Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 72
Filtrar
1.
Int J Surg ; 110(4): 1904-1912, 2024 Apr 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38241345

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision (RaTME) may be associated with reduced conversion to an open approach and a higher rate of complete total mesorectal excision (TME); however, studies on its advantages in intersphincteric resection (ISR) are inadequate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective multicenter cohort study enroled consecutive patients who underwent RaTME and laparoscopy-assisted total mesorectal excision (LaTME) at four medical centres between January 2020 and March 2023. Propensity score matching (PSM), inverse probability of treatment weight (IPTW), and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed. The primary outcome was the ISR rate. Secondary outcomes were coloanal anastomosis (CAA), conversion to open surgery, conversion to transanal TME, abdominoperineal resection, postoperative morbidity and mortality within 30 days, and pathological outcomes. RESULTS: Among the 1571 patients, 1211 and 450 underwent LaTME and RaTME, respectively, with corresponding ISR incidences of 5.3% and 8.4% ( P =0.024). After PSM and IPTW, RaTME remained associated with higher ISR rates (4.5% versus 9.4%, P =0.022 after PSM; 4.9% versus 9.2, P =0.005 after IPTW). This association remained in multivariate analysis after adjusting for other confounding factors. RaTME was further associated with a higher CAA rate, longer operating time, and higher hospitalization expenses. CONCLUSIONS: RaTME may facilitate ISR in middle and low rectal cancers, showing an independent association with a higher ISR incidence, with pathological outcomes and complications comparable to those of LaTME. However, it may also require a longer operating time and incur higher hospitalization expenses.


Assuntos
Laparoscopia , Pontuação de Propensão , Neoplasias Retais , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgia , Neoplasias Retais/patologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/economia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Laparoscopia/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Idoso , Canal Anal/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Reto/cirurgia , Adulto
2.
Br J Surg ; 111(1)2024 Jan 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37943801

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Right hemicolectomy is the standard treatment for right-sided colon cancer. There is variation in the technical aspects of performing right hemicolectomy as well as in short-term outcomes. It is therefore necessary to explore best clinical practice following right hemicolectomy in expert centres. METHODS: This snapshot study of right hemicolectomy for colon cancer in China was a prospective, multicentre cohort study in which 52 tertiary hospitals participated. Eligible patients with stage I-III right-sided colon cancer who underwent elective right hemicolectomy were consecutively enrolled in all centres over 10 months. The primary endpoint was the incidence of postoperative 30-day anastomotic leak. RESULTS: Of the 1854 patients, 89.9 per cent underwent laparoscopic surgery and 52.3 per cent underwent D3 lymph node dissection. The overall 30-day morbidity and mortality were 11.7 and 0.2 per cent, respectively. The 30-day anastomotic leak rate was 1.4 per cent. In multivariate analysis, ASA grade > II (P < 0.001), intraoperative blood loss > 50 ml (P = 0.044) and D3 lymph node dissection (P = 0.008) were identified as independent risk factors for postoperative morbidity. Extracorporeal side-to-side anastomosis (P = 0.031), intraoperative blood loss > 50 ml (P = 0.004) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (P = 0.004) were identified as independent risk factors for anastomotic leak. CONCLUSION: In high-volume expert centres in China, laparoscopic resection with D3 lymph node dissection was performed in most patients with right-sided colon cancer, and overall postoperative morbidity and mortality was low. Further studies are needed to explore the optimal technique for right hemicolectomy in order to improve outcomes further.


Assuntos
Neoplasias do Colo , Laparoscopia , Humanos , Fístula Anastomótica/epidemiologia , Fístula Anastomótica/etiologia , Fístula Anastomótica/cirurgia , Estudos de Coortes , Estudos Prospectivos , Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica , Neoplasias do Colo/patologia , Colectomia/efeitos adversos , Colectomia/métodos , Morbidade , Fatores de Risco , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos
3.
Metabolism ; 152: 155743, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38007149

RESUMO

The gut has been increasingly recognized in recent years as a pivotal organ in the maintenance of glucose homeostasis. Specifically, the profound and enduring improvement in glucose metabolism achieved through metabolic surgery to modify the anatomy of the gut has prompted scholars to acknowledge that the most effective strategy for treating type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) involves the gut. The mechanisms underlying the regulation of glucose metabolism by the gut encompass gut hormones, bile acids, intestinal gluconeogenesis, gut microbiota, and signaling interactions between the gut and other organs (liver, brain, adipose, etc.). Recent studies have also revealed a novel phenomenon of glucose lowering through the gut: metabolic surgery and metformin promote the excretion of glucose from the circulation into the intestinal lumen by enterocytes. However, there is still limited understanding regarding the underlying mechanisms of intestinal glucose excretion and its contribution to glycemic control. This article reviews current research on intestinal glucose excretion while focusing on its role in T2DM management as well as potential mechanisms.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Derivação Gástrica , Humanos , Glucose/metabolismo , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/metabolismo , Controle Glicêmico , Intestinos
4.
Heliyon ; 9(10): e20187, 2023 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37780770

RESUMO

Introduction: It has been a decade since the first patient with colon cancer underwent colectomy by hybrid transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (hvNOTES). However, the efficacy and safety of this procedure is not well established. Methods: This study is an open-label, multicenter, single-arm, phase 2 trial undertaken at six centers in China. Female patients aged over 18 years and below 80 years old with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1, with pathologically proven, resectable, cT1-3N0-2M0 disease who have previously untreated colon cancer are eligible for inclusion. The primary endpoint is a composite of major intraoperative and postoperative complications (greater than grade III, the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [CTCAE], version 5.0). Secondary endpoints include conversion to laparoscopic or open surgery, postoperative concentration of C-Reactive Protein and procalcitonine, complete pathological assessment of complete mesocolic excision specimens, postoperative pain, amount of narcotic pain medication administered, time to first flatus after surgery, number of harvested lymph nodes, R0 resection rate, length of hospital stay, sexual function assessment, quality of recovery, satisfaction with surgical scars, quality of life, postoperative recurrence patterns, relapse-free survival, and overall survival. Ethics and dissemination: The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, China, number: WDRY2022-K053. All patients will receive written information of the trial and provide informed consent before enrollment. The results of this trial will be disseminated in academic conferences and peer-reviewed medical journals.Trial registration number NCT04048421.

5.
Obes Surg ; 33(10): 3051-3061, 2023 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37561268

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery (BS) is known to improve the components of metabolic syndrome (MS) in patients with obesity. However, few studies have evaluated the effect of BS on patients with MS at low BMI levels. The study aims to assess the effect of BS on MS in patients with low BMI by comparing BS with medical therapy (MT). METHODS: A total of 271 patients with MS who underwent BS and MT at a single institution were reviewed in this retrospective cohort study. A 1:1 propensity score matching was performed for the BS and MT groups with BMI<35 kg/m2. We analyzed the 5 years effect of BS versus MT on the remission of MS, its components, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk, and medication used. RESULTS: Patients in the MT group showed a decrease in the prevalence of MS to 62% at the 1st year and 10% at the 5th year. In the BS group, MS prevalence in patients with BMI<35 kg/m2 decreased to 30% and 9% at the 1st and 5th year, whereas in patients with BMI≥35 kg/m2 was 26% and 7%, respectively. The 10-year ASCVD risk and the lifetime ASCVD were significantly decreased 5 years after BS in patients with BMI<35 kg/m2. The number and daily drug dose of hypoglycemic drugs, antihypertensive medications, and lipid-lowering drugs were reduced from baseline in both BS and MT groups. CONCLUSION: Bariatric surgery significantly improves MS remission rates and long-term cardiovascular risk in Chinese patients with metabolic syndrome and a BMI <35 kg/m2.


Assuntos
Aterosclerose , Cirurgia Bariátrica , Síndrome Metabólica , Obesidade Mórbida , Humanos , Aterosclerose/epidemiologia , Índice de Massa Corporal , População do Leste Asiático , Síndrome Metabólica/epidemiologia , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Pontuação de Propensão , Estudos Retrospectivos , Redução de Peso
7.
Front Oncol ; 13: 1187476, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37333806

RESUMO

Objective: During the past decade, the concept of complete mesocolic excision (CME) has been developed in an attempt to minimize recurrence for right-sided colon cancer. This study aims to compare outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with CME for right-sided colon cancer. Methods: We performed a retrospective multicenter propensity score matching study. From July 2016 to July 2021, 382 consecutive patients from different Chinese surgical departments were available for inclusion out of an initial cohort of 412, who underwent robotic or laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with CME. Data of all patients were retrospectively collected and reviewed. Of these, 149 cases were performed by a robotic approach, while the other 233 cases were done by laparoscopy. Propensity score matching was applied at a ratio of 1:1 to compare perioperative, pathologic, and oncologic outcomes between the robotic and the laparoscopic groups (n = 142). Results: Before propensity score matching, there were no statistical differences regarding the sex, history of abdominal surgery, body mass index (BMI), American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system, tumor location, and center between groups (p > 0.05), while a significant difference was observed regarding age (p = 0.029). After matching, two comparable groups of 142 cases were obtained with equivalent patient characteristics (p > 0.05). Blood loss, time to oral intake, return of bowel function, length of stay, and complications were not different between groups (p > 0.05). The robotic group showed a significantly lower conversion rate (0% vs. 4.2%, p = 0.03), but a longer operative time (200.9 min vs. 182.3 min, p < 0.001) and a higher total hospital cost (85,016 RMB vs. 58,266 RMB, p < 0.001) compared with the laparoscopic group. The number of harvested lymph nodes was comparable (20.4 vs. 20.5, p = 0.861). Incidence of complications, mortality, and pathologic outcomes were similar between groups (p > 0.05). The 2-year disease-free survival rates were 84.9% and 87.1% (p = 0.679), and the overall survival rates between groups were 83.8% and 80.7% (p = 0.943). Conclusion: Despite the limitations of a retrospective analysis, the outcomes of robotic right hemicolectomy with CME were comparable to the laparoscopic procedures with fewer conversions to open surgery. More clinical advantages of the robotic surgery system need to be further confirmed by well-conducted randomized clinical trials with large cohorts of patients.

8.
Tech Coloproctol ; 27(7): 569-578, 2023 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37014449

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Robotic surgery for right-sided colon and rectal cancer has rapidly increased; however, there is limited evidence in the literature of advantages of robotic left colectomy (RLC) for left-sided colon cancer. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of RLC versus laparoscopic left colectomy (LLC) with complete mesocolic excision (CME) for left-sided colon cancer. METHODS: Patients who had RLC or LLC with CME for left-sided colon cancer at five hospitals in China between January 2014 and April 2022 were included. A one-to-one propensity score matched analysis was performed to decrease confounding. The primary outcome was postoperative complications occurring within 30 days of surgery. Secondary outcomes were disease-free survival, overall survival and the number of harvested lymph nodes. RESULTS: A total of 292 patients (187 male; median age 61.0 [20.0-85.0] years) were eligible for this study, and propensity score matching yielded 102 patients in each group. The clinicopathological characteristics were well-matched between groups. The two groups did not differ in estimated blood loss, conversion to open rate, time to first flatus, reoperation rate, or postoperative length of hospital stay (p > 0.05). RLC was associated with a longer operation time (192.9 ± 53.2 vs. 168.9 ± 52.8 min, p = 0.001). The incidence of postoperative complications did not differ between the RLC and LLC groups (18.6% vs. 17.6%, p = 0.856). The total number of lymph nodes harvested in the RLC group was higher than that in the LLC group (15.7 ± 8.3 vs. 12.1 ± 5.9, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in 3-year and 5-year overall survival or 3-year and 5-year disease-free survival. CONCLUSION: Compared to laparoscopic surgery, RLC with CME for left-sided colon cancer was found to be associated with higher numbers of lymph nodes harvested and similar postoperative complications and long-term survival outcomes.


Assuntos
Neoplasias do Colo , Laparoscopia , Mesocolo , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resultado do Tratamento , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/efeitos adversos , Pontuação de Propensão , Neoplasias do Colo/patologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Mesocolo/cirurgia , Mesocolo/patologia , Colectomia/efeitos adversos , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Excisão de Linfonodo
9.