Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Cephalalgia ; 40(14): 1622-1632, 2020 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32838537

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Migraine treatment may mitigate migraine and associated pain in the perioperative period. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to estimate the effect of perioperative acute and prophylactic migraine treatment on the risk of postoperative 30-day hospital readmission with an admitting diagnosis specifying any pain complaints among migraine patients. DESIGN: Electronic health records were analysed for 21,932 adult migraine patients undergoing surgery between 2005 and 2017 at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston, Massachusetts, USA. METHODS: Perioperative abortive migraine treatment was defined as guideline-recommended medication (triptan, ergotamine, acetaminophen, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug) prescription after surgery, within 30 days after discharge and prior readmission. Perioperatively continued prophylactic migraine treatment was defined as prescription both prior to surgery and perioperatively for recommended medications (beta-blockers, antidepressants, antiepileptics, onabotulinumtoxin A). RESULTS: Overall, 10,921 (49.8%) patients received a prescription for abortive migraine drugs. Of these, 1.2% and 1.5% of patients with and without such prescription were readmitted for pain, respectively. Patients with abortive treatment had lower odds of pain-related readmission (adjusted odds ratio 0.63 [95% confidence interval 0.49-0.81]). Prophylactic migraine treatment showed no effect on pain-related readmission independently of acute treatment (adjusted odds ratio 0.97 [95% confidence interval 0.72-1.32]). CONCLUSIONS: Migraine patients undergoing surgery with a perioperative prescription for abortive migraine drugs were at decreased risk of pain-related hospital readmission.


Assuntos
Transtornos de Enxaqueca , Humanos , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/tratamento farmacológico , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/epidemiologia , Dor Pós-Operatória/diagnóstico , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Dor Pós-Operatória/epidemiologia , Readmissão do Paciente , Triptaminas
2.
JAMA ; 319(5): 452-462, 2018 02 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29411032

RESUMO

Importance: Perioperative stroke is a major complication for patients undergoing surgery. Patent foramen ovale (PFO) represents a possible anatomical link between venous thrombosis and stroke. Objective: To determine whether a preoperatively diagnosed PFO is associated with increased risk of perioperative ischemic stroke. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective cohort study from Massachusetts General Hospital and 2 affiliated community hospitals between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2015. Participants were 182 393 consecutive adults undergoing noncardiac surgery with general anesthesia. Exposures: Preoperatively diagnosed PFO. Main Outcomes and Measures: Perioperative ischemic stroke occurring within 30 days of surgery; stroke subtype by Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project classification and stroke severity by National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). Results: Among the 150 198 patient cases analyzed (median [SD] age, 55 [16] years), 1540 (1.0%) had a diagnosis of PFO before surgery. A total of 850 (0.6%) ischemic strokes occurred within 30 days of surgery (49 [3.2%] among patients with PFO and 801 [0.5%] among patients without PFO). In adjusted analyses, patients with PFO had an increased risk of ischemic stroke compared with patients without PFO (odds ratio, 2.66 [95% CI, 1.96-3.63]; P < .001). The estimated risks of stroke were 5.9 for every 1000 patients with PFO and 2.2 for every 1000 patients without PFO (adjusted absolute risk difference, 0.4% [95% CI, 0.2%-0.6%). Patients with PFO also had an increased risk of large vessel territory stroke (relative risk ratio, 3.14 [95% CI, 2.21-4.48]; P < .001) and a more severe stroke-related neurologic deficit measured by NIHSS (median, 4 [interquartile range {IQR}, 2-10] vs median, 3 [IQR, 1-6] for those without PFO; P = .02). Conclusions and Relevance: Among adult patients undergoing noncardiac surgery at 3 hospitals, having a preoperatively diagnosed PFO was significantly associated with increased risk of perioperative ischemic stroke within 30 days after surgery. Further research is needed to confirm these findings and to determine whether interventions would decrease this risk.


Assuntos
Forame Oval Patente/complicações , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/etiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Área Sob a Curva , Isquemia Encefálica/etiologia , Comorbidade , Ecocardiografia , Feminino , Forame Oval Patente/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Incidência , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Período Perioperatório , Período Pré-Operatório , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/epidemiologia
3.
Ann Surg ; 267(6): 1084-1092, 2018 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28288059

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the dose-response relationship between intraoperative fluid administration and postoperative outcomes in a large cohort of surgical patients. BACKGROUND: Healthy humans may live in a state of fluid responsiveness without the need for fluid supplementation. Goal-directed protocols driven by such measures are limited in their ability to define the optimal fluid state during surgery. METHODS: This analysis of data on file included 92,094 adult patients undergoing noncardiac surgery with endotracheal intubation between 2007 and 2014 at an academic tertiary care hospital and two affiliated community hospitals. The primary exposure variable was total intraoperative volume of crystalloid and colloid administered. The primary outcome was 30-day survival. Secondary outcomes were respiratory complications within three postoperative days (pulmonary edema, reintubation, pneumonia, or respiratory failure) and acute kidney injury. Exploratory outcomes were postoperative length of stay and total cost of care. Our models were adjusted for patient-, procedure-, and anesthesia-related factors. RESULTS: A U-shaped association was observed between the volume of fluid administered intraoperatively and 30-day mortality, costs, and postoperative length of stay. Liberal fluid volumes (highest quintile of fluid administration practice) were significantly associated with respiratory complications whereas both liberal and restrictive (lowest quintile) volumes were significantly associated with acute kidney injury. Moderately restrictive volumes (second quintile) were consistently associated with optimal postoperative outcomes and were characterized by volumes approximately 40% less than traditional textbook estimates: infusion rates of approximately 6-7 mL/kg/hr or 1 L of fluid for a 3-hour case. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative fluid dosing at the liberal and restrictive margins of observed practice is associated with increased morbidity, mortality, cost, and length of stay.


Assuntos
Hidratação/efeitos adversos , Cuidados Intraoperatórios/efeitos adversos , Cuidados Intraoperatórios/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Soluções para Reidratação/administração & dosagem , Soluções para Reidratação/efeitos adversos , Injúria Renal Aguda/etiologia , Injúria Renal Aguda/prevenção & controle , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Custos Hospitalares , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Intubação Intratraqueal , Tempo de Internação , Pneumonia/etiologia , Pneumonia/prevenção & controle , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Edema Pulmonar/etiologia , Edema Pulmonar/prevenção & controle , Sistema de Registros , Insuficiência Respiratória/etiologia , Insuficiência Respiratória/prevenção & controle , Estudos Retrospectivos
4.
BMJ ; 356: i6635, 2017 Jan 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28073753

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE:  To evaluate whether patients with migraine are at increased risk of perioperative ischemic stroke and whether this may lead to an increased hospital readmission rate. DESIGN:  Prospective hospital registry study. SETTING:  Massachusetts General Hospital and two satellite campuses between January 2007 and August 2014. PARTICIPANTS:  124 558 surgical patients (mean age 52.6 years; 54.5% women). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:  The primary outcome was perioperative ischemic stroke occurring within 30 days after surgery in patients with and without migraine and migraine aura. The secondary outcome was hospital readmission within 30 days of surgery. Exploratory outcomes included post-discharge stroke and strata of neuroanatomical stroke location. RESULTS:  10 179 (8.2%) patients had any migraine diagnosis, of whom 1278 (12.6%) had migraine with aura and 8901 (87.4%) had migraine without aura. 771 (0.6%) perioperative ischemic strokes occurred within 30 days of surgery. Patients with migraine were at increased risk of perioperative ischemic stroke (adjusted odds ratio 1.75, 95% confidence interval 1.39 to 2.21) compared with patients without migraine. The risk was higher in patients with migraine with aura (adjusted odds ratio 2.61, 1.59 to 4.29) than in those with migraine without aura (1.62, 1.26 to 2.09). The predicted absolute risk is 2.4 (2.1 to 2.8) perioperative ischemic strokes for every 1000 surgical patients. This increases to 4.3 (3.2 to 5.3) for every 1000 patients with any migraine diagnosis, 3.9 (2.9 to 5.0) for migraine without aura, and 6.3 (3.2 to 9.5) for migraine with aura. : Patients with migraine had a higher rate of readmission to hospital within 30 days of discharge (adjusted odds ratio 1.31, 1.22 to 1.41). CONCLUSIONS:  Surgical patients with a history of migraine are at increased risk of perioperative ischemic stroke and have an increased 30 day hospital readmission rate. Migraine should be considered in the risk assessment for perioperative ischemic stroke.


Assuntos
Transtornos de Enxaqueca/complicações , Enxaqueca com Aura/complicações , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/etiologia , Feminino , Hospitais , Humanos , Masculino , Massachusetts , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Sistema de Registros , Fatores de Risco
5.
Crit Care Med ; 45(1): e30-e39, 2017 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27635768

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Inhalational anesthetics are bronchodilators with immunomodulatory effects. We sought to determine the effect of inhalational anesthetic dose on risk of severe postoperative respiratory complications. DESIGN: Prospective analysis of data on file in surgical cases between January 2007 and December 2015. SETTING: Massachusetts General Hospital (tertiary referral center) and two affiliated community hospitals. PATIENTS: A total of 124,497 adult patients (105,267 in the study cohort and 19,230 in the validation cohort) undergoing noncardiac surgical procedures and requiring general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation. INTERVENTIONS: Median effective dose equivalent of inhalational anesthetics during surgery (derived from mean end-tidal inhalational anesthetic concentrations). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Postoperative respiratory complications occurred in 6,979 of 124,497 cases (5.61%). High inhalational anesthetic dose of 1.20 (1.13-1.30) (median [interquartile range])-fold median effective dose equivalent versus 0.57 (0.45-0.64)-fold median effective dose equivalent was associated with lower odds of postoperative respiratory complications (odds ratio, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.53-0.65; p < 0.001). Additionally, high inhalational anesthetic dose was associated with lower 30-day mortality and lower cost. Inhalational anesthetic dose increase and reduced risk of postoperative respiratory complications remained significant in sensitivity analyses stratified by preoperative and intraoperative risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative use of higher inhalational anesthetic doses is strongly associated with lower odds of postoperative respiratory complications, lower 30-day mortality, and lower cost of hospital care. The authors speculate based on these data that sedation with inhalational anesthetics outside of the operating room may likewise have protective effects that decrease the risk of respiratory complications in vulnerable patients.


Assuntos
Anestésicos Inalatórios/administração & dosagem , Pneumonia/prevenção & controle , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Edema Pulmonar/prevenção & controle , Insuficiência Respiratória/prevenção & controle , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Feminino , Custos Hospitalares , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Intubação Intratraqueal , Masculino , Massachusetts/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Pontuação de Propensão , Estudos Prospectivos , Edema Pulmonar/epidemiologia , Insuficiência Respiratória/epidemiologia
6.
Ann Surg ; 264(6): 1116-1124, 2016 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26655919

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To compare sarcopenia and frailty for outcome prediction in surgical intensive care unit (SICU) patients. BACKGROUND: Frailty has been associated with adverse outcomes and describes a status of muscle weakness and decreased physiological reserve leading to increased vulnerability to stressors. However, frailty assessment depends on patient cooperation. Sarcopenia can be quantified by ultrasound and the predictive value of sarcopenia at SICU admission for adverse outcome has not been defined. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, observational study of SICU patients. Sarcopenia was diagnosed by ultrasound measurement of rectus femoris cross-sectional area. Frailty was diagnosed by the Frailty Index Questionnaire based on 50 variables. Relationship between variables and outcomes was assessed by multivariable regression analysis NCT02270502. RESULTS: Sarcopenia and frailty were quantified in 102 patients and observed in 43.1% and 38.2%, respectively. Sarcopenia predicted adverse discharge disposition (discharge to nursing facility or in-hospital mortality, odds ratio 7.49; 95% confidence interval 1.47-38.24; P = 0.015) independent of important clinical covariates, as did frailty (odds ratio 8.01; 95% confidence interval 1.82-35.27; P = 0.006); predictive ability did not differ between sarcopenia and frailty prediction model, reflected by χ values of 21.74 versus 23.44, respectively, and a net reclassification improvement (NRI) of -0.02 (P = 0.87). Sarcopenia and frailty predicted hospital length of stay and the frailty model had a moderately better predictive accuracy for this outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Bedside diagnosis of sarcopenia by ultrasound predicts adverse discharge disposition in SICU patients equally well as frailty. Sarcopenia assessed by ultrasound may be utilized as rapid beside modality for risk stratification of critically ill patients.


Assuntos
Estado Terminal , Idoso Fragilizado , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Músculo Quadríceps/diagnóstico por imagem , Sarcopenia/complicações , Sarcopenia/diagnóstico por imagem , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Avaliação Geriátrica , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Casas de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Prospectivos , Medição de Risco , Inquéritos e Questionários
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA