Unmatched. What's Next? Is a Preliminary Year of Residency or Research Fellowship Better for Reapplicants to Plastic Surgery?

Background: Plastic and reconstructive surgery is one of the most competitive residency programs, and given the increased number of applicants for a relatively fixed number of positions, successfully matching is a challenge. Match rates have declined since 2018, with a match rate of ~55% in 2022. Two common options before reapplying are a preliminary year of residency (preliminary year) or a research fellowship. This study investigated which option is more beneficial for reapplicants seeking a successful match. Methods: This retrospective study included all applicants to an integrated plastic and reconstructive surgery residency from 2015 to 2023. Two cohorts based on reapplication strategy (research fellowship or preliminary year) were created. Demographic, applicant, and match data were collected. Pearson chi-squared, Fisher exact, and Wilcoxon rank sum testing were performed. Results: In total, 125 reapplicants were included. Seventy-one (56.8%) reapplicants pursued a preliminary year, and 29 (23.2%) completed a research fellowship. Research fellowship reapplicants had a greater mean number of first author publications (8.8 versus 3.2, P < 0.001), non-first author publications (11.3 versus 5.9, P = 0.021), poster presentations (9.7 versus 6.0, P = 0.028), and oral presentations (11.8 versus 6.4, P < 0.001). Research fellowship reapplicants were more likely to match into plastic and reconstructive surgery (PRS) than preliminary year reapplicants, with 72.4% (n = 21) of research fellowship reapplicants matching into PRS compared with 39.4% (n = 28) of preliminary year reapplicants (P = 0.003). Conclusions: Research fellowship reapplicants demonstrated greater research productivity and were almost twice as likely to match into PRS compared with preliminary reapplicants.

Plastic Surgery and Cryptocurrency: A 2024 Update.

Cryptocurrency offers a decentralized alternative to traditional financial systems, facilitating peer-to-peer transactions with minimal fees and heightened security. It also transformed into a financial asset similar to gold. Despite its volatile valuation, recent developments, such as the approval of Bitcoin exchange-traded funds by the Securities and Exchange Commission, underscore its evolving role as an investment opportunity. Plastic surgery has increasingly embraced cryptocurrency as a form of payment, leveraging its speed, security, and privacy benefits. However, alongside its potential advantages, risks such as volatility, irreversibility of transactions, and regulatory uncertainties warrant careful consideration. Moving forward, the integration of blockchain technology and cryptocurrency is poised to revolutionize various aspects of plastic surgery, from patient privacy to postoperative monitoring devices, necessitating a proactive approach from surgeons to navigate this evolving landscape. This article explores the intersection of cryptocurrency and plastic surgery, delving into its current applications, risks, investment potential, and future prospects.

A systematic review of patient regret after surgery- A common phenomenon in many specialties but rare within gender-affirmation surgery.

Regret after gender-affirming surgery (GAS) is a complex issue. Comparing regret after GAS to regret after plastic surgery operations and other major life decisions is a novel approach that can provide insight into the magnitude of this issue. A systematic review of three databases was conducted to investigate regret after common plastic surgery operations. Three separate literature reviews on regret after GAS, regret after elective operations, and regret after major life decisions were performed. A total of 55 articles examining regret after plastic surgery were included. The percentage of patients reporting regret ranged from 0 to 47.1 â€‹% in breast reconstruction, 5.1-9.1 â€‹% in breast augmentation, and 10.82-33.3 â€‹% in body contouring. In other surgical subspecialties, 30 â€‹% of patients experience regret following prostatectomy and up to 19.5 â€‹% following bariatric surgery. Rate of regret after GAS is approximately 1 â€‹%. Other life decisions, such as having children and getting a tattoo have regret rates of 7 â€‹% and 16.2 â€‹%, respectively. When comparing regret after GAS to regret after other surgeries and major life decisions, the percentage of patients experiencing regret is extremely low.

A 16-Year Analysis of Aesthetic Surgery Volume and Its Association With US Economic Performance.

Historically, demand for plastic surgery has been associated with the performance of the US economy. This study evaluates the relationship between economic performance indicators and the popularity and profitability of aesthetic surgery from 2006 to 2022, considering several recessions and the rise of social media. The data were collected from the Aesthetic Society's (AS) Aesthetic Plastic Surgery National Databank and the American Society of Plastic Surgeons' (ASPS) Plastic Surgery Statistics Report from 2006 to 2022. Procedures analyzed included the most performed cosmetic surgeries, as well as neuromodulator injections and dermal fillers. Pearson correlation tests were used to analyze the strength of association between 8 financial indicators and case volumes and expenditures for each procedure. From 2006 to 2020, ASPS data demonstrated gross domestic product (GDP) per capita year-over-year (YOY) change that was positively correlated with case volume and expenditures across 13 out of the 24 different procedure metrics (54.2%). From 2006 to 2016, AS data were positively correlated with the YOY change of theNational Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotations (NASDAQ), Standard and Poor's 500, and Dow Jones in 12 of the 24 variables (50%). This was followed by GDP YOY change, with positive correlations to 11 variables (45.8%). YOY changes of consumer-level finances and inflation indicators were less frequently associated among both datasets.In conclusion, our study shows that aesthetic plastic surgery procedures and expenditures correlate with GDP. Although aesthetic surgery demand may be difficult to anticipate, this study elucidates several factors plastic surgeons may use as a bellwether for their practices.

Picture Perfect: Standardizing and Safekeeping Clinical Photography in Plastic Surgery.

Plastic surgery relies heavily on clinical photography to document preoperative and postoperative changes, visualize surgical approaches, and evaluate outcomes. However, the contemporary landscape of plastic surgery photography faces challenges, including a lapse in standards due to the prevalence of smartphones, social media platforms, and security concerns related to data storage and cyberattacks. In this comprehensive review, the authors aim to provide plastic surgeons with practical guidelines for achieving standardized, high-quality clinical photography while navigating the evolving landscape of technology, security, and ethical considerations. We explore the security challenges associated with storing clinical photographs, emphasizing the legal obligations under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). We also discuss various storage options, including HIPAA-compliant cloud services, electronic medical records, and emerging technologies like blockchain and artificial intelligence.

Surgical management of adult acquired buried penis syndrome: A systematic review of patient-reported outcome instruments.

PURPOSE: Adult acquired buried penis (AABP) is a morbid condition often necessitating surgical intervention. Accurate assessment of pre- and postoperative symptoms is crucial to understand how AABP impacts a patients' quality of life, verify surgical effectiveness, and practice patient-centered care. There is no validated patient-reported outcome instrument specific for AABP evaluation. We undertook a comprehensive review of existing literature on patient-reported outcome instruments post-AABP surgery to highlight the importance of developing a specific tool. METHODS: Following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis 2020 guidelines, we queried three databases using relevant keywords (e.g., "buried penis repair"). Inclusion criteria were studies that discussed surgical management of AABP with patient-reported outcomes. Pediatric and congenital cases were excluded. Information collected included study design, level of evidence, number of participants included in the study, etiology of buried penis, surgical technique, preoperative or postoperative patient-reported outcomes, and patient-reported outcome instrument used. RESULTS: Initial query identified 998 records. After abstract screening and applying the inclusion or exclusion criteria, a total of 19 articles with 440 patients were included. Eight studies implemented patient-reported outcome instruments. The international index of erectile dysfunction-5 and Likert satisfaction scales were used most frequently. Although all instruments were validated, none were validated in the specific context of AABP surgical intervention. CONCLUSIONS: There is considerable heterogeneity within the AABP literature regarding patient symptomatology, postoperative complications, patient-reported outcomes, and instruments used. The results of this study emphasize the need for a patient-reported outcome measure to examine the influence of AABP repair on patient satisfaction and health-related quality of life.