Descriptive analysis of incidence and risk factors for short intramedullary nail breakage in femoral intertrochanteric fractures: a multicenter (TRON group) retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of hip fractures is increasing. Femoral intertrochanteric fractures make up 50% of hip fractures and are treated by intramedullary nails. Implant breakage is a recognized complication that can have rare and serious implications. This study aimed to investigate implant breakage rates after surgical treatment for femoral intertrochanteric fractures. METHODS: This was a retrospective multicenter analysis. All 1854 patients who underwent surgical treatment for femoral intertrochanteric fractures were selected from 12 hospitals (TRON group) between 2016 and 2020. Exclusion criteria included implants other than those specified and follow-up periods less than three months. Demographic data, surgical details, and radiographic assessments were collected from medical records and X-ray evaluations. RESULTS: Among the 983 study patients, consisting of 245 males (24.9%) and 738 females (75.1%), the implant breakage rate was 0.31%, with three confirmed cases. The average age was 83.9 years. The mean follow-up period was 640.9 days. Two cases were linked to ASULOCK implants, and one to an OLSII implant. Statistical analysis showed a significantly higher incidence of ASULOCK implant breakage (p < 0.001). In the two cases of ASULOCK implant breakage and one case of OLSII implant breakage, breakage in all three implants occurred at the anti-rotation screws. CONCLUSIONS: There were no implant breakages of the main body of the implants; all breakages occurred in the additional anti-rotation screw. The necessity of the anti-rotation screw will require further discussion. These results can potentially inform clinical decisions and guide further research in preventing implant breakage.

Low and high body mass index and lower numbers of screws in the articular segment are risk factors for non-union of distal humeral fractures in the elderly: A multi-center retrospective study (TRON study).

Background: Distal humerus fracture in the elderly is a challenging fracture for orthopedic surgeons. Non-union is one of the serious complications of distal humerus fracture after surgery. This retrospective multicenter study aimed to estimate the incidence of distal humeral non-union after open reduction and internal fixation, determine factors related to non-union, and compare the postoperative results of cases with non-union to cases with the union. Methods: Among 423 patients diagnosed with distal humeral fracture and who were treated by surgical therapy in 2010-2020 from our database called TRON. Only 190 subjects met the inclusion criteria. We performed a logistic regression analysis with the presence of non-union as the response variable to examine risk factors. We compare the Mayo Elbow Performance Scores of cases with non-union to cases with the union. Results: Non-union occurred after surgery in 15 patients (7.9%). The logistic regression analysis showed that body mass index<20 kg/m2 and ≥25 kg/m2, and ≤3 screws in the articular segment were significant explanatory factors for non-union (odds ratio 10.4 and 47.8, respectively). The Mayo Elbow Performance Scores were significantly worse in patients with non-union. Discussion: Low and high body mass index and three or fewer screws in the articular segment might be risk factors for non-union of distal humerus fracture in the elderly. Non-union is associated with poor clinical outcomes.

Fracture of the patella involving inferior pole is associated with postoperative patella baja - A retrospective multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: The patella fracture involving of inferior pole fractures (IPF) may be associated with patella baja, However, the clinical impact of this condition remains unclear. This study aims to clarify 1) the incidence of patella baja following patellar fracture surgery, 2) the associated clinical outcomes with and without the presence of patella baja, and 3) the potential correlation between the detection of IPF on CT and the occurrence of patella baja. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective multicenter study involving 251 patients who underwent surgical treatment for patellar fractures. Patients were divided into the patella baja (PB; n = 49) group and patella norma (PN; n = 202) group. Data collected included demographics, radiographic findings, surgical details, and postoperative complications. We compared these items between PB group and PN group. Logistic regression analyses were used to identify risk factors for patella baja. RESULTS: Immediately following surgery, 36 (14.3%) patients presented with patella baja which increased to 49 cases (19.5%) at six months postoperatively. There is no statistically significant difference in the demographics, surgical details, clinical outcomes and complication between PB group and PN group. While, in the radiographical assessment, the prevalence of IPF on CT scan in the patella baja group was significantly higher than that in the patella norma group. By logistic regression analysis, IPFP on CT was identified as an independent risk factor for patella baja. (odds ratio 2.11, 95% confidence interval: 1.03-4.33, p = 0.042). CONCLUSION: In patients with patellar fractures, the incidence of patella baja increased from 14.3% immediately post-surgery to 19.5% at the six-month check-up. No significant differences were observed in clinical outcomes between the patella baja group and the norma group. The patella fracture involving IPF on CT emerged as a predictive factor for patella baja.

Diaphyseal forearm fracture management in adolescent patients from 2011 to 2020: A multicenter study of surgery and regional anesthesia trends.

BACKGROUND: Diaphyseal forearm fractures are common traumatic injuries among children. There has been much debate on the use of intramedullary nailing (IMN) or plate fixation in the adolescent population (10-16 years of age). Furthermore, as ultrasound technology has advanced, the safety and efficacy of ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block for children has dramatically improved. Therefore, anesthesia options for adolescent patients have increased in recent years. This study aimed to investigate recent surgical and regional anesthesia trends of diaphyseal forearm fractures in patients 10 to 16 years of age in Japan through a multicenter epidemiological survey from 2011 to 2020. METHODS: This retrospective, multicenter study included 226 pediatric patients with diaphyseal forearm fracture aged 10-16 years treated from January 2011 to December 2020. We divided the patients into four groups according to the period in which they were treated: early (2011-2013), middle (2014-2016), late (2017-2019), and COVID-19 (2020). Information from medical records was used to investigate the number of surgeries, types of anesthesia administered, and internal fixation methods used for diaphyseal forearm fracture in adolescent patients during each period. RESULTS: The number of surgeries was generally constant in each period but decreased during the COVID-19 period. In the early, middle, late, and COVID-19 periods, the percentages of surgeries performed under regional anesthesia were 67.7, 85.5, 87.0, and 100% respectively (p = 0.003). During the same periods, the percentages of patients receiving IMN were 41.5, 49.3, 58.0, and 66.7%, respectively (p = 0.033). CONCLUSION: The use of IMN and regional anesthesia to treat diaphyseal forearm fracture in patients 10 to 16 years of age steadily increased during the study period from 2011 to 2020. These results indicate that regional anesthesia is safe, effective, and well-tolerated by adolescent patients. The treatment strategy for diaphyseal forearm fractures in adolescents using regional anesthesia in combination with IMN worked well and was effective during COVID-19. Our evidence suggests this trend will continue. We anticipate that our findings can be extrapolated for upper extremity fractures in adolescent patients beyond the Tokai region of Japan where the study was based.

Does Early and Late Weight Bearing Have an Effect on the Results of Elderly Tibial Plateau Fractures with Internal Fixation?: A Multicenter (TRON Group) Study.

Introduction: There is still no consensus on the length of the non-bearing period required for tibial plateau fractures (TPFs) treated surgically. Several studies showed that full weight bearing immediately postoperatively does not affect fixation or cause joint collapse in patients with TPF. While there are concerns about weight bearing in the elderly due to fragile bone quality, their physical disability often makes it difficult to carry out activities of daily life when weight bearing is not allowed. The purpose of this study was to assess differences in clinical and radiographic outcomes between an early weight-bearing (EWB) group and a non-weight-bearing (NWB) group following TPF in elderly patients. Material and Methods: We extracted the data of 432 patients who suffered TPF from January 2011 to December 2020 from a database which is named TRON. We excluded patients with insufficient follow-up postoperatively, AO type A/C fracture, age < 60 years old, multiple trauma, and those lost to follow-up. Finally, 91 patients were eligible. EWB group patients were encouraged to perform partial weight-bearing walking at ≤ 4 weeks after surgery, whereas NWB group patients were not allowed weight bearing for > 4 weeks after surgery. Baseline intergroup differences were adjusted for by matching age, sex, body mass index, smoking history, and injury mechanism. We compared Knee Society Score (KSS), timing of full weight bearing, and X-ray findings including step-off, tibia plateau angle, plateau slope, and condylar widening in the X-rays between the two groups. Results: There were no significant statistical differences between the EWB group and NWB group after matching. The mean follow-up period was 28.0 (range 12-73) months. All cases did not require reoperation or additional procedures. The median KSS at 12 months or at the last follow up postoperatively was 100 (77-100) vs. 95 (75-100) points (P = 0.33). There were no differences in fracture-related infection rates or wound dehiscence. In the radiological evaluation of EWB and NWB, the correction loss of condylar widening was only significantly greater for EWB compared to NWB. Conclusions: We found that early weight bearing could contribute to increased condylar widening. While our short-term follow-up didn't reveal any significant clinical differences, this highlights the need for long-term follow-up to comprehensively understand the implications of these radiographic changes.

Does Preoperative Manual Reduction (Omoto Technique) Affect Surgical Outcomes for Calcaneal Fractures? A Multicenter (TRON Group) Retrospective Study.

The Omoto technique is a well-known method that is commonly used for noninvasive manual repair of calcaneal fractures. However, there have been no detailed studies on its clinical outcomes in preoperative closed reduction for surgical cases. This multicenter retrospective study aimed to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of calcaneal fractures treated with and without the preoperative Omoto technique, assessing its effectiveness. We extracted 335 patients with calcaneal fracture who underwent surgery between 2015 and 2020 from our multicenter database, named TRON. We evaluated the clinical outcomes using the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, the Böhler angle (BA) for radiographic analysis, and noted any complications. We divided the patients into those managed with the Omoto technique (group O) and those managed without the Omoto technique (group N). Patients were matched by age, sex, and fracture type, resulting in 43 patients per group. The use of the Omoto technique at the time of injury significantly improved the Böhler angle (BA). Furthermore, there were no significant differences in AOFAS, postoperative complications, or BA values at the final follow-up. In conclusion, our study demonstrates that the Omoto technique, when used preoperatively for calcaneal fractures, does not negatively impact the outcomes of subsequent surgical treatments. For patients who prefer to avoid surgery, the Omoto technique can be an effective initial intervention. Additionally, our findings suggest that the Omoto technique may facilitate less invasive surgical options in certain cases.

An age-matched comparative study on intramedullary nailing and plate fixation of both-bone diaphyseal forearm fracture in adolescents.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare radiological and functional outcomes and complication rates between intramedullary nailing (IMN) and plate fixation for diaphyseal forearm fractures in adolescents via an age-matched analysis. METHODS: Data were collected from medical records at 11 hospitals from 2009 to 2019, and the age-matched study was conducted between IMN and plate fixation. Functional outcomes, radiographic outcomes, and postoperative complication rates were compared. RESULTS: The IMN group (Group N) and plate fixation group (Group P) each comprised 26 patients after age matching. The mean age after matching was 13.42 years old. Bone maturities at the wrist of the radius and ulna were not significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.764 and p = 1). At the last follow-up period, functional outcomes using the Price criteria were over 90% in both groups, and the rotational range of motion was comparable to that of the healthy side. Over 70% of cases in Group N were performed by closed reduction, and operation time was half that of Group P. Postoperative neurological symptoms and refractures were more common in Group P than in Group N, although not statistically significantly so. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment outcomes for age-matched adolescent diaphyseal forearm fractures were excellent with IMN, as well as with plate fixation in many cases despite fewer complications, better cosmesis, and shorter operative times with IMN. IMN for diaphyseal forearm fractures is a useful treatment option even in adolescents although the indications for the best procedure to perform should be considered depending on individual patient needs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: Multicenter retrospective study.

Predictive factors for one-year mortality after surgery for periprosthetic femoral fracture: A retrospective multicenter (TRON group) study.

BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic femoral fracture (PFF) after total hip arthroplasty (THA) or bipolar hip arthroplasty (BHA) represents a challenging situation and the treatment is associated with high rates of complications and mortality. The aims of this multicenter retrospective study were to determine 1-year mortality and to identify predictors associated with mortality, including patient characteristics and surgical factors, in patients undergoing surgery for PFF after THA or BHA. METHODS: We collected 249 cases of PPF after THA or BHA that were treated in our 11 hospitals (named the TRON group) between January 2010 and December 2019. We excluded patients who were conservatively treated, cases in which the 1-year postoperative outcome was unknown, and Vancouver type A cases. Finally, we analyzed 161 patients. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to identify factors affecting 1-year mortality. Patient-side factors such as age, BMI, fracture type, and preoperative mobility, and surgical factors such as surgical procedure, time to surgery, and operation time were analyzed respectively. RESULTS: Eighteen of 161 patients (11.2%) died one year after surgery. The multivariate Cox regression analysis identified older age, wheelchair status before injury, and operation time as independent predictors of 1-year mortality (older age: hazard ratio [HR] 1.07, 95% CI 1.01-1.15, P = 0.048; wheelchair status: HR 5.82, 95% CI 1.01-33.47, P = 0.049; operation time: [HR] 1.01, 95% CI 1.00-1.01, P = 0.00929). Meanwhile, fracture type according to the Vancouver classification, body mass index, presence of previous fragility fractures, type of fixation, blood loss during operation, and time to surgery were not independent predictors of 1-year mortality in this analysis. ConclusionThe 1-year mortality rate after surgery for PPFs patients was 11.2%. Factors associated with older and poor activity of daily living (ADL) performance (e.g., wheelchair status before injury), and longer operative time were associated with 1-year mortality after surgery for PPF. Surgeons should carefully plan treatment according to each patient's condition.

Comparison of the Outcomes of Plating, Screw Fixation, and Pinning in Sanders Type II Fractures: A Multicenter (TRON) Retrospective Study.

Calcaneus fractures Sanders type II have been historically treated with various modalities. However, few studies compared these procedures directly. The multicenter (TRON group) retrospective study compared the radiographic and clinical outcomes of operative procedures using Kirschner wires (K-wires), cannulated cancellous screws (CCSs) and plates. Between 2014 and 2020, 121 patients with Sanders type II calcaneus fractures were surgically treated in our group using K-wire (Group K: n = 31), CCS (Group C: n = 60) or plate (Group p: n = 30) fixation. We assessed the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score and infection after operation as clinical outcomes and Böhler's and Preiss' angles as radiographic outcomes. The AOFAS scores of the 3 groups showed a significant difference, with Group P showing significantly inferior scores to Group C at 6 months postoperatively and at the final follow-up examination (p = .015 and p < .001, respectively). The rate of infection did not differ to a statistically significant extent, but the incidence in Group P tended to be higher in comparison to the other groups. Among the three groups, Böhler's angle did not differ to a statistically significant extent immediately after the operation (p = .113) or at the final follow-up examination (p = .383). Postoperatively, Preiss' angle did not differ to a statistically significant extent (p = .251) but was significantly smaller in the Group C at the final follow-up examination (p = .0331). In Sanders type II calcaneus fracture, CCS fixation may obtain the best functional outcomes.

Early versus delayed weight bearing after internal fixation for femoral neck fracture in younger adults: A multicenter retrospective study.

INTRODUCTION: Femoral neck fracture (FNF) is among the most common and devastating injuries that orthopedic surgeons encounter. However, the incidence of FNF is lower in younger adults than in elderly individuals. In elderly FNF patients, early weight bearing (EWB) is preferred to prevent loss of function and decreased activity. In younger adults, some surgeons decide on delayed-weight bearing (DWB) after surgery because EWB may cause femoral neck shortening. We aimed to compare the postoperative results (clinical outcome, radiological evaluation, and complications) of EWB and DWB after FNF surgery in younger adults. METHODS: The study included 151 younger adults (age: ≤65 years at injury; nondisplaced, n = 100; displaced, n = 51) who underwent internal fixation at 11 university-affiliated hospitals in 2016-2020, and who were followed for ≥1 year. Patients were divided into the EWB (EWB in early postoperative period) and DWB (beginning weight bearing at 4 weeks after surgery) groups. The two groups were matched for age, and nondisplaced (EWB and DWB, both n = 24) and displaced (EWB and DWB, both n = 11) FNF were analyzed. The study items were age, sex, body mass index (BMI), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), presence of diabetes, days waiting for surgery, fracture type, Parker mobility score (PMS) at last follow-up examination, pain (Numerical Rating Scale: NRS), radiological evaluation (femoral neck shortening, Canulated Cancellous screws (CCS) backout, and complications (nonunion, femoral head osteonecrosis). RESULTS: The patient backgrounds of the nondisplaced and displaced types did not differ. The PMS was significantly higher in the DWB group at the last follow-up examination (nondisplaced: 8.00±2.20 vs. 6.67±2.22, p = 0.005, displaced: 8.67±0.89 vs. 6.91±2.77, p<0.001). NRS and the amount of femoral neck shortening were significantly lower in the DWB group (nondisplaced: 1.65±0.70 mm vs. 3.94±3.03 mm, p<0.001, displaced: 4.26± 2.64 mm vs. 8.91±5.69 mm, p<0.001). CCS backout did not differ between the groups. One case of each of nonunion and femoral head osteonecrosis were observed in the displaced EWB and DWB groups; these differences were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: DWB after internal fixation for FNF in younger adults was associated with better outcomes than EWB.

Predictive factors for reoperation after periprosthetic femoral fracture: A retrospective multicenter (TRON) study.

BACKGROUND: The surgical treatment of periprosthetic femoral fracture (PFF) can be technically demanding and it is associated with high rates of complications and repeat surgery. However, repeat surgery is uncommon and few studies have examined survival and the functional prognosis following reoperation after the surgical treatment of PFF. We aimed to estimate the rate of reoperation for any reason, to determine the survival rate after reoperation for PFF, and to identify predictors associated with reoperation after PFF surgery in a multicenter (TRON group) study. METHODS: Two hundred forty-six patients were admitted for treatment of PFF. After excluding patients managed conservatively and those with Vancouver type A fracture, we analyzed 184 patients. Unadjusted risk ratios (RRs) were calculated, and multiple logistic regression was used to calculate adjusted RRs. We used the Kaplan-Meier method to create survival curves and a log-rank test to determine survival from the date of repeat surgery. RESULTS: Fifteen of the 184 patients (8.2 %) underwent reoperation after PFF surgery. The 1-year survival rate after reoperation for PFF was 66.7 % (11 of 15). Vancouver B3 and Vancouver C were identified as independent risk factors for reoperation after PFF surgery (Vancouver B3: Risk ratio [RR] 19.0, 95 % CI 1.10-329 P < 0.001; Vancouver C: RR 13.3, 95 % CI 1.4-123.0, P = 0.023). CONCLUSION: The reoperation rate after PFF surgery and the mortality after reoperation PFF surgery were relatively high. The fracture type is associated with reoperation after PFF surgery.

Comparative Outcomes of Anterior and Posterior Plating for Distal-Third Humerus Shaft Fractures.

PURPOSE: When treating distal-third humerus shaft fractures (HSFs) surgically, the optimal approach for plating is controversial. We conducted a retrospective multicenter study to investigate and compare the clinical outcomes of anterior and posterior plating in distal-third HSFs and the incidence of complications including iatrogenic radial nerve palsy. METHODS: We identified 116 patients from our multicenter trauma database who were diagnosed as having distal-third HSFs and who underwent surgical treatment, including intramedullary nailing between 2011 and 2020. We analyzed 50 cases treated in one of two ways: open reduction internal fixation with anterior plating (group A: 20 cases) and open reduction internal fixation with posterior plating (group P: 30 cases). RESULTS: The findings were similar in terms of operation time, estimated bleeding, and clinical and radiographic outcomes between the groups. Postoperative radial nerve palsy occurred only in group P (4 cases) and never in group A. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that the anterior approach is a safe and effective method for treating distal-third HSFs with satisfactory outcomes. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

What is the Radiographic Factor Associated with Meniscus Injury in Tibial Plateau Factures? Multicenter Retrospective (TRON) Study.

Purpose: Tibial plateau fracture (TPF) is a complex intra-articular injury involving comminution and depression of the joint, which can be accompanied by meniscal tears. The aims of this study were (1) to demonstrate the rate at which surgical treatment for lateral meniscal injury and (2) to clarify the explanatory radiographic factors associated with meniscal injury in patients with TPF. Methods: We extracted the patients who received surgical treatment for TPF from our multicenter database (named TRON) included from 2011 to 2020. We analyzed 79 patients who were received surgical treatment for TPF with Schatzker type II and III and evaluation for meniscal injury on arthroscopy. We investigated the rate at which surgical treatment of the lateral meniscus was required in patients with TPF and the explanatory radiographic factors associated with meniscal injury. Radiographs and CT scans were evaluated to measure the following parameters: tibial plateau slope, distance from lateral edge of the articular surface to fracture line (DLE), articular step, and width of articular bone fragment (WDT). Meniscus tears were classified according to whether surgery was necessary. The results were analyzed by multivariate Logistic analyses. Results: We showed that 27.7% (22/79) of cases of TPF with Schatzker type II and III had lateral meniscal injury that required repair. WDT ≥ 10 mm (odds ratio 10.9; p = 0.005) and DLE ≥ 5 mm (odds ratio 5.7; p = 0.05) were independent explanatory factors for meniscal injury with TPF. Conclusion: Bone fragment size and the location of fracture line on radiographs in patients with TPF are associated with meniscus injuries requiring surgery. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43465-023-00888-5.

＜Editors' Choice＞ Hook plate fixation versus locking plate fixation for distal clavicle fracture: a multicenter propensity score-matched study.

Hook plate fixation and locking plate fixation are two standard internal fixation implants for treating distal clavicle fractures. We aimed to clarify the following: 1) Does the locking plate offer better clinical outcomes than the hook plate? 2) Is bone union better with a locking plate than hook plate? and 3) Are complications different between the locking plate and hook plate? We conducted a retrospective multicenter study of 338 patients who underwent surgery from 2014 to 2018 in our 10 hospitals, which comprise the TRON group. Of them, 208 patients treated using any plates were eligible. After 30 patients were excluded for various reasons, 178 patients were included. We classified them into two groups, locking plate group (Group L) and hook plate group (Group H), using propensity score matching. We confirmed bone union with an X-ray, evaluated the UCLA shoulder score, and compared the frequency of complications. After matching, Group L and Group H included 49 patients each. The UCLA score was higher in Group L than in Group H at each follow-up point. We confirmed bone union in all patients in Group L, but it was not confirmed in three patients (6.1%) in Group H. No statistically significant differences were observed except for plate migration, which was observed in nine patients (18.4%) in Group H but in no patients in Group L. The postoperative UCLA score was significantly better in Group L. We recommend the locking plate as a surgical treatment for distal clavicle fractures.

Incidence and Risk Factors for Fracture-Related Infection After Peri-Prosthetic Femoral Fractures: A Multicenter Retrospective Study (TRON Group Study).

Background: Fracture-related infection (FRI) sometimes occurs with peri-prosthetic femoral fracture (PPF) treatment. Fracture-related infection often leads to multiple re-operations, possible non-union, a decreased clinical function, and long-term antibiotic treatment. In this multicenter study, we aimed to clarify the incidence of FRI, the causative organisms of wound infection, and the risk factors associated with post-operative infection for PPF. Patients and Methods: Among 197 patients diagnosed with peri-prosthetic femoral fracture who received surgical treatment in 11 institutions (named the TRON group) from 2010 to 2019, 163 patients were included as subjects. Thirty-four patients were excluded because of insufficient follow-up (less than six months) or data loss. We extracted the following risk factors for FRI: gender, body mass index, smoking history, diabetes mellitus, chronic hepatitis, rheumatoid arthritis, dialysis, history of osteoporosis treatment, injury mechanism (high- or low-energy), Vancouver type, and operative information (waiting period for surgery, operation time, amount of blood loss, and surgical procedure). We conducted a logistic regression analysis to investigate the risk factors for FRI using these extracted items as explanatory variables and the presence or absence of FRI as the response variable. Results: Fracture-related infection occurred after surgery for PPF in 12 of 163 patients (7.3%). The most common causative organism was Staphylococcus aureus (n = 7). The univariable analysis showed differences for dialysis (p = 0.001), Vancouver type (p = 0.036), blood loss during surgery (p = 0.001), and operative time (p = 0.001). The multivariable logistic-regression analysis revealed that the patient background factor of dialysis (odds ratio [OR], 22.9; p = 0.0005), and the operative factor of Vancouver type A fracture (OR, 0.039-1.18; p = 0.018-0.19) were risk factors for FRI. Conclusions: The rate of post-operative wound infection in patients with a PPF was 7.3%. Staphylococcus was the most frequent causative organism. The surgeon should pay attention to infection after surgery for patients with Vancouver type A fractures and those undergoing dialysis.

Locked Tension Band Wiring for Mayo IIA Olecranon Fractures: Modified Surgical Technique and Retrospective Comparative Study of Clinical Outcomes and Cost-effectiveness with Locking Plate.

Background: Tension band wiring (TBW) has traditionally been used for simple olecranon fractures, but due to its many complications, locking plate (LP) is increasingly being employed. To reduce the complications, we developed a modified technique for olecranon fracture repair, locked TBW (LTBW). The study aimed to compare (1) the frequency of complications and re-operations between LP and LTBW techniques, (2) clinical outcomes and the cost efficacy. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated data of 336 patients who underwent surgical treatment for simple and displaced olecranon fractures (Mayo Type ⅡA) in the hospitals of a trauma research group. We excluded open fractures and polytrauma. We investigated complication and re-operation rates as primary outcomes. As secondary outcomes, Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI) and the total cost, including surgery, outpatients and re-operation, were examined between the two groups. Results: We identified 34 patients in the LP group and 29 patients in the LTBW group. The mean follow-up period was 14.2 ± 3.9 months. The complication rate in the LTBW group was comparable to that in the LP group (10.3% vs. 17.6%; p = 0.49). Re-operation and removal rates were not significantly different between the groups (6.9% vs. 8.8%; p = 1.000 and 41.4% vs. 58.8%; p = 1.00, respectively). Mean MEPI at 3 months was significantly lower in the LTBW group (69.7 vs. 82.6; p < 0.01), but mean MEPI at 6 and 12 months were not significantly different (90.6 vs. 85.2; p = 0.06, 93.9 vs. 95.2; p = 0.51, respectively). The mean cost/patient of the total cost in the LTBW group were significantly lower than those in the LP group ($5,249 vs. $6,138; p < 0.001). Conclusions: This study showed that LTBW achieved clinical outcomes equivalent to those of LP and was significantly more cost effective than LP in the retrospective cohort. Level of Evidence: Level III (Therapeutic).

Ulnar Nerve Neuropathy After Surgery for Intraarticular Distal Humerus Fractures: An Analysis of 116 Patients.

PURPOSE: To identify the incidence and the factors associated with a postoperative ulnar nerve neuropathy in patients who had undergone open reduction and internal fixation for intraarticular distal humerus fractures. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 116 patients who had undergone surgery between January 2011 and December 2020. Age, sex, BMI, mechanism of injury, open or closed fracture, operation time, tourniquet time, and nerve injury at the final examination were collected from medical charts. We essentially used the paratricipital approach. In cases in which the reduction of intraarticular bone fragments was difficult, olecranon osteotomy was used. Ulnar nerve function was graded according to a modified system of McGowan. We conducted logistic regression analysis to investigate factors of neuropathy using items identified as statistically significant in univariate analysis as explanatory variables. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients (29.3%) had persistent neuropathy at the final follow-up. In the modified McGowan classification, 28 patients had grade 1 and 6 patients had grade 2 neuropathy. Olecranon osteotomy emerged as a distinct explanatory variable for the prophylaxis of ulnar nerve neuropathy in the multivariate analysis (odds ratio, 0.30; 95% confidence interval, 0.12-0.73). Anterior transposition, however, was not a statistically significant factor (odds ratio, 1.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.81-4.56). CONCLUSIONS: Olecranon osteotomy was the only independent factor associated with preventing the occurrence of ulnar nerve neuropathy. Ulnar nerve transposition might not be associated with prevention of ulnar nerve neuropathy. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic IV.

Retrospective Comparative Study of Clinical Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness with Bone Substitutes on Volar Locking Plate Fixation of Unstable Distal Radial Fractures in the Elderly.

Background: This multicenter retrospective study aimed to compare clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness with bone substitutes on volar locking plate (VLP) fixation of unstable distal radial fractures (DRF) in the elderly. Methods: The data of 1,980 patients of ≥65 years of age who underwent surgery for the DRF with a VLP in 2015-2019 were extracted from a database (named TRON). Patients lost to follow-up or who received autologous bone grafting were excluded. The patients (n = 1,735) were divided into the VLP fixation alone (Group VLA) and VLP fixation with bone substitutes (Group VLS). Propensity score matching of background characteristics (ratio, 4:1) was performed. The modified Mayo wrist scores (MMWS) were evaluated as clinical outcomes. The implant failure rate, bone union rate, volar tilt (VT), radial inclination (RI), ulnar variance (UV) and distal dorsal cortical distance (DDD) were evaluated as radiologic parameters. We also compared the initial surgery cost and total cost for each group. Results: After matching, the backgrounds of Groups VLA (n = 388) and VLS (n = 97) were not significantly different. The MMWS values of the groups were not significantly different. Radiographic evaluation revealed no implant failure in either group. Bone union was confirmed in all patients in both groups. The VT, RI, UV and DDD values of the groups were not significantly different. The initial surgery cost and total cost in the VLS group were significantly higher than those in the VLA group ($3,515 vs. $3,068, p < 0.001). Conclusions: In patients of ≥65 years of age with DRF, the clinical and radiological outcomes of VLP fixation with bone substitutes did not differ from those of VLP fixation alone, yet the additional use of bone augmentation was associated with higher medical costs. The indications for bone substitutes should be more strictly considered in the elderly with DRF. Level of Evidence: Level IV (Therapeutic).

Longer time of implantation using the buried pin technique for intramedullary nailing would decrease refracture in the diaphyseal forearm fracture in children-retrospective multicenter (TRON) study.

BACKGROUND: Intramedullary nailing using Kirschner wires in pediatric diaphyseal forearm fractures is often performed as a less invasive treatment than plate fixation, but it remains controversial whether the tips of Kirschner wires are buried or exposed. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between whether the tips are buried or exposed and complications, especially of refracture. METHODS: Data of 405 patients under 16 years who underwent surgical treatment for diaphyseal forearm fractures in our 11 hospitals between 2010 and 2020 were collected. Finally, 143 patients who underwent intramedullary nailing with at least 6-month follow-up were analyzed. We investigated difference in complication rates depending on whether the Kirschner wire tips were buried (Group B: n = 79) or exposed (Group E: n = 64). Regarding refractures, we also examined time of onset and status of bone union before the refracture occurred. RESULTS: The duration before implant removal in Group B was more than 4 times longer than that in Group E (mean 187.9 vs. 41.4 days, p<0.001), although there was no significant difference in the progression of bone union between the two groups. Regarding postoperative complications, Group B had a significantly lower rate of refractures than Group E (7.9% vs. 32.8%, p<0.001), although the rate of irritation pain was significantly higher (15.2% vs. 1.6%, p = 0.006). The infection rate was also lower in Group B than Group E, but not significantly so (3.8% vs. 10.9%, p = 0.112). Refractures between 3 and 9 months after surgery accounted for 66.7% of all refractures, and those within 3 months accounted for 14.5% of all fractures. There was no significant difference in the status of bone union before the refracture occurred between patients with and without refracture. CONCLUSIONS: The present study showed that longer time of implantation using the buried pin technique for intramedullary nailing reduces refracture of pediatric diaphyseal forearm fractures. Because of the risk of refracture during remodeling, we recommend the implantation of intramedullary nailing for 6-9 months and the instruction for the patients and the parents to pay more attention to refracture at least within 9 months postoperatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level Ⅲ, Multicenter retrospective study.

Comparison of surgical treatments for distal ulna fracture when combined with anterior locking plate fixation of distal radius in the over 70 age group.

We conducted a retrospective multicentre study to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes, and complications of three surgical treatments of distal ulna fracture (DUF) when combined with anterior locking plate fixation for distal radial fracture (DRF) in patients over 70 years of age. We identified 1521 patients over 70 years of age who were diagnosed as having DRF and who underwent anterior locking plate fixation between 2015 and 2020, among which 122 cases of DUF were analysed. Three surgical treatment options for DUF were identified in this cohort: K-wire fixation (Group K), locking plate fixation (Group L) and Darrach procedure (Group D). The results of the analysis showed the total immobilization period in Group D to be the shortest among the three treatments. Functional outcomes were superior, and the rate of complications were smaller in Group D than in Group L. In addition, rotational range of motion was larger in Group D and Group L compared with Group K. In patients who are 70 years of age or older with combined unstable DRF and highly comminuted or displaced DUF, the Darrach procedure for DUF seems to be the most useful and reasonable treatment option once the fracture of the distal radius has been rigidly fixed.Level of evidence: IV.