Socioeconomic Status Correlates With Initial Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Pain Interference (PROMIS-PI) Scores but Not the Likelihood of Spine Surgery.

Objective To explore how socioeconomic status and patient characteristics may be associated with initial self-reports of pain and determine if there was an increased association with undergoing spine surgery. Methods Patients at an academic center between 2015 and 2021 who completed the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Pain Interference (PROMIS-PI) questionnaire were included. Multivariable linear regression models were used to determine the association between insurance type and patient factors with initial reports of pain. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to determine the association between PI and the likelihood of surgery in two time periods, three and 12 months. Results The study included 9,587 patients. The mean PROMIS-PI scores were 61.93 (SD 7.82) and 63.74 (SD 6.93) in the cervical and lumbar cohorts, respectively. Medicaid and Workers' Compensation insurance patients reported higher pain scores compared to those with private insurance: Medicaid (cervical: 2.77, CI (1.76-3.79), p<0.001; lumbar (2.05, CI (1.52-2.59), p<0.001); Workers' Compensation (cervical: 2.12, CI (0.96-3.27), p<0.001; lumbar: 1.51, CI (0.79-2.23), p<0.001). Black patients reported higher pain compared to White patients (cervical: 1.50, CI (0.44-2.55), p=0.01; lumbar: 1.51, CI (0.94-2.08), p<0.001). Higher PROMIS-PI scores were associated with a higher likelihood of surgery. There was no increased association of likelihood of surgery in Black, Medicaid, or Workers' Compensation patients when controlling for pain severity. Conclusion Black patients and patients with Medicaid and Workers' compensation insurance were likely to report higher pain scores. Higher initial pain scores were associated with an increased likelihood of surgery. However, despite increased pain scores, Black patients and those with Medicaid and Workers' Compensation insurance did not have a higher likelihood of undergoing surgery.

Are Quality Scores in the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services Merit-based Incentive Payment System Associated With Outcomes After Outpatient Orthopaedic Surgery?

BACKGROUND: The Medicare Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) ties reimbursement incentives to clinician performance to improve healthcare quality. It is unclear whether the MIPS quality score can accurately distinguish between high-performing and low-performing clinicians. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) What were the rates of unplanned hospital visits (emergency department visits, observation stays, or unplanned admissions) within 7, 30, and 90 days of outpatient orthopaedic surgery among Medicare beneficiaries? (2) Was there any association of MIPS quality scores with the risk of an unplanned hospital visit (emergency department visits, observation stays, or unplanned admissions)? METHODS: Between January 2018 and December 2019, a total of 605,946 outpatient orthopaedic surgeries were performed in New York State according to the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database. Of those, 56,772 patients were identified as Medicare beneficiaries and were therefore potentially eligible. A further 34% (19,037) were excluded because of missing surgeon identifier, age younger than 65 years, residency outside New York State, emergency department visit on the same day as outpatient surgery, observation stay on the same claim as outpatient surgery, and concomitant high-risk or eye procedures, leaving 37,735 patients for analysis. The database does not include a list of all state residents and thus does not allow for censoring of patients who move out of state. We chose this dataset because it includes nearly all hospitals and ambulatory surgery centers in a large geographic area (New York State) and hence is not limited by sampling bias. We included 37,735 outpatient orthopaedic surgical encounters among Medicare beneficiaries in New York State from 2018 to 2019. For the 37,735 outpatient orthopaedic surgical procedures included in our study, the mean ± standard deviation age of patients was 73 ± 7 years, 84% (31,550) were White, and 59% (22,071) were women. Our key independent variable was the MIPS quality score percentile (0 to 19th, 20th to 39th, 40th to 59th, or 60th to 100th) for orthopaedic surgeons. Clinicians in the MIPS program may receive a bonus or penalty based on the overall MIPS score, which ranges from 0 to 100 and is a weighted score based on four subscores: quality, promoting interoperability, improvement activities, and cost. The MIPS quality score, which attempts to reward clinicians providing superior quality of care, accounted for 50% and 45% of the overall MIPS score in 2018 and 2019, respectively. Our main outcome measures were 7-day, 30-day, and 90-day unplanned hospital visits after outpatient orthopaedic surgery. To determine the association between MIPS quality scores and unplanned hospital visits, we estimated multivariable hierarchical logistic regression models controlling for MIPS quality scores; patient-level (age, race and ethnicity, gender, and comorbidities), facility-level (such as bed size and teaching status), surgery and surgeon-level (such as surgical procedure and surgeon volume) covariates; and facility-level random effects. We then used these models to estimate the adjusted rates of unplanned hospital visits across MIPS quality score percentiles after adjusting for covariates in the multivariable models. RESULTS: In total, 2% (606 of 37,735), 2% (783 of 37,735), and 3% (1013 of 37,735) of encounters had an unplanned hospital visit within 7, 30, or 90 days of outpatient orthopaedic surgery, respectively. Most hospital visits within 7 days (95% [576 of 606]), 30 days (94% [733 of 783]), or 90 days (91% [924 of 1013]) were because of emergency department visits. We found very small differences in unplanned hospital visits by MIPS quality scores, with the 20th to 39th percentile of MIPS quality scores having 0.71% points (95% CI -1.19% to -0.22%; p = 0.004), 0.68% points (95% CI -1.26% to -0.11%; p = 0.02), and 0.75% points (95% CI -1.42% to -0.08%; p = 0.03) lower than the 0 to 19th percentile at 7, 30, and 90 days, respectively. There was no difference in adjusted rates of unplanned hospital visits between patients undergoing surgery with a surgeon in the 0 to 19th, 40th to 59th, or 60th to 100th percentiles at 7, 30, or 90 days. CONCLUSION: We found that the rates of unplanned hospital visits after outpatient orthopaedic surgery among Medicare beneficiaries were low and primarily driven by emergency department visits. We additionally found only a small association between MIPS quality scores for individual physicians and the risk of an unplanned hospital visit after outpatient orthopaedic surgery. These findings suggest that policies aimed at reducing postoperative emergency department visits may be the best target to reduce overall postoperative unplanned hospital visits and that the MIPS program should be eliminated or modified to more strongly link reimbursement to risk-adjusted patient outcomes, thereby better aligning incentives among patients, surgeons, and the Centers for Medicare ad Medicaid Services. Future work could seek to evaluate the association between MIPS scores and other surgical outcomes and evaluate whether annual changes in MIPS score weighting are independently associated with clinician performance in the MIPS and regarding clinical outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

Using PROMIS Scores to Provide Cost-Conscious Follow-up After Foot and Ankle Surgery.

BACKGROUND: National campaigns in the United States, such as Choosing Wisely, emphasize that decreasing low-value office visits maximizes health care value. Although patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are frequently used to quantify postoperative outcomes, they have not been assessed as a tool to help guide clinicians consider alternatives or discontinue in-person follow-up visits. The purpose of this study is to assess the frequency and cost of in-person follow-up visits after patients report substantial improvement defined as 2 consecutive improvements above preoperative Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) pain interference (PI) scores. METHODS: Retrospective PROMIS PI data were obtained between 2015 and 2020 for common elective foot (n = 759) and ankle (n = 578) surgical procedures. Patients were divided into quartiles according to their preoperative PI score. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to investigate time to substantial improvement. Substantial improvement was defined as having 2 consecutive postoperative minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) above preoperative PROMIS PI scores. MCID was measured using the distribution-based method. Multivariable negative binomial models were used to determine the number of visits and direct associated costs after substantial improvement. The cost to payors was estimated using reimbursement rates. RESULTS: Within 3 months, 12% to 46% of foot and 16% to 61% of ankle patients achieved substantial improvement. Results vary by preoperative pain quartile, with patients who report higher preoperative pain scores achieving earlier improvement. After achieving substantial improvement, foot and ankle patients averaged 3.60 and 4.01 follow-up visits during the remaining 9 months of the year. Visit costs averaged $266 and $322 per foot and ankle patient respectively. CONCLUSION: Postoperative follow-up visits are time-consuming and costly. Physicians might consider objective measures, such as PROMIS PI, to determine the need, timing, and alternatives for in-person follow-up visits for elective foot and ankle surgeries after patients demonstrate reliable clinical improvement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective cohort study at a single institution.

Is Morbid Obesity a Modifiable Risk Factor in Patients Who Have Severe Knee Osteoarthritis and do Not Have a Formal Perioperative Optimization Program?

BACKGROUND: Obesity is considered a modifiable risk factor prior to total knee arthroplasty (TKA); however, little data support this hypothesis. Our purpose was to evaluate patients who have a body mass index (BMI) >40 presenting for TKA to determine the incidence of: (1) patients who achieved successful weight loss through nutritional modification or bariatric surgery and (2) patients who underwent TKA over the study period without the presence of a formal optimization program. METHODS: This was a retrospective, single-center analysis. Inclusion criteria included: Kellgren and Lawrence grade 3 or 4 knee osteoarthritis, BMI >40 at presentation, and minimum 1-year follow-up (mean 45 months) (N = 624 patients). Demographics, weight loss interventions, pursuit of TKA, maximum BMI change, and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System scores were collected. Multivariable logistic and linear regressions evaluated associations of underlying demographic and treatment characteristics with outcomes. RESULTS: There were 11% of patients who ended up pursuing TKA over the study period. Bariatric surgery was 3.7 times more likely to decrease BMI by minimum 10 compared to nonsurgical intervention (95% confidence interval [CI] [1.7, 8.1]; P = .001). Bariatric surgery resulted in mean BMI change of -3.3 (range, 0 to 22) compared to nonsurgical interventions (-2.6 [range, 0 to 12]) and no intervention (0.4 [range, 0 to 15]; P < .0001). Bariatric surgery patients were 3.1 times more likely to undergo TKA (95% CI [1.3, 7.1]; P = .008), and nonsurgical interventions were 2.4 times more likely to undergo TKA (95% CI [1.3, 4.5]; P = .006) compared to no intervention. Non-White patients across all interventions were less likely to experience loss >5 BMI compared to White patients (95% CI [0.2, 0.9]; P = .018). CONCLUSIONS: Most patients were unable to reduce BMI more than 5 to 10 over a mean 4-year period without a formal weight optimization program. Utilization of bariatric surgery was most successful compared to nonsurgical interventions, although ultimate pursuit of TKA remained low in all cohorts.

Demographics and Early Outcomes of Commercial Antibiotic Cement Usage for Infection Prophylaxis During Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients Older Than 65 Years: An American Joint Replacement Registry Study.

INTRODUCTION: The use of antibiotic-laden bone cement (ALBC) for infection prophylaxis in the setting of primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains controversial. Using data from the American Joint Replacement Registry (AJRR), (1) we examined the demographics of ALBC usage in the United States and (2) identified the effect of prophylactic commercially available ALBC on early revision and readmission for prosthetic joint infection (PJI) after primary TKA. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of the AJRR from 2017 to 2020. Patients older than 65 years undergoing primary cemented TKA with or without the use of commercially available antibiotic cement were eligible for inclusion (N = 251,506 patients). Data were linked to available Medicare claims to maximize revision outcomes. Demographics including age, sex, race/ethnicity, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), preoperative inflammatory arthritis, region, and body mass index (BMI) class were recorded. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to evaluate the association between the two outcome measures and ALBC usage. RESULTS: Patients undergoing cemented TKA with ALBC were more likely to be Non-Hispanic Black ( P < 0.001), have a CCI of 2 or 3 ( P < 0.001), reside in the South ( P < 0.001), and had a higher mean BMI ( P < 0.001). In the regression models, ALBC usage was associated with increased risk of 90-day revision for PJI (hazards ratio 2.175 [95% confidence interval] 1.698 to 2.787) ( P < 0.001) and was not associated with 90-day all-cause readmissions. Male sex, higher CCI, and BMI >35 were all independently associated with 90-day revision for PJI. DISCUSSION: The use of commercial ALBC in patients older than 65 years for primary TKA in the AJRR was not closely associated with underlying comorbidities suggesting that hospital-level and surgeon-level factors influence its use. In addition, ALBC use did not decrease the risk of 90-day revision for PJI and was not associated with 90-day readmission rates.

Incidence and Risk Factors for Revision Within 1 Year of Primary Carpal Tunnel Release.

BACKGROUND: The annual volume of carpal tunnel release (CTR) in the United States has been estimated to be 577 000 per year. Our objectives were to evaluate the incidence and risk factors for revision CTR within 1 year of primary CTR. METHODS: We identified all adult patients undergoing primary CTR from October 2015 to September 2019 in the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes. We used the CPT modifier codes to determine laterality of index and revision procedures. We estimated multivariable hierarchical logistic regression models to evaluate risk factors for revision CTR within 1 year. RESULTS: Of the 80 423 primary CTR procedures, 178 (0.22%) underwent a revision CTR within 1 year of the index surgery. The mean (SD) age of the entire cohort was 58.69 (14.43) years, 61.1% were women, 73.2% were non-Hispanic white, 42.9% were covered through private insurance, and 9.5% had diabetes mellitus. Workers' compensation insurance (odds ratio [OR] = 1.83, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13-2.98, P = .02) and simultaneous bilateral CTR (OR = 14.91, 95% CI, 9.62-23.12, P < .001) were associated with revision CTR within 1 year of the index procedure. No models demonstrated an association between endoscopic technique or surgeon volume and revision CTR. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of revision CTR within 1 year was lower than that previously reported. Patients covered by workers' compensation and those undergoing simultaneous bilateral CTR had higher likelihood of a revision CTR within 1 year, whereas endoscopic technique and surgeon volume were not associated with revision CTR within 1 year.

Racial/ethnic and income-based differences in the use of surgery for cervical and lumbar disorders in New York State: a retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: The extent to which use of spine surgeries for patients with cervical and lumbar disorders varies by their race/ethnicity and income is currently unknown. PURPOSE: To assess racial/ethnic and income-based differences in use of spine surgery in New York State (NYS) from 2016 to 2019. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective observational analysis using 2016 to 2019 New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) data, direct standardization, and multivariable mixed-effects linear regression models. METHODS: A dataset of patients who underwent surgery for cervical and spinal disorders in NYS in the period 2016 to 2019 was used to determine county-level age- and sex-standardized annual cervical and lumbar surgery rates expressed as number of surgeries per 10,000 individuals. Further sub-analysis was performed with the key independent variables being the combination of individual-level race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, and Hispanic individuals) and income (low-/high-income residing in zip codes below/above state median income); and year. We estimated multivariable mixed-effects linear regression models which controlled county-level variables to determine the adjusted rates of spine surgeries for patients belonging to various race/ethnicity and income group combinations. RESULTS: The study included 29,650 and 42,498 patients in the cervical and lumbar cohorts, respectively. In 2019, the county-level mean cervical and lumbar surgery rates were 3.88 and 5.19 surgeries per 10,000 individuals, respectively. There was a five-fold rate variation across NYS. In 2019, the adjusted cervical rates were 4.59 (White low-income), 4.96 (White high-income), 7.20 (Black low-income), 3.01 (Black high-income), 4.37 (Hispanic low-income), and 1.17 (Hispanic high-income). The adjusted lumbar rates were 5.49 (White low-income), 6.31 (White high-income), 9.43 (Black low-income), 2.47 (Black high-income), 4.22 (Hispanic low-income), and 2.02 (Hispanic high-income). The rates for low-income Black or Hispanic patients were significantly higher than their high-income counterparts. Low-income Black patients had the highest rates. Over the study period, the gap/difference increased significantly between high-income Hispanic and White individuals by 2.19 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -4.27, -0.10, p=.04) for cervical surgery; and between low-income Black and White individuals by 2.82 (2.82, 95% CI: 0.59, 5.06, p=.01) for lumbar surgery. CONCLUSION: There are differences in the rates of spine surgery in New York State, among identifiable groups. Black individuals from poorer zip codes experience relatively higher spine surgery rates. Understanding the drivers of surgical rate variation is key to improving the equitable delivery of spine care. A better understanding of such rate variations could inform health policy.

Association of Total Knee Replacement Removal From the Inpatient-Only List With Outpatient Surgery Utilization and Outcomes in Medicare Patients.

Importance: Little is known about the association of total knee replacement (TKR) removal from the Medicare inpatient-only (IPO) list in 2018 with outcomes in Medicare patients. Objective: To evaluate (1) patient factors associated with outpatient TKR use and (2) whether the IPO policy was associated with changes in postoperative outcomes for patients undergoing TKR. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study included data from administrative claims from the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System. Included patients were Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries undergoing TKRs or total hip replacements (THRs) in New York State from 2016 to 2019. Multivariable generalized linear mixed models were used to identify patient factors associated with outpatient TKR use, and with a difference-in-differences strategy to examine association of the IPO policy with post-TKR outcomes relative to post-THR outcomes in Medicare patients. Data analysis was performed from 2021 to 2022. Exposures: IPO policy implementation in 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures: Use of outpatient or inpatient TKR; secondary outcomes included 30-day and 90-day readmissions, 30-day and 90-day postoperative emergency department visits, non-home discharge, and total cost of the surgical encounter. Results: A total of 37 588 TKR procedures were performed on 18 819 patients from 2016 to 2019, with 1684 outpatient TKR procedures from 2018 to 2019 (mean [SD] age, 73.8 [5.9] years; 12 240 female [65.0%]; 823 Hispanic [4.4%], 982 non-Hispanic Black [5.2%], 15 714 non-Hispanic White [83.5%]). Older (eg, age 75 years vs 65 years: adjusted difference, -1.65%; 95% CI, -2.31% to -0.99%), Black (-1.44%; 95% CI, -2.81% to -0.07%), and female patients (-0.91%; 95% CI, -1.52% to -0.29%), as well as patients treated in safety-net hospitals (disproportionate share hospital payments quartile 4: -18.09%; 95% CI, -31.81% to -4.36%), were less likely to undergo outpatient TKR. After IPO policy implementation in the TKR cohort, there were lower adjusted 30-day readmissions (adjusted difference [AD], -2.11%; 95% CI, -2.73% to -1.48%; P < .001), 90-day readmissions ( -3.23%; 95% CI, -4.04% to -2.42%; P < .001), 30-day ED visits ( -2.45%; 95% CI, -3.17% to -1.72%; P < .001), 90-day ED visits (-4.01%; 95% CI, -4.91% to -3.11%; P < .001) and higher cost per encounter ($2988; 95% CI, $415 to $5561; P = .03). However, these changes did not differ from changes in the THR cohort except for increased TKR cost of $770 per encounter ($770; 95% CI, $83 to $1457; P = .03) relative to THR. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of patients undergoing TKR and THR, we found that older, Black, and female patients and patients treated in safety-net hospitals may have had lesser access to outpatient TKRs highlighting concerns of disparities. IPO policy was not associated with changes in overall health care use or outcomes after TKR, except for an increase of $770 per TKR encounter.

What Factors Are Associated With Revision Cubital Tunnel Release Within 3 Years?

BACKGROUND: It has been shown that patient demographics such as age, payer factors such as insurance type, clinical characteristics such as preoperative opioid use, and disease grade but not surgical procedure are associated with revision surgery to treat cubital tunnel syndrome. However, prior studies evaluating factors associated with revision surgery after primary cubital tunnel release have been relatively small and have involved patients from a single institution or included only a single payer. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) What percentage of patients who underwent cubital tunnel release underwent revision within 3 years? (2) What factors are associated with revision cubital tunnel release within 3 years of primary cubital tunnel release? METHODS: We identified all adult patients who underwent primary cubital tunnel release from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2017, in the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database using Current Procedural Terminology codes. We chose this database because it includes all payers and nearly all facilities in a large geographic area where cubital tunnel release may be performed. We used Current Procedural Terminology modifier codes to determine the laterality of primary and revision procedures. The mean age of the cohort overall was 53 ± 14 years, 43% (8490 of 19,683) were women, and 73% (14,308 of 19,683) were non-Hispanic White. The Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database organization does not include a listing of all state residents and thus does not allow for censoring of patients who move out of state. All patients were followed for 3 years. We developed a multivariable hierarchical logistic regression model to model factors independently associated with revision cubital tunnel release within 3 years. Key explanatory variables included age, gender, race or ethnicity, insurance, patient residential location, medical comorbidities, concomitant procedures, whether the procedure was unilateral or bilateral, and year. The model also controlled for facility-level random effects to account for the clustering of observations among these entities. RESULTS: The risk of revision cubital tunnel release within 3 years of the primary procedure was 0.7% (141 of 19,683). The median time to revision cubital tunnel release was 448 days (interquartile range 210 to 861 days). After controlling for patient-level covariates and facility random effects, and compared with their respective counterparts, the odds of revision surgery were higher for patients with workers compensation insurance (odds ratio 2.14 [95% confidence interval 1.38 to 3.32]; p < 0.001), a simultaneous bilateral index procedure (OR 12.26 [95% CI 5.93 to 25.32]; p < 0.001), and those who underwent submuscular transposition of the ulnar nerve (OR 2.82 [95% CI 1.35 to 5.89]; p = 0.006). The odds of revision surgery were lower with increasing age (OR 0.79 per 10 years [95% CI 0.69 to 0.91]; p < 0.001) and a concomitant carpal tunnel release (OR 0.66 [95% CI 0.44 to 0.98]; p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: The risk of revision cubital tunnel release was low. Surgeons should be cautious when performing simultaneous bilateral cubital tunnel release and when performing submuscular transposition in the setting of primary cubital tunnel release. Patients with workers compensation insurance should be informed they are at increased odds for undergoing subsequent revision cubital tunnel release within 3 years. Future work may seek to better understand whether these same effects are seen in other populations. Future work might also evaluate how these and other factors such as disease severity could affect functional outcomes and the trajectory of recovery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

Clinical Improvement Following Operative Management of Ankle Fractures Among Patients With and Without Moderate to High Depressive Symptoms: An Analysis Using PROMIS.

