Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Gastroenterology ; 158(4): 862-874.e8, 2020 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31376388

RESUMO

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Few studies have evaluated long-term outcomes of ongoing colonoscopic screening and surveillance in a screening population. We aimed to determine the 10-year risk for advanced neoplasia (defined as adenomas ≥10mm, adenomas with villous histology or high-grade dysplasia, or colorectal cancer [CRC]) and assessed whether baseline colonoscopy findings were associated with long-term outcomes. METHODS: We collected data from the Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program Study on 3121 asymptomatic veterans (50-75 years old) who underwent a screening colonoscopy from 1994 through 1997 at 13 medical centers and were then followed for 10 years or until death. We included 1915 subjects with at least 1 surveillance colonoscopy and estimated cumulative incidence of advanced neoplasia by Kaplan-Meier curves. We then fit a longitudinal joint model to estimate risk of advanced neoplasia at each subsequent examination after baseline, adjusting for multiple colonoscopies within individuals. RESULTS: Through 10 years of follow-up, there were 146 individuals among all baseline colonoscopy groups found to have at least 1 incident advanced neoplasia. The cumulative 10-year incidence of advanced neoplasia was highest among those with baseline CRC (43.7%; 95% CI 13.0%-74.4%), followed by those with baseline advanced adenoma (AA) (21.9%; 95% CI 15.7-28.1). The cumulative 10-year incidence of advanced neoplasia was 6.3% (95% CI 4.1%-8.5%) and 4.1% (95% CI 2.7%-5.4%) for baseline 1 to 2 small adenomas (<1cm, and without villous histology or high-grade dysplasia) and no neoplasia, respectively (log-rank P = .10). After adjusting for prior surveillance, the risk of advanced neoplasia at each subsequent examination was not significantly increased in veterans with 1 or 2 small adenomas at baseline (odds ratio 0.96; 95% CI 0.67-1.41) compared with veterans with no baseline neoplasia. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline screening colonoscopy findings associate with advanced neoplasia within 10 years. Individuals with only 1 or 2 small adenomas at baseline have a low risk of advanced neoplasia over 10 years. Alternative surveillance strategies, could be considered for these individuals.


Assuntos
Adenoma/patologia , Pólipos do Colo/patologia , Colonoscopia/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Colorretais/epidemiologia , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/estatística & dados numéricos , Adenoma/diagnóstico por imagem , Adenoma/cirurgia , Idoso , Colo/diagnóstico por imagem , Colo/patologia , Colo/cirurgia , Pólipos do Colo/diagnóstico por imagem , Pólipos do Colo/cirurgia , Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Incidência , Mucosa Intestinal/diagnóstico por imagem , Mucosa Intestinal/patologia , Mucosa Intestinal/cirurgia , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Programas de Rastreamento , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/estatística & dados numéricos , Veteranos/estatística & dados numéricos
2.
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities ; 6(3): 570-583, 2019 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30963508

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Despite increases in BRCA mutation testing, racial/ethnic disparities in counseling and testing have persisted for decades. The purpose of the review was to summarize recent literature as it relates to detecting, understanding, and reducing disparities in BRCA counseling and testing. DESIGN: This is a narrative review of articles published January 2012 to July 2017 relevant to genetic testing and counseling, breast and ovarian cancer, and minority health and heath disparities. Twenty-three articles were included in this review. RESULTS: Studies report lower counseling and/or testing rates for eligible racial/ethnic minorities among family members of high-risk individuals as well as among breast cancer survivors. Key barriers and facilitators of disparate BRCA counseling/testing that emerged in this review included awareness, cost-related factors, stress and distrust, family concerns and communication, and provider communication and referral. To address differential access to and use of BRCA testing services and expand testing in minority populations, it is necessary for interventions to focus on improving awareness, risk-perception, and family and patient-provider communication. CONCLUSION: Multi-level and targeted interventions are needed to reduce persistent racial/ethnic disparities and improve assessment, provider recommendations, counseling and testing among minority populations.


Assuntos
Etnicidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Aconselhamento Genético/estatística & dados numéricos , Testes Genéticos/estatística & dados numéricos , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Síndrome Hereditária de Câncer de Mama e Ovário/diagnóstico , Grupos Raciais/estatística & dados numéricos , Etnicidade/genética , Feminino , Genes BRCA1 , Síndrome Hereditária de Câncer de Mama e Ovário/etnologia , Síndrome Hereditária de Câncer de Mama e Ovário/genética , Humanos , Grupos Raciais/etnologia , Grupos Raciais/genética , Fatores Socioeconômicos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA