: A promising approach for improved survival.

BACKGROUND: Integrating immunotherapy with locoregional therapies marks a significant milestone in the realm of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment . This study aimed to assess the impact of addition of Atezolizumab-Bevacizumab (AtezoBev) on the outcome patients treated with SIRT. METHODS: We conducted a study that included all Child-Pugh A HCC treated with SIRT since 2017. We examined the effects of the addition of 3 infusions of AtezoBev before the SIRT procedure and after SIRT on patients outcome (AtezoBev-SIRT group). Time-to-event data were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier with the log-rank test. RESULTS: Thirty five HCC patients treated with SIRT were included, of whom 23 % also received AtezoBev infusions. The two groups were similar in terms of liver function and HCC parameters. The median OS was not reached for patients who received AtezoBev in combination with SIRT and 14 months for patients only treated by SIRT. The median PFS was higher in the group treated by SIRT and AtezoBev vs SIRT alone (11.3 months vs 5.8 months). In the global cohort, 8 patients presented a downstaging (23 %), 4 underwent liver surgery (1 in the AtezoBev-SIRT group) and 4 liver transplantation (1 in the AtezoBev-SIRT group) CONCLUSIONS: The administration of AtezoBev, both before and after SIRT, is associated with enhanced OS and PFS outcomes compared to SIRT alone for unresectable HCC.

Pre-emptive TIPS in high-risk acute variceal bleeding. An updated and revised individual patient data meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: A previous individual patient data meta-analysis (IPD-MA) showed that compared with drugs+endoscopy, the placement of transjugular portosystemic shunt within 72 hours of admission (pre-emptive transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt: p-TIPS) increases the survival of high-risk patients (Child-Pugh B+ active bleeding and Child-Pugh C<14 points) with cirrhosis and acute variceal bleeding. However, the previous IPD-MA was not a two-stage meta-analysis, did not consider the potential risk of selection bias of observational studies, and did not include the most recent randomized clinical trial. We performed an updated and revised IPD-MA to reassess the efficacy of p-TIPS, addressing all previous issues. APPROACH AND RESULTS: We included all studies from the previous IPD-MA and searched for other possible eligible publications until September 2022. We performed a two-stage IPD-MA of data from 8 studies (4 randomized clinical trials and 4 observational). In addition, we performed a sensitivity analysis excluding those patients dying up to the first 72 hours after admission in the Drugs+Endoscopy arms of the 4 observational studies. The primary end point was the effects of p-TIPS versus Drugs+Endoscopy on 1-year survival.We identified 1389 patients (342 p-TIPS and 1047 Drugs+Endoscopy). The two-stage IPD-MA showed that p-TIPS significantly reduced the mortality in the overall population (HR=0·43, 95% CI: 0.32-0.60, p <0.001. This effect was observed in both subgroups of patients with Child-Pugh. The sensitivity analysis confirmed the survival benefit of p-TIPS. CONCLUSIONS: The updated two-stage IPD-MA confirms the significant survival advantage of p-TIPS in high-risk patients with cirrhosis and acute variceal bleeding. As a result, we recommend p-TIPS as the preferred first-choice treatment for these patients.

Impact of radiological response and pattern of progression in patients with HCC treated by atezolizumab-bevacizumab.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: We aim to assess the role of radiological response to atezolizumab-bevacizumab in patients with HCC to predict overall survival. APPROACH AND RESULTS: We retrospectively included patients with HCC treated by atezolizumab-bevacizumab in 2 tertiary centers. A retrospective blinded analysis was performed by 2 radiologists to assess Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST 1.1) and modified RECIST (mRECIST) criteria at 12 weeks. Imaging response and treatment decisions in the multidisciplinary tumor board at 12 weeks were registered. Among 125 patients, 9.6% and 20.8% had a response, 39.2% and 35.2% had stable disease, and 51.2% and 44% had progression, according to RECIST 1.1 and mRECIST, respectively, with a substantial interobserver agreement (k coefficient=0.79). Metastasis was independently associated with a higher risk of progression. Patients classified as responders did not reach median survival, which was 16.2 and 15.9 months for patients classified as stable and 9.1 and 9.0 months for patients classified as progressors, in RECIST 1.1 and mRECIST criteria, respectively. We observed a wide variability in the identification of progression in the multidisciplinary tumor board in clinical practice compared with the blind evaluation by radiologists mainly due to discrepancy in the evaluation of the increase in size of intrahepatic lesions. The appearance of new extrahepatic lesions or vascular invasion lesions was associated with a worse overall survival ( p =0.032). CONCLUSIONS: RECIST 1.1 and mRECIST criteria predict overall survival with more responders identified by mRECIST and the appearance of new extrahepatic lesion or vascular invasion was associated with a poor prognosis. A noticeable discrepancy was observed between patients classified as progressors at reviewing and the decision reached during the multidisciplinary tumor board.

Portal hypertension and variceal bleeding in patients with liver cancer: Evidence gaps for prevention and management.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Portal hypertension (PHT) and HCC are 2 major complications of cirrhosis that often coexist in the same patient and impact the prognosis, especially in patients with acute variceal bleeding. In this review, we aim to discuss the best strategy for PHT screening and primary prophylaxis, as well as the management of acute variceal bleeding, to improve the management of PHT in HCC patients. RESULTS: Recent therapeutic advances observed in the management of HCC, notably through the advent of immunotherapy, have led to a clear improvement in the survival of patients. The prevention of complications related to underlying cirrhosis, such as PHT and acute variceal bleeding, is now part of the management of HCC patients. The Baveno VII conference recently redefined screening and prophylaxis in patients with cirrhosis. However, data regarding the applicability of these criteria in patients with HCC have been sparse. From our point of view, the Baveno criteria are not appropriate to exclude high-risk esophageal varices (EV) in HCC patients, and endoscopy should be performed except in HCC patients with a liver stiffness measurement (LSM) ≥25 kPa, who should benefit from nonselective beta-blockers (NSSBs) without performing endoscopy. We are also in favor of using NSBBs as primary prophylaxis in patients with EV regardless of the size and with gastric varices since these patients display clinically significant PHT. CONCLUSIONS: Appropriate evaluation and treatment of PHT remain major issues in improving the outcomes of HCC patients. Many questions remain unanswered, opening the field to many areas of research.

Burden of grade 3 or 4 liver injury associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Background & Aims: There is concern about the burden of liver injury in patients with cancer exposed to immune checkpoints inhibitors (ICIs). Methods: In a retrospective cohort study, we evaluated the likelihood of grade 3/4 liver injury, of grade 3/4 cholestatic liver injury, and of liver failure, as per the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5, following treatment with ICIs. We compared these occurrences with a group of cancer patients who were propensity-matched and treated with conventional chemotherapy. For all ICI patients experiencing grade 3/4 liver injury, we conducted a causality assessment using the RUCAM method and examined patient outcomes. Results: Among 952 patients (median [IQR] age 66 [57-73] years, 64% males) who were treated with ICI between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2019, a total of 86 (9%) progressed to grade 3/4 liver injury, and liver failure was not observed. Anti-PD-(L)1/anti-CTLA-4 antibodies combinations (adjusted hazard ratio 3.36 [95% CI: 1.67-6.79]; p <0.001), and chronic hepatitis B (adjusted hazard ratio 5.48 [95% CI: 1.62-18.5]; p = 0.006], were independent risk factors. Liver injury was attributed to ICI treatment in 19 (2.0%) patients. Patients with ICI toxicity typically presented with granulomatous hepatitis or cholangiocyte inflammation. ICI withdrawal was associated with cancer progression and mortality. Re-introduction of ICI was not associated with recurrent grade 3/4 liver injury. Compared with matched patients treated with conventional, non-ICI-based chemotherapy, anti-PD-(L)1/anti-CTLA-4 combinations (p <0.001) and anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapies (p = 0.053) increased the risk of grade 3/4 liver injury and of grade 3/4 cholestatic liver injury, respectively. Conclusions: An increased risk of grade 3/4 liver injury under anti-PD-(L)1/anti-CTLA-4 antibodies was observed, whereas no substantial increase in the likelihood of liver failure occurred even after treatment reintroduction. Impact and implications: There is concern about liver injury in patients with cancer exposed to immune checkpoints inhibitors (ICIs). We investigated the burden of grade 3/4 liver injury after treatment with ICIs in a multicentric cohort of patients with cancer. Overall, a 9% incidence of grade 3/4 liver injury was detected after ICIs, and direct ICI hepatotoxicity was demonstrated in 2% of patients. Anti-PD-(L)1/Anti-CTLA-4 antibody combinations, and chronic HBV infection were independent risk factors. ICI withdrawal for grade 3/4 liver injury was associated with cancer progression. Re-introduction of ICI treatment was not associated with recurrent grade 3/4 liver injury.

Portal-hypertension features are associated with ascites occurrence and survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated by external radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: We studied the impact of Portal hypertension (PHT) on ascites occurrence and on radiotherapy outcome in cirrhotic patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHOD: All cirrhotic patients that received radiotherapy for HCC between 2012 and 2022 were included. Portal hypertension-Score was built using univariate analysis with the presence of esophageal varices (EV), platelet count, history of acute variceal bleeding (AVB) and spleen size. Time-to-events data were estimated using Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank and Cox-models. RESULTS: 60 patients were included (female 27%, age 67 years-old, Child-Pugh A 82%, alcoholic/non-alcoholic steatohepatitis/hepatitis C virus 55/40/32%). 38% and 15% presented history of ascites and AVB respectively, 25% had large EV, 53.5% presented PHT score ≥ 5. 92% were BCLC-0/A, median tumor size was 30 mm. At 6 months, ascites incidence was 19% and precluded access to further HCC treatment for all patients with HCC recurrence. All PHT parameters included in the score and PHT score ≥ 5 (hazard ratio (HR) = 14.07, p = 0.01) were associated with ascites occurrence. Transplantation free survival and recurrence free survival at 1 year were 56% and 47% respectively. Albi grade 3 (HR = 3.01; p = 0.04) was independently associated with Transplantation free survival. CONCLUSION: Radiotherapy should be cautiously performed in patients with PHT score ≥ 5 because of ascites occurrence risk precluding access to further HCC treatments.

Albumin infusion reduces ascite occurrence in Child-Pugh B patients treated by Atezolizumab-Bevacizumab for advanced HCC.

BACKGROUND: Long-term albumin infusions have been associated with improved outcomes in decompensated cirrhotic patients. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of albumin infusion on the prognosis of Child-Pugh B patients undergoing treatment with AtezoBev for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective multicentric study that included all Child-Pugh B cirrhotic patients treated with AtezoBev since 2020. We examined the effects of albumin infusion (40 g every 3 weeks) on overall survival (OS) and the occurrence of cirrhosis-related complications. Time-to-event data were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier with the log-rank test and Cox models. RESULTS: Forty-seven HCC patients with a Child-Pugh B score who received AtezoBev were included, of whom 26% also received albumin infusions every 3 weeks. The two groups were similar in terms of liver function and HCC parameters. The median OS was 4.4 and 5.8 months (p = 0.42) for patients who did or did not receive albumin, respectively. The occurrence of hepatic encephalopathy and variceal bleeding was similar between the two groups. However, albumin infusions were associated with a significantly lower rate of ascites expansion/development (13% versus 57%, p = 0.005). Cox analysis revealed that a history of ascites (HR=3.82 [95% CI: 1.73-8.48]) was independently associated with a higher risk of ascites expansion/development, whereas albumin infusions were protective (HR=0.07 [95% CI: 0.01-0.54]). CONCLUSIONS: Albumin infusion did not improve overall survival in Child-Pugh B HCC patients treated with AtezoBev, but it significantly reduced the expansion/development of ascites.

Baveno VI and VII criteria are not suitable for screening for large varices or clinically significant portal hypertension in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Baveno VI and VII criteria are used in patients with cirrhosis to rule out large size oesophageal varices (EV) and rule in/out clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH). AIM: To evaluate their diagnostic performance in these patients. METHODS: We retrospectively included all patients with Child-Pugh A cirrhosis and HCC who had endoscopy, liver stiffness measurement (LSM) and platelet count within 6 months. They were classified according to the BCLC stage. Favourable Baveno VI criteria were defined by LSM < 20 kPa and platelets > 150 G/L (to rule out large EV), favourable Baveno VII criteria if LSM ≤ 15 kPa and platelets ≥ 150 G/L (to rule out CSPH, which was defined by a HVPG ≥ 10 mm Hg. RESULTS: We included 185 patients; 46% were BCLC-0/A, 28% BCLC-B and 26% BCLC-C. EV were present in 44% (23% large), and HVPG ≥ 10 mm Hg in 42% (mean 8 mm Hg). In patients with favourable Baveno VI criteria, 8% of the whole cohort (Se 93%, NPV 92%), 11% of BCLC-0-A (Se 89%, NPV 89%) and 10.0% of BCLC-C patients (Se 91%, NPV 90%) had large EV. Among patients with HVPG < 10 mm Hg, 6% had large EV and 17% small. CSPH was present in 23% of patients with favourable Baveno VII criteria among the whole cohort, and in 25% of those with BCLC-0/A. The specificity of LSM ≥ 25 kPa to rule in CSPH was 48%. CONCLUSIONS: Favourable Baveno VI criteria are not appropriate to rule out the presence of high-risk EV, or Baveno VII criteria to rule CSPH in/out in patients with HCC.

Current challenges and future perspectives in treating patients with NAFLD-related cirrhosis.

Despite the slow, progressive nature of NAFLD, the number of patients with NAFLD-related cirrhosis has significantly increased. Although the management of patients with cirrhosis is constantly evolving, improving the prognosis of patients with NAFLD-related cirrhosis is a challenge because it is situated at the crossroads between the liver, the metabolic, and the cardiovascular diseases. Therefore, the therapeutic interventions should not only target the liver but also the associated cardiometabolic conditions and should be adapted accordingly. The objective of the current review is to critically discuss the particularities in the management of patients with NAFLD-related cirrhosis. We relied on the recommendations of scientific societies and discussed them in the specific context of NAFLD cirrhosis and the surrounding cardiometabolic milieu. Herein, we covered the following aspects: (1) the weight loss strategies through lifestyle interventions to avoid sarcopenia and improve portal hypertension; (2) the optimal control of metabolic comorbidities in particular type 2 diabetes aimed not only to improve cardiovascular morbidity/mortality but also to lower the incidence of cirrhosis-related complications (we discussed various aspects related to the safety of oral antidiabetic drugs in cirrhosis); (3) the challenges in performing bariatric surgery in patients with cirrhosis related to the portal hypertension and the risk of cirrhosis decompensation; (4) the particularities in the diagnosis and management of the portal hypertension and the difficulties in managing patients awaiting for liver transplantation; and (5) the difficulties in developing drugs and conducting clinical trials in patients with NAFLD-related cirrhosis. Moreover, we discussed the emerging options to overcome these obstacles.

Precision Bariatric/Metabolic Medicine and Surgery.

Indications and techniques of bariatric surgery (BS) have constantly evolved in recent decades and now face new challenges [...].

Treatment of portal hypertension in patients with HCC in the era of Baveno VII.

Portal hypertension (PHT) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) often coexist, and their association impairs the prognosis of patients with cirrhosis. The interplay between these two conditions is of major therapeutic significance, both from the perspective of offering adequate treatment for HCC and for preventing or managing the complications of PHT. Recommendations on the management of PHT were heavily revised at the last Baveno VII conference, redefining screening and extending the indications for prophylaxis. PHT can preclude locoregional therapies, and TIPS placement can be discussed in patients with HCC. New systemic therapies for HCC can influence the level of PHT and favour bleeding. Complications of PHT should be prevented and treated adequately in all patients, especially those presenting with advanced HCC. Specific aspects of the management of both conditions will be discussed in the present expert opinion, which considers very recent data in the HCC field.