Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Int Med Res ; 51(10): 3000605231205760, 2023 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37862790

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To simulate hysteroscopic suturing in vitro and analyze the learning curve of gynecologists with different experience levels. METHODS: Three gynecologists were trained on uterine models in a circulating water box. The posterior uterine wall was sutured 10 times under hysteroscopy for 5 consecutive days, and the time of each suture procedure was recorded. RESULTS: Doctors A, B, and C completed 50 posterior uterine sutures. After Dr. C completed 50 sutures on the posterior wall, he added 50 sutures on the anterior wall (Group D). The mean suturing time was 71.54 ± 68.158 s in Group A, 50.10 ± 28.060 s in Group B, 34.04 ± 10.457 s in Group C, and 30.38 ± 8.734 s in Group D. The difference between Groups C and B and between Groups B and A was statistically significant. There was no statistically significant difference between Groups C and D. Simulation curves were created using the number of features as the abscissa and cumulative sum as the coordinate, with peak curves of 19, 27, and 18 cases for Group A, B, and C, respectively. CONCLUSION: Doctors with experience in single-hole laparoscopic surgery or hysteroscopic suture surgery can significantly shorten the hysteroscopic suturing time.


Assuntos
Levanogestrel , Treinamento por Simulação , Masculino , Feminino , Gravidez , Humanos , Curva de Aprendizado , Histeroscopia , Suturas
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA