Intraoperative alignment correlates well with long standing radiographs - The X-ray grid method in complex knee surgery.

OBJECTIVE: While long standing radiographs (LSR) represent the gold standard for preoperative alignment assessment and planning of lower limb deformity corrections, there is no consensus about the intraoperative alignment assesments (IAC) due to various limitations of the common methods. The present study introduces a radiolucent X-ray grid with integrated radiopaque lines explicitly designed for fluoroscopic IAC and evaluates its reliability in comparsion to the LSR. METHODS: Patients with posttaumatic and congenital lower limb deformity surgery and preoperative LSR as well as fluoroscopic IAC utilizing the X-ray grid were retrospectively included to the study. The mechanical axis deviation (MAD) in percentage of the maximum tibial width from the medial to the lateral in comparison between the image pairs was set as primary outcome parameter. Multiple rater and measurements determined intra- and interobserver reliabilit of both imaging methods. In addition, the effects of age, gender, body mass index (BMI), etiology, joint line convergence angle (JLCA), and extent varus or valgus deformity were analysed. RESULTS: A total of 84 patients were finally included. The mean absolute difference of MAD between the two techniques was 7.2 ± 0.8%. MAD between the LSR and IAC correlated at a high level (R = 0.96, p <0.001). The agreement decreased with increasing extent of deformity (p <0.01) and with higher deviation of JLCA between LSR and IAC (p <0.01). Intra- and interobserver concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) for MAD measurements were 0.99 for both imaging techniques. CONCLUSION: Fluoroscopy combined with the X-ray grid method is a valid tool for intraoperative assessment of lower limb alignment in deformity correction surgery, and the correlation between LSR and IAC is better than in other similar techniques described in the literature. However, in case of severe coronal alignment deformity and highly divergent JLCA, the agreement between both imaging techniques decreases significantly.

Radiation-free drill guidance in interlocking of intramedullary nails.

Intramedullary nailing is a technically demanding procedure which involves an excessive amount of x-ray acquisitions; one study lists as many as 48 to successfully complete the procedure. In this work, a novel low cost radiation-free drilling guide is designed to assist surgeons in completing the distal locking procedure without any x-ray acquisitions. Using an augmented reality fluoroscope that coregisters optical and x-ray images, we exploit solely the optical images to detect the drilling guide in order to estimate the tip position in real-time in x-ray. We tested over 200 random drill guide poses showing a mean tip-estimation error of 1.72 +/- 0.7mm which is significantly robust and accurate for the interlocking. In a preclinical study on dry bone phantom, three expert surgeons successfully completed the interlocking 56 out of 60 trials with no x-ray acquisition for guidance and an average time of 2 min.

Intra-op measurement of the mechanical axis deviation: an evaluation study on 19 human cadaver legs.

The alignment of the lower limb in high tibial osteotomy (HTO) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA) must be determined intraoperatively. One way to do so is to deform the mechanical axis deviation (MAD), for which a tolerance measurement of 10 mm is widely accepted. Many techniques are proposed in clinical practice such as visual inspection, cable method, grid with lead impregnated reference lines, or more recently, navigation systems. Each has their disadvantages including reliability of the MAD measurement, excess radiation, prolonged operation time, complicated setup and high cost. To alleviate such shortcomings, we propose a novel clinical protocol that allows quick and accurate intraoperative calculation of MAD. This is achieved by an X-ray stitching method requiring only three X-ray images placed into a panoramic image frame during the entire procedure. The method has been systematically analyzed in a simulation framework in order to investigate its accuracy and robustness. Furthermore, we validated our protocol via a preclinical study comprising 19 human cadaver legs. Four surgeons determined MAD measurements using our X-ray panorama and compared these values to a gold-standard CT-based technique. The maximum average MAD error was 3.5mm which shows great potential for the technique.