Adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin compared with surgery alone for gastric cancer: 7-year results of the FFCD randomized phase III trial (8801).

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy after resection for gastric cancer in a randomized controlled trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: After curative resection, stage II-III-IVM0 gastric cancer patients were randomly assigned to postoperative chemotherapy or surgery alone. 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) 800 mg/m(2) daily (5-day continuous infusion) was initiated before day 14 after resection. One month later, four 5-day cycles of 5-FU (1 g/m(2) per day) plus cisplatin (100 mg/m(2) on day 2) were administered every 4 weeks. RESULTS: The study was closed prematurely after enrollment of 260 patients (79.7% N+), owing to poor accrual. At 97.8 months median follow-up, 5- and 7-year overall survival were 41.9% and 34.9% in the control group versus 46.6% and 44.6% in the chemotherapy group (P=0.22). Cox model hazard ratios were 0.74 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.54-1.02; P=0.063] for death and 0.70 (95% CI 0.51-0.97; P=0.032) for recurrence. An invaded/removed lymph nodes ratio >0.3 was the main independent poor prognostic factor identified by multivariate analysis (P=0.0001). Because of toxicity, only 48.8% of patients received more than 80% of the planned dose. CONCLUSION: There was no statistically significant survival benefit with this toxic cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy, but a risk reduction in recurrence was observed.

Randomized phase II study evaluating oxaliplatin alone, oxaliplatin combined with infusional 5-FU, and infusional 5-FU alone in advanced pancreatic carcinoma patients.

BACKGROUND: A randomized phase II, open-label multicenter study evaluating oxaliplatin alone (OXA), infusional 5-fluorouracil alone (5-FU) and an oxaliplatin/infusional 5-FU combination (OXFU) in untreated, advanced pancreatic carcinoma (APC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced or metastatic, histologically/cytologically proven pancreatic carcinoma with measurable disease, received OXA [130 mg/m2, 2-h intravenous (i.v.) infusion] alone, OXA combined with 5-FU (1000 mg/m2/day, continuous i.v., days 1-4), or 5-FU alone, every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Sixty-three patients (42 males/21 females) were treated: 17 patients/52 cycles OXA, 31 patients/ 175 cycles OXFU, 15 patients/41 cycles 5-FU, with a median of three, six and two cycles/patient, respectively. Patient characteristics were similar in all arms. Median age was 57 years (range 21-75), and 83% of patients had PS 0-1. Most patients (62%) had moderate to well-differentiated tumors, 90% had metastatic disease, 81% with liver metastases. All responses (three partial responses; WHO) occurred in the OXFU arm (10% response rate). Five of 32 patients evaluable for clinical benefit were responders (OXA, 14%; OXFU, 21%). Median time to progression and overall survival were higher in the combination arm (4.2 and 9.0 months, respectively) than either single-agent arm (OXA, 2.0 and 3.4 months; 5-FU, 1.5 and 2.4 months, respectively). Moderate hematotoxicity without morbidity was seen in all arms. Two OXFU patients had grade 3 oxaliplatin neurosensory toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: With a 10% response rate, median overall survival of 9 months and an encouraging safety profile, the OXFU combination is effective, appears superior to infusional 5-FU and warrants further studies in APC patients.

Phase II study of oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and folinic acid in locally advanced or metastatic gastric cancer patients.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of an oxaliplatin, fluorouracil (5-FU), and folinic acid (FA) combination in patients with metastatic or advanced gastric cancer (M/AGC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Of the 54 eligible patients with measurable or assessable M/AGC, 53 received oxaliplatin 100 mg/m(2) and FA 400 mg/m(2) (2-hour intravenous infusion) followed by 5-FU bolus 400 mg/m(2) (10-minute infusion) and then 5-FU 3,000 mg/m(2) (46-hour continuous infusion) every 14 days. RESULTS: Patients (69% male, 31% female) had a median age of 61 years (range, 31 to 75 years), 89% had a performance status of 0 or 1, 70% had newly diagnosed disease, and 87% had metastatic disease. All had histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma. With a median of three involved organs, disease sites included the lymph nodes (67%), stomach (65%), and liver (61%). A median of 10 cycles per patient and 468 complete cycles were administered. Best responses in the 49 assessable patients were two complete responses and 20 partial responses, giving an overall best response rate of 44.9%. Eight patients underwent complementary treatment with curative intent (six with surgery and two with chemoradiotherapy). Median follow-up, time to progression, and overall survival were 18.6 months, 6.2 months, and 8.6 months, respectively. Grade 3/4 neutropenia, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia occurred in 38%, 19%, 4%, and 11% of patients, respectively, and febrile neutropenia occurred in six patients (one episode each). Grade 3 peripheral neuropathy occurred in 21% of patients (oxaliplatin-specific scale). Seven patients withdrew because of treatment-related toxicity. CONCLUSION: This oxaliplatin/5-FU/FA regimen shows good efficacy and an acceptable safety profile in M/AGC patients, and may prove to be a suitable alternative regimen in this indication.

Topotecan preceded by oxaliplatin using a 3 week schedule: a phase I study in advanced cancer patients.

Combinations of topoisomerase I (topo I) poisons and platinum derivatives have synergistic antitumoral effects. However, their clinical development is limited by supra-additive haematological toxicity. The aim of this study was to determine whether sustained doses of topotecan and oxaliplatin could be achieved using a synergistic sequence. 34 advanced cancer patients and 186 cycles were evaluable for toxicity over five dosing levels. Oxaliplatin at 85-110 mg/m(2) was given on day 1, followed by topotecan 0.5-1.25 mg/m(2)/day x 5 from day 1 to 5, every 3 weeks. Plasma pharmacokinetics (PK) of total and ultrafiltrable platinum, total and lactone forms of topotecan were determined in the first cycle. The dose-limiting toxicity (DT) was identified as grade 4 thrombocytopenia. The occurrence of grade 4 thrombocytopenia did not correlate with topotecan PK, but it did with the patient's characteristics. Severe thrombocytopenia was seen in 1/8 of patients without clinical or biological evidence of malnutrition, with a creatinine clearance higher than 1 ml/s, and no more than two previous chemotherapy regimens, while it was seen in 8/10 patients with one of these characteristics (P<0.004). In conclusion, the recommended doses of oxaliplatin 110 mg/m(2) and topotecan 1 mg/m(2)/day, every 3 weeks can be administered to patients with a favourable general status and pretreatment characteristics and a phase II study is worthwhile in ovarian cancer patients.

Chronotherapy of colorectal cancer metastases.

Chronotherapy has consisted in the adaptation of chemotherapeutic drug delivery to circadian (approximately 24-hour) rhythms. This can be achieved in fully ambulatory patients using multichannel programmable pumps. Up to approximately 1500 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer have been registered in one of 15 trials testing the relevance of this treatment method with 5-fluorouracil +/- leucovorin +/- oxaliplatin. Chronotherapy was shown as significantly less toxic and more effective than constant rate infusion in 2 consecutive multicenter trials. High efficacy and good tolerability permitted secondary surgical resection of previously inoperable metastases, with apparent survival improvement (3-year survival > or = 20%) and cures in some patients. This strategy is currently undergoing further testing within the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. Nevertheless, combining chronotherapy with surgery of colorectal cancer metastases can be readily offered to patients as a safer therapeutic option for optimizing outcome.

Dose escalation of CPT-11 in combination with oxaliplatin using an every two weeks schedule: a phase I study in advanced gastrointestinal cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: To determine the dose-limiting toxicity of CPT-11 in combination with oxaliplatin, and the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) and the recommended dose (RD) of CPT-11 using an every two weeks schedule. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study was designed to evaluate escalated doses of CPT-11 starting at 100 mg/m2 with a fixed clinically-relevant dose of 85 mg/m2 oxaliplatin given every two weeks. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients and 186 cycles were evaluable for toxicity (median per patient: 7, range: 1-13). Grade 3 oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity was cumulative and limiting in 39% (9 of 23) of patients. The MTD of CPT-11 was 200 mg/m2, with incomplete neutrophil recovery at day 15 as limiting toxicity. At the RD (175 mg/m2 of CPT-11): no grade 4 neutropenia was seen in the two first cycles; 30% of patients experienced grade 3-4 diarrhea. Febrile neutropenia (3.2% of all cycles) was 3-fold more frequent in performance status (PS) 2 than in PS0-1 patients. Among eleven colorectal cancer (CRC) patients, three complete and four partial responses were documented, including in three 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) refractory patients. CONCLUSION: To combine CPT-11 175 mg/m2 and oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 every two weeks is feasible in an outpatient setting, and very active in 5-FU resistant CRC patients. A dose of 150 mg/m2 CPT-11 is recommended in PS2 patients.

5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) continuous intravenous infusion compared with bolus administration. Final results of a randomised trial in metastatic colorectal cancer.

The aim of this Phase III, balanced randomised trial was to compare continuous intravenous infusion (CVI) of 5-FU with bolus (B) administration for metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). One hundred and fifty-five non-pretreated patients were randomised to receive CVI 5-FU at a dose of 750 mg/m2/day (d), 7 d every 21 d (n = 77), or bolus 5-FU 500 mg/m2/d x 5 d every 28 d (n = 78). Incremental dose escalation at 50 mg per step was recommended in the absence of toxicity. All the patients had measurable metastatic disease (M), particularly, liver and a good performance status (WHO grade 0-1). Dose intensity was significantly higher in CVI than in the bolus group: 1369 mg/m2/week versus 558 mg/m2/week (P = 0.0001). Grade II-IV stomatitis was more frequent in the CVI group (31% versus 9%; P < 0.0001) as was hand and foot syndrome (14% versus 3%; P < 0.001). Diarrhoea (22% versus 12%) and grade III granulocytopenia (2% versus 6%) were comparable. Responses were more frequent in the CVI (26%) than in the bolus group (13%) (P < 0.04); progression-free survival was higher for the CVI group (P = 0.04), but there was no statistical difference in overall survival (median: 10 months (m) compared to 9 m), and 1 year survival (SD) 42% (6%) versus 40% (6%). In the multivariate analysis, survival was better for patients with a good PS, well-differentiated adenocarcinomas and a primary tumour without serosal extension. In conclusion, with a higher dose intensity, CVI 5-FU improved tumour control, but not overall survival.

Factors influencing outcome in de novo myelodysplastic syndromes treated by allogeneic bone marrow transplantation: a long-term study of 71 patients Société Française de Greffe de Moelle.

We report on 71 consecutive patients with de novo myelodysplastic syndromes referred to physicians belonging to the Société française de greffe de moelle from 1982 through 1991 and transplanted with marrow from HLA-identical siblings. There were 16 cases of refractory anemia, 27 of refractory anemia with excess of blast cells, and 28 of refractory anemia with excess of blast cells in transformation. Seventeen patients had received cytoreductive chemotherapy before the graft. The disease progressed in 17 patients between diagnosis and grafting. Twenty-three patients are alive with a median follow-up of 6 years, whereas 24 died from relapse and 24 from transplant-related complications. Kaplan-Meier estimates of event-free survival, relapse and transplant-related mortality at 7 years were 32%, 48%, and 39%, respectively. The log-rank test and Cox's model revealed better outcome among young patients, patients in an early stage of the French-American-British (FAB) classification or with a low percentage of marrow blasts before transplantation, patients who did not undergo cytoreductive chemotherapy before transplantation, and patients conditioned with total body irradiation and cyclophosphamide. The high rate of relapse in advanced FAB stages has led us to graft patients earlier in the course of the disease, and we are currently conducting a multicenter, randomized study to determine the value of intensive chemotherapy before grafting in patients with an excess of marrow blasts.

Phase II trial of pirarubicin in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer.

Eighteen patients with either metastatic or locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma were treated with intravenous infusion of Pirarubicin 50 mg/m2/day every 3 weeks. Seventeen patients were evaluable for response. One had minor response, 5 had stable disease, and 11 had progression of disease. Hematological toxicity was moderate, leading to a dose reduction in only 1 patient; there was no clinical cardiac toxicity. We conclude that Pirarubicin used with this dosage and schedule has no activity in advanced pancreatic carcinoma.

Phase II trial of 7-day continuous 5-fluorouracil infusion in the treatment of advanced colorectal carcinoma.

Thirty-eight patients with advanced colorectal adenocarcinoma were entered on a phase II trial of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in continuous infusion, using a portable pump. Half of the patients had been pretreated (n = 19) and 16 of them had received intravenous bolus 5-FU alone or in combination. At the first cycle patients received continuous intravenous 5-FU at the dose of 650 mg/m2 per day for 7 consecutive days. Doses were escalated during the following cycles and adjusted according to the toxicities encountered in the previous cycle. Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks. A mean dose of 750 mg/m2/day (500-1,000) was administered for a mean number of 10 (1-25) cycles. We observed 1 complete response, 7 partial responses for a response rate of 21 +/- 13% (CI95%), 16 had stable disease (42%) and 14 a progression (37%). In 2 patients subsequently the residual tumors could be excised after chemotherapy. Median survival was 13.5 months. Toxicity was: grade 2 leukopenia in 1 patient (3%), mucositis grade 2-4 in 11 patients (29%), diarrhea grade 2-3 in 7 patients (18%), and hand and foot syndrome in 12 patients (31%). There was a correlation between the mean dose administered and the responses. However no clear correlation was found between toxicity and tumoral response for the first two cycles. These results confirm the limited efficacy of continuous intravenous 5-FU and its good tolerance in ambulatory patients.

Prognostic factors in patients with liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma treated with discontinuous intra-arterial hepatic chemotherapy.

48 patients with colorectal cancer metastatic to the liver were implanted with a subcutaneous access system allowing hepatic intra-arterial perfusion. Regional chemotherapy used 5-fluorouracil, while 17 patients also received low-dose mitomycin at the beginning of the study. Responses to the treatment occurred in 29 patients (60%) and median survival was 14.4 months. Toxicity included gastroduodenal erosions in 12.5% of the patients, leucopenia in 20.8%, catheter thrombosis in 42% and arterial thrombosis in 50%. 2 patients died of digestive haemorrhage probably related to treatment. When individually analysed, four factors were found to significantly affect survival: presence of hepatomegaly (defined as palpable liver edge exceeding the right costal margin by more than 5 cm) (P = 0.006), percentage of hepatic replacement superior to 50% (P = 0.003), more than four metastases (P = 0.025) and hypovascularised metastases at radionuclide liver scan with 99m technetium-labelled macroaggregate albumin (MAA) (P = 0.04). The effect of the four variables on the observed survival time was analysed using a Cox regression model. Two variables were found to have simultaneously influenced survival. Presence of hepatomegaly emerged as the more significant (P = 0.0001), the other being hypovascularised metastases at 99mTc-MAA.

[The value of tumor markers in digestive oncology]. / Intérêt des marqueurs tumoraux en cancérologie digestive.

Over the last few years, many tumor markers have been proposed to clinicians but only a limited number of them meet the necessary criteria to be useful for either screening, diagnosis, prognosis or follow-up of gastrointestinal (GI) tumors. Both CEA and Ca 19-9 have proven to be clinically useful for the detection of recurrent tumors. AFP remains the most useful marker for the follow-up of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Its interest for the early detection of primary tumor is debated. Recent data suggest that assays based on monoclonal antibodies to AFP could be used for detection HCC in high risk populations. Decarboxy-prothrombin assay may be a complement to the AFP test in this localization. In addition to GI hormones, serotonin and urinary 5HIAA, Neuron Specific Enolase appears to be a valuable marker for the follow-up of neuroendocrine tumors of the GI tract. Only a few of the new tumor-associated antigens detected by monoclonal antibodies, appear to be promising clinical ly e.g. Ca50 TAG-72, PAO. Monoclonal antibodies to tumor-associated markers have also been used with other techniques: Immunohistochemistry: this technique is useful to the pathologist for the diagnosis of undifferentiated tumors by demonstrating the presence of specific antigens on tissue samples. Immunoscintigraphy: it can be useful for the detection of either metastases of recurrences of colorectal cancer by using anti-ACE antibodies labeled with Iodine 131 iodine 123 or indium 111. However immunoscintigraphy is less sensitive than both ultrasonography and CT scan for localizing hepatic metastases. At the present time the best indication of this method remains the diagnosis of pelvic recurrences.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

[Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma. Preliminary results]. / Chimiothérapie néoadjuvante pour les adénocarcinomes gastriques localement avancés. Résultats préliminaires.

Gastric adenocarcinoma locally advanced or located at the cardia, or of large size or with local lymphadenopathies are of bad prognosis. To improve the surgical results we have tested the feasibility and tumoral efficacity of pre-operative (neoadjuvant) chemotherapy. Twenty patients have been included between 6/87 and 12/88. Median age was 63 years (36-74); all patients were in good general condition (OMS 0-1). The tumors were located at the cardia in 50%. The tumor median size was 10 cm (6-19), pathological lymph nodes were seem at CAT. Scan in 10/20. The neoadjuvant chemotherapy was continuous IV, 5 FU 1 g/m2/day for 5 days + CDDP 100 mg/m2, day 1. The cycles were repeated every 4 weeks. The median number of cycles prior surgery was 2 (1-4) and depended of tolerance and efficacy. We have observed (WHO criteria). 1 CR, 12 PR (Responsible rate: 65%). 6 MR or S. One patient was non evaluable because coronary insufficiency complicating the first cycle. The neoadjuvant chemotherapy toxicity was mainly hematological. The surgical procedure was curative in 15/20 patients; palliative 4 and non feasible for progression 1. Normal rate of post-operative complications was encountered: 2 subphrenic abscess, 1 pneumopathy, 1 stercoral peritonitis. At this date 3/20 patients died (17 patients are still alive, among them 14 are NED (the overall median survival is more than 10 months). This study demonstrated the feasibility and high response rate of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced gastric carcinomas. A randomized trial is warranted to demonstrate the survival benefit.