The Use of Unilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block in Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the efficacy of continuous unilateral erector spinae plane (ESP) blocks in minimally invasive cardiac surgery patients. DESIGN: A retrospective nonrandomized study. SETTING: At a single-center, tertiary academic institution. PARTICIPANTS: The study comprised 129 adult patients undergoing minimally invasive cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. INTERVENTIONS: Patient data were retrospectively collected and compared. Group 1 patients received ultrasound-guided ESP blocks, and group 2 patients underwent conventional intraoperative management without ESP blocks. After intubation in the group 1 cohort, 20-to- 25 mL of 0.25% ropivacaine were deposited beneath the erector spinae plane, along with catheter placement for continuous postoperative infusion. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patient characteristics (ie, age, sex, and comorbidities) were well-matched between both cohorts. The total 48-hour opioid consumption, as measured in morphine equivalents (mg), was significantly decreased in patients receiving erector spinae plane blocks compared to patients receiving conventional therapy (30.24 mg ± 23.8 v 47.82 mg ± 53.6, p = 0.04). The length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) also was reduced in the treatment group in comparison to the control group (1.99 days ± 1.7 v 2.65 days ± 2.4, p = 0.03). Lastly, patients receiving the blocks benefitted from a decrease in overall hospital length of stay when compared to the control group (5.93 days ± 2.4 v 7.35 days ± 5.8, p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Erector spinae plane catheter use may safely improve postoperative measures, including decreased opioid consumption and improved pain relief, as well as reductions in ICU and hospital lengths of stay in patients undergoing minimally invasive cardiac surgery.

Preoperative patient education: can we improve satisfaction and reduce anxiety? / Informação pré-operatória ao paciente: podemos melhorar a satisfação e reduzir a ansiedade? / Información preoperatoria al paciente: ¿podemos mejorar la satisfacción y reducir la ansiedad?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Patients' knowledge deficits concerning anesthesia and the anesthesiologist's role in their care may contribute to anxiety. The objective of this study was to develop anesthesia patient education materials that would help improve patient's satisfaction regarding their knowledge of the perioperative process and decrease anxiety in a community hospital with a large Spanish-speaking population. METHODS: A survey (Survey A) in English and Spanish was administered to all adult anesthesiology preoperative clinic patients during a 4-week period. The data were analyzed and then a patient education handout was developed in both English and Spanish to assist with our patients' major concerns. A second survey (Survey B) was administered that was completed after the education handout had been put into use at the clinic. The survey asked for basic demographic information and included questions on satisfaction with regard to understanding of anesthesia as well as worries regarding surgery and pain. RESULTS: In the patients who received the handout, statistically significant improvement was found in the questions that asked about satisfaction with regard to understanding of type of anesthesia, options for pain control, what patients are supposed to do on the day of surgery, and the amount of information given with regard to anesthetic plan. There was no difference in anxiety related to surgery in patients who received the educational handout compared to those patients who did not. CONCLUSIONS: Patient education handouts improved patient's satisfaction regarding their knowledge of the perioperative process but did not reduce anxiety related to surgery. .

JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: A falta de conhecimento dos pacientes em relação à anestesia e ao papel do anestesiologista em sua assistência pode contribuir para a ansiedade. O objetivo deste estudo foi desenvolver materiais explicativos para o paciente sobre a anestesia que poderiam ajudar a melhorar a satisfação do paciente em relação ao seu conhecimento do processo perioperatório e a diminuir a ansiedade em hospital comunitário com uma grande população de língua espanhola. MÉTODOS: Durante quatro semanas, uma pesquisa (Pesquisa A) em inglês e espanhol foi feita no período pré-operatório com todos os pacientes adultos que seriam submetidos à anestesia. Os dados foram analisados e, posteriormente, um folheto explicativo foi desenvolvido em inglês e espanhol para esclarecer as principais preocupações dos pacientes. Uma segunda pesquisa (Pesquisa B) foi feita após a colocação do folheto explicativo em uso na clínica. A pesquisa investigou as informações demográficas básicas e incluiu perguntas sobre a satisfação relacionada à compreensão da anestesia, bem como as preocupações com a cirurgia e a dor. RESULTADOS: Nos pacientes que receberam o folheto houve melhoria estatisticamente significativa em relação às perguntas sobre a satisfação com a compreensão do tipo de anestesia, as opções para o controle da dor, o que os pacientes deveriam fazer no dia da cirurgia, bem como a quantidade de informações prestadas sobre o plano anestésico. Não houve diferença na ansiedade relacionada à cirurgia entre os pacientes que receberam e os que não receberam o folheto educativo. CONCLUSÕES: Os folhetos explicativos melhoraram a satisfação do paciente em relação ao conhecimento do processo perioperatório, mas não reduziram a ansiedade relacionada à cirurgia. .

JUSTIFICACIÓN Y OBJETIVOS: La falta de conocimiento de los pacientes con relación a la anestesia y al papel del anestesista en su asistencia puede contribuir a la ansiedad. El objetivo de este estudio fue desarrollar materiales explicativos para el paciente sobre la anestesia que podrían ayudar a mejorar la satisfacción del paciente respecto a su conocimiento del proceso perioperatorio y a disminuir la ansiedad en un hospital comunitario con una gran población de hablantes de lengua española. MÉTODOS: Durante un período de 4 semanas, se llevó a cabo una investigación (investigación A) en inglés y en español en el período preoperatorio con todos los pacientes adultos que se iban a someter a la anestesia. Se analizaron los datos analizaron y posteriormente se confeccionó un folleto explicativo en inglés y en español para aclarar las principales preocupaciones de los pacientes. Una segunda investigación (investigación B) fue realizada después de que se completó el folleto explicativo que se estaba usando en la clínica. La encuesta solicitó información demográfica básica e incluyó preguntas sobre la satisfacción relacionada con la comprensión de la anestesia y también sobre las preocupaciones relacionadas con la cirugía y el dolor. RESULTADOS: En los pacientes que recibieron el folleto hubo una mejoría estadísticamente significativa con relación a las preguntas sobre la satisfacción con la comprensión del tipo de anestesia, las opciones para el control del dolor, lo que los pacientes deberían hacer el día de la cirugía, como también la cantidad de informaciones prestadas sobre el plan de anestesia. No hubo diferencia en la ansiedad relacionada con la cirugía entre los pacientes que recibieron y los que no recibieron el folleto educativo. CONCLUSIONES: Los folletos explicativos mejoraron la satisfacción del paciente respecto al conocimiento del proceso perioperatorio, pero no redujeron la ansiedad relacionada con la cirugía. .

Association Between Preoperative Aspirin-dosing Strategy and Mortality After Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether preoperative aspirin-acetylsalicylic acid (ASA)-timing or dose independently affects 30-day all-cause mortality. BACKGROUND: Preoperative ASA administration is associated with reduced morbidity and mortality after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). However, data are lacking regarding optimal timing and dosing of ASA. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data from 3018 consecutive patients who underwent CABG surgery between July 2005 and May 2011. Patients were assigned to 3 groups according to the time of the last preoperative ASA dose: (1) 24 hours or less preoperatively (n = 1173), (2) between 24 and 72 hours (n = 876), and (3) more than 72 hours or none (n = 969). In a separate analysis, patients were grouped according to ASA dose: 81 mg (n = 1285), 325 mg (n = 1004), and none (n = 543). The primary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality. RESULTS: The 30-day mortality rate was significantly lower in patients who took ASA 24 hours or less preoperatively (1.5%) than in those who took it between 24 and 72 hours (3.2%) or more than 72 hours or none (2.9%). Multivariate analysis showed that ASA within 24 hours preoperatively was associated with reduced mortality (odds ratio [OR], 0.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.20-0.82; P = 0.01). Moreover, mortality was significantly reduced for patients taking 81 mg of ASA (1.4%) compared with 325 mg (2.9%) or none (3.9%). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that 81 mg of ASA decreased mortality risk by 66% (OR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.18-0.66; P < 0.01), whereas 325 mg of ASA had no mortality benefit (OR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.41-1.35; P = 0.33) compared with no ASA. CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose ASA use within 24 hours of CABG is independently associated with decreased early postoperative mortality.

[Preoperative patient education: can we improve satisfaction and reduce anxiety?]. / Informação pré-operatória ao paciente: podemos melhorar a satisfação e reduzir a ansiedade?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Patients' knowledge deficits concerning anesthesia and the anesthesiologist's role in their care may contribute to anxiety. The objective of this study was to develop anesthesia patient education materials that would help improve patient's satisfaction regarding their knowledge of the perioperative process and decrease anxiety in a community hospital with a large Spanish-speaking population. METHODS: A survey (Survey A) in English and Spanish was administered to all adult anesthesiology preoperative clinic patients during a 4-week period. The data were analyzed and then a patient education handout was developed in both English and Spanish to assist with our patients' major concerns. A second survey (Survey B) was administered that was completed after the education handout had been put into use at the clinic. The survey asked for basic demographic information and included questions on satisfaction with regard to understanding of anesthesia as well as worries regarding surgery and pain. RESULTS: In the patients who received the handout, statistically significant improvement was found in the questions that asked about satisfaction with regard to understanding of type of anesthesia, options for pain control, what patients are supposed to do on the day of surgery, and the amount of information given with regard to anesthetic plan. There was no difference in anxiety related to surgery in patients who received the educational handout compared to those patients who did not. CONCLUSIONS: Patient education handouts improved patient's satisfaction regarding their knowledge of the perioperative process but did not reduce anxiety related to surgery.

Randomized, controlled trial comparing the effects of anesthesia with propofol, isoflurane, desflurane and sevoflurane on pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

BACKGROUND: Pain is the primary complaint and the main reason for prolonged recovery after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The authors hypothesized that patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy will have less pain four hours after surgery when receiving maintenance of anesthesia with propofol when compared to isoflurane, desflurane, or sevoflurane. METHODS: In this prospective, randomized trial, 80 patients scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy were assigned to propofol, isoflurane, desflurane, or sevoflurane for the maintenance of anesthesia. Our primary outcome was pain measured on the numeric analog scale four hours after surgery. We also recorded intraoperative use of opioids as well as analgesic consumption during the first 24h after surgery. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in pain scores four hours after surgery (p=0.72). There were also no statistically significant differences in pain scores between treatment groups during the 24h after surgery (p=0.45). Intraoperative use of fentanyl and morphine did not vary significantly among the groups (p=0.21 and 0.24, respectively). There were no differences in total morphine and hydrocodone/APAP use during the first 24h (p=0.61 and 0.53, respectively). CONCLUSION: Patients receiving maintenance of general anesthesia with propofol do not have less pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy when compared to isoflurane, desflurane, or sevoflurane.

Randomized, controlled trial comparing the effects of anesthesia with propofol, isoflurane, desflurane and sevoflurane on pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy / Estudo randômico controlado que compara os efeitos da anestesia com propofol, isoflurano, desflurano e sevoflurano sobre a dor pós-colecistectomia videolaparoscópica / Estudio aleatorizado controlado comparando los efectos de la anestesia con propofol, isoflurano, desflurano y sevoflurano sobre el dolor poscolecistectomía videolaparoscópica

Background: Pain is the primary complaint and the main reason for prolonged recovery after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The authors hypothesized that patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy will have less pain four hours after surgery when receiving maintenance of anesthesia with propofol when compared to isoflurane, desflurane, or sevoflurane. Methods: In this prospective, randomized trial, 80 patients scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy were assigned to propofol, isoflurane, desflurane, or sevoflurane for the maintenance of anesthesia. Our primary outcome was pain measured on the numeric analog scale four hours after surgery. We also recorded intraoperative use of opioids as well as analgesic consumption during the first 24 h after surgery. Results: There was no statistically significant difference in pain scores four hours after surgery (p = 0.72). There were also no statistically significant differences in pain scores between treatment groups during the 24 h after surgery (p = 0.45). Intraoperative use of fentanyl and morphine did not vary significantly among the groups (p = 0.21 and 0.24, respectively). There were no differences in total morphine and hydrocodone/APAP use during the first 24 h (p = 0.61 and 0.53, respectively). Conclusion: Patients receiving maintenance of general anesthesia with propofol do not have less pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy when compared to isoflurane, desflurane, or sevoflurane. .

Justificativa e objetivo: a dor é a principal queixa e também o motivo principal de recuperação prolongada pós-colecistectomia laparoscópica. A nossa hipótese foi que os pacientes submetidos à colecistectomia laparoscópica apresentariam menos dor quatro horas após a cirurgia se recebessem manutenção anestésica com propofol em comparação com isoflurano, desflurano ou sevoflurano. Métodos: neste estudo prospectivo e randômico, 80 pacientes agendados para colecistectomia laparoscópica foram designados para receber propofol, isoflurano, desflurano ou sevoflurano para manutenção da anestesia. Nosso desfecho primário foi dor mensurada em escala analógica numérica quatro horas após a cirurgia. Também registramos o uso intraoperatório de opiáceos, bem como o consumo de analgésicos durante as primeiras 24 horas pós-cirúrgicas. Resultados: não houve diferença estatisticamente significante nos escores de dor quatro horas após a cirurgia (p = 0,72). Também não houve diferença estatisticamente significativa nos escores de dor entre os grupos de tratamento durante as 24 horas pós-cirúrgicas (p = 0,45). O uso intraoperatório de fentanil e morfina não variou significativamente entre os grupos (p = 0,21 e 0,24, respectivamente). Não houve diferença no consumo total de morfina e hidrocodona/APAP durante as primeiras 24 horas (p = 0,61 e 0,53, respectivamente). Conclusão: os pacientes que receberam propofol para manutenção da anestesia geral não apresentaram menos dor pós-colecistectomia videolaparoscópica em comparação com os que receberam isoflurano, desflurano ou sevoflurano. .

Justificación y objetivo: el dolor es el principal motivo de queja y también la principal razón de una prolongada recuperación tras una colecistectomía laparoscópica. Nuestra hipótesis fue que los pacientes sometidos a colecistectomía laparoscópica tenían menos dolor 4 h después de la cirugía cuando recibían propofol para la anestesia en comparación con isoflurano, desflurano o sevoflurano. Métodos: en este estudio prospectivo y aleatorizado, 80 pacientes programados para colecistectomía laparoscópica fueron designados para recibir propofol, isoflurano, desflurano o sevoflurano para el mantenimiento de la anestesia. Nuestro primer resultado fue el dolor medido en escala analógica numérica 4 h después de la cirugía. También registramos el uso intraoperatorio de opiáceos y el consumo de analgésicos durante las primeras 24 h del postoperatorio. Resultados: no hubo diferencias estadísticamente significativas en las puntuaciones del dolor 4 h después de la cirugía (p = 0,72). Tampoco hubo diferencias estadísticamente significativas en las puntuaciones del dolor entre los grupos de tratamiento durante las 24 h del postoperatorio (p = 0,45). El uso intraoperatorio de fentanilo y morfina no varió significativamente entre los grupos (p = 0,21 y 0,24 respectivamente). No hubo una diferencia en el consumo total de morfina e hidrocodona/APAP durante las primeras 24 h (p = 0,61 y 0,53 respectivamente). Conclusiones: los pacientes que recibieron propofol para el mantenimiento de la anestesia general no tenían menos dolor poscolecistectomía videolaparoscópica en comparación con los que recibieron isoflurano, desflurano o sevoflurano. .

Low serum sodium level during cardiopulmonary bypass predicts increased risk of postoperative stroke after coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Rapid decreases in serum sodium levels are associated with altered mental status, seizures, and coma. During cardiac surgery, serum sodium levels decrease rapidly when cardiopulmonary bypass is initiated because cardiopulmonary bypass causes hemodilution. However, whether this decrease influences neurologic outcome after cardiac surgery remains unclear. We investigated whether the average serum sodium level during cardiopulmonary bypass is independently predictive of postoperative stroke or 30-day all-cause mortality in patients who undergo primary coronary artery bypass grafting. METHODS: In a single-institution, retrospective cohort of 2348 consecutive patients who underwent primary, isolated coronary artery bypass grafting, sequential multivariate logistic regression was performed to determine the threshold below which the average serum sodium level during cardiopulmonary bypass independently predicts postoperative stroke or early death. To further test the validity of this threshold and to control for selection bias, stepwise multivariate logistic regression was also performed on propensity score-matched patients (n = 924). RESULTS: An average serum sodium level less than 130 mEq/L during cardiopulmonary bypass was independently predictive of stroke, both in the entire study cohort (1.44% vs 2.92%; odds ratio, 2.09; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-4.1; P = .03) and in the propensity-matched patients (0.9% vs 3.0%; odds ratio, 4.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-13.0; P = .02). The average serum sodium level during cardiopulmonary bypass was not independently associated with early death, regardless of what threshold value was used. CONCLUSIONS: An average serum sodium level of less than 130 mEq/L during cardiopulmonary bypass is independently associated with an increased risk of postoperative stroke in patients who undergo primary coronary artery bypass grafting.

Complications of cerebrospinal fluid drainage after thoracic aortic surgery: a review of 504 patients over 5 years.

BACKGROUND: Cerebrospinal fluid drainage, a well-established means of preventing paraplegia after thoracic aortic aneurysm surgery, can result in serious, sometimes lethal complications. In a large group of patients who underwent surgical thoracic aortic aneurysm repair with cerebrospinal fluid drainage, we examined the incidences of and potential risk factors for these outcomes. METHODS: The records were reviewed of 504 patients who underwent surgical thoracic aortic aneurysm repair with cerebrospinal fluid drainage at the Texas Heart Institute at St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital between February 2005 and December 2009. All historical data, inpatient records, and billing data were searched for evidence of complications. RESULTS: Of the 504 patients, 14 (2.8%) had intracranial hemorrhage, of whom 10 (72%) had subdural hematoma. Postdural puncture headache developed in 49 patients (9.7%), of whom 17 (34.6%) required epidural blood patch placement for resolution. Multivariable analysis identified having a connective tissue disorder (odds ratio, 3.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.33-7.13) as an independent predictor of postdural puncture headache, but not age less than 40 years (odds ratio, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.94-0.99). CONCLUSIONS: Cerebrospinal fluid drainage, as performed by our method, seems to be associated with a modest rate of intracranial bleeding in patients who undergo surgical thoracic aortic aneurysm repair. In contrast, postdural puncture headache is not uncommon, particularly in patients with connective tissue disease. Clinicians caring for these patients should consider the likelihood of postdural puncture headache, and any such patient with postoperative headache should be assessed for epidural blood patch placement.

Left atrial dissection after left ventricular aneurysm repair.

Left atrial (LA) dissection is an uncommon entity that occurs most often after mitral valve surgery. We present a case of a 52-year-old man who developed an LA dissection after repair of a postinfarction left ventricular (LV) aneurysm. Transesophageal echocardiography was used to establish the diagnosis of an LA dissection that almost completely occluded the LA, limiting LV filling and causing hemodynamic instability.

Subclinical changes in serum creatinine and mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting.

BACKGROUND: Changes in postoperative serum creatinine levels have been used to define acute renal injury in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. It remains unclear, however, whether subclinical increases in serum creatinine that do not meet current Acute Kidney Injury Network or RIFLE (risk, injury, failure, loss, and end-stage kidney disease) criteria for acute renal injury are predictive of mortality after cardiac surgery. METHODS: Multivariate logistic regression was performed in a retrospective cohort of 3914 consecutive patients undergoing primary, isolated coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass to determine whether postoperative serum creatinine change independently predicts 30-day all-cause mortality in patients with normal renal function and with varying levels of preoperative renal insufficiency. To control further for selection bias, multivariate logistic regression was performed on a propensity-matched cohort (n = 2042) to determine whether subclinical increases in serum creatinine predict mortality. RESULTS: Negative change in serum creatinine was associated with reduced 30-day all-cause mortality. Even subclinical increases in serum creatinine were associated with increased mortality relative to patients with negative changes in serum creatinine (odds ratio, 3.93; 95% confidence interval, 1.68-9.22; P < .01). After propensity matching, subclinical increases in serum creatinine were still associated with increased mortality (odds ratio, 4.13; 95% confidence interval, 1.37-12.45; P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: Subclinical increases in serum creatinine that do not meet acute renal injury criteria are independently associated with 30-day all-cause mortality in patients with normal renal function or preoperative renal insufficiency undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.

Obesity is associated with increased morbidity after coronary artery bypass graft surgery in patients with renal insufficiency.

OBJECTIVE: Although obesity is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease, it is not clear whether obesity increases the risk of postoperative morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. Increasing evidence suggests that both obesity and renal insufficiency are associated with increased systemic inflammation, thrombogenicity, and endothelial dysfunction. Cardiac surgical patients with comorbid obesity and renal insufficiency might thus be at greater risk for systemic proinflammatory and thrombotic states, which in turn might increase the risk of adverse perioperative outcomes. We investigated the influence of obesity on adverse postoperative outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery in patients with and without renal insufficiency. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed of patients (n = 10,863) undergoing primary coronary artery bypass grafting surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass between January 1995 and June 2005. Patients with preoperative renal insufficiency (n = 1385) and patients with preoperative normal renal function (n = 9478) were further classified as obese (body mass index, > or =30 kg/m(2)) or nonobese (body mass index, 18.5-29.9 kg/m(2)). Multivariate, stepwise logistic regression was performed, controlling for demographic factors, medications, and perioperative risk factors to determine whether obesity is independently associated with an increased risk of adverse postoperative outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery in patients with or without renal insufficiency. RESULTS: Obese patients with preoperative renal insufficiency had higher rates of postoperative myocardial infarction (5.9% vs 3.4%) and low cardiac output syndrome (24.5% vs 18.6%) and increased hospital stay (14.9 +/- 13.7 vs 13.2 +/- 13.0 days) than nonobese patients with preoperative renal insufficiency (all outcomes, P < .05). Multivariate analysis revealed that obese patients with preoperative renal insufficiency were independently associated with an increased risk of postoperative myocardial infarction (odds ratio, 1.82; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-3.07; P < .05) and low cardiac output syndrome (odds ratio, 1.53; 95% confidence interval, 1.15-2.03; P < .01) and increased hospital stay (P < .05). In contrast, obese patients with normal preoperative renal function were independently associated only with an increased risk of postoperative sternal wound infection (odds ratio, 2.55; 95% confidence interval, 1.40-4.67; P < .01) and leg wound infection (odds ratio, 2.27; 95% confidence interval, 1.71-3.02; P < .01). CONCLUSION: Obesity is an independent risk factor for increased cardiovascular morbidity and prolonged hospital stay in patients with preoperative renal insufficiency undergoing primary coronary artery bypass grafting surgery.