The role of distal third radius dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and central DXA in evaluating for osteopenia and osteoporosis in men receiving androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer.

The authors assessed the use of distal third radius dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) concomitantly with central (hip and lumbar spine) DXA to identify men with osteopenia or osteoporosis receiving androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for prostate cancer. Initial classification with central DXA demonstrated 60 (17%) normal, 187 (55%) osteopenic, and 96 (28%) osteoporotic patients. Sixteen of 60 (27%) normal patients were reclassified as osteopenic (14) or osteoporotic (2), and 20 of 187 (11%) osteopenic patients were reclassified as osteoporotic with the combination of central DXA plus distal third radius DXA. The difference in reclassification was statistically significant. The addition of distal third radius to central DXA scanning in men with bone loss associated with ADT identifies a statistically significant number of men being reclassified as having osteopenia or osteoporosis. Combined central and distal third radius DXA scanning should be considered routine in the evaluation of all men suspected of bone loss associated with ADT. This has specific significant clinical relevance because of the large number of men with nonevaluable central DXA studies. Fracture risk prediction and treatment recommendations based on this reclassification will need to be determined by follow-up studies.

Contemporary prostate biopsy complication rates in community-based urology practice.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether the increased number of rectal perforations associated with contemporary transrectal ultrasound-guided, 12-core prostate biopsy, with a periprostatic block, is associated with a greater rate of postprocedural complications. METHODS: We prospectively studied 1000 patients undergoing contemporary transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy and compared the rates of complicated urinary tract infection and significant rectal bleeding with the rates in our previous report of complications using a then-standard, 6-core biopsy technique, without a periprostatic block. RESULTS: Three patients developed complicated urinary tract infections, two of which were with ciprofloxacin-resistant organisms. This was not a significant different statistically from our earlier report. Seven patients had significant rectal bleeding requiring endoscopic intervention. This rate also was not significantly different statistically from our earlier report. CONCLUSIONS: Our infection and rectal bleeding complications associated with contemporary transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy were low. We experienced a small, nonstatistically significant, increase in the complicated urinary tract infection rate and a small, nonstatistically significant, increase in the rectal bleeding rate in association with the transition from an eight-core, no periprostatic block, technique to the contemporary technique.