The Autonomy Toolbox: A Multicenter Collaborative to Promote Resident Autonomy.

OBJECTIVES: Autonomy is necessary for resident professional development and well-being. A recent focus on patient safety has increased supervision and decreased trainee autonomy. Few validated interventions exist to improve resident autonomy. We aimed to use quality improvement methods to increase our autonomy metric, the Resident Autonomy Score (RAS), by 25% within 1 year and sustain for 6 months. METHODS: We developed a bundled-intervention approach to improve senior resident (SR) perception of autonomy on Pediatric Hospital Medicine (PHM) services at 5 academic children's hospitals. We surveyed SR and PHM faculty perceptions of autonomy and targeted interventions toward areas with the highest discordance. Interventions included SR and faculty development, expectation-setting huddles, and SR independent rounding. We developed a Resident Autonomy Score (RAS) index to track SR perceptions over time. RESULTS: Forty-six percent of SRs and 59% of PHM faculty completed the needs assessment survey querying how often SRs were afforded opportunities to provide autonomous medical care. Faculty and SR ratings were discordant in these domains: SR input in medical decisions, SR autonomous decision-making in straightforward cases, follow-through on SR plans, faculty feedback, SR as team leader, and level of attending oversight. The RAS increased by 19% (3.67 to 4.36) 1 month after SR and faculty professional development and before expectation-setting and independent rounding. This increase was sustained throughout the 18-month study period. CONCLUSIONS: SRs and faculty perceive discordant levels of SR autonomy. We created an adaptable autonomy toolbox that led to sustained improvement in perception of SR autonomy.

Adolescent Drug Ingestions Requiring ICU Stay: Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVES: Ingestions are a prevalent form of self-harm in teenagers and are unfortunately an increasingly common reason for admission to both acute care and critical care services. The goal of this study was to identify characteristics associated with requiring PICU stay among adolescents hospitalized for ingestions. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study comparing patients admitted to hospital medicine service and critical care service from January 2019 to December 2019. SETTING: Freestanding children's hospital in the midwestern United States. PATIENTS: Adolescents 12-18 years old hospitalized for ingestion. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Out of 209 patients included in the study cohort, 95 required PICU admission. High-risk behaviors (having had sex or usage of alcohol, drugs, tobacco, or vaping) were endorsed by 190 of 209 patients (91%). We compared patient characteristics, ingestion history, workup, and pharmacological and PICU-specific interventions between patients hospitalized on the hospital medicine service and the PICU. We failed to identify an association between reason for ingestion, substance ingested, and previously identified suicide risk factors including previous suicide attempt, previous self-harm, and psychiatric comorbidity and admission to PICU, as opposed to non-PICU admission. PICU stay was associated with longer peak corrected QT interval value, receiving a pharmacological intervention, and longer duration of hospital stay. Fifteen of 95 patients (16% [95% CI, 9-25%]) in the PICU received a PICU-specific intervention. CONCLUSIONS: We failed to identify specific patient demographics or mental behavioral health characteristics associated with PICU stay after ingestion. Therefore, we believe that all adolescents hospitalized due to ingestion-irrespective of disposition-should receive standardized high-risk behavior screening due to the pervasive nature of these behaviors among this patient population. PICU-specific care, beyond observation, could be needed in as high as one-in-four PICU admissions. Further research is needed to inform optimal disposition and resource allocation for this patient population.