Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
J Neurooncol ; 155(3): 255-264, 2021 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34626296

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: While adjuvant treatment regimens have been modified for older patients with glioblastoma (GBM), surgical strategies have not been tailored. METHODS: Clinical data of 48 consecutive patients aged 70 years or older, who underwent surgical resection for GBM with intraoperative ultrasonography (IoUS) alone or combination with intraoperative MRI (IoMRI) at Yale New Haven Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Variables were analyzed, and comparative analyses were performed. RESULTS: The addition of IoMRI was not superior to IoUS alone in terms of overall survival (OS) (P = 0.306), Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS) at postoperative 6 weeks (P = 0.704) or extent of resection (P = 0.263). Length of surgery (LOSx), however, was significantly longer (P = 0.0002) in the IoMRI group. LOSx (P = 0.015) and hospital stay (P = 0.025) were predictors of postoperative complications. Increased EOR (GTR or NTR) (P = 0.030), postoperative adjuvant treatment (P < 0.0001) and postoperative complications (P = 0.006) were predictive for OS. Patients with relatively lower preoperative KPS scores (<70) showed significant improvement at postoperative 6 weeks (P<0.0001). Patients with complications (P = 0.038) were more likely to have lower KPS at postoperative 6 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Aggressive management with surgical resection should be considered in older patients with GBM, even those with relatively poor KPS. The use of ioMRI in this population does not appear to confer any measurable benefit over ioUS in experienced hands, but prolongs the length of surgery significantly, which is a preventable prognostic factor for impeding care.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Glioblastoma , Idoso , Neoplasias Encefálicas/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Encefálicas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Encefálicas/cirurgia , Glioblastoma/diagnóstico por imagem , Glioblastoma/mortalidade , Glioblastoma/cirurgia , Humanos , Avaliação de Estado de Karnofsky , Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
J Neurooncol ; 155(1): 45-52, 2021 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34495456

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Although numerous studies have established advanced patient age as a risk factor for poor outcomes following intracranial meningioma resection, large-scale evaluation of frailty for preoperative risk assessment has yet to be examined. METHODS: Weighted discharge data from the National Inpatient Sample were queried for adult patients undergoing benign intracranial meningioma resection from 2015 to 2018. Complex samples multivariable logistic regression models and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis were performed to evaluate adjusted associations and discrimination of frailty, quantified using the 11-factor modified frailty index (mFI), for clinical endpoints. RESULTS: Among 20,250 patients identified (mean age 60.6 years), 35.4% (n = 7170) were robust (mFI = 0), 34.5% (n = 6985) pre-frail (mFI = 1), 20.1% (n = 4075) frail (mFI = 2), and 10.0% (n = 2020) severely frail (mFI ≥ 3). On univariable analysis, these sub-cohorts stratified by increasing frailty were significantly associated with the development of Clavien-Dindo grade IV (life-threatening) complications (inclusive of those resulting in mortality) (1.3% vs. 3.1% vs. 6.5% vs. 9.4%, p < 0.001) and extended length of stay (eLOS) (15.4% vs. 22.5% vs. 29.3% vs. 37.4%, p < 0.001). Following multivariable analysis, increasing frailty (aOR 1.40, 95% CI 1.17, 1.68, p < 0.001) and age (aOR 1.20, 95% CI 1.05, 1.38, p = 0.009) were both independently associated with development of life-threatening complications or mortality, whereas increasing frailty (aOR 1.20, 95% CI 1.10, 1.32, p < 0.001), but not age, was associated with eLOS. Frailty (by mFI-11) achieved superior discrimination in comparison to age for both endpoints (AUC 0.69 and 0.61, respectively). CONCLUSION: Frailty may be more accurate than advanced patient age alone for prognostication of adverse events and outcomes following intracranial meningioma resection.


Assuntos
Fragilidade , Neoplasias Meníngeas , Meningioma , Fragilidade/complicações , Fragilidade/epidemiologia , Humanos , Neoplasias Meníngeas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Meníngeas/cirurgia , Meningioma/epidemiologia , Meningioma/cirurgia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Morbidade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA