Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMJ Open ; 10(2): e031933, 2020 02 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32054624

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To examine the associations of current tobacco use with tobacco advertising, promotion and sponsorship (TAPS), and illicit tobacco sales exposures among Myanmar high school students. DESIGN: A quantitative, cross-sectional study. SETTING: Seven high schools from both urban and rural areas of four states and regions in Myanmar. PARTICIPANTS: In total, 1174 high school students (482 males and 692 females) were interviewed using a self-administered questionnaire. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Current tobacco use of participants, defined as using any kind of smoked or smokeless tobacco product at least one occasion within the past 30 days. RESULTS: The prevalence of TAPS exposure was 90.9% among high school students in Myanmar. Current tobacco use was positively associated with being over 14 years old (adjusted OR (AOR) 9.81; 95% CI 4.54 to 21.19), being male (AOR 28.06; 95% CI 13.29 to 59.25), exposure to any kind of TAPS (AOR 6.59; 95% CI 2.33 to 18.64), having seen any smoked tobacco product for sale inside or within 100 feet of the school premises (AOR 4.17; 95% CI 1.65 to 10.58), having seen the sale or gifting of any smoked tobacco product to minors (AOR 6.46; 95% CI 2.18 to 19.12) and having seen the sale or distribution of any smoked tobacco product by minors (AOR 2.42; 95% CI 1.42 to 4.10). Having ever received health education about tobacco use (AOR 0.45; 95% CI 0.27 to 0.78), or having a higher perception score of tobacco use (AOR 0.17; 95% CI 0.10 to 0.30) were negatively associated with current tobacco use. CONCLUSIONS: There was an alarming prevalence of TAPS exposure among Myanmar high school students. TAPS exposure and violations of tobacco sale regulations were strong risk factors for current tobacco use among Myanmar high school students, while health education about tobacco products was reported as an effective protective factor. Specific smokeless tobacco sale regulations for minors are needed immediately in Myanmar.


Assuntos
Publicidade/legislação & jurisprudência , Publicidade/métodos , Indústria do Tabaco/legislação & jurisprudência , Uso de Tabaco/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Publicidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Comércio , Estudos Transversais , Estudos de Avaliação como Assunto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Mianmar/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Estudantes/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto Jovem
2.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 17(1): 669, 2017 Sep 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28927450

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cost information is important for efficient allocation of healthcare expenditure, estimating future budget allocation, and setting user fees to start new financing systems. Myanmar is in political transition, and trying to achieve universal health coverage by 2030. This study assessed the unit cost of healthcare services at two public hospitals in the country from the provider perspective. The study also analyzed the cost structure of the hospitals to allocate and manage the budgets appropriately. METHODS: A hospital-based cross-sectional study was conducted at 200-bed Magway Teaching Hospital (MTH) and Pyinmanar General Hospital (PMN GH), in Myanmar, for the financial year 2015-2016. The step-down costing method was applied to calculate unit cost per inpatient day and per outpatient visit. The costs were calculated by using Microsoft Excel 2010. RESULTS: The unit costs per inpatient day varied largely from unit to unit in both hospitals. At PMN GH, unit cost per inpatient day was 28,374 Kyats (27.60 USD) for pediatric unit and 1,961,806 Kyats (1908.37 USD) for ear, nose, and throat unit. At MTH, the unit costs per inpatient day were 19,704 Kyats (19.17 USD) for medicine unit and 168,835 Kyats (164.24 USD) for eye unit. The unit cost of outpatient visit was 14,882 Kyats (14.48 USD) at PMN GH, while 23,059 Kyats (22.43 USD) at MTH. Regarding cost structure, medicines and medical supplies was the largest component at MTH, and the equipment was the largest component at PMN GH. The surgery unit of MTH and the eye unit of PMN GH consumed most of the total cost of the hospitals. CONCLUSION: The unit costs were influenced by the utilization of hospital services by the patients, the efficiency of available resources, type of medical services provided, and medical practice of the physicians. The cost structures variation was also found between MTH and PMN GH. The findings provided the basic information regarding the healthcare cost of public hospitals which can apply the efficient utilization of the available resources.


Assuntos
Orçamentos , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Serviços de Saúde/economia , Hospitais Públicos/economia , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/economia , Custos e Análise de Custo , Estudos Transversais , Administração Financeira de Hospitais , Recursos em Saúde , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde , Administração Hospitalar , Humanos , Mianmar , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/organização & administração , Alocação de Recursos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA