Alterations in mucosal immunity identified in the colon of patients with irritable bowel syndrome.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) has been associated with mucosal dysfunction, mild inflammation, and altered colonic bacteria. We used microarray expression profiling of sigmoid colon mucosa to assess whether there are stably expressed sets of genes that suggest there are objective molecular biomarkers associated with IBS. METHODS: Gene expression profiling was performed using Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 (Affymetrix) GeneChips with RNA from sigmoid colon mucosal biopsy specimens from 36 IBS patients and 25 healthy control subjects. Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction was used to confirm the data in 12 genes of interest. Statistical methods for microarray data were applied to search for differentially expressed genes, and to assess the stability of molecular signatures in IBS patients. RESULTS: Mucosal gene expression profiles were consistent across different sites within the sigmoid colon and were stable on repeat biopsy over approximately 3 months. Differentially expressed genes suggest functional alterations of several components of the host mucosal immune response to microbial pathogens. The most strikingly increased expression involved a yet uncharacterized gene, DKFZP564O0823. Identified specific genes suggest the hypothesis that molecular signatures may enable distinction of a subset of IBS patients from healthy controls. By using 75% of the biopsy specimens as a validation set to develop a gene profile, the test set (25%) was predicted correctly with approximately 70% accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: Mucosal gene expression analysis shows there are relatively stable alterations in colonic mucosal immunity in IBS. These molecular alterations provide the basis to test the hypothesis that objective biomarkers may be identified in IBS and enhance understanding of the disease.

The hepatocarcinoma cell line HepG2 does not express a GHS-R1a-type ghrelin receptor.

The interaction of ghrelin, a 28-residue acylated peptide, with the growth hormone secretagogue receptor 1a (GHS-R1a) has been studied mostly in cells expressing a recombinant GHS-R1a. As awareness is growing on the importance to study G protein-coupled receptors in a natural environment, we studied the effect of ghrelin in the human hepatocellular HepG2 cell line because it has been described in literature to respond to ghrelin. Despite extensive efforts, we were not able to confirm mRNA expression of GHS-R1a by reverse transcription PCR, radioligand binding, or ghrelin-induced GHS-R1a receptor activation; therefore, we conclude that HepG2 cells do not express GHS-R1a. On the other hand, we confirmed a modest effect of ghrelin on the up-regulation of IRS-1 phosphorylation, which might suggest the existence of an alternative ghrelin receptor in HepG2 cells.

Alterations in expression of p11 and SERT in mucosal biopsy specimens of patients with irritable bowel syndrome.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The pathophysiology of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) remains enigmatic; abnormalities in serotonin metabolism have been implicated. Two proteins that influence the function of serotonin and serotonergic receptors are serotonin transporter protein (SERT or soluble carrier protein, SLC6A4) and p11 (S-100A10, or calpactin I light chain). Both proteins are reported to be associated with depression-like states, a frequent comorbid condition in IBS. We explored the hypothesis that expression of these 2 proteins in colonic and rectal mucosa is abnormal in patients with IBS as compared with healthy controls. METHODS: Messenger RNA (mRNA) expression of SLC6A4 and p11 was measured in sigmoid and rectal mucosal biopsy specimens. Genotype of the promoter for SLC6A4 was also assessed in all participants. Validation studies explored reproducibility of 2 biopsy specimens taken from the same region and biopsy specimens taken an average of approximately 3 months apart. RESULTS: We found normal colonic mucosal expression of SLC6A4 in diarrhea (IBS-D)- or constipation-predominant IBS (IBS-C). On the other hand, p11 expression was increased in IBS. No significant effect on p11 mRNA expression in sigmoid colon or rectum was noted from antidepressant treatment in any of the analyzed subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Colonic mucosal expression of SLC6A4 in IBS is normal. Given that overexpression of p11 can increase serotonergic receptor functions (eg, 5-HT(1B) receptors), these data support the need for further study of the interaction between p11 expression in health and disease and its role in the therapeutic response to serotonergic agents, including antidepressants.

Mechanisms involved in the loss of excitatory post-stimulus responses by inflammation.

AIM: Electrical stimulation of colonic muscles elicits a response during the stimulation period, and a transient excitation after the stimulus. Post-stimulus or "rebound" excitation has been linked to pathways involving inhibitory neurotransmitters, prostaglandins and substance P but the mechanism is incompletely understood. Because rabbit colitis is characterized by a loss of inhibitory neurotransmission we hypothesized it might affect the rebound response. Therefore we characterized rebound responses in non-inflamed and inflamed tissue by comparing the effect of antagonists/blockers of putative (nitric oxide [NO], ATP, substance P, prostaglandins) and new (serotonin) neurotransmitters. METHODS: Strips from rabbits with colitis induced by 2,4,6-trinitrobenzenesulfonic acid (TNBS) were subjected to electrical field stimulation. Because rebound responses are more prominent under nonadrenergic noncholinergic (NANC) conditions, the effect of specific antagonists (N(omega)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME), indomethacin, SR140333, methiothepin) on the rebound response was compared under normal and NANC conditions. RESULTS: NANC-conditions increased rebound responses in non-inflamed strips, but this effect was reduced or abolished in inflamed strips. Rebound responses were reduced by pretreatment with the NO-synthase inhibitor, L-NAME, under NANC conditions in non-inflamed strips but not affected in inflamed tissue. In contrast, the P(2) purine receptor antagonist, suramin, did not affect rebound responses in inflamed and non-inflamed strips. The effect of the cyclo-oxygenase inhibitor (COX), indomethacin, on rebound responses was reversed from excitatory to inhibitory by inflammation. Under NANC conditions rebound contractions were also reduced by the neurokinin-1 (NK(1)) antagonist, SR140333, both in normal and inflamed strips. The most pronounced reduction in rebound responses in inflamed and non-inflamed strips under normal conditions was observed with the 5-hydroxytryptamin (1,2) (5-HT(1,2)) antagonist, methiothepin. CONCLUSION: Rebound responses are mainly non-cholinergic and involve NO, substance P, serotonin and inhibitory prostaglandins. In inflamed tissue the nitrergic pathway is absent, excitatory prostaglandins prevail and the cholinergic and tachykinergic components are relatively more important. However there remains an important serotonergic contribution. Our data suggest that inflammation damages different neural pathways to a different extent and is most selective for nitrergic pathways.

Interaction of the growth hormone-releasing peptides ghrelin and growth hormone-releasing peptide-6 with the motilin receptor in the rabbit gastric antrum.

The structural relationship between the motilin and the growth hormone secretagogue receptor (GHS-R), and between their respective ligands, motilin and ghrelin, prompted us to investigate whether ghrelin and the GHS-R agonist growth hormone-releasing peptide-6 (GHRP-6), could interact with the motilin receptor. The interaction was evaluated in the rabbit gastric antrum with binding studies on membrane preparations and with contraction studies on muscle strips in the presence of selective antagonists under conditions of electrical field stimulation (EFS) or not. Binding studies indicated that the affinity (pK(d)) for the motilin receptor was in the order of ghrelin (4.23 +/- 0.07) < GHRP-6 (5.54 +/- 0.08) < motilin (9.13 +/- 0.03). The interaction of ghrelin with the motilin receptor requires the octanoyl group. Motilin induced smooth muscle contractile responses but ghrelin and GHRP-6 were ineffective. EFS elicited on- and off-responses that were increased by motilin already at 10(-9) M, but not by 10(-5) M ghrelin. In contrast, GHRP-6 also enhanced the on- and off-responses. The motilin antagonist Phe-cyclo[Lys-Tyr(3-tBu)-betaAla-] trifluoroacetate (GM-109) blocked the effect of GHRP-6 on the off-responses but not on the on-responses. Under nonadrenergic noncholinergic conditions, the effects of motilin and GHRP-6 on the on-responses were abolished; those on the off-responses were preserved. All responses were blocked by neurokinin (NK)(1) and NK(2) antagonists. In conclusion, ghrelin is unable to induce contractions via the motilin receptor. However, GHRP-6 enhances neural contractile responses, partially via interaction with the motilin receptor on noncholinergic nerves with tachykinins as mediator, and partially via another receptor that may be a GHS-R subtype on cholinergic nerves that corelease tachykinins.