Background: Understanding the recovery trajectory following operative management of ankle fractures can help surgeons guide patient expectations. Further, it is beneficial to consider the impact of mental health on the recovery trajectory. Our study aimed to address the paucity of literature focused on understanding the recovery trajectory following surgery for ankle fractures, including in patients with depressive symptoms. Methods: From February 2015 to March 2020, patients with isolated ankle fractures were asked to complete Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF), Pain Interference (PI), and Depression questionnaires as part of routine care at presentation and follow-up time points. Linear mixed effects regression models were used to evaluate the patient recovery pattern, comparing the preoperative time point to <3 months, 3-6 months, and >6 months across all patients. Additional models that included the presence of depression symptoms as a covariate were then used. Results: A total of 153 patients met inclusion criteria. By 3-6 months, PROMIS PF (ß: 9.95, 95% CI: 7.97-11.94, P < .001), PI (ß: -10.30, 95% CI: -11.87 to -8.72, P < .001), and Depression (ß: -5.60, 95% CI: -7.01 to -4.20, P < .001) improved relative to the preoperative time point. This level of recovery was sustained thereafter. When incorporating depressive symptoms into our model as a covariate, the moderate to high depressive symptoms were associated with significantly and clinically important worse PROMIS PF (ß: -4.00, 95% CI: -7.00 to -1.00, P = .01) and PI (ß: 3.16, 95% CI: -0.55 to 5.76, P = .02) scores. Conclusion: Following ankle fracture surgery, all patients tend to clinically improve by 3-6 months postoperatively and then continue to appreciate this clinical improvement. Although patients with moderate to high depressive symptoms also clinically improve following the same trajectory, they tend to do so to a lesser level than those who have low depressive symptoms. Level of Evidence: Level III, case-control study.

Heightened 30-Day Postoperative Complication Risk Persists After COVID-19 Infection.

BACKGROUND: Current literature describing the riskiness of operating on actively infected COVID-19 patients far outnumbers that on the risk of operating on recovered patients. The purpose of this study was to analyze a single, tertiary referral center experience regarding postoperative complications and readmissions in COVID-19-recovered patients versus COVID-19-naïve (never previously infected) patients undergoing elective and emergency surgery across all surgical subspecialties. METHODS: All PCR positive COVID-19 patients that underwent a surgical procedure between February 1, 2020, and November 1, 2020, were included in the COVID-positive cohort. These patients were then matched to COVID-naïve controls that underwent similar procedures within the same time frame. Primary outcomes included 30-day postoperative complications as well as 90-day readmissions. Multivariable analyses were also performed. RESULTS: 112 COVID-positive patients met inclusion criteria and were all matched to COVID-naïve controls. 76 patients (68%) underwent surgery > 30 days from their COVID diagnosis. COVID-positive patients were at significantly higher risk of 30-day complications compared to the COVID-naïve cohort (22% versus 8%, respectively; p < 0.01). Multivariable analyses found ambulatory/asymptomatic infections, undergoing surgery between 30 and 120 days from diagnosis, initial presentation to the emergency department and elevated ASA scores to be significantly associated with 30-day complications. No differences were found for 90-day readmissions. CONCLUSION: Patients with previous COVID-19 infections carry a higher perioperative risk profile for 30-day complications compared to COVID-naïve counterparts in unvaccinated populations.

Trends in lumbar interbody fusion: A study of American Board of Orthopedic Surgery (ABOS) candidate data.

Background: There has been an increase in posterior-based interbody fusions over the past two decades. Our objective was to evaluate trends in interbody fusion use among the American Board of Orthopedic Surgery (ABOS) Part II candidates. Methods: The ABOS database from 2003 to 2012 was queried for common procedural terminology (CPT) codes indicating lumbar interbody fusion (22,558 anterior lumbar interbody fusion [ALIF] and 22,630 and 22,633 posterior lumbar interbody fusion [PLIF] or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion [TLIF]). Trends in the use of interbody fusion technique, associated complications, and geographical variation were evaluated. We also queried utilization of the anterior and posterior interbody fusions by the International Classification of Diseases-9 code. Results: 6841 interbody fusion cases were identified (2329 ALIF and 4512 PLIF/TLIF). There was a significantly higher use of PLIF/TLIF than ALIF over the study period (P < 0.001). As compared to patients in the Midwest, those in the Northwest had significantly higher odds of undergoing PLIF/TLIF (odds ratio [OR]: 4.79, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.61-6.35, P <0.001), and those in the Southwest had significantly lower odds of PLIF/TLIF (OR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.69-0.95, P = 0.01). The overall complication rate was 22.2% (n = 1,519). Vascular-related complications were significantly higher among patients undergoing ALIF (31 vs. 1, P <0.001), while those undergoing TLIF/PLIF were more likely to experience unspecified medical complications. On multivariate analysis, patients undergoing PLIF/TLIF had lower odds of experiencing a complication (P = 0.03, OR 0.87, CI 95%). Conclusion: Over the 10-year study period, there has been a significantly increased rate of posterior interbody fusion among candidates taking part II ABOS examination.

Association of Medicare Mandatory Bundled Payment Reform With Joint Replacement Surgery Use for Beneficiaries With Alzheimer Disease and Related Dementias.

Importance: Medicare beneficiaries with Alzheimer disease and related dementias (ADRD) are a particularly vulnerable group in whom arthritis is a frequently occurring comorbidity. Medicare's mandatory bundled payment reform-the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) model-was intended to improve quality and reduce spending in beneficiaries undergoing joint replacement surgical procedures for arthritis. In the absence of adjustment for clinical risk, hospitals may avoid performing elective joint replacements for beneficiaries with ADRD. Objective: To evaluate the association of the CJR model with utilization of joint replacements for Medicare beneficiaries with ADRD. Design Setting and Participants: This cohort study used national Medicare data from 2013 to 2017 and multivariable linear probability models and a triple differences estimation approach. Medicare beneficiaries with a diagnosis of arthritis were identified from 67 metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) mandated to participate in CJR and 104 control MSAs. Data were analyzed from July 2020 to July 2021. Exposures: Implementation of the CJR model in 2016. Main Outcomes and Measures: Outcomes were separate binary indicators for whether or not a beneficiary underwent hip or knee replacement. Key independent variables were the MSA group, before-CJR and after-CJR phase, ADRD diagnosis, and their interactions. The linear probability models controlled for beneficiary characteristics, MSA fixed effects, and time trends. Results: The study included 24 598 729 beneficiary-year observations for 9 624 461 unique beneficiaries, of which 250 168 beneficiaries underwent hip and 474 751 underwent knee replacements. The mean (SD) age of the 2013 cohort was 77.1 (7.9) years, 3 110 922 (66.4%) were women, 3 928 432 (83.8%) were non-Hispanic White, 792 707 (16.9%) were dually eligible for Medicaid, and 885 432 (18.9%) had an ADRD diagnosis. Before CJR implementation, joint replacement rates were lower among beneficiaries with ADRD (hip replacements: 0.38% vs 1.17% for beneficiaries with and without ADRD, respectively; P < .001; knee replacements: 0.70% vs 2.25%; P < .001). After controlling for relevant covariates, CJR was associated with a 0.07-percentage-point decline in hip replacements for beneficiaries with ADRD (95% CI, -0.13 to -0.001; P = .046) and a 0.07-percentage-point decline for beneficiaries without ADRD (95% CI, -0.12 to -0.02; P = .01) residing in CJR MSAs compared with beneficiaries in control MSAs. However, this change in hip replacement rates for beneficiaries with ADRD was not statistically significantly different from the change for beneficiaries without ADRD (percentage point difference: 0.01; 95% CI, -0.08 to 0.09; P = .88). No statistically significant changes in knee replacement rates were noted for beneficiaries with ADRD compared with those without ADRD with CJR implementation (percentage point difference: -0.03, 95% CI, -0.09 to 0.02; P = .27). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of Medicare beneficiaries with arthritis, the CJR model was not associated with a decline in joint replacement utilization among beneficiaries with ADRD compared with beneficiaries without ADRD in the first 2 years of the program, thereby alleviating patient selection concerns.

Black Race, Hispanic Ethnicity, and Medicaid Insurance Are Associated With Lower Rates of Rotator Cuff Repair in New York State.

PURPOSE: To determine the use of operative rotator cuff repair for rotator cuff pathology in New York State and analyze the racial, ethnic, and income-based disparities in receiving rotator cuff repair. METHODS: A retrospective review of the Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System Database of New York State was conducted to include patients with a new diagnosis of rotator cuff tear between July 1, 2017, and June 30, 2019, with at least 6 months of follow-up. Bivariate analysis using χ2 tests and multivariable logistic regression models were used to determine racial, ethnic, and income-based disparities in the use of surgical treatment with rotator cuff repair. RESULTS: A total of 87,660 patients were included in the study. Of these, 36,422 patients (41.5%) underwent surgical treatment with rotator cuff repair. Multivariable analysis showed that Black race (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.69-0.87; P < .001), Hispanic/Latino ethnicity (aOR 0.91; 95% CI 0.85-0.97); P = .004), and Medicaid (aOR 0.75; 95% CI 0.70-0.80; P < .001), or other government insurance (aOR 0.82; 95% CI 0.78-0.86; P < .001) were independently associated with lower rates of rotator cuff repair. Male sex (aOR 1.18; 95% CI 1.14-1.22; P < .001), Asian race (aOR 1.27; 95% CI 1.00-1.62; P = .048), workers' compensation insurance (aOR 1.12; 95% CI 1.07-1.18; P < .001), and greater home ZIP code income quartile (aOR 1.19; 95% CI 1.09-1.30; P < .001) were independently associated with greater rates of operative management. Although race was an independent covariate affecting rate of rotator cuff repair, the effects of race were altered when accounting for the other covariates, suggesting that race alone does not account for the differences in rate of surgery for rotator cuff pathology. CONCLUSIONS: In this analysis of all adult patients presenting with rotator cuff tears to New York hospital systems from 2017 to 2019, we identified significant racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic disparities in the likelihood of rotator cuff repair surgery for patients with rotator cuff tears. These include lower rates of rotator cuff repair for those Black, Hispanic, and low-income populations as represented by Medicaid insurance and low home ZIP code income quartile. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study reports disparities in the use of rotator cuff repair for individuals with rotator cuff pathology.

Long-Term Health-Related Quality of Life After Harrington Instrumentation and Fusion for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Minimum 40-Year Follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Despite its importance for clinical decisions, the long-term consequences of posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion (PSIF) for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), particularly in the lower lumbar spine, remain unclear. This study evaluates the long-term health-related quality of life and the need for a further surgical procedure in patients treated with Harrington instrumentation from 1961 to 1977 according to the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) and in comparison with age-matched norms. METHODS: A search was performed to identify and contact the 314 identified patients with AIS treated with PSIF by Dr. L.A. Goldstein. The assessment included identified subsequent spine surgery, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Scoliosis Research Society-7 (SRS-7), EuroQol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D), and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29 (PROMIS-29). The health-related quality of life was compared with U.S. norms and, within the cohort, was compared by patient factors, LIV, and subsequent spine surgery. RESULTS: In this study, 134 patients (42.7%) were identified; 24 (7.6%) had died, 81 (25.8%) consented to participate in the study, and 29 (9.2%) declined participation. The mean follow-up was 45.4 years (range, 40 to 56 years). There were 81 patients who completed the surveys, 77 patients who completed the SRS-7, 77 patients who completed the ODI, and 76 patients who completed the PROMIS-29 and EQ-5D. There were 12.8% of patients with LIV L3 or proximal and 36.4% with LIV L4 or distal who had an additional surgical procedure (odds ratio, 3.98). Comparing the ODI of patients who had undergone an additional surgical procedure with those who had not showed 42% and 73% minimal disability, 53% and 23% moderate disability, and 5% and 2% severe disability. Of the patients who had not undergone an additional surgical procedure, those with LIV L3 or proximal had mean scores of 14.12 points for the ODI and 23.3 points for the SRS-7 and those with LIV L4 or distal had mean scores of 17.9 points for the ODI and 22.7 points for the SRS-7; these differences were not significant. The mean PROMIS-29 and EQ-5D scores were not different from normal U.S. age-based means. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with AIS treated with PSIF at a mean 45-year follow-up and LIV L4 or distal had a higher rate of undergoing an additional surgical procedure than those with LIV L3 or proximal. Patients undergoing an additional surgical procedure had lower health-related quality of life than those who did not. Despite this, there was no difference in health-related quality of life for patients with LIV L4 or distal compared with patients with LIV L3 or proximal. This cohort of patients with AIS treated with PSIF demonstrates normal self-reported health-related quality of life compared with the age-matched general population. These long-term outcomes of PSIF for AIS are encouraging. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Association of Time Elapsed Since Ischemic Stroke With Risk of Recurrent Stroke in Older Patients Undergoing Elective Nonneurologic, Noncardiac Surgery.

Importance: Perioperative strokes are a major cause of death and disability. There is limited information on which to base decisions for how long to delay elective nonneurologic, noncardiac surgery in patients with a history of stroke. Objective: To examine whether an association exists between the time elapsed since an ischemic stroke and the risk of recurrent stroke in older patients undergoing elective nonneurologic, noncardiac surgery. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used data from the 100% Medicare Provider Analysis and Review files, including the Master Beneficiary Summary File, between 2011 and 2018 and included elective nonneurologic, noncardiac surgeries in patients 66 years or older. Patients were excluded if they had more than 1 procedure during a 30-day period, were transferred from another hospital or facility, were missing information on race and ethnicity, were admitted in December 2018, or had tracheostomies or gastrostomies. Data were analyzed May 7 to October 23, 2021. Exposures: Time interval between a previous hospital admission for acute ischemic stroke and surgery. Main Outcomes and Measures: Acute ischemic stroke during the index surgical admission or rehospitalization for stroke within 30 days of surgery, 30-day all-cause mortality, composite of stroke and mortality, and discharge to a nursing home or skilled nursing facility. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate adjusted odds ratios (AORs) to quantify the association between outcome and time since ischemic stroke. Results: The final cohort included 5 841 539 patients who underwent elective nonneurologic, noncardiac surgeries (mean [SD] age, 74.1 [6.1] years; 3 371 329 [57.7%] women), of which 54 033 (0.9%) had a previous stroke. Patients with a stroke within 30 days before surgery had higher adjusted odds of perioperative stroke (AOR, 8.02; 95% CI, 6.37-10.10; P < .001) compared with patients without a previous stroke. The adjusted odds of stroke were not significantly different at an interval of 61 to 90 days between previous stroke and surgery (AOR, 5.01; 95% CI, 4.00-6.29; P < .001) compared with 181 to 360 days (AOR, 4.76; 95% CI, 4.26-5.32; P < .001). The adjusted odds of 30-day all-cause mortality were higher in patients who underwent surgery within 30 days of a previous stroke (AOR, 2.51; 95% CI, 1.99-3.16; P < .001) compared with those without a history of stroke, and the AOR decreased to 1.49 (95% CI, 1.15-1.92; P < .001) at 61 to 90 days from previous stroke to surgery but did not decline significantly, even after an interval of 360 or more days. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this cohort study suggest that, among patients undergoing nonneurologic, noncardiac surgery, the risk of stroke and death leveled off when more than 90 days elapsed between a previous stroke and elective surgery. These findings suggest that the recent scientific statement by the American Heart Association to delay elective nonneurologic, noncardiac surgery for at least 6 months after a recent stroke may be too conservative.

Mismatch Between Pelvic Incidence and Lumbar Lordosis is the Key Sagittal Plane Determinant of Patient Outcome at Minimum 40 Years After Instrumented Fusion for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review. OBJECTIVE: Assess measures of spinal-pelvic balance in predicting functional outcome in patients who underwent posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) at minimum 40-year follow-up. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Back pain and long-term function are considered when choosing levels for surgery in AIS patients. Three hundred and fourteen patients underwent fusion for AIS between 1961 and 1977. One hundred and thirty-four patients were located for potential long-term follow-up. METHODS: With Institutional Review Board approval, medical records and public resources were used to locate patients. Patients completed health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instruments, and returned for assessment including full radiographs. Radiographs were analyzed for scoliosis measures, and recognized spinal-pelvic measures including the lumbar lordosis, sagittal vertical axis (SVA), pelvic incidence, and pelvic tilt (PT). Bivariate and multivariable analyses were performed to assess the association between spinal-pelvic measures and patient-reported outcomes. RESULTS: Thirty-five of 134 patients agreed to return for complete HRQoL and radiographic follow-up. There were no differences at baseline between those agreeing and declining participation. The cohort was 94% female, had an average age of 60.5 years, and average follow-up of 46 years. In bivariate analysis, pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis difference (PI-LL) was the only spinal-pelvic parameter which statistically discriminated between patients doing well and not, as assessed by the Oswestry Disability Index and the Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference and Fatigue instruments. In multivariable analysis, (PI-LL > 9°) was associated with worse scores in PROMIS-Pain Interference, Physical Function, Depression, Fatigue, Social Function and the total Oswestry score. An SVA > 50 mm was associated with worse scores in the Scoliosis Research Society-7. CONCLUSION: In a cohort of 35 patients with average follow-up of 46 years after posterior spinal instrumentation with Harrington rods (PSIF) for AIS, spinal-pelvic mismatch as identified by (PI-LL > 9°) was associated with inferior HRQoL outcomes. Other spinal-pelvic measures (SVA and PT) were not reliably associated with inferior HRQoL.Level of Evidence: 4.

Early complications and reoperation rates are similar amongst open reduction internal fixation, intramedullary nail, and distal femoral replacement for periprosthetic distal femur fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Our purpose was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate complication and revision rates for periprosthetic distal femur fractures (PPDFF) treated with: (1) ORIF using periarticular locking plates (ORIF), (2) retrograde intramedullary nail (IMN), and (3) distal femoral replacement (DFR). METHODS: Systematic review of the literature was performed to identify eligible studies (N = 52). Identified treatment groups were: ORIF (N = 1205 cases), IMN (N = 272 cases), and DFR (N = 353 cases). Median follow-up was 30 months (range 6-96 months). Primary outcomes were: (1) major complication rates and (2) reoperation rates over the follow-up period. Secondary outcomes were incidence of deep infection, periprosthetic fracture, mortality over the follow-up period, 1-year mortality, non-union, malunion, delayed union, and hardware failure. Data for primary and secondary outcomes were pooled and unadjusted analysis was performed. Meta-analysis was performed on subset of individual studies comparing at least two of three treatment groups (N = 14 studies). Odds-ratios and their respective standard errors were determined for each treatment group combination. Maximum likelihood random effects meta-analysis was conducted for primary outcomes. RESULTS: From the systematic review, major complication rates (p = 0.55) and reoperation rates (p = 0.20) were not significantly different between the three treatment groups. DFR group had a higher incidence of deep infection relative to IMN and ORIF groups (p = 0.03). Malunion rates were higher in IMN versus ORIF (p = 0.02). For the meta-analysis, odds of major complications were not significantly different between IMN versus DFR (OR 1.39 [0.23-8.52]), IMN versus ORIF (OR 0.86 [0.48-1.53]), or the ORIF versus DFR (OR 0.91 [0.52-1.59]). Additionally, odds of a reoperation were not significantly different between IMN versus DFR (OR 0.59 [0.08-4.11]), IMN versus ORIF (OR 1.26 [0.66-2.40]), or ORIF versus DFR (OR 0.91 [0.51-1.55]). CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in major complications or reoperations between the three treatment groups. Deep infection rates were higher in DFR relative to internal fixation, malunion rates were higher in IMN versus ORIF, and periprosthetic fracture rates were higher in DFR and IMN versus ORIF.

Association of Mandatory Bundled Payments for Joint Replacement With Postacute Care Outcomes Among Medicare and Medicaid Dual Eligible Patients.

IMPORTANCE: The Medicare comprehensive care for joint replacement (CJR) model, a mandatory bundled payment program started in April 2016 for hospitals in randomly selected metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs), may help reduce postacute care (PAC) use and episode costs, but its impact on disparities between Medicaid and non-Medicaid beneficiaries is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To determine effects of the CJR program on differences (or disparities) in PAC use and outcomes by Medicare-Medicaid dual eligibility status. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Observational cohort study of 2013-2017, based on difference-in-differences (DID) analyses on Medicare data for 1,239,452 Medicare-only patients, 57,452 dual eligibles with full Medicaid benefits, and 50,189 dual eligibles with partial Medicaid benefits who underwent hip or knee surgery in hospitals of 75 CJR MSAs and 121 control MSAs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Risk-adjusted differences in rates of institutional PAC [skilled nursing facility (SNF), inpatient rehabilitation, or long-term hospital care] use and readmissions; and for the subgroup of patients discharged to SNF, risk-adjusted differences in SNF length of stay, payments, and quality measured by star ratings, rate of successful discharge to community, and rate of transition to long-stay nursing home resident. RESULTS: The CJR program was associated with reduced institutional PAC use and readmissions for patients in all 3 groups. For example, it was associated with reductions in 90-day readmission rate by 1.8 percentage point [DID estimate=-1.8; 95% confidence interval (CI), -2.6 to -0.9; P<0.001] for Medicare-only patients, by 1.6 percentage points (DID estimate=-1.6; 95% CI, -3.1 to -0.1; P=0.04) for full-benefit dual eligibles, and by 2.0 percentage points (DID estimate=-2.0; 95% CI, -3.6 to -0.4; P=0.01) for partial-benefit dual eligibles. These CJR-associated effects did not differ between dual eligibles (differences in above DID estimates=0.2; 95% CI, -1.4 to 1.7; P=0.81 for full-benefit patients; and -0.3; 95% CI, -1.9 to 1.3; P=0.74 for partial-benefit patients) and Medicare-only patients. Among patients discharged to SNF, the CJR program showed no effect on successful community discharge, transition to long-term care, or their persistent disparities. CONCLUSIONS: The CJR program did not help reduce persistent disparities in readmissions or SNF-specific outcomes related to Medicare-Medicaid dual eligibility, likely due to its lack of financial incentives for reduced disparities and improved SNF outcomes.