Brief Report: Second-line treatment outcomes in patients with advanced NSCLC previously treated with first-line immunotherapy regimens.

CLINICAL PRACTICE POINTS: In the United States of America, nearly all patients with advanced NSCLC, absent oncogenic drivers, receive some form of immunotherapy (IO) as part of initial treatment. Current national guidelines currently recommend against IO re-challenge if there is disease progression on IO in the first line, but re-treatment with IO is attractive given its favorable toxicity profile and descriptions of durable clinical benefit in a subset of patients treated beyond disease progression on initial IO (Gandara, J Thorac Oncol, 2018). Data in the non-clinical trial setting on the efficacy of IO in sequential lines of treatment after initial IO are lacking. In our large cohort study of patients with advanced NSCLC treated with immunotherapy regimens in the first-line setting, we find that outcomes after second-line treatment did not differ statistically by type of treatment used in the second line. While current prospective clinical trials are investigating several aspects of the utility of continuing immunotherapy and adding novel agents, our study offers data outside of a clinical trial. In addition, with the increased prevalence of adjuvant immunotherapy we urgently need to wrestle with whether to continue immunotherapy in the first-line metastatic setting if a patient experiences disease progression on adjuvant immunotherapy. While this analysis does not directly investigate that question, it does provide hypothesis-generating evidence for further evaluations.

Gene Expression in Meniscal Tears at the Time of Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy Predicts the Progression of Osteoarthritis Within 6 Years of Surgery.

BACKGROUND: While knees with meniscal tears are associated with a heightened risk of developing osteoarthritis (OA), it is difficult to predict which patients are at the greatest risk for OA. Gene signatures in menisci that are resected during arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM) may provide insight into the risk of OA progression. HYPOTHESIS: Meniscal gene signatures at the time of APM will predict radiographic OA progression. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: Meniscal fragments were collected from 38 patients without OA during clinically indicated APM of the medial meniscus. The expression of 28 candidate genes with known roles in cartilage homeostasis, OA, extracellular matrix degradation, and obesity was assessed by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. Weightbearing radiographs obtained before surgery and at final follow-up were graded by a musculoskeletal radiologist using the Kellgren-Lawrence classification of OA. The association of meniscal gene expression at baseline with the progression of radiographic OA was determined. RESULTS: Gene expression and baseline and follow-up radiographic data were available from 31 patients (81.6%) at a mean follow-up of 6.2 ± 1.3 years. Patients without OA progression had significantly higher expression of 7 genes: MMP9 (5.1-fold; P = .002), IL8 (2.9-fold; P = .016), CCL3 (3.7-fold; P = .032), CCL3L1 (4.5-fold; P = .008), CXCL6 (6.2-fold; P = .010), LEP (5.2-fold; P = .004), and RETN (46-fold; P = .008). CONCLUSION: Gene expression in the meniscus at the time of APM may be associated with the risk for progression of OA after surgery. Elevated expression of the aforementioned genes may reflect a chondroprotective response. Stratifying the risk for OA progression after APM could facilitate targeted interventions to delay or prevent the development of OA. Further studies in a larger cohort with an extended follow-up, and inclusion of additional genes, are warranted to better characterize this association.