Open-Spaced Ridged Hydrogel Scaffolds Containing TiO2-Self-Assembled Monolayer of Phosphonates Promote Regeneration and Recovery Following Spinal Cord Injury.

The spinal cord has a poor ability to regenerate after an injury, which may be due to cell loss, cyst formation, inflammation, and scarring. A promising approach to treating a spinal cord injury (SCI) is the use of biomaterials. We have developed a novel hydrogel scaffold fabricated from oligo(poly(ethylene glycol) fumarate) (OPF) as a 0.08 mm thick sheet containing polymer ridges and a cell-attractive surface on the other side. When the cells are cultured on OPF via chemical patterning, the cells attach, align, and deposit ECM along the direction of the pattern. Animals implanted with the rolled scaffold sheets had greater hindlimb recovery compared to that of the multichannel scaffold control, which is likely due to the greater number of axons growing across it. The immune cell number (microglia or hemopoietic cells: 50-120 cells/mm2 in all conditions), scarring (5-10% in all conditions), and ECM deposits (Laminin or Fibronectin: approximately 10-20% in all conditions) were equal in all conditions. Overall, the results suggest that the scaffold sheets promote axon outgrowth that can be guided across the scaffold, thereby promoting hindlimb recovery. This study provides a hydrogel scaffold construct that can be used in vitro for cell characterization or in vivo for future neuroprosthetics, devices, or cell and ECM delivery.

Limited efficacy of temozolomide alone for astrocytoma, IDH-mutant, CNS WHO grades 2 or 3.

PURPOSE: The role of temozolomide chemotherapy alone in isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-mutant astrocytomas has not been conclusively determined. Radiotherapy might be superior to temozolomide. Recent studies have linked temozolomide with induction of hypermutation and poor clinical course in some IDH-mutant gliomas. METHODS: In this retrospective study, 183 patients with astrocytoma, IDH-mutant, CNS WHO grade 2 or 3 and diagnosed between 2001 and 2019 were included. Patients initially monitored by wait-and-scan strategies or treated with radiotherapy or temozolomide alone were studied. Patient data were correlated with outcome. Matched pair and subgroup analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Radiotherapy was associated with longer progression-free survival than temozolomide (6.2 vs 3.4 years, p = 0.02) and wait-and-scan strategies (6.2 vs 4 years, p = 0.03). Patients treated with radiotherapy lived longer than patients treated with temozolomide (14.4 vs 10.7 years, p = 0.02). Survival was longer in the wait-and-scan cohort than in the temozolomide cohort (not reached vs 10.7 years, p < 0.01). Patients from the wait-and-scan cohort receiving temozolomide at first progression had significantly shorter survival times than patients treated with any other therapy at first progression (p < 0.01). Post-surgical T2 tumor volume, contrast enhancement on MRI and WHO grade were associated with overall survival in univariate analyses (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The results suggest superiority of radiotherapy over temozolomide and wait-and-scan strategies regarding progression-free survival and superiority of radiotherapy over temozolomide regarding overall survival. Our results are consistent with the notion that early temozolomide might compromise outcome in some patients.

Superselective intra-arterial cerebral infusion to improve brain tumor drug delivery.

Graphical abstract [Formula: see text].

Status Quo and Trends of Intra-Arterial Therapy for Brain Tumors: A Bibliometric and Clinical Trials Analysis.

Intra-arterial drug delivery circumvents the first-pass effect and is believed to increase both efficacy and tolerability of primary and metastatic brain tumor therapy. The aim of this update is to report on pertinent articles and clinical trials to better understand the research landscape to date and future directions. Elsevier's Scopus and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were reviewed in August 2021 for all possible articles and clinical trials of intra-arterial drug injection as a treatment strategy for brain tumors. Entries were screened against predefined selection criteria and various parameters were summarized. Twenty clinical trials and 271 articles satisfied all inclusion criteria. In terms of articles, 201 (74%) were primarily clinical and 70 (26%) were basic science, published in a total of 120 different journals. Median values were: publication year, 1986 (range, 1962-2021); citation count, 15 (range, 0-607); number of authors, 5 (range, 1-18). Pertaining to clinical trials, 9 (45%) were phase 1 trials, with median expected start and completion years in 2011 (range, 1998-2019) and 2022 (range, 2008-2025), respectively. Only one (5%) trial has reported results to date. Glioma was the most common tumor indication reported in both articles (68%) and trials (75%). There were 215 (79%) articles investigating chemotherapy, while 13 (65%) trials evaluated targeted therapy. Transient blood-brain barrier disruption was the commonest strategy for articles (27%) and trials (60%) to optimize intra-arterial therapy. Articles and trials predominately originated in the United States (50% and 90%, respectively). In this bibliometric and clinical trials analysis, we discuss the current state and trends of intra-arterial therapy for brain tumors. Most articles were clinical, and traditional anti-cancer agents and drug delivery strategies were commonly studied. This was reflected in clinical trials, of which only a single study had reported outcomes. We anticipate future efforts to involve novel therapeutic and procedural strategies based on recent advances in the field.