Ankle impingement after extra-articular open fracture of the leg: Full arthroscopic treatment in the supine position.

OBJECTIVE: Extra-articular open fractures of the leg often result from high energy trauma. After healing, a painful ankle impingement may occur. In the event of anterior and posterior impingements, arthroscopic treatment may require two surgical positions. We propose an operative strategy to treat anterior and posterior ankle impingement after extra-articular open fracture of the leg. Our hypothesis is that this strategy is simple, effective and with a low risk of complication. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Anterior ankle impingements were treated by anterior arthroscopy in supine position; anterior and posterior impingements were treated by anterior and posterior arthroscopy in supine position; anterior and posterior impingements associated with retraction of gastrocnemius muscles were treated with anterior arthroscopy in supine position followed by posterior arthroscopy in prone position, and an open tendon lengthening of the calcaneal tendon in the same position. The anterior and posterior arthroscopic release was tested in the cadaver laboratory. Then, the surgical strategy was applied to our patients in our clinical practice. After, we analysed retrospectively the results of the strategy in the first patients treated for a painful ankle impingement after extra-articular open fracture of the leg. The data retrieved were the importance of pain (VAS), the presence of clinical instability, ankle mobility, gastrocnemius retraction and the AOFAS functional score and the post-operative complications. Then, these data were compared before the surgery and at last follow-up. RESULTS: From the cadaver laboratory, anterior and posterior arthroscopic release was possible in all cases without changing position. From our clinical practice, we included 5 patients (3 women and 2 men, mean age 43 years) suffering from an ankle impingement after extra-articular open fracture of the leg (2 patients with isolated anterior impingement, 1 patient with anterior and posterior impingement, and 2 patients with anterior and posterior impingement plus a gastrocnemius retraction). All post-operative parameters (pain, range of motion and AOFAS score) at mean follow-up of 53 months were improved. No post-operative complication was reported. CONCLUSION: We propose a surgical strategy adapted to the different clinical presentations of ankle impingement after extra-articular open fracture of the leg.

Clinical and functional outcomes of 405 Achilles tendon ruptures after a minimum follow-up of 1 year.

OBJECTIVE: The results of surgical versus conservative treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures are still controversial. The objective of this study was to compare surgical and conservative treatment at a minimum follow-up of 1 year in terms of the complications, functional outcomes and clinical results. HYPOTHESES: There is no difference in the complications, clinical results and functional outcomes between the two treatment groups. There is no difference in the occurrence of complications or the clinical results due to the immobilization or rehabilitation protocols. METHODS: This was a retrospective comparative, multicenter, non-randomized study of acute Achilles tendon ruptures treated between 01/01/2018 and 31/12/2019 at 21 study sites in France. All patients who received surgical or conservative treatment were included. The demographics, sports participation, nature of treatment, immobilization parameters (type, duration, position) and rehabilitation protocol were collected. Rerupture, general and specific complications, clinical results (heel-rise test, single-leg hop, calf circumference, ankle dorsiflexion) and the functional outcomes (ATRS, VISA-A, EFAS, SF-12) were collected at the final review. RESULTS: Four hundred five patients were reviewed at a mean follow-up of 24 (±7) months. Surgical treatment was done in 372 patients (92%) and conservative treatment in 33 patients (8%), with these two sets of patients having comparable preoperative characteristics. There was a similar number of reruptures in the conservative group (3 cases, 9%) as in the surgical group (15 cases, 4%) (p=0.176). There were more general complications in the conservative group (24%) than in the surgical group (11%) (p=0.04). There was a 9% rate of surgery-related complications (infection, nerve damage, anesthesia after-effects). The ATRS (p=0.017), EFAS Total (p=0.013), EFAS daily living (p=0.008), and SF-12 physical (p=0.01) were better in the surgical group. Strict then relative immobilization provided the best balance between functional recovery (EFAS total of 33, p<0.01) and tendon lengthening (0°, p=0.01) without increasing the occurrence of rerupture (2%, p=0.18). Early weightbearing accompanied by immobilization and rehabilitation within 30 days did not lead to more reruptures than if it was started beyond 30 days (p=0.082 and p=0.07). CONCLUSIONS: This study found no differences in the number of reruptures between surgical treatment and conservative treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures. Surgical treatment led to better clinical results but had a variable effect on improving the functional scores. No matter which treatment is used, in the ideal case, 3 weeks of strict immobilization in equinus should be followed by progressive reduction over the next 3 weeks. Early weightbearing and mobilization within 30 days did not increase the risk of rerupture; it actually optimized the clinical and functional outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III; retrospective comparative, non-randomized.

Construction and validation of a functional diagnostic score in anterior cruciate ligament ruptures of the knee in the immediate post-traumatic period. Preliminary results of a multicenter prospective study.

INTRODUCTION: Knee ligament injuries are frequent and their number is constantly increasing with the development of sports activities. Dynamic knee maneuvers usually make it possible to diagnose anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries but they remain difficult to perform in the early post-traumatic phase. This leads to the almost systematic use of MRI scans, many of which turn out to be superfluous. The aim of this study was to construct a screening score based solely on history-taking, in order to help diagnose ACL injuries, and to define thresholds that could help inform recommendations for MRI usage. The hypothesis was that this score could distinguish a population of patients with a ruptured ACL from a population of patients with other knee injuries. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This prospective multicenter study included 166 patients. Patients were included if they were between 18 and 55 years of age, with knee trauma that had occurred in the last 10 days, and without a bone fracture on standard radiographs. They were excluded if the trauma required immediate surgical management and if they had a history of knee trauma. The screening score was completed by the physician. The score included the following items: assessment of pain, immediate post-traumatic functional impairment, notion of a "pop", feeling of instability and presence of a swelling. An MRI was systematically performed and the patient consulted a referring physician to compare the initial score with the diagnosis. RESULTS: Eighty-six patients had an injured ACL and 80 had a healthy ACL. Two thresholds could be identified. For a score lower than 4, the risk of an ACL injury was low with a sensitivity of 96% and a negative predictive value of 87%. For a score above 8, the ACL injury was highly probable with a specificity of 88% and a positive predictive value of 83%. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: The score was able to distinguish a population of patients with a ruptured ACL from a population of patients with other knee injuries. These preliminary results confirm that the selected items are relevant and that the score can help improve the diagnostic orientation of patients with recent knee trauma. Increasing the sample size in combination with an analysis of influencing factors will determine whether the performance of this score can be refined. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II prospective multicenter study.

The awareness of injury prevention programmes is insufficient among French- and German-speaking sports medicine communities in Europe.

PURPOSE: Evaluate the current state of sports injury prevention perception, knowledge and practice among sports medicine professionals located in Western Europe and involved in injury prevention. METHODS: Members of two different sports medicine organizations (GOTS and ReFORM) were invited to complete a web-based questionnaire (in German and in French, respectively) addressing perception, knowledge and implementation of sports injury prevention through 22 questions. RESULTS: 766 participants from a dozen of countries completed the survey. Among them, 43% were surgeons, 23% sport physicians and 18% physiotherapists working mainly in France (38%), Germany (23%) and Belgium (10%). The sample rated the importance of injury prevention as "high" or "very high" in a majority of cases (91%), but only 54% reported to be aware of specific injury prevention programmes. The French-speaking world was characterized by lower levels of reported knowledge, unfamiliarity with existing prevention programmes and less weekly time spent on prevention as compared to their German-speaking counterparts. Injury prevention barriers reported by the respondents included mainly insufficient expertise, absence of staff support from sports organizations and lack of time. CONCLUSION: There is a lack of awareness regarding injury prevention concepts among sports medicine professionals of the European French- and German-speaking world. This gap varied according to the professional occupation and working country. Relevant future paths for improvement include specific efforts to build awareness around sports injury prevention. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Criteria for return to running after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a scoping review.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the criteria used to guide clinical decision-making regarding when a patient is ready to return to running (RTR) after ACL reconstruction. DESIGN: Scoping review. DATA SOURCES: The MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, Web of Science, PEDro, SPORTDiscus and Cochrane Library electronic databases. We also screened the reference lists of included studies and conducted forward citation tracking. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: Reported at least one criterion for permitting adult patients with primary ACL reconstruction to commence running postoperatively. RESULTS: 201 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria and reported 205 time-based criteria for RTR. The median time from when RTR was permitted was 12 postoperative weeks (IQR=3.3, range 5-39 weeks). Fewer than one in five studies used additional clinical, strength or performance-based criteria for decision-making regarding RTR. Aside from time, the most frequently reported criteria for RTR were: full knee range of motion or >95% of the non-injured knee plus no pain or pain <2 on visual analogue scale; isometric extensor limb symmetry index (LSI)>70% plus extensor and flexor LSI>70%; and hop test LSI>70%. CONCLUSIONS: Fewer than one in five studies reported clinical, strength or performance-based criteria for RTR even though best evidence recommends performance-based criteria combined with time-based criteria to commence running activities following ACL reconstruction.

Biomechanical evaluation of four femoral fixation configurations in a simulated anterior cruciate ligament replacement using a new generation of Ligament Advanced Reinforcement System (LARS™ AC).

BACKGROUND: Recent improvements in manufacturing of biomaterials have made available a new generation of artificial ligaments with better biocompatibility and design that have led to a new interest in using them for ACL reconstructions. PURPOSE: To evaluate the biomechanical characteristics of four femoral fixations using a Ligament Advanced Reinforcement System (LARS™ AC; LARS, Arc sur Tille, France) for anterior cruciate ligament replacement. METHOD: Six femoral ACL fixations in four configurations using fresh calf femurs with an interference titanium screw inserted inside to outside, an interference titanium screw inserted outside to inside, an interference titanium screw inserted inside to outside with a staple and a new transversal cortical suspension device developed by LARS™ were compared in a static loading and failure test. Output values were ultimate strength, graft slippage, mode of failure, energy to failure and stiffness. RESULTS: The transversal fixation performed with a significantly higher failure load than others (1804 N) (p < 0.001), whereas there were no significant differences between the three fixations with interference screws. There were no significant differences of stiffness between all fixations, and the transversal device had a significantly higher graft slippage (13.1 mm) than others (all p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In this in vitro evaluation, the transversal fixation exhibited better biomechanical performance under static solicitations than others. The transversal device is expected to provide better clinical results than the well-established screw system fixations for femoral ACL fixation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Laboratory investigation (Level 2).

Spinal surgery and ophthalmic complications: a French survey with review of 17 cases.

OBJECTIVES: Ocular complications after spine surgery are incompletely understood and are not as rare as implied by recent publications. In 13 out of 15 published case reports, ocular complications are attributed mainly to compression. But in 66 cases reported in 4 series in the literature, compression seems to play a role in less than 10 cases. However, 3 out of the 4 series lack sufficient detail to support this mechanism clearly. Our objectives were to identify the mechanisms and specific risk factors associated with this devastating complication, to help in prevention. METHODS: A 2-page survey was sent to all French orthopedic centers specializing in spine surgery (28 centers) requesting information regarding any patients who had experienced visual deficits after spine surgery. Respondents were asked to identify presence of commonly cited preoperative risk factors, including ophthalmologic diagnosis and local signs (eyelid or conjunctival edema, periorbital numbness, or paresthesia) and intraoperative risks, such as positioning of the head, to clarify the possible mechanisms. Seventeen patients were thus included. RESULTS: Two main mechanisms were identified. First, ocular compression (9 cases) characterized by a unilateral definitive blindness with local signs due to a central retinal artery occlusion. Second, internal carotid thromboembolism (4 cases) associated with head rotation toward the ipsilateral side, causing an ischemic optic neuropathy with a unilateral partial and potentially regressive visual loss. CONCLUSIONS: The authors propose 2 preventive measures: modification of horseshoe-shaped headrest and precautions with lateral rotation of the head in patients with carotid atheroma.

Bucket-handle meniscal lesions: magnetic resonance imaging criteria for reparability.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in predicting knee bucket-handle meniscal tear (BHMT) reparability. METHODS: Twenty-eight patients who underwent knee arthroscopy by a single surgeon for BHMT with prior MRI examination were included. BHMTs were diagnosed by MRI based on the association of a displaced meniscal fragment on coronal images and one of the following three signs on sagittal slices: flipped meniscus sign, double posterior cruciate ligament, and meniscal fragment within the intercondylar notch. BHMT patients' MRIs were retrospectively reviewed independently to search for criteria of reparability by 2 observers with different degrees of experience in musculoskeletal radiology, and disagreements were arbitrated to consensus. The criteria for BHMT reparability were as follows: (1) rim width of less than 4 mm; (2) tear length of 1 cm or greater, regardless of total lesion length; and (3) generation of isosignals by the inner meniscal fragment and peripheral rim compared with the normal contralateral meniscus of the same knee. The first 2 criteria indicate an adequate meniscal lesion length in the vascularized zone (only the peripheral third), enabling meniscal healing after repair; the third criterion guarantees that the meniscus is nondegenerative. RESULTS: Of the BHMTs, 5 (17.9%) were arthroscopically reparable and 23 (82.1%) were not. Interpretation of magnetic resonance images correctly predicted reparability in 4 of 5 reparable BHMTs and irreparability in 22 of 23 irreparable BHMTs (26/28 lesions). Interobserver agreement was good for the prediction of reparability (kappa = 0.7). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that knee BHMTs that are predicted to be reparable by MRI would have a high likelihood of actually being reparable. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, development of diagnostic criteria on basis of consecutive patients and gold standard.