Antibodies to a novel antigen in acute hepatitis C virus infections.

BACKGROUND: Conformational viral proteins potentially play an important role in the immunobiology of acute hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and may enable earlier antibody detection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: HCV RNA was detected using nucleic acid testing. Early antibody production was evaluated using three enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) containing antigenic proteins not present in licensed EIAs. Respectively, these contained: (1) multiple-epitope fusion antigen (MEFA) 7.1-NS3/4a, (2) F and Core, and (3) E1/E2 proteins. NS3/4a is a conformational antigen retaining protease and helicase enzymatic activities. MEFA 7.1 contains the linear epitopes used in licenced EIAs, including the latest EIA-3.0, in combination with genotype 1-3 specific epitopes. Forty-two RNA positive, EIA-3.0 negative samples, including two persistently serosilent cases, were used to evaluate these research EIAs. As controls, 54 EIA-3.0 negative/RNA negative and three HCV RNA+/antibody positive specimens were included. RESULTS: Only the MEFA 7.1-NS3/4a EIA was positive in seven (17%) of the 42 HCV RNA + specimens, in all three EIA-3.0 positive controls but in none of 54 EIA-3.0 negative/HCV RNA negative controls. Notably, six of the seven (86%) specimens had evidence of active hepatitis (ALT > 210 IU/l). The two serosilent cases were research EIA negative. CONCLUSION: A novel EIA with conformational and linear epitopes detected HCV antibodies in 17% of viraemic specimens missed by the standard reference EIA-3.0. Our research EIA appears to detect HCV antibodies closer to the initiation of acute hepatitis. Given that the average RNA-positive, antibody-negative window period is 56.4 days, this 17% yield would translate into a 10-day earlier detection of antibodies.

Performance of ORTHO HCV core antigen and trak-C assays for detection of viraemia in pre-seroconversion plasma and whole blood donors.

OBJECTIVE: Logistics and cost of nucleic acid amplification testing (NAT) screening preclude its current use in many developing countries. Development of hepatitis C virus (HCV) core antigen assays offer an alternative to NAT. We evaluated two specimen populations to assess the sensitivity, relative to NAT, of the HCV core antigen (HCVcAg) ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) test system and the trak-C assay: (1) plasma donor HCV NAT-conversion panels and (2) cross-sectional whole blood donor NAT yield specimens. METHODS: Differential sensitivities among NAT (NGI; Chiron/Gen-Probe) and both HCVcAg assays (Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics, Rochester, NY) were evaluated using: (1) 102 serial ramp-up phase specimens from 37 plasma donor NAT-conversion panels (Alpha Therapeutic/BioClinical Partners); and (2) 42 cross-sectional whole blood donor NAT yield specimens (confirmed RNA positive, antibody negative) plus 54 NAT false-positive specimens (American Red Cross). RESULTS: Viral load among the plasma donor NAT-conversion panels at the cutoffs for HCVcAg and trak-C assays were 32 000 copies/ml (95% confidence interval [CI] 8000-120 000) and 8000 copies/ml (95% CI: 2200-28 000), respectively. The mean (95% CI) difference in window period reduction compared to routine mini-pool NAT screening (estimated sensitivity 100 copies/ml) was delayed 5.2 days (2.2-7.6 days) for HCVcAg assay and 3.8 days (2.1-5.5 days) for the trak-C assay. Among the 42 NAT yield specimens, the HCVcAg assay detected 31 (74%) as core antigen-positive while the trak-C assay detected 37 (88%) as core antigen-positive. Viral loads for the five specimens not detected by the trak-C HCVcAg assay ranged from 100 to 7770 copies/ml. All 54 NAT false-positive specimens were non-reactive on both HCV core antigen assays. CONCLUSION: These data indicate that the trak-C assay has sensitivity approaching routine mini-pool NAT screening for the detection of seronegative HCV infection. In the absence of routine NAT screening for early HCV infection, the use of an HCV core antigen assay should be considered.

Analytical and clinical sensitivity of West Nile virus RNA screening and supplemental assays available in 2003.

BACKGROUND: Transfusion-transmitted West Nile virus (WNV) infections were first reported in 2002, which led to rapid development of investigational nucleic acid amplification tests (NAT). A study was conducted to evaluate sensitivities of WNV screening and supplemental NAT assays first employed in 2003. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Twenty-five member-coded panels were distributed to NAT assay manufacturers. Panels included five pedigreed WNV standards (1, 3, 10, 30, and 100 copies/mL), 15 or 16 donor units with very-low-level viremia identified through 2003 screening, and four or five negative control samples. Samples were tested neat in 10 replicates by all assays; for NAT screening assays, 10 replicates were also performed on dilutions consistent with minipool (MP)-NAT. The viral load distribution for 142 MP-NAT yield donations was characterized, relative to the analytical sensitivity of MP-NAT systems. RESULTS: Analytical sensitivities (50% limits of detection [LoD] based on Poisson model of detection of WNV standards) for screening NAT assays ranged from 3.4 to 29 copies per mL; when diluted consistent with MP pool sizes, the 50 percent LoD of screening NAT assays was reduced to 43 to 309 copies per mL. Analytical sensitivity of supplemental assays ranged from 1.5 to 7.7 copies per mL (50% LoD). Detection of RNA in donor units varied consistent with analytical LoD of assays. Detection of low-level viremia after MP dilutions was particularly compromised for seropositive units, probably reflecting lower viral loads in the postseroconversion phase. Based on the viral load distribution of MP-NAT yield donations (median, 3519 copies/mL; range, < 50-690,000), 13 to 24 percent of units had viral loads below the 50 percent LoD of screening NAT assays run in MP-NAT format. CONCLUSION: WNV screening and supplemental assays had generally excellent analytical sensitivity, comparable to human immunodeficiency virus-1 and hepatitis C virus NAT assays. The presence of low-level viremic units during epidemic periods and the impact of MP dilutions on sensitivity, however, suggest the need for further improvements in sensitivity as well as a role for targeted individual-donation NAT in epidemic regions.

First report of human immunodeficiency virus transmission via an RNA-screened blood donation.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Blood banks in the USA have recently introduced minipool nucleic acid amplification testing (MP-NAT) of blood products to reduce the transmission of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) by transfusions. However, MP-NAT is limited in its ability to detect preseroconversion samples with very low viral RNA loads. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To determine whether a red blood cell unit, from an MP-NAT-negative donation, transmitted HIV when transfused to a patient, we compared the viral sequences from the blood donor and recipient. The implicated donation was also tested by commercially available NAT assays at a range of dilution factors to determine whether the infectious unit could have been detected using individual-donation NAT (ID-NAT). RESULTS: Phylogenetic linkage of HIV sequences in the blood donor and recipient confirmed the transmission of HIV by blood transfusion, the first such case identified since introduction of MP-NAT screening in 1999. Viral RNA was reliably detected by ID-NAT, but only inconsistently detected by MP-NAT. CONCLUSIONS: Even following the introduction of MP-NAT, a preseroconversion donation with a viral load of

Performance of second- and third-generation RIBAs for confirmation of third-generation HCV EIA-reactive blood donations. Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor Study.

BACKGROUND: Licensure of an enhanced HCV screening assay (HCV 3.0 EIA) without concurrent licensure of a complementary supplemental assay (i.e., RIBA HCV 3.0 strip immunoblot assay [RIBA-3]) decoupled screening and supplemental testing. In March 1998, the FDA Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) recommended the use of RIBA-3 on RIBA HCV 2.0 strip immunoblot assay (RIBA-2)-indeterminate units screened with HCV EIA 3.0. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The sensitivity of RIBA-2 and RIBA-3 was compared in tests on HCV 3.0 EIA-repeatably reactive (RR) units identified immediately after the implementation of HCV 3.0 EIA screening. Two protocols were evaluated: parallel testing of HCV 3.0 EIA-RR units by RIBA-2 and RIBA-3 and reflex testing of HCV 3.0 EIA-RR and RIBA-3-confirmed-positive units by RIBA-2. All specimens with discordant RIBA-2 and RIBA-3 results and a representative sampling with concordant RIBA results were tested by PCR. RESULTS: In the parallel testing protocol, 99,777 donations were screened, with 245 HCV 3.0 EIA-RR specimens included in the study. Of 166 RIBA-2-positive samples, 165 tested positive in RIBA-3 (1 sample reacted to the control superoxide dismutase antigen in RIBA-3). Thirty-two (74%) of 43 RIBA-2-indeterminate specimens and 4 (11%) of 36 RIBA-2-negative specimens tested positive in RIBA-3. HCV RNA was identified in 5 (16%) of 32 RIBA-2-indeterminate/RIBA-3-positive donations, as well as in 26 (70%) of 37 concordant RIBA-2/RIBA-3-positive donations. In the reflex testing protocol, 292,459 donations were screened, with 709 HCV 3.0 EIA-RR specimens included in the study. RIBA-3 testing yielded 517 (73%) positive specimens, of which 50 (9.7%) tested indeterminate and 15 (2.9%) tested negative in RIBA-2. Among the RIBA-discordant specimens, 10 (20%) RIBA-2-indeterminate specimens and 1 (7%) RIBA-2-negative specimens tested positive in PCR; in comparison, 60 (77%) of 78 concordant RIBA-2/RIBA-3-positive units tested positive in PCR. CONCLUSIONS: RIBA-3 is significantly more sensitive than RIBA-2 in testing of HCV 3.0 EIA-screened donations. During the review process of this manuscript, the FDA licensed the RIBA-3 test.

Lookback on donors who are repeatedly reactive on first-generation hepatitis C virus assays:justification and rational implementation.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to explore strategies to minimize the number of unwarranted consignee notifications resulting from hepatitis C virus (HCV) first-generation (single-antigen) enzyme immunoassay (EIA 1.0) targeted lookback. STUDY DESIGN AND METHOD: The four blood centers participating in this study contributed data on 3753 HCV EIA 1.0-repeatably reactive (RR) donations. The analysis focused on 1) statistical evaluation of HCV EIA 1.0 signal-to-cutoff (S/CO) ratios versus HCV second-generation recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA 2.0) interpretation from all participating blood centers and 2) RNA testing using transcription-mediated amplification on all HCV EIA 1.0 RR/RIBA 2. 0-positive or -indeterminate specimens and a subset of RIBA 2. 0-negative donations for which specimens were available. RESULTS: Analysis of HCV EIA 1.0 S/CO ratios versus RIBA 2.0 indicated that 1180 (89%) of 1326 RIBA 2.0-positive specimens had an S/CO ratio >2. 5, while 146 (11%) had a ratio 2.5, while 1954 (87%) had a ratio 2.5. HCV RNA was detected in only 2 (1.5%) of 137 HCV EIA 1.0-RR/RIBA 2.0-negative specimens: 1 of these 2 specimens had an S/CO >2.5, while the other had an S/CO 2.5 yielded an 89- percent sensitivity for RIBA 2.0-positive specimens, and donations with an S/CO ratio >2.5 had a 75-percent probability of being RIBA 2.0 positive. A policy recommendation to use the S/CO ratio to triage lookback would prevent unwarranted notification of 87 percent of recipients of blood from RIBA 2.0-negative donors and would result in a failure to notify only 5 to 10 percent of recipients potentially exposed to infectious units.

Use of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1 and 2 recombinant strip immunoblot assay to resolve enzyme immunoassay anti-HIV-2-repeatably reactive samples after anti-HIV-1/2 combination enzyme immunoassay screening.

BACKGROUND: With the implementation of combination human immunodeficiency virus types 1 and 2 (HIV-1/2) antibody enzyme immunoassay (EIA) in donor screening in 1992, the supplemental testing algorithm changed to require the use of a Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-licensed HIV-1 Western blot (WB) or immunofluorescence assay, as well as an FDA-licensed HIV-2 EIA. When HIV-2 EIA-reactive specimens are identified, further testing to confirm HIV-2 infection is recommended. Currently, a licensed HIV-2 supplemental assay is not available. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The sensitivity of an HIV-1/2 recombinant strip immunoblot assay (SIA) for HIV-2 was determined on the basis of the analysis of 65 HIV-2-positive samples identified by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Anti-HIV-1/2 combination EIA-repeatably reactive (RR) specimens from seven blood centers and their affiliated hospitals were tested in parallel by HIV-1 WB and HIV-2 EIA. Anti-HIV-2 EIA-RR specimens were further tested by HIV-1/2 SIA. Specimens interpreted as positive for HIV-2 or HIV-1/2 were referred to the CDC for final resolution of antibody status. RESULTS: Ninety-seven percent (63/65) of known HIV-2-positive samples tested positive for HIV-2 only or HIV-1/2 on the HIV-1/2 SIA. A total of 1048 anti-HIV-1/2 combination-EIA-RR specimens were evaluated. Sixty-nine percent (75/109) of the WB-positive specimens were HIV-2 EIA-RR, while only 9 percent (84/939) of WB-indeterminate or WB-negative specimens tested HIV-2 EIA-RR. The HIV-1/2 SIA resolved 91 percent of HIV-2 EIA-RR samples as negative. Four HIV-2 EIA-RR specimens (all HIV-1 WB-positive) were classified as positive for HIV-1 and HIV-2 in the HIV-1/2 SIA. Final interpretation of these specimens by CDC was that they were reactive for HIV-1 with cross-reactivity to HIV-2. CONCLUSION: No confirmed HIV-2-positive specimens were detected. The HIV-1/2 SIA is currently useful for resolving HIV-2 EIA-RR specimens.

History of posttransfusion hepatitis.

The risk of hepatitis virus transmission from tranfusions has declined dramatically from that of the 1940s when posttransfusion hepatitis (PTH) was first appreciated. Introduction of hepatitis B surface antigen screening and conversion to volunteer donors for whole-blood donations in the late 1960s and early 1970s led to substantial reduction in PTH cases. However, up to 10% of the recipients continued to develop PTH, most cases of which were attributed to an unknown non-A, non-B viral agent. Implementation of surrogate marker testing (i.e., alanine aminotransferase and anti-hepatitis B virus core antigen) for residual non-A, non-B hepatitis in the late 1980s reduced the per unit risk of PTH from 1 in 200 to about 1 in 400. Hepatitis C virus was discovered in 1989 and quickly was established as the causative agent of > 90% of non-A, non-B PTH. Introduction of progressively improved antibody assays in the early 1990s reduced the risk of PTH due to hepatitis C virus to about 1 in 100000. Although additional hepatitis viruses exist (e.g., hepatitis G virus), these appear to be minor contributors to clinical PTH, which has been virtually eradicated.

Canine bladder epithelial cells in culture: susceptibility to canine distemper and measles viruses.

A canine bladder epithelial cell strain was established in culture for the study of canine distemper virus. Epithelial cells were scraped off the bladder with a scalpel and were cultured in enriched Eagle's medium. Cells were enzymatically dispersed and passed over 46 population doublings which covered a period of more than 3 years. The cells were heteroploid when karyotyped at passage level 5 and 42. This cell strain permitted direct isolation of canine distemper virus and also showed susceptibility to laboratory strains of measles virus. Seemingly, establishment of cell strains from canine bladder epithelium can be accomplished without difficulty.