Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 76
Filtrar
1.
Viruses ; 15(8)2023 08 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37632050

RESUMO

Vaccine-associated adverse events (VAAEs), including feline injection-site sarcomas (FISSs), occur only rarely but can be severe. Understanding potential VAAEs is an important part of informed owner consent for vaccination. In this review, the European Advisory Board on Cat Diseases (ABCD), a scientifically independent board of feline medicine experts, presents the current knowledge on VAAEs in cats, summarizing the literature and filling the gaps where scientific studies are missing with expert opinion to assist veterinarians in adopting the best vaccination practice. VAAEs are caused by an aberrant innate or adaptive immune reaction, excessive local reactions at the inoculation site, an error in administration, or failure in the manufacturing process. FISS, the most severe VAAE, can develop after vaccinations or injection of other substances. Although the most widely accepted hypothesis is that chronic inflammation triggers malignant transformation, the pathogenesis of FISS is not yet fully understood. No injectable vaccine is risk-free, and therefore, vaccination should be performed as often as necessary, but as infrequently as possible. Vaccines should be brought to room temperature prior to administration and injected at sites in which FISS surgery would likely be curative; the interscapular region should be avoided. Post-vaccinal monitoring is essential.


Assuntos
Doenças do Gato , Sarcoma , Gatos , Animais , Vacinação/efeitos adversos , Vacinação/veterinária , Sarcoma/etiologia , Sarcoma/veterinária , Doenças do Gato/etiologia , Comércio , Inflamação
2.
Viruses ; 14(5)2022 04 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35632665

RESUMO

Immunocompromise is a common condition in cats, especially due to widespread infections with immunosuppressive viruses, such as feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV) and feline leukaemia virus (FeLV), but also due to chronic non-infectious diseases, such as tumours, diabetes mellitus, and chronic kidney disease, as well as treatment with immunosuppressive drugs, such as glucocorticoids, cyclosporins, or tumour chemotherapy. In this review, the European Advisory Board on Cat Diseases (ABCD), a scientifically independent board of experts in feline medicine from eleven European countries, discusses the current knowledge and rationale for vaccination of immunocompromised cats. So far, there are few data available on vaccination of immunocompromised cats, and sometimes studies produce controversial results. Thus, this guideline summarizes the available scientific studies and fills in the gaps with expert opinion, where scientific studies are missing. Ultimately, this review aims to help veterinarians with their decision-making in how best to vaccinate immunocompromised cats.


Assuntos
Vírus da Imunodeficiência Felina , Vírus da Leucemia Felina , Animais , Gatos , Europa (Continente) , Vacinação/veterinária
3.
PLoS One ; 16(5): e0251872, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34010337

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: As the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic accelerates, the supply of personal protective equipment remains under strain. To combat shortages, re-use of surgical masks and filtering facepiece respirators has been recommended. Prior decontamination is paramount to the re-use of these typically single-use only items and, without compromising their integrity, must guarantee inactivation of SARS-CoV-2 and other contaminating pathogens. AIM: We provide information on the effect of time-dependent passive decontamination (infectivity loss over time during room temperature storage in a breathable bag) and evaluate inactivation of a SARS-CoV-2 surrogate and a non-enveloped model virus as well as mask and respirator integrity following active multiple-cycle vaporised hydrogen peroxide (VHP), ultraviolet germicidal irradiation (UVGI), and dry heat (DH) decontamination. METHODS: Masks and respirators, inoculated with infectious porcine respiratory coronavirus or murine norovirus, were submitted to passive decontamination or single or multiple active decontamination cycles; viruses were recovered from sample materials and viral titres were measured via TCID50 assay. In parallel, filtration efficiency tests and breathability tests were performed according to EN standard 14683 and NIOSH regulations. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Infectious porcine respiratory coronavirus and murine norovirus remained detectable on masks and respirators up to five and seven days of passive decontamination. Single and multiple cycles of VHP-, UVGI-, and DH were shown to not adversely affect bacterial filtration efficiency of masks. Single- and multiple UVGI did not adversely affect respirator filtration efficiency, while VHP and DH induced a decrease in filtration efficiency after one or three decontamination cycles. Multiple cycles of VHP-, UVGI-, and DH slightly decreased airflow resistance of masks but did not adversely affect respirator breathability. VHP and UVGI efficiently inactivated both viruses after five, DH after three, decontamination cycles, permitting demonstration of a loss of infectivity by more than three orders of magnitude. This multi-disciplinal approach provides important information on how often a given PPE item may be safely reused.


Assuntos
COVID-19/metabolismo , Descontaminação/métodos , Peróxido de Hidrogênio/farmacologia , Norovirus/efeitos dos fármacos , Equipamento de Proteção Individual/provisão & distribuição , SARS-CoV-2/efeitos dos fármacos , Anti-Infecciosos/farmacologia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/virologia , Reutilização de Equipamento , Temperatura Alta , Humanos , Máscaras/microbiologia , Norovirus/isolamento & purificação , Pandemias , Equipamento de Proteção Individual/microbiologia , Dispositivos de Proteção Respiratória/microbiologia , SARS-CoV-2/isolamento & purificação , Raios Ultravioleta , Terapia Ultravioleta , Ventiladores Mecânicos/microbiologia , Volatilização
4.
J Feline Med Surg ; 22(11): 1084-1088, 2020 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33100172

RESUMO

OVERVIEW: Encephalitozoon cuniculi is a common obligate intracellular microsporidian parasite of rabbits that is increasingly recognised as a pathogen of cats and other mammalian species. These guidelines aim to review the literature on feline E cuniculi infection and provide recommendations on prevention and management. INFECTION IN CATS: E cuniculi infection should be considered as a differential diagnosis in cases of feline uveitis and cataract formation. It is not significantly associated with either chronic kidney disease or meningoencephalitis. E cuniculi infection is more common in stray or feral cats than in pet cats. DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT: Serological tests for antibody detection in the blood are easy to perform and can be useful for diagnosis, but their specificity is low as antibodies have been found in apparently healthy cats. PCR appears to be more sensitive than histopathology for diagnosis, and is more sensitive when performed on cataractous lenses compared with aqueous humour, although ease of sampling is an obvious limitation. Treatment is with fenbendazole for 3 weeks and phacoemulsification to remove microsporidia from cataractous lenses. ZOONOTIC RISK: E cuniculi is a potential zoonotic agent, and there is a particular risk to immunocompromised humans posed by infected rabbits. Albeit infrequent, spore shedding has been identified in cats, so care should be taken around infected cats.


Assuntos
Doenças do Gato/terapia , Catarata/veterinária , Encephalitozoon cuniculi/fisiologia , Encefalitozoonose/veterinária , Uveíte/veterinária , Animais , Doenças do Gato/diagnóstico , Doenças do Gato/prevenção & controle , Catarata/diagnóstico , Catarata/parasitologia , Gatos , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Encefalitozoonose/diagnóstico , Encefalitozoonose/prevenção & controle , Encefalitozoonose/terapia , Uveíte/diagnóstico , Uveíte/parasitologia
5.
J Feline Med Surg ; 22(5): 442-451, 2020 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32326862

RESUMO

OVERVIEW: Dirofilaria immitis and Dirofilaria repens are the most important filarial worms, causing heartworm disease and subcutaneous dirofilariosis, respectively. D repens is currently considered an emerging zoonotic agent in Europe. LIFE CYCLE AND INFECTION: Filarial worms infect mainly dogs, but also cats, ferrets, wild carnivores and humans. The life cycle involves an intermediate mosquito host. Compared with dogs, cats are imperfect hosts for dirofilarial worms. After inoculation, only a low number of L3 larvae develop to the adult stage in a small percentage of cats. Heartworm disease in cats may be associated with severe pulmonary thromboembolism and an eosinophilic inflammatory response in the lungs, potentially leading to sudden death. Otherwise self-cure occurs in most cases after 18-48 months. Subcutaneous dirofilariosis may present as subcutaneous nodules or dermatitis. DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT: Diagnosis in cats is more difficult compared with dogs and needs a multistep approach (antigen and antibody tests, as well as diagnostic imaging). Cats with acute heartworm disease require stabilisation within an intensive care unit. Cats with respiratory signs or suggestive radiographic changes should receive prednisolone and follow-up with a similar multistep approach. Adulticidal therapy is not safe in cats. PREVENTION: In endemic areas cats should receive year-round chemoprophylaxis from 2 months of age.


Assuntos
Doenças do Gato , Dirofilariose , Animais , Doenças do Gato/prevenção & controle , Doenças do Gato/terapia , Gatos , Dirofilaria immitis , Dirofilaria repens , Dirofilariose/prevenção & controle , Dirofilariose/terapia
6.
Viruses ; 11(11)2019 10 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31671816

RESUMO

Feline leukaemia virus (FeLV) is a retrovirus associated with fatal disease in progressively infected cats. While testing/removal and vaccination led to a decreased prevalence of FeLV, recently, this decrease has reportedly stagnated in some countries. This study aimed to prospectively determine the prevalence of FeLV viraemia in cats taken to veterinary facilities in 32 European countries. FeLV viral RNA was semiquantitatively detected in saliva, using RT-qPCR as a measure of viraemia. Risk and protective factors were assessed using an online questionnaire to report geographic, demographic, husbandry, FeLV vaccination, and clinical data. The overall prevalence of FeLV viraemia in cats visiting a veterinary facility, of which 10.4% were shelter and rescue cats, was 2.3% (141/6005; 95% CI: 2.0%-2.8%) with the highest prevalences in Portugal, Hungary, and Italy/Malta (5.7%-8.8%). Using multivariate analysis, seven risk factors (Southern Europe, male intact, 1-6 years of age, indoor and outdoor or outdoor-only living, living in a group of ≥5 cats, illness), and three protective factors (Northern Europe, Western Europe, pedigree cats) were identified. Using classification and regression tree (CART) analysis, the origin of cats in Europe, pedigree, and access to outdoors were important predictors of FeLV status. FeLV-infected sick cats shed more viral RNA than FeLV-infected healthy cats, and they suffered more frequently from anaemia, anorexia, and gingivitis/stomatitis than uninfected sick cats. Most cats had never been FeLV-vaccinated; vaccination rates were indirectly associated with the gross domestic product (GDP) per capita. In conclusion, we identified countries where FeLV was undetectable, demonstrating that the infection can be eradicated and highlighting those regions where awareness and prevention should be increased.


Assuntos
Doenças do Gato/epidemiologia , Infecções por Retroviridae/veterinária , Infecções Tumorais por Vírus/veterinária , Animais , Doenças do Gato/diagnóstico , Gatos , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Feminino , Vírus da Leucemia Felina/isolamento & purificação , Masculino , Prevalência , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Proteção , Infecções por Retroviridae/diagnóstico , Infecções por Retroviridae/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco , Saliva/virologia , Infecções Tumorais por Vírus/diagnóstico , Infecções Tumorais por Vírus/epidemiologia , Viremia/diagnóstico , Viremia/epidemiologia , Viremia/veterinária
7.
Rev. argent. microbiol ; 50(4): 380-390, Dec. 2018. graf, tab
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-977261

RESUMO

Equid alphaherpesvirus 3 (EHV3) is the etiological agent of equine coital exanthema (ECE), which is a venereal, highly contagious disease, characterized by the formation of papules, vesicles, pustules and ulcers on the external genitalia of mares and stallions. EHV3 remains in a latent state after a successful infection and there are latently infected animals in which the virus is reactivated and generally re-excreted subclinically. There are no available vaccines for this condition and prevention is based on the clinical examination of mares prior to mating, which allows to segregate those showing clinical signs. As this approach does not eliminate the risk of contagion in stallions from subclinically infected mares, there is a need for a specific EHV3 treatment. Nowadays, there exist various antiviral compounds of proven effectiveness for other alphaherpesviruses affecting humans and animals. The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy of three antiviral compounds, acyclovir, ganciclovir and cidofovir against EHV3 in vitro, and to assess their efficacy against six EHV3 Argentinian field isolates. To determine the efficacy of these compounds in vitro, three parameters were analyzed: reduction of plaque number, reduction of plaque size and reduction of viral production. Additionally, the effectiveness of the three compounds at an optimum concentration previously determined in this study was investigated for the EHV3 field isolates. Based on our results, ganciclovir was the most potent antiviral compound to reduce EHV3 replication in vitro and may thus be a valuable candidate for treatment and prevention of ECE in mares and stallions.


El alfa-herpesvirus equino 3 (EHV3) es el agente etiológico del exantema coital equino (ECE), enfermedad venérea, altamente contagiosa y caracterizada por la aparición de pápulas, vesículas, pústulas y úlceras en los genitales externos de yeguas y padrillos. Luego de la primo-infección, el EHV3 se mantiene en el animal en un estado de latencia a partir del cual puede reactivar y excretarse, generalmente de manera subclínica. No existen vacunas, por lo que la prevención se basa en la detección de las lesiones clínicas previo al servicio, y la segregación de estos animales. Sin embargo, este abordaje no previene la infección del padrillo por parte de yeguas que excretan el virus de manera subclínica, y por lo tanto existe la necesidad de un tratamiento específico contra el EHV3. En la actualidad, existen varios compuestos antivirales de probada eficacia contra herpesvirus humanos y veterinarios. El objetivo de este trabajo es comparar la eficacia de 3 compuestos antivirales, aciclovir, ganciclovir y cidofovir, contra EHV3 in vitro, y evaluar la eficacia de los mismos contra 6 cepas de campo argentinas de EHV3. Para determinar la eficacia de los compuestos in vitro se evaluaron 3 parámetros: reducción del número de placas de lisis, reducción del tamaño de placas de lisis y reducción de la producción de virus. Adicionalmente, la efectividad de los compuestos en una concentración óptima, previamente determinada en este estudio, fue determinada para 6 cepas de campo argentinas de EHV3. De acuerdo con los resultados obtenidos, ganciclovir fue el compuesto más potente en reducir la replicación del EHV3 in vitro, y por lo tanto podría considerarse un potencial candidato para el tratamiento y la prevención del ECE en yeguas y padrillos.


Assuntos
Animais , Feminino , Antivirais/farmacologia , Aciclovir/farmacologia , Ganciclovir/farmacologia , Herpesvirus Equídeo 3/efeitos dos fármacos , Infecções por Herpesviridae/veterinária , Cidofovir/farmacologia , Doenças dos Cavalos/virologia , Células Cultivadas , Herpesvirus Equídeo 3/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por Herpesviridae/virologia , Cavalos
8.
J Feline Med Surg ; 20(3): 256-261, 2018 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29478400

RESUMO

OVERVIEW: Haemoplasmas are haemotropic bacteria that can induce anaemia in a wide range of mammalian species. Infection in cats: Mycoplasma haemofelis is the most pathogenic of the three main feline haemoplasma species known to infect cats. ' Candidatus Mycoplasma haemominutum' and ' Candidatus Mycoplasma turicensis' are less pathogenic but can result in disease in immunocompromised cats. Male, non-pedigree cats with outdoor access are more likely to be haemoplasma infected, and ' Candidatus M haemominutum' is more common in older cats. All three haemoplasma species can be carried asymptomatically. Transmission: The natural mode of transmission of haemoplasma infection is not known, but aggressive interactions and vectors are possibilities. Transmission by blood transfusion can occur and all blood donors should be screened for haemoplasma infection. DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT: PCR assays are the preferred diagnostic method for haemoplasma infections. Treatment with doxycycline for 2-4 weeks is usually effective for M haemofelis-associated clinical disease (but this may not clear infection). Little information is currently available on the antibiotic responsiveness of ' Candidatus M haemominutum' and ' Candidatus M turicensis'.


Assuntos
Doenças do Gato , Infecções por Mycoplasma , Mycoplasma , Animais , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Doenças do Gato/diagnóstico , Doenças do Gato/tratamento farmacológico , Doenças do Gato/transmissão , Gatos , Feminino , Masculino , Infecções por Mycoplasma/diagnóstico , Infecções por Mycoplasma/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Mycoplasma/transmissão , Infecções por Mycoplasma/veterinária , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto
9.
J Feline Med Surg ; 19(5): 542-548, 2017 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28438088

RESUMO

OVERVIEW: Anaplasma species, Ehrlichia species and Rickettsia species are vector-borne pathogens infecting a wide variety of mammals, but causing disease in very few of them. Infection in cats: Anaplasma phagocytophilum is the most important feline pathogen among these rickettsial organisms, and coinfections are possible. Little information is available on the pathogenesis of these agents in cats. Clinical signs are usually reported soon after tick infestation. They are mostly non-specific, consisting of fever, anorexia and lethargy. Joint pain may occur. Infection in humans: Some rickettsial species ( A phagocytophilum, Ehrlichia chaffeensis, Ehrlichia ewingii, Rickettsia conorii, Rickettsia rickettsii, Rickettsia felis, Rickettsia typhi and Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis) are of zoonotic concern. Direct contact with cat saliva should be avoided because of potential contamination by R felis. Infected cats are 'sentinels' of the presence of rickettsial pathogens in ticks and fleas in a given geographical area, and they signal a risk for people exposed to vectors.


Assuntos
Anaplasmose , Doenças do Gato , Ehrlichiose/veterinária , Infecções por Rickettsia/veterinária , Anaplasma/fisiologia , Anaplasmose/diagnóstico , Anaplasmose/tratamento farmacológico , Anaplasmose/microbiologia , Anaplasmose/prevenção & controle , Animais , Doenças do Gato/diagnóstico , Doenças do Gato/tratamento farmacológico , Doenças do Gato/microbiologia , Doenças do Gato/prevenção & controle , Gatos , Ehrlichia/fisiologia , Ehrlichiose/diagnóstico , Ehrlichiose/microbiologia , Ehrlichiose/terapia , Humanos , Rickettsia/fisiologia , Infecções por Rickettsia/diagnóstico , Infecções por Rickettsia/microbiologia , Infecções por Rickettsia/terapia
10.
J Feline Med Surg ; 17(7): 570-82, 2015 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26101308

RESUMO

OVERVIEW: The ABCD has published 34 guidelines in two Special Issues of the Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery (JFMS): the first in July 2009 (Volume 11, Issue 7, pages 527-620) and the second in July 2013 (Volume 15, Issue 7, pages 528-652). The present article contains updates and new information on 18 of these (17 disease guidelines and one special article 'Prevention of infectious diseases in cat shelters'). For detailed information, readers are referred to the guidelines published in the above-mentioned JFMS Special Issues.


Assuntos
Infecções Bacterianas/veterinária , Doenças do Gato/prevenção & controle , Viroses/veterinária , Animais , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Infecções Bacterianas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Bacterianas/prevenção & controle , Vacinas Bacterianas/imunologia , Doenças do Gato/tratamento farmacológico , Gatos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Medicina Veterinária/normas , Vacinas Virais/imunologia , Viroses/tratamento farmacológico , Viroses/prevenção & controle
11.
J Feline Med Surg ; 17(7): 583-7, 2015 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26101309

RESUMO

OVERVIEW: In 2013, the ABCD published 'Matrix vaccination guidelines: ABCD recommendations for indoor/outdoor cats, rescue shelter cats and breeding catteries' in a Special Issue of the Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery (Volume 15, Issue 7, pages 540-544). The ABCD's vaccination recommendations were presented in tabulated form, taking into account that there is no universal vaccination protocol for all cats. To support the veterinarian's decision making, recommendations for four lifestyles were made: for cats with outdoors access, cats kept solely indoors, rescue shelter cats and cats in breeding catteries. This update article follows the same approach, offering current and, where relevant, expanded recommendations.


Assuntos
Infecções Bacterianas/veterinária , Vacinas Bacterianas/imunologia , Doenças do Gato/prevenção & controle , Vacinas Virais/imunologia , Viroses/veterinária , Bem-Estar do Animal/normas , Animais , Infecções Bacterianas/prevenção & controle , Vacinas Bacterianas/administração & dosagem , Doenças do Gato/microbiologia , Doenças do Gato/virologia , Gatos , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Abrigo para Animais , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Medicina Veterinária/normas , Vacinas Virais/administração & dosagem , Viroses/prevenção & controle
12.
J Feline Med Surg ; 17(7): 588-93, 2015 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26101310

RESUMO

OVERVIEW: The availability of blood components has increased the number of indications for transfusing cats, and fresh whole blood is readily accessible to clinicians because it can be taken from in-house donor cats or 'volunteer' feline blood donors. A certain amount of risk remains to the recipient cat, as immediate or delayed adverse reactions can occur during or after transfusion, related to immunemediated mechanisms. This article, however, focuses on adverse events caused by infectious agents, which may originate either from contamination of blood following incorrect collection, storage or transfusion, or from transfusion of contaminated blood obtained from an infected donor. PREVENTION OF BLOOD CONTAMINATION: In cats, blood cannot be collected through a closed system and, therefore, collection of donor blood requires a multi-step manipulation of syringes and other devices. It is crucial that each step of the procedure is performed under the strictest aseptic conditions and that bacterial contamination of blood bags is prevented, as bacterial endotoxins can cause an immediate febrile reaction or even fatal shock in the recipient cat. PREVENTION OF DISEASE TRANSMISSION: With a view to preventing transmission of blood-borne infectious diseases, the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine has adopted basic criteria for selecting pathogens to be tested for in donor pets. The worldwide core screening panel for donor cats includes feline leukaemia virus, feline immunodeficiency virus, Bartonella species and feline haemoplasma. The list should be adapted to the local epidemiological situation concerning other vector-borne feline infections. The most practical, rapid and inexpensive measure to reduce transfusion risk is to check the risk profile of donor cats on the basis of a written questionnaire. Blood transfusion can never, however, be considered entirely safe.


Assuntos
Transfusão de Sangue/veterinária , Doenças do Gato/prevenção & controle , Doenças Transmissíveis/veterinária , Doença Iatrogênica/veterinária , Bem-Estar do Animal/normas , Animais , Gatos , Doença Iatrogênica/prevenção & controle , Vírus da Imunodeficiência Felina , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Reação Transfusional , Medicina Veterinária/normas
13.
J Feline Med Surg ; 17(7): 594-605, 2015 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26101311

RESUMO

OVERVIEW: Regardless of whether a pathogen is viral, bacterial, parasitic, fungal or an emerging unknown, the mainstay of infectious disease control is hygiene, and the cornerstone of good hygiene is effective disinfection. CHALLENGES AND CURRENT CHOICES: Certain pathogens present a challenge to kill effectively: parvovirus, protozoal oocysts, mycobacteria, bacterial spores and prions resist most disinfectants but can be eliminated through heat, especially steam, which will kill protozoal oocysts. Heat is the safest and most effective disinfectant, but cannot be universally applied. Temperatures in washing machines and dishwashers should be at least 60 °C to eliminate pathogenic spores and resistant viruses. Enveloped viruses are susceptible to most disinfectants; of the non-enveloped viruses, parvovirus is recognised as being the most difficult to eradicate. Sodium hypochlorite is recommended for many applications: cleaning of floors, laundry, food preparation surfaces and utensils. Skin scrubs and rubs containing alcohols are more effective than those containing chlorhexidine, and less subject to contamination. DISINFECTANTS TO AVOID: Deficiency of the enzyme UDP-glucuronosyl transferase renders the cat susceptible to the toxic effects of phenol-based disinfectants (including many essential oils), so these should be avoided in feline environments. Quaternary ammonium compounds (eg, benzalkonium chloride) are also probably best avoided. THE FUTURE: Veterinary disinfection approaches in the future may include use of ultraviolet radiation and, increasingly, silver.


Assuntos
Bem-Estar do Animal/normas , Doenças do Gato/prevenção & controle , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis/normas , Desinfetantes/administração & dosagem , Desinfecção/normas , Abrigo para Animais/normas , Animais , Gatos , Desinfetantes/efeitos adversos , Animais de Estimação , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Medicina Veterinária/normas
14.
J Feline Med Surg ; 17(7): 614-6, 2015 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26101313

RESUMO

OVERVIEW: Borna disease virus (BDV) has a broad host range, affecting primarily horses and sheep, but also cattle, ostriches, cats and dogs. In cats, BDV may cause a non-suppurative meningoencephalomyelitis ('staggering disease'). INFECTION: The mode of transmission is not completely elucidated. Direct and indirect virus transmission is postulated, but BDV is not readily transmitted between cats. Vectors such as ticks may play a role and shrews have been identified as a potential reservoir host. Access to forested areas has been reported to be an important risk factor for staggering disease. DISEASE SIGNS: It is postulated that BDV may infect nerve endings in the oropharynx and spread via olfactory nerve cells to the central nervous system. A strong T-cell response may contribute to the development of clinical disease. Affected cats develop gait disturbances, ataxia, pain in the lower back and behavioural changes. DIAGNOSIS: For diagnostic purposes, detection of viral RNA by reverse transcription PCR in samples collected from cats with clinical signs of Borna disease can be considered diagnostic. Serology is of little value; cats without signs of Borna disease may be seropositive and yet not every cat with BDV infection has detectable levels of antibodies. HUMAN INFECTION: A hypothesis that BDV infection may be involved in the development of selected neurological disorders in man could not be confirmed. A research group within the German Robert Koch Institute studied the potential health threat of BDV to humans and concluded that BDV was not involved in the aetiology of human psychiatric diseases.


Assuntos
Bem-Estar do Animal/normas , Doença de Borna/prevenção & controle , Vírus da Doença de Borna/isolamento & purificação , Doenças do Gato/prevenção & controle , Abrigo para Animais/normas , Zoonoses/virologia , Animais , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Doença de Borna/diagnóstico , Doenças do Gato/diagnóstico , Doenças do Gato/virologia , Gatos , Humanos , Masculino , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Medicina Veterinária/normas
15.
J Feline Med Surg ; 17(7): 617-9, 2015 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26101314

RESUMO

OVERVIEW: West Nile virus (WNV) is a zoonotic mosquito-borne virus with a broad host range that infects mainly birds and mosquitos, but also mammals (including humans), reptiles, amphibians and ticks. It is maintained in a bird-mosquito-bird transmission cycle. The most important vectors are bird-feeding mosquitos of the Culex genus; maintenance and amplification mainly involve passerine birds. WNV can cause disease in humans, horses and several species of birds following infection of the central nervous system. INFECTION IN CATS: Cats can also be infected through mosquito bites, and by eating infected small mammals and probably also birds. Although seroprevalence in cats can be high in endemic areas, clinical disease and mortality are rarely reported. If a cat is suspected of clinical signs due to an acute WNV infection, symptomatic treatment is indicated.


Assuntos
Bem-Estar do Animal/normas , Doenças do Gato/prevenção & controle , Febre do Nilo Ocidental/veterinária , Vírus do Nilo Ocidental/isolamento & purificação , Animais , Aves , Doenças do Gato/diagnóstico , Doenças do Gato/virologia , Gatos , Culex , Reservatórios de Doenças/veterinária , Humanos , Insetos Vetores , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Medicina Veterinária/normas , Febre do Nilo Ocidental/transmissão
16.
J Feline Med Surg ; 17(7): 620-5, 2015 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26101315

RESUMO

OVERVIEW: Streptococcus canis is most prevalent in cats, but recently S equi subsp zooepidemicus has been recognised as an emerging feline pathogen. S CANIS INFECTION: S canis is considered part of the commensal mucosal microflora of the oral cavity, upper respiratory tract, genital organs and perianal region in cats. The prevalence of infection is higher in cats housed in groups; and, for example, there may be a high rate of vaginal carriage in young queens in breeding catteries. A wide spectrum of clinical disease is seen, encompassing neonatal septicaemia, upper respiratory tract disease, abscesses, pneumonia, osteomyelitis, polyarthritis, urogenital infections, septicaemia, sinusitis and meningitis. S EQUI SUBSP ZOOEPIDEMICUS INFECTION: S equi subsp zooepidemicus is found in a wide range of species including cats. It was traditionally assumed that this bacterium played no role in disease of cats, but it is now considered a cause of respiratory disease with bronchopneumonia and pneumonia, as well as meningoencephalitis, often with a fatal course. Close confinement of cats, such as in shelters, appears to be a major risk factor. As horses are common carriers of this bacterium, contact with horses is a potential source of infection. Additionally, the possibility of indirect transmission needs to be considered. DIAGNOSIS: Streptococci can be detected by conventional culture techniques from swabs, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid or organ samples. Also real-time PCR can be used, and is more sensitive than culture. TREATMENT: In suspected cases, treatment with broad-spectrum antibiotics should be initiated as soon as possible and, if appropriate, adapted to the results of culture and sensitivity tests.


Assuntos
Bem-Estar do Animal/normas , Doenças do Gato/microbiologia , Doenças do Gato/prevenção & controle , Doenças Respiratórias/veterinária , Infecções Estreptocócicas/veterinária , Streptococcus equi/patogenicidade , Animais , Doenças do Gato/diagnóstico , Gatos , Surtos de Doenças/veterinária , Feminino , Cavalos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Doenças Respiratórias/microbiologia , Doenças Respiratórias/prevenção & controle , Infecções Estreptocócicas/microbiologia , Infecções Estreptocócicas/prevenção & controle , Streptococcus equi/isolamento & purificação , Medicina Veterinária/normas
17.
J Feline Med Surg ; 17(7): 606-13, 2015 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26101312

RESUMO

OVERVIEW: In cats, the most serious of adverse effects following vaccination is the occurrence of invasive sarcomas (mostly fibrosarcomas): so-called 'feline injection-site sarcomas' (FISSs). These develop at sites of previous vaccination or injection. They have characteristics that are distinct from those of fibrosarcomas in other areas and behave more aggressively. The rate of metastasis ranges from 10-28%. PATHOGENESIS: The pathogenesis of these sarcomas is not yet definitively explained. However, chronic inflammatory reactions are considered the trigger for subsequent malignant transformation. Injections of long-acting drugs (such as glucocorticoids, and others) have been associated with sarcoma formation. Adjuvanted vaccines induce intense local inflammation and seem therefore to be particularly linked to the development of FISS. The risk is lower for modified-live and recombinant vaccines, but no vaccine is risk-free. TREATMENT AND PREVENTION: Aggressive, radical excision is required to avoid tumour recurrence. The prognosis improves if additional radiotherapy and/or immunotherapy (such as recombinant feline IL-2) are used. For prevention, administration of any irritating substance should be avoided. Vaccination should be performed as often as necessary, but as infrequently as possible. Non-adjuvanted, modified-live or recombinant vaccines should be selected in preference to adjuvanted vaccines. Injections should be given at sites at which surgery would likely lead to a complete cure; the interscapular region should generally be avoided. Post-vaccination monitoring should be performed.


Assuntos
Bem-Estar do Animal/normas , Doenças do Gato/etiologia , Doenças do Gato/prevenção & controle , Abrigo para Animais/normas , Sarcoma/veterinária , Vacinação/veterinária , Animais , Gatos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Sarcoma/etiologia , Neoplasias de Tecidos Moles/etiologia , Neoplasias de Tecidos Moles/veterinária , Vacinação/efeitos adversos , Medicina Veterinária/normas
18.
J Feline Med Surg ; 17(7): 626-36, 2015 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26101316

RESUMO

OVERVIEW: Cardiopulmonary nematodes are emerging parasites of cats in Europe. A number of helminth parasites may be involved. The most prevalent lungworm in domestic cats is Aelurostrongylus abstrusus. Oslerus rostratus and Troglostrongylus species are found mainly in wild cats. The trichurid Capillaria aerophila has a low host specificity and is not uncommon in cats. Additionally the lung flukes Paragonimus species are reported in many species outside of Europe, including cats. CLINICAL SIGNS: Lungworm infections may be asymptomatic, or cause mild to severe respiratory signs, dependent on the worm species and burden; mixed infections are observed. Kittens can be vertically infected and may develop a more severe disease. Affected cats show a productive cough, mucopurulent nasal discharge, tachypnoea, dyspnoea and, in severe cases, respiratory failure and death. MANAGEMENT: Early diagnosis and treatment greatly improves the prognosis. First-stage larvae can be easily detected in fresh faecal samples; the Baermann migration method is the enrichment technique of choice, but takes 24 h. Lungworm larvae can be found in tracheal swabs and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, but with less sensitivity than in faeces. Molecular methods have been developed that exhibit high specificity and sensitivity, and allow diagnosis in the prepatent phase. Treatment options include fenbendazole paste, milbemycin oxime/praziquantel and various spot-on formulations. Severe cases should receive prompt medical care in an intensive care unit. PREVENTION: Avoiding predation is at present the only preventive measure for pulmonary worms with indirect life cycles. ZOONOTIC RISK: C aerophila has zoonotic potential, causing severe pulmonary disease in humans. Some Paragonimus species are also of zoonotic concern.


Assuntos
Bem-Estar do Animal/normas , Doenças do Gato/prevenção & controle , Doenças do Gato/parasitologia , Pneumopatias Parasitárias/veterinária , Infecções por Nematoides/veterinária , Infecções por Strongylida/veterinária , Animais , Doenças do Gato/diagnóstico , Doenças do Gato/tratamento farmacológico , Gatos , Europa (Continente) , Fezes/parasitologia , Feminino , Larva , Pneumopatias Parasitárias/parasitologia , Masculino , Infecções por Nematoides/prevenção & controle , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Praziquantel/uso terapêutico , Infecções por Strongylida/prevenção & controle , Medicina Veterinária/normas
19.
J Feline Med Surg ; 17(7): 637-41, 2015 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26101317

RESUMO

OVERVIEW: Cytauxzoon species are apicomplexan haemoparasites, which may cause severe disease in domestic cats, as well as lions and tigers. For many years, cytauxzoonosis in domestic cats was only reported in North and South America, but in recent years the infection has also been seen in Europe (Spain, France and Italy). INFECTION: Cytauxzoon felis is the main species; it occurs as numerous different strains or genotypes and is transmitted via ticks. Therefore, the disease shows a seasonal incidence from spring to early autumn and affects primarily cats with outdoor access in areas where tick vectors are prevalent. Domestic cats may experience subclinical infection and may also act as reservoirs. CLINICAL SIGNS: Cytauxzoonosis caused by C felis in the USA is an acute or peracute severe febrile disease with non-specific signs. Haemolytic anaemia occurs frequently; in some cats neurological signs may occur in late stages. The Cytauxzoon species identified in Europe differ from C felis that causes disease in the USA and are probably less virulent. The majority of infected cats have been healthy; in some cases anaemia was found, but disease as it occurs in the USA has not been reported to date. DIAGNOSIS: Diagnosis is usually obtained by Cytauxzoon detection in blood smears and/or fine-needle aspirates from the liver, spleen and lymph nodes. PCR assays are able to detect low levels of parasitaemia and may be used for confirmation. TREATMENT: Currently a combination of the antiprotozoal drugs atovaquone and azithromycin is the treatment of choice. Concurrent supportive and critical care treatment is extremely important to improve the prognosis. Cats that survive the infection may become chronic carriers for life. PREVENTION: Cats with outdoor access in endemic areas should receive effective tick treatment.


Assuntos
Bem-Estar do Animal/normas , Doenças do Gato/prevenção & controle , Reservatórios de Doenças/veterinária , Infecções Protozoárias em Animais/prevenção & controle , Animais , Animais Domésticos , Antiprotozoários/uso terapêutico , Doenças do Gato/diagnóstico , Doenças do Gato/parasitologia , Gatos , Reservatórios de Doenças/parasitologia , Europa (Continente) , França , Piroplasmida/parasitologia , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase/veterinária , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Infecções Protozoárias em Animais/diagnóstico , Infecções Protozoárias em Animais/parasitologia , Estações do Ano , Medicina Veterinária/normas
20.
J Feline Med Surg ; 17(7): 642-4, 2015 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26101318

RESUMO

OVERVIEW: Hepatozoonosis of domestic cats has been reported in several countries, mainly as a subclinical infection. DISEASE AGENT: Infection has been described mostly in areas where canine infection is present and, in recent years, Hepatozoon felis has been identified as a distinct species by molecular techniques. The vector for feline hepatozoonosis remains unknown and the pathogenesis has not been elucidated. INFECTION IN CATS: Feline hepatozoonosis is mainly a subclinical infection and few cases have been reported with clinical signs. The diagnosis of hepatozoonosis in cats can be made by observation of parasite gamonts in blood smears, parasite meronts in muscles by histopathology, and detection of parasite DNA in blood and tissue by PCR. DISEASE MANAGEMENT: The treatment of choice is not known, but single cases have been treated with doxycycline or oxytetracycline and primaquine. Although the mode of transmission and the type of vector is not known, preventive treatment against blood-sucking vectors (fleas and ticks) is advised.


Assuntos
Bem-Estar do Animal/normas , Doenças do Gato/diagnóstico , Doenças do Gato/prevenção & controle , Infecções Protozoárias em Animais/diagnóstico , Infecções Protozoárias em Animais/prevenção & controle , Animais , Doenças do Gato/tratamento farmacológico , Gatos , Infestações por Pulgas/diagnóstico , Infestações por Pulgas/prevenção & controle , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Infecções Protozoárias em Animais/parasitologia , Medicina Veterinária/normas
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA