Patient and limb outcomes 10 years after endovascular revascularization of the superficial femoral artery for peripheral artery disease: The Boston Femoral Artery Endovascular Revascularization Outcomes (Boston FAROUT) study.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to describe patient and limb outcomes in the decade after endovascular revascularization for chronic lower-extremity peripheral artery disease (PAD). METHODS: We assessed outcomes in patients having endovascular revascularization of the superficial femoral artery in two centers between 2003 and 2011 and followed for a median 9.3 (25-75%: 6.8, 11.1) years. Outcomes included death, myocardial infarction, stroke, repeat limb revascularizations, and amputations. We used competing risks analysis with clustering by patient to determine the hazard ratios (HR) and 95% CI for patients, and procedural characteristics for cause of death, cardiovascular events, and major adverse limb events (MALE). RESULTS: There were 253 index limb revascularizations in 202 patients followed for a median 9.3 years. Patients had intensive medical treatment with 90% on statins and 80% on beta-blockers. During follow up there were 57 (28%) cardiovascular deaths and 62 (31%) noncardiovascular deaths. Of the 253 limbs, 227 (90%) were free of MALE over follow up and 93 (37%) had MALE or minor repeat revascularization. In multivariable models, cardiovascular death significantly associated with critical limb ischemia (HR = 3.21, 95% CI = 1.84, 5.61) and noncardiovascular death with chronic kidney disease (HR = 2.69, 95% CI = 1.68, 4.30), and smoking (HR = 2.75, 95% CI = 1.01, 7.52). MALE or minor repeat revascularization associated with critical limb ischemia (HR = 1.43, 95% CI = 0.84, 2.43), smoking (HR = 2.49, 95% CI = 1.26, 4.90), and lesion length > 200 mm (HR = 1.51, 95% CI = 0.98, 2.33). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with intensive medical therapy, the risk of noncardiovascular death was high and similar to cardiovascular death. Endovascular intervention can have acceptable long-term results. Future studies should evaluate strategies to reduce both cardiovascular and noncardiovascular deaths.

Endovascular Ultrasound Renal Denervation to Treat Hypertension: The RADIANCE II Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Two initial sham-controlled trials demonstrated that ultrasound renal denervation decreases blood pressure (BP) in patients with mild to moderate hypertension and hypertension that is resistant to treatment. Objective: To study the efficacy and safety of ultrasound renal denervation without the confounding influence of antihypertensive medications in patients with hypertension. Design, Setting, and Participants: Sham-controlled, randomized clinical trial with patients and outcome assessors blinded to treatment assignment that was conducted between January 14, 2019, and March 25, 2022, at 37 centers in the US and 24 centers in Europe, with randomization stratified by center. Patients aged 18 years to 75 years with hypertension (seated office systolic BP [SBP] ≥140 mm Hg and diastolic BP [DBP] ≥90 mm Hg despite taking up to 2 antihypertensive medications) were eligible if they had an ambulatory SBP/DBP of 135/85 mm Hg or greater and an SBP/DBP less than 170/105 mm Hg after a 4-week washout of their medications. Patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 40 mL/min/1.73 m2 or greater and with suitable renal artery anatomy were randomized 2:1 to undergo ultrasound renal denervation or a sham procedure. Patients were to abstain from antihypertensive medications until the 2-month follow-up unless prespecified BP criteria were exceeded and were associated with clinical symptoms. Interventions: Ultrasound renal denervation vs a sham procedure. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary efficacy outcome was the mean change in daytime ambulatory SBP at 2 months. The primary safety composite outcome of major adverse events included death, kidney failure, and major embolic, vascular, cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, and hypertensive events at 30 days and renal artery stenosis greater than 70% detected at 6 months. The secondary outcomes included mean change in 24-hour ambulatory SBP, home SBP, office SBP, and all DBP parameters at 2 months. Results: Among 1038 eligible patients, 150 were randomized to ultrasound renal denervation and 74 to a sham procedure (mean age, 55 years [SD, 9.3 years]; 28.6% female; and 16.1% self-identified as Black or African American). The reduction in daytime ambulatory SBP was greater with ultrasound renal denervation (mean, -7.9 mm Hg [SD, 11.6 mm Hg]) vs the sham procedure (mean, -1.8 mm Hg [SD, 9.5 mm Hg]) (baseline-adjusted between-group difference, -6.3 mm Hg [95% CI, -9.3 to -3.2 mm Hg], P < .001), with a consistent effect of ultrasound renal denervation throughout the 24-hour circadian cycle. Among 7 secondary BP outcomes, 6 were significantly improved with ultrasound renal denervation vs the sham procedure. No major adverse events were reported in either group. Conclusions and Relevance: In patients with hypertension, ultrasound renal denervation reduced daytime ambulatory SBP at 2 months in the absence of antihypertensive medications vs a sham procedure without postprocedural major adverse events. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03614260.

Permanent inferior vena cava filters offer greater expected patient utility at lower predicted cost.

OBJECTIVE: Retrievable inferior vena cava (IVC) filters were first approved for use in the United States in 2003 to address the long-term complications of migration, thrombosis, fracture, and perforation observed with permanent IVC filter implantation. Although Food and Drug Administration approval of retrievable IVC filters includes permanent implantation, the incidence of complications from long-term implantation appears to be greater than that reported with existing permanent IVC filters. Also, only a small fraction of such retrievable IVC filters are ever retrieved. The purpose of the present study was to determine the threshold retrieval rate at which the use of retrievable IVC filters could be justified. METHODS: A Markov decision tree was constructed comparing retrievable and permanent IVC filters regarding their effectiveness and cost. A review of the reported data provided outcome probabilities, and the Tufts Medical Center Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Registry was the source of the utility values for the various potential outcomes. Medicare reimbursement rates served as a proxy for costs. A sensitivity analysis was performed for various parameters, primarily to determine the retrieval rate threshold at which the use of retrievable IVC filters would outperform the use of permanent IVC filters. RESULTS: Base case analysis demonstrated a greater predicted effectiveness for permanent compared with retrievable IVC filter implantation (5.41 quality-adjusted life-years [QALY] vs 5.33 QALY) at a lower cost ($2070 vs $4650). Monte Carlo simulation at 10,000 iterations confirmed the expected utility (5.4 ± 3.0 QALY vs 5.3 ± 3.0 QALY; P = .0002) and cost ($1900 ± $7400 vs $4800 ± 9900; P < .0001) to be statistically superior for permanent IVC filters. A sensitivity analysis for the filter retrieval rate demonstrated that the strategy of using a retrievable IVC filter was never preferable for utility or cost. The superiority of permanent IVC filter placement for effectiveness and cost persisted, regardless of anticipated patient-predicted annual mortality. A two-way sensitivity analysis for both IVC filter removal rate and annual patient mortality confirmed the superiority of permanent IVC filter placement at all levels. CONCLUSIONS: The predicted effectiveness of permanent IVC filters was greater and the predicted cost lower than those for retrievable IVC filters, regardless of the IVC filter retrieval rate. This interpretation of existing reported data using Markov decision analysis modeling supports the argument that unless the long-term complication rate of retrievable IVC filters can be significantly improved, their use should be abandoned in favor of currently available permanent IVC filters.

Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure affects measurement of fractional flow reserve.

BACKGROUND: Fractional flow reserve (FFR), the hyperemic ratio of distal (Pd) to proximal (Pa) coronary pressure, is used to identify the need for coronary revascularization. Changes in left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) might affect measurements of FFR. METHODS AND MATERIALS: LVEDP was recorded simultaneously with Pd and Pa during conventional FFR measurement as well as during additional infusion of nitroprusside. The relationship between LVEDP, Pa, and FFR was assessed using linear mixed models. RESULTS: Prospectively collected data for 528 cardiac cycles from 20 coronary arteries in 17 patients were analyzed. Baseline median Pa, Pd, FFR, and LVEDP were 73 mmHg, 49 mmHg, 0.69, and 18 mmHg, respectively. FFR<0.80 was present in 14 arteries (70%). With nitroprusside median Pa, Pd, FFR, and LVEDP were 61 mmHg, 42 mmHg, 0.68, and 12 mmHg, respectively. In a multivariable model for the entire population LVEDP was positively associated with FFR such that FFR increased by 0.008 for every 1-mmHg increase in LVEDP (beta=0.008; P<0.001), an association that was greater in obstructed arteries with FFR<0.80 (beta=0.01; P<0.001). Pa did not directly affect FFR in the multivariable model, but an interaction between LVEDP and Pa determined that LVEDP's effect on FFR is greater at lower Pa. CONCLUSIONS: LVEDP was positively associated with FFR. The association was greater in obstructive disease (FFR<0.80) and at lower Pa. These findings have implications for the use of FFR to guide revascularization in patients with heart failure. SUMMARY FOR ANNOTATED TABLE OF CONTENTS: The impact of left ventricular diastolic pressure on measurement of fractional flow reserve (FFR) is not well described. We present a hemodynamic study of the issue, concluding that increasing left ventricular diastolic pressure can increase measurements of FFR, particularly in patients with FFR<0.80 and lower blood pressure.

Percutaneous revascularization of long femoral artery lesions for claudication: patency over 2.5 years and impact of systematic surveillance.

BACKGROUND: Angioplasty and stenting are preferred treatments for revascularizing femoral artery lesions up to 100 mm, but surgical bypass is recommended for longer lesions. We assessed long-term patency after percutaneous revascularization of long femoral artery lesions for claudication with intensive out-patient surveillance. METHODS: We followed a cohort of 111 consecutive patients receiving angioplasty or stenting in 142 limbs in two institutions. Patients were followed for 2.5 years, and event curves and multivariable survival analysis used to compare outcomes in three groups according to lesion length (< 100 mm, 100-200 mm, and greater than 200 mm). Failed patency was defined as recurrence of symptoms with a decline in ankle brachial index, or stenosis identified by duplex ultrasound, or reintervention. RESULTS: Compared to lesions less than 100 mm, longer lesions had higher failed primary patency (100-200 mm: HR = 2.0, P = 0.16, >200 mm: HR = 2.6, P = 0.03). Failed secondary patency was similar for short and intermediate lesions (< 5% incidence), but trended higher for lesions >200 mm (HR = 4.2, P = 0.06). An initial procedure residual stenosis greater than 20% was the only significant multivariable factor related to poorer long-term patency (HR = 15.8, P = 0.003). Compared to short lesions, the gain in long-term patency with out-patient surveillance and reintervention was higher for longer lesions and significantly so for intermediate lesions (100-200 mm = 23% versus <100 mm = 8%, P = 0.041). CONCLUSION: Percutaneous treatment of long femoral artery lesions can provide acceptable long-term patency for patients with claudication when out-patient surveillance is used to identify patients who require repeat interventions. Future long-term studies should consider overall patency encompassing more than one percutaneous reintervention.