Therapeutic interventions using the peritoneal and coelomic cavity in dogs, cats, and exotic pets.

OBJECTIVE: To provide a video tutorial describing intraperitoneal (IP) and intracoelomic (IC) therapeutics (IP/IC fluid therapy, euthanasia, direct peritoneal resuscitation). ANIMALS: Dogs, cats, and exotic pets. METHODS: Peritoneal and coelomic centesis allows for delivery of fluids or to perform euthanasia. The peritoneal and coelomic membranes contain a vast network of capillaries and lymphatics that allow absorption of fluids and blood products. Needles are inserted aseptically IP or IC at species-specific locations to avoid iatrogenic damage. In mammals, the needle is inserted in a periumbilical location at a 1- to 2-cm radius from the umbilicus, while the needle is inserted into the ventral inguinal fossa in chelonians and lateroventrally in lizards and snakes. Direct peritoneal resuscitation is a human technique in which a dextrose/electrolyte solution infused IP reduces ischemia-reperfusion injury, edema, and tissue necrosis to improve mortality in patients with diseases like shock and sepsis or who require acute abdominal surgery. RESULTS: Isotonic crystalloids are given IP/IC at 10- to 20-mL/kg doses (smaller volumes in reptiles) and blood products at standard calculated doses. Sodium pentobarbital without phenytoin (3 mL/4.5 kg) is used for IP/IC euthanasia. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Being aware of multiple routes for fluid and blood product administration allows treatment in animals for which intravenous or intraosseous catheterization is undesirable or impossible. While intravenous or intraosseous routes are always preferred, especially for resuscitation, familiarity with locations for IP/IC fluid and euthanasia is useful. Techniques like direct peritoneal resuscitation are not currently used in animals but might be translated to veterinary cases in the future.

Conventional versus high-flow oxygen therapy in dogs with lower airway injury.

Dogs with lower airway pathology that present in respiratory distress often receive oxygen therapy as the first line of treatment regardless of the underlying cause. Conventional "low-flow" systems deliver oxygen with a maximum flow rate of 15 L/minute. Traditionally, when an animal's respiratory status does not improve with conventional oxygen therapy and treatments for underlying disease, options might be limited to either intubation and mechanical ventilation or humane euthanasia. High-flow oxygen therapy (HFOT) has been gaining popularity in veterinary medicine as an alternative route of oxygen supplementation for animals that require support beyond conventional therapy. High-flow oxygen therapy can supply a mixture of air and oxygen via a heated and humidified circuit. It is user friendly and can be used in an environment in which mechanical ventilation is unavailable. This review article is written for emergency doctors and general practitioners who lack access to mechanical ventilation. This article briefly reviews pertinent respiratory physiology, traditional oxygen supplementation techniques, the physiology of HFOT, and the limited evidence available in veterinary medicine regarding the use of HFOT, its applications, and limitations. Guidelines for the use of HFOT are suggested and HFOT is compared to conventional therapy.

Les chiens avec une pathologie des voies respiratoires inférieures qui présentent une détresse respiratoire reçoivent souvent une oxygénothérapie en première intention, quelle que soit la cause sous-jacente. Les systèmes conventionnels à « faible débit ¼ fournissent de l'oxygène avec un débit maximum de 15 L/minute. Traditionnellement, lorsque l'état respiratoire d'un animal ne s'améliore pas avec l'oxygénothérapie conventionnelle et les traitements de la maladie sous-jacente, les options peuvent se limiter à l'intubation et à la ventilation mécanique ou à l'euthanasie. L'oxygénothérapie à haut débit (HFOT) gagne en popularité en médecine vétérinaire en tant que voie alternative de supplémentation en oxygène pour les animaux qui nécessitent un soutien au-delà de la thérapie conventionnelle. L'oxygénothérapie à haut débit peut fournir un mélange d'air et d'oxygène via un circuit chauffé et humidifié. Il est convivial et peut être utilisé dans un environnement où la ventilation mécanique n'est pas disponible.Cet article de revue est écrit pour les médecins urgentistes et les médecins généralistes qui n'ont pas accès à la ventilation mécanique. L'article passe brièvement en revue la physiologie respiratoire pertinente, les techniques traditionnelles de supplémentation en oxygène, la physiologie de la HFOT et les preuves limitées disponibles en médecine vétérinaire concernant l'utilisation de la HFOT, ses applications et ses limites. Des lignes directrices pour l'utilisation de la HFOT sont suggérées et la HFOT est comparée au traitement conventionnel.(Traduit par Docteur Serge Messier).

Cryopreservation of feline red blood cells in liquid nitrogen using glycerol and hydroxyethyl starch.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to evaluate the techniques and short-term effects of cryopreservation of feline red blood cells (RBCs) in liquid nitrogen using glycerol or hydroxyethyl starch (HES) as a cryoprotectant. METHODS: Feline RBCs were manually mixed with either 20% glycerol or 12.5% HES and frozen for 24 h in liquid nitrogen. The samples were thawed and glycerolized samples were manually washed. Success of the freeze/thaw process was determined by recovery rate of RBCs and evaluation of morphological changes using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). A unit of canine packed RBCs was also subjected to the same methodology to evaluate the cryopreservation handling technique. RESULTS: Feline RBCs preserved with 20% glycerol had a high recovery rate (94.23 ± 1.25%) immediately after thawing. However, the majority of the cells were lost during the washing process, with a final packed cell volume of <1%. A recovery rate was unable to be assessed for samples preserved with HES owing to the high viscosity of the mixture. SEM revealed significant morphological changes after glycerol was added to the feline RBCs. Although these morphological changes were partially reversed after thawing, the majority of the RBCs were lost during the washing process. Minimal morphological changes were noted in the HES sample. Similar results were noted with the canine RBCs. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The described manual technique for cryopreservation using glycerol was not able to successfully preserve feline or canine RBCs. In the present study, it was difficult to make conclusions about the efficacy of HES. Further studies evaluating HES as a cryoprotectant are warranted.