Medical student perceptions of assessments of clinical reasoning in a general surgery clerkship.

BACKGROUND: Components factoring into general surgery clerkship grades vary by institution, and while evaluators attempt to remain unbiased when evaluating medical student performance, subjectivity and implicit bias remain an issue. Our institution recently implemented a case-based structured oral examination to provide the general surgery clerkship director objective insight into students' clinical reasoning skills. We hypothesized that medical students believe this exam, along with graded clinical documentation and the Observed Standardized Clinical Encounter (OSCE), are fair assessments and increase students' awareness of their clinical reasoning skills. METHODS: A survey was sent to third-year medical students in the classes of 2023 and 2024 at our institution who had completed their general surgery clerkship. Students rated five grading assessments (i.e., preceptor evaluations, the oral examination, clinical documentation, the OSCE, and the shelf exam) on fairness and the ability of the assessment to give them insight into their clinical reasoning on a five-point Likert scale 1-5 (with 1 = Strongly Agree, 5 = Strongly Disagree). RESULTS: One hundred and ten of 162 (67.9%) students responded to the survey. The shelf examination was the most highly regarded assessment tool followed by the oral examination. Seventy-three percent agreed or strongly agreed that the oral exam was a fair assessment, and 80% agreed or strongly agreed that it gave them insight into their clinical reasoning skills. Alternatively, only 41.8% of students agreed or strongly agreed that preceptor evaluations were fair assessments and 42.7% agreed or strongly agreed that it gave them insight into their clinical reasoning. CONCLUSIONS: Third-year medical students on a general surgery clerkship favor the shelf examination and a case-based oral examination over other assessment tools regarding fairness and perception of their clinical reasoning. This type of examination can provide general surgery clerkship directors with additional objective data to assess medical students more fairly and improve students' clinical reasoning.

Hypoxia-induced reprogrammed myoblasts enhance the formation of neuromuscular junctions: A pioneer study.

We previously reported that muscle cells could reprogram into progenitors after traumatic injuries. These injury-induced muscle stem cells (iMuSCs) have increased migration and differentiation capacities, including neuronal differentiation. Recent studies in our laboratory suggest that the hypoxia-induced by tissue injury plays an essential role in the reprogramming process of muscle cells. We hypothesize that muscle cells reprogrammed with hypoxia have increased neuronal differentiation potentials and the neuronal differentiation extends into the formation of neuromuscular junction (NMJ)-like structures. In this study, C2C12 myoblasts were cultured under hypoxic conditions and subsequently in neural differentiation media to generate neurospheres, and then with muscle differentiation media to induce NMJ-like structure formation. Hypoxia-induced muscle cells also produced more robust NMJs compared to controls after intramuscular cell transplantation. Our results suggest hypoxia plays a role in the reprogramming of muscle stem cells, which may have the potential to form neuromuscular junctions and ultimately contribute to functional muscle healing.