RESUMO
Introduction: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication in patients undergoing major vascular surgery. Despite significant research efforts in this area, the incidence of AKI remains high, posing a significant challenge to healthcare systems, especially in situations where resources are limited. Early prediction of AKI severity and individualized postoperative care is therefore essential. Methods: The primary objective of this exploratory study was to assess the diagnostic value of urine cell-cycle arrest biomarkers [(TIMP-2) × (IGFBP7)] and soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) for predicting moderate or severe AKI within 24 h after open aortic surgery, and compared to routine kidney biomarkers. Seventy-five patients undergoing elective aortic surgery were included. Clinical parameters, urine and blood samples were collected preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and 24 h later. AKI was defined using KDIGO criteria. Individual and combined diagnostic performance of biomarkers were evaluated. Results: Of the 75 patients, 61% developed AKI, of which 28% developed moderate or severe AKI within 24 h of surgery. Baseline demographics, comorbidities and kidney parameters did not differ between patients with moderate or severe AKI (AKI II/III) and none or mild AKI (AKI 0/I), except for higher preoperative suPAR levels in later AKI II/III patients. Urine osmolality, Cystatin C and serum creatinine had the highest predictive power for AKI II/III with AUCs of 0.75-0.72. (TIMP-2) × (IGFBP7), and neither (TIMP-2) × (IGFBP7) nor suPAR individually showed superior diagnostic value. Combining CysC or SCr with urine osmolality and 6 h urine output gave the best performance with AUCs of 0.86 (95% CI, 0.74-0.96) and 0.85 (95% CI, 0.75-0.95) respectively. Conclusion: Our study suggests that routine parameters like urine osmolality, CysC, SCr and 6 h urine output perform best in predicting postoperative AKI after aortic surgery compared to the new biomarkers (TIMP-2) × (IGFBP7) and suPAR. Combining biomarkers, particularly CysC or SCr with urine output, urine osmolality, may enhance diagnostic accuracy. Further validation in larger cohorts and clinical settings is warranted to establish their clinical utility.
RESUMO
Iron deficiency is common in idiopathic and heritable pulmonary arterial hypertension patients (I/HPAH). A previous report suggested a dysregulation of the iron hormone hepcidin, which is controlled by BMP/SMAD signaling involving the bone morphogenetic protein receptor 2 (BMPR-II). Pathogenic variants in the BMPR2 gene are the most common cause of HPAH. Their effect on patients' hepcidin levels has not been investigated. The aim of this study was to assess whether iron metabolism and regulation of the iron regulatory hormone hepcidin was disturbed in I/HPAH patients with and without a pathogenic variant in the gene BMPR2 compared to healthy controls. In this explorative, cross-sectional study hepcidin serum levels were quantified by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. We measured iron status, inflammatory parameters and hepcidin modifying proteins such as IL6, erythropoietin, and BMP2, BMP6 in addition to BMPR-II protein and mRNA levels. Clinical routine parameters were correlated with hepcidin levels. In total 109 I/HPAH patients and controls, separated into three groups, 23 BMPR2 variant-carriers, 56 BMPR2 noncarriers and 30 healthy controls were enrolled. Of these, 84% had iron deficiency requiring iron supplementation. Hepcidin levels were not different between groups and corresponded to the degree of iron deficiency. The levels of IL6, erythropoietin, BMP2, or BMP6 showed no correlation with hepcidin expression. Hence, iron homeostasis and hepcidin regulation was largely independent from these parameters. I/HPAH patients had a physiologically normal iron regulation and no false elevation of hepcidin levels. Iron deficiency was prevalent albeit independent of pathogenic variants in the BMPR2 gene.