Three-Dimensional CT-Based Limb Length Evaluation Is Highly Dependent on Anatomical Landmark Selection and Pelvic Asymmetry.

Background: Pelvic skeletal asymmetry can result in rotational differences and morphologic bony prominence variance between the left and right hemipelvis. When selecting bony reference points for modern computed tomography-based robotic total hip arthroplasty planning, it is unclear which bony landmarks are the most reliable and accurate, especially in the presence of significant pelvic asymmetry. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted utilizing a database of computed tomography scans. Multiple bony landmarks in the pelvis and femur were selected for comparison, with the aim of measuring pelvic asymmetry. Specifically, the study measured the average difference in lateral offset between the left and right hemipelvis caused by pelvic asymmetry. Landmarks were also compared to determine the impact of pelvic asymmetry on hip length, femur length, and limb length discrepancies. Furthermore, a scenario was simulated in the software whereby a total hip replacement was inserted, potentially changing the hip length. The impact of pelvic reference point selection on the measurement of this simulated change in hip length was examined. Results: This study population showed widespread pelvic asymmetry. The anatomical landmarks of the opposite side cannot be relied upon for predicting the anatomy of the affected side. The center of rotation axis is more reliable than the inferior obturator foramen axis for hip length discrepancy due to pelvic asymmetry (P < .05). Conclusions: Current computer-assisted surgery THR software reports measurements of global offset and hip length that do not consider pelvic asymmetry. Surgeons are not given confidence ranges to represent the potential impact of asymmetry on the global offset and hip length values. Surgeons following these numbers to guide implant position may incur implant placement error should significant pelvic asymmetry be present in a given patient.

Downsizing and minimising medialisation of the acetabular component: Novel technique to preserve bone in THA.

Standard practice for acetabular component placement in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is to medialise the acetabular component. Bone preservation techniques during primary THA are beneficial for possible future revisions. The goal of this study is to examine the effect of downsizing and minimising medialisation of the acetabular component on bone resection volume. The volume of bone resected during acetabular preparation for different sizes of components was calculated and the volume of bone preserved by downsizing the cup was determined. Minimising medialisation of the acetabular component by 1-3 mm from the true floor was calculated. Absolute values and percentage of bone volume preserved when acetabular components are downsized or less medialised is presented. Downsizing the acetabular component by one size (2 mm) preserves between 2.6 cm3 (size 40 vs 42) and 8.4 cm3 (size 72 vs 74) of bone volume and consistently reduces resected bone volume by at least 35% (range 35.2%-37.5%). Similarly, reducing medialisation of a 56 mm acetabular cup (as an example of a commonly implanted component) by 3 mm reduces bone loss by 5.9 cm3- 44% less bone volume resection. Downsizing and minimising medialisation of the cup in THA substantially preserves bone which may benefit future revision surgeries. Surgeons could consider implanting the smallest acceptable acetabular shell to preserve bone without compromising on head size.

A population-based cohort study examining the risk of abdominal cancer after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

OBJECTIVE: Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has increasingly been used as the primary treatment approach for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). This study examined the hypothesis that EVAR leads to an increased risk of abdominal cancer within the radiation field compared with open AAA repair. METHODS: The nationwide English Hospital Episode Statistics database was used to identify all patients older than 50 years who received an AAA repair in 2005 to 2013. EVAR and open AAA repair groups were compared for the incidence of postoperative cancer using inverse probability weights and G-computation formula to adjust for selection bias and confounding. RESULTS: Among 14,150 patients who underwent EVAR and 24,645 patients who underwent open AAA repair, follow-up was up to 7 years. EVAR was associated with an increased risk of postoperative abdominal cancer (hazard ratio [HR], 1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-1.27) and all cancers (HR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.02-1.17). However, there was no difference between the groups in the risk of lung cancer (HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.92-1.18) or obesity-related nonabdominal cancer (HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.69-1.83). Within the EVAR group, use of computed tomography surveillance was not associated with any increased risk of abdominal cancer (HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.71-1.23) or all cancers (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.81-1.17). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests an increased risk of abdominal cancer after EVAR compared with open AAA repair. The differential cancer risk should be further explored in alternative national populations, and radiation exposure during EVAR should be measured as a quality metric in the assessment of EVAR centers.

Editor's Choice - The Implications of Non-compliance to Endovascular Aneurysm Repair Surveillance: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: Increasingly, reports show that compliance rates with endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) surveillance are often suboptimal. The aim of this study was to determine the safety implications of non-compliance with surveillance. METHODS: The study was carried out according to the Preferred Items for Reporting of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. An electronic search was undertaken by two independent authors using Embase, MEDLINE, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases from 1990 to July 2017. Only studies that analysed infrarenal EVAR and had a definition of non-compliance described as weeks or months without imaging surveillance were analysed. Meta-analysis was carried out using the random-effects model and restricted maximum likelihood estimation. RESULTS: Thirteen articles (40,730 patients) were eligible for systematic review; of these, seven studies (14,311 patients) were appropriate for comparative meta-analyses of mortality rates. Three studies (8316 patients) were eligible for the comparative meta-analyses of re-intervention rates after EVAR and four studies (12,995 patients) eligible for meta-analysis for abdominal aortic aneurysm related mortality (ARM). The estimated average non-compliance rate was 42.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] 28-56%). Although there is some evidence that non-compliant patients have better survival rates, there was no statistically significant difference in all cause mortality rates (year 1: odds ratio [OR] 5.77, 95% CI 0.74-45.14; year 3: OR 2.28, 95% CI 0.92-5.66; year 5: OR 1.81, 95% CI 0.88-3.74) and ARM (OR 1.47, 95% CI 0.99-2.19) between compliant and non-compliant patients in the first 5 years after EVAR. The re-intervention rate was statistically significantly higher in compliant patients from 3 to 5 years after EVAR (year 1: OR 6.36, 95% CI 0.23-172.73; year 3: OR 3.94, 85% CI 1.46-10.69; year 5: OR 5.34, 95% CI 1.87-15.29). CONCLUSION: This systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that patients compliant with EVAR surveillance programmes may have an increased re-intervention rate but do not appear to have better survival rates than non-compliant patients.

A Systematic Review of Predictors of Reintervention After EVAR: Guidance for Risk-Stratified Surveillance.

BACKGROUND: Current surveillance protocols after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) are ineffective and costly. Stratifying surveillance by individual risk of reintervention requires an understanding of the factors involved in developing post-EVAR complications. This systematic review assessed risk factors for reintervention after EVAR and proposals for stratified surveillance. METHODS: A systematic search according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines was performed using EMBASE and MEDLINE databases to identify studies reporting on risk factors predicting reintervention after EVAR and proposals for stratified surveillance. RESULTS: Twenty-nine studies reporting on 39 898 patients met the primary inclusion criteria for reporting predictors of reintervention or aortic complications with or without suggestions for stratified surveillance. Five secondary studies described external validation of risk scores for reintervention or aortic complications. There was great heterogeneity in reporting risk factors identified at the pre-EVAR, intraoperative, and post-EVAR stages of treatment, although large preoperative abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter was the most commonly observed risk factor for reintervention after EVAR. CONCLUSION: Existing data on predictors of post-EVAR complications are generally of poor quality and largely derived from retrospective studies. Few studies describing suggestions for stratified surveillance have been subjected to external validation. There is a need to refine risk prediction for EVAR failure and to conduct prospective comparative studies of personalized surveillance with standard practice.

Aortic dissection.

Aortic dissection is a life-threatening condition caused by a tear in the intimal layer of the aorta or bleeding within the aortic wall, resulting in the separation (dissection) of the layers of the aortic wall. Aortic dissection is most common in those 65-75 years of age, with an incidence of 35 cases per 100,000 people per year in this population. Other risk factors include hypertension, dyslipidaemia and genetic disorders that involve the connective tissue, such as Marfan syndrome. Swift diagnostic confirmation and adequate treatment are crucial in managing affected patients. Contemporary management is multidisciplinary and includes serial non-invasive imaging, biomarker testing and genetic risk profiling for aortopathy. The choice of approach for repairing or replacing the damaged region of the aorta depends on the severity and the location of the dissection and the risks of complication from surgery. Open surgical repair is most commonly used for dissections involving the ascending aorta and the aortic arch, whereas minimally invasive endovascular intervention is appropriate for descending aorta dissections that are complicated by rupture, malperfusion, ongoing pain, hypotension or imaging features of high risk. Recent advances in the understanding of the underlying pathophysiology of aortic dissection have led to more patients being considered at substantial risk of complications and, therefore, in need of endovascular intervention rather than only medical or surgical intervention.

Predicting reinterventions after open and endovascular aneurysm repair using the St George's Vascular Institute score.

BACKGROUND: Identifying patients at risk for aneurysm rupture and sac expansion after open and endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair (EVAR) may help to attenuate this risk by intensifying follow-up and early detection of problems. The goal of this study was to validate the St George's Vascular Institute (SGVI) score to identify patients at risk for a secondary intervention after elective aneurysm repair. METHODS: A post hoc on-treatment analysis of a randomized trial comparing open AAA repair and EVAR was performed. In this multicenter trial, 351 patients were randomly assigned to undergo open AAA repair or EVAR. Information on survival and reinterventions was available for all patients at 5 years postoperatively, for 79% at 6 years, and for 53% at 7 years. Open repair was completed in 173 patients and EVAR in 171, based on an on-treatment analysis. Because 17 patients had incomplete anatomic data, 327 patients (157 open repair and 170 EVAR) were available for analysis. During 6 years of follow-up, 78 patients underwent at least one reintervention. The SGVI score, which is calculated from preoperative AAA morphology using aneurysm and iliac diameter, predictively dichotomized patients into groups at high-risk or low-risk for a secondary intervention. The observed freedom from reintervention was compared between groups at predicted high-risk and predicted low-risk. RESULTS: The 20 patients in the high-risk group were indeed at higher risk for a secondary intervention compared with the 307 patients predicted to be at low risk (hazard ratio [HR], 3.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.05-7.11; P < .001). Discrimination between high-risk and low-risk groups was valid for EVAR (HR, 4.06; 95% CI, 1.93-8.51; P < .001) and for open repair (HR, 3.41; 95% CI, 1.02-11.4; P = .033). CONCLUSIONS: The SGVI score appears to be a useful tool to predict reintervention risk in patients after open repair and EVAR.

Predicting Mid-term All-cause Mortality in Patients Undergoing Elective Endovascular Repair of a Descending Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm.

INTRODUCTION: All-cause mortality in patients after repair of aortic aneurysms of the descending thoracic aorta thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is relatively high at mid-term follow-up. The aim of this study was to derive and validate a system that could predict all-cause mortality after TEVAR to aid with patient selection. METHODS: The MOTHER database contained 625 patients that underwent elective surgery for descending thoracic aortic aneurysms. Univariate analysis identified preoperative factors associated with mid-term all-cause mortality, and a Cox proportional hazards model was developed. The model was internally validated using Kaplan-Meier comparison of observed vs predicted mortality. External validation was performed using a data set from the University of Florida College of Medicine. RESULTS: There were 625 patients that underwent TEVAR for descending thoracic aortic aneurysm in the MOTHER database and 231 in the University of Florida College of Medicine validation set. The mid-term mortality rate at 6 years of follow-up was 34.4% and 34%, respectively. The all-cause mortality risk score was calculated using 0.0398 × (age) + 0.516 × (renal insufficiency) + 0.46 × (previous cerebrovascular disease) + 0.352 × (prior tobacco use) + 0.376 × (number of devices >2) + 0.016 × (maximum aneurysm diameter). Using this score, low-, medium-, and high-risk groups were defined, with predicted survival at 5 years of 80%, 60%, and 40%. Patients at high risk of mid-term all-cause death were identified in the validation cohort using the prediction rule. CONCLUSIONS: Identifying patients with a limited life expectancy after TEVAR is possible using a preoperative risk-stratification system. This information can be used to inform decision making regarding when and whether to proceed with TEVAR.

An Artificial Neural Network Stratifies the Risks of Reintervention and Mortality after Endovascular Aneurysm Repair; a Retrospective Observational study.

BACKGROUND: Lifelong surveillance after endovascular repair (EVAR) of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) is considered mandatory to detect potentially life-threatening endograft complications. A minority of patients require reintervention but cannot be predictively identified by existing methods. This study aimed to improve the prediction of endograft complications and mortality, through the application of machine-learning techniques. METHODS: Patients undergoing EVAR at 2 centres were studied from 2004-2010. Pre-operative aneurysm morphology was quantified and endograft complications were recorded up to 5 years following surgery. An artificial neural networks (ANN) approach was used to predict whether patients would be at low- or high-risk of endograft complications (aortic/limb) or mortality. Centre 1 data were used for training and centre 2 data for validation. ANN performance was assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis to compare the incidence of aortic complications, limb complications, and mortality; in patients predicted to be low-risk, versus those predicted to be high-risk. RESULTS: 761 patients aged 75 +/- 7 years underwent EVAR. Mean follow-up was 36+/- 20 months. An ANN was created from morphological features including angulation/length/areas/diameters/volume/tortuosity of the aneurysm neck/sac/iliac segments. ANN models predicted endograft complications and mortality with excellent discrimination between a low-risk and high-risk group. In external validation, the 5-year rates of freedom from aortic complications, limb complications and mortality were 95.9% vs 67.9%; 99.3% vs 92.0%; and 87.9% vs 79.3% respectively (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: This study presents ANN models that stratify the 5-year risk of endograft complications or mortality using routinely available pre-operative data.

The ETTAA study protocol: a UK-wide observational study of 'Effective Treatments for Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm'.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic thoracic aortic aneurysm (CTAA) affecting the arch or descending aorta is an indolent but life-threatening condition with a rising prevalence as the UK population ages. Treatment may be in the form of open surgical repair (OSR) surgery, endovascular stent grafting (ESG) or best medical therapy (BMT). Currently, there is no consensus on the best management strategy, and no UK-specific economic studies that assess outcomes beyond the chosen procedure, but this is required in the context of greater demand for treatment and limited National Health Service (NHS) resources. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a prospective, multicentre observational study with statistical and economic modelling of patients with CTAA affecting the arch or descending aorta. We aim to gain an understanding of how treatments are currently chosen, and to determine the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the three available treatment strategies (BMT, ESG and OSR). This will be achieved by: (1) following consecutive patients who are referred to the teams collaborating in this proposal and collecting data regarding quality of life (QoL), medical events and hospital stays over a maximum of 5 years; (2) statistical analysis of the comparative effectiveness of the three treatments; and (3) economic modelling of the comparative cost-effectiveness of the three treatments. Primary study outcomes are: aneurysm growth, QoL, freedom from reintervention, freedom from death or permanent neurological injury, incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year gained. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study will generate an evidence base to guide patients and clinicians to determine the indications and timing of treatment, as well as informing healthcare decision-makers about which treatments the NHS should provide. The study has achieved ethical approval and will be disseminated primarily in the form of a Health Technology Assessment monograph at its completion. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN04044627.

Multicenter Nellix EndoVascular Aneurysm Sealing system experience in aneurysm sac sealing.

OBJECTIVE: Despite improvements in endograft devices, operator technique, and patient selection, endovascular repair has not achieved the long-term durability of open surgical aneurysm repair. Persistent or recurrent aneurysm sac flow from failed proximal sealing, component failure, or branch vessel flow underpins a significant rate of reintervention after endovascular repair. The Nellix device (Endologix, Irvine, Calif) employs a unique design with deployment of polymer-filled EndoBags surrounding the endograft flow lumens, sealing the aneurysm sac space and potentially reducing complications from persistent sac flow. This retrospective analysis represents the initial experience in consecutive patients treated with the device in real-world practice. METHODS: This study was performed at six clinical centers in Europe and one in New Zealand during the initial period after commercialization of the Nellix device. Patients underwent evaluation with computed tomography and other imaging modalities following local standards of care. Patients were selected for treatment with Nellix and treated by each institution according to its endovascular repair protocol. Clinical and imaging end points included technical success (successful device deployment and absence of any endoleak at completion angiography), freedom from all-cause and aneurysm-related mortality, endoleak by type, limb occlusion, aneurysm rupture, and reintervention. RESULTS: During a 17-month period, 171 patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms were treated with the Nellix device and observed for a median of 5 months (range, 0-14 months). The 153 male and 18 female patients with mean age of 74 ± 7 years had aneurysms 61 ± 9 mm in diameter with an average infrarenal neck length of 28 ± 15 mm and infrarenal angulation of 37 ± 22 degrees. Technical success was achieved in all but two patients (99%); one patient had a type Ib endoleak and another had a type II endoleak. Through the last available follow-up, type Ia endoleak was observed in five patients (3%), type Ib endoleak in four patients (2%), and type II endoleak in four patients (2%). There were eight limb occlusions (5%), among which seven were evident at the 1-month follow-up visit. Aneurysm-related reinterventions were performed in 15 patients (9%). There were no aneurysm ruptures or open surgical conversions. CONCLUSIONS: This first multicenter postmarket report of the Nellix device for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair demonstrates satisfactory results during the initial learning phase of this new technology. The rate of aneurysm exclusion was high, and frequency of complications was low. More definitive conclusions on the value of this novel device await the results of the ongoing Nellix EVAS FORWARD Global Registry and the EVAS FORWARD investigational device exemption trial.

Management of a type Ia endoleak with the Nellix endovascular aneurysm sealing system.

PURPOSE: To report the application of the Nellix endovascular aneurysm sealing (EVAS) device, including two chimney grafts, to successfully treat a type Ia endoleak. CASE REPORT: An 87-year-old man had an asymptomatic 7.6-cm infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and a 4.5-cm right internal iliac artery aneurysm treated using an aortouni-iliac stent-graft. Two years after the index endovascular repair, an asymptomatic type Ia endoleak was detected on duplex ultrasound; the computed tomographic angiogram (CTA) demonstrated significant sac enlargement and stent-graft migration. Initial attempts to treat the leak with 2 aortic cuffs only reduced the size of the endoleak. Another procedure was undertaken using the Nellix device with chimney grafts to increase the proximal sealing zone above the existing stent-graft. Imaging postoperatively demonstrated successful resolution of the endoleak and continuing patency of both renal artery chimney stent-grafts. CTA at 6 months demonstrated persistent sealing of the endoleak. CONCLUSION: The use of the EVAS system may represent another endovascular solution that can be added to the clinician's repertoire for treating type Ia endoleak after conventional endovascular repair of infrarenal AAA.

Comparison of aortic diameter and area after endovascular treatment of aortic dissection.

BACKGROUND: Different methods have been used to assess remodeling of the thoracic aorta after endovascular treatment of Stanford type B aortic dissections. Changes in morphology may be described using diameter, area, or volume. The aim of this study was to determine if aortic diameter measurements could be used to approximate aortic area in order to refine reporting standards. METHODS: The study population encompassed 100 patients enrolled in the VIRTUE registry (designed to assess thoracic endografting with the Valiant Stent Graft System [Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN] for the treatment of type B aortic dissections). Diameter and area measurements of the true lumen, false lumen, and whole aorta were made using three-dimensional computed tomographic (3D CT) workstations, at different anatomic locations. Measurements included preoperative, postoperative, and follow-up scans. The Pearson test was used to determine general correlation between diameter and volume at each location. Scatter plots were drawn and linear regression models were used to draw a line of best fit. Comparison of these with nonlinear models was performed. RESULTS: Aortic true and false lumen diameter and area showed good correlation (p < 0.001) in the majority of anatomic locations. This relationship was present preoperatively and during follow-up (p < 0.001). The linear regression models fit well with high R(2) values. At very large aortic sizes nonlinear models were a slightly better fit, but this was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Aortic diameter measurements correlate with luminal areas in patients with type B aortic dissection. This implies area increases proportionately with diameter over time. Therefore, diameter measurements using multiplanar reconstructions based on a central luminal line appear to be adequate when assessing aortic remodeling after endovascular treatment of aortic dissection.

The importance of structures and processes in determining outcomes for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: an international perspective.

Annual procedural mortality reports have become mandatory for vascular surgery in England, reflecting a more widespread appetite for transparency and accountability across the National Health Service (NHS) [BMJ 2013;346:f854]. The outcomes of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair, in particular, have attracted considerable commentary: from 1999 to 2006, postoperative mortality was higher in England than in many other countries (7.9 vs. 1.9-4.5%) [European Society for Vascular Surgery. 2nd Vascunet Report. 2008]. This stimulated considerable service reconfiguration (centralization), quality improvement initiatives, the uptake of endovascular technology, and the examination of institution-level mortality data [http://www.vascularsociety.org.uk/library/quality-improvement.html], which resulted in a fall in elective AAA mortality to 1.8% by 2012 [http://www.hqip.org.uk/assets/NCAPOP-Library/NCAPOP-2013-2014/Outcomes-after-Elective-Repair-of-Infra-renal-Abdominal-Aortic-Aneurysm.pdf (February 2015)]. Despite improvements at a national level, the outcomes of AAA repair vary considerably between different hospitals in the NHS [Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2014;7:131-141], analogous to interprovider variation that has been reported across a range of emergency medical and surgical conditions [BMC Health Serv Res 2014;14:270]. This suggests that underlying institution structures and processes contribute independently to patients' outcomes. There is also considerable evidence that the outcomes of AAA repair vary in different healthcare systems, both in the elective European Society for Vascular Surgery, 2008 and emergency settings. A consideration of the role of structures and processes in influencing outcomes for AAA repair can be conducted across different institutions or even different healthcare systems. This can help identify which factors are consistently associated with the best outcomes, informing efforts to better organize and deliver services for patients requiring vascular surgery.

Increased Expression of Lamin A/C Correlate with Regions of High Wall Stress in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.

BACKGROUND: Since aortic diameter is the most -significant risk factor for rupture, we sought to identify stress-dependent changes in gene expression to illuminate novel molecular processes in aneurysm rupture. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We constructed finite element maps of abdominal computerized tomography scans (CTs) of seven abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) patients to map wall stress. Paired biopsies from high- and low-stress areas were collected at surgery using vascular landmarks as coordinates. Differential gene expression was evaluated by Illumina Array analysis, using the whole genome DNA-mediated, annealing, selection, extension, and ligation (DASL) gene chip (n = 3 paired samples). RESULTS: The sole significant candidate from this analysis, Lamin A/C, was validated at the protein level, using western blotting. Lamin A/C expression in the inferior mesenteric vein (IMV) of AAA patients was compared to a control group and in aortic smooth muscle cells in culture in response to physiological pulsatile stretch. -Areas of high wall stress (n = 7) correlate to those -regions which have the thinnest walls [778 µm (585-1120 µm)] in comparison to areas of lowest wall stress [1620 µm (962-2919 µm)]. Induced expression of Lamin A/C -correlated with areas of high wall stress from AAAs but was not significantly induced in the IMV from AAA patients compared to controls (n = 16). Stress-induced expression of Lamin A/C was mimicked by exposing aortic smooth muscle cells to prolonged pulsatile stretch. CONCLUSION: Lamin A/C protein is specifically increased in areas of high wall stress in AAA from patients, but is not increased on other vascular beds of aneurysm patients, suggesting that its elevation may be a compensatory response to the pathobiology leading to aneurysms.

Management of the left subclavian artery and neurologic complications after thoracic endovascular aortic repair.

OBJECTIVE: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) of various pathologies has been associated with peri-interventional neurologic complication rates of up to 15%. The objective of this study was to determine the influence of the management of the left subclavian artery (LSA) on neurologic complications and to define subgroups that might benefit from LSA revascularization. METHODS: The Medtronic Thoracic Endovascular Registry (MOTHER; Medtronic, Santa Rosa, Calif), consists of data from five sponsored trials and one institutional series incorporating 1010 patients undergoing TEVAR from 2002 to 2010. Perioperative stroke and spinal cord injury (SCI) rates were described according to the management of the LSA and presenting pathology. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine factors associated with perioperative neurologic complications. RESULTS: Of 1002 patients included in the analysis, stroke occurred in 48 (4.8%), and SCI developed in 42 (4.2%) ≤ 30 days of surgery. The stroke rate was 2.2% in patients with no coverage of the LSA vs 9.1% with coverage alone and 5.1% in patients who underwent LSA revascularization before coverage (P < .001). This relationship was strongest in the aneurysm group. Coverage of the LSA without revascularization was independently associated with stroke (odds ratio [OR], 3.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7-7.1), specifically in the posterior territory (OR, 11.7; 95% CI, 2.5-54.6), as was previous cerebrovascular accident (OR, 7.1; 95% CI, 2.2-23.1; P = .001), whereas a covered LSA was not associated with an increased risk of SCI. CONCLUSIONS: Coverage of the LSA without revascularization is an important modifiable risk factor for stroke in patients undergoing TEVAR for a thoracic aortic aneurysm. Prior revascularization appears to protect against posterior circulation territory stroke.

Endovascular treatment of mycotic aortic aneurysms: a European multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Mycotic aortic aneurysm (MAA) is a rare and life-threatening disease. The aim of this European multicenter collaboration was to study the durability of endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) of MAA, by assessing late infection-related complications and long-term survival. METHODS AND RESULTS: All EVAR treated MAAs, between 1999 and 2013 at 16 European centers, were retrospectively reviewed. One hundred twenty-three patients with 130 MAAs were identified. Mean age was 69 years (range 39-86), 87 (71%) were men, 58 (47%) had immunodeficiency, and 47 (38%) presented with rupture. Anatomic locations were ascending/arch (n=4), descending (n=34), paravisceral (n=15), infrarenal aorta (n=63), and multiple (n=7). Treatments were thoracic EVAR (n=43), fenestrated/branched EVAR (n=9), and infrarenal EVAR (n=71). Antibiotic was administered for mean 30 weeks. Mean follow-up was 35 months (range 1 week to 149 months). Six patients (5%) were converted to open repair during follow-up. Survival was 91% (95% confidence interval, 86% to 96%), 75% (67% to 83%), 55% (44% to 66%), and 41% (28% to 54%) after 1, 12, 60, and 120 months, respectively. Infection-related death occurred in 23 patients (19%), 9 after discontinuation of antibiotic treatment. A Cox regression analysis demonstrated non-Salmonella-positive culture as predictors for late infection-related death. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular treatment of MAA is feasible and for most patients a durable treatment option. Late infections do occur, are often lethal, and warrant long-term antibiotic treatment and follow-up. Patients with non-Salmonella-positive blood cultures were more likely to die from late infection.

Treatment of a juxtarenal aneurysm with the Nellix endovascular aneurysm sealing system and chimney stent.

PURPOSE: To present treatment of a juxtarenal aneurysm using the Nellix endovascular aneurysm sealing system (EVAS) and a chimney stent. CASE REPORT: A 79-year-old woman was diagnosed with a 6-cm juxtarenal aneurysm. Standard endovascular aneurysm repair was not possible due to lack of an adequate infrarenal landing zone, and poor iliac access and angulated visceral aortic branches precluded a custom-made fenestrated solution. The patient was not a suitable candidate for open surgery due to significant comorbidity, so she underwent successful endovascular aneurysm repair with the Nellix EVAS system and a renal chimney stent. Follow-up imaging at 6 months showed a sealed aneurysm sac and patent renal chimney stent. CONCLUSION: The Nellix EVAS system obliterates the aneurysm sac using polymer-filled endobags. The ability of the endobags to conform to adjacent structures may offer advantages over conventional endografts when combined with parallel grafts designed to treat juxtarenal aneurysms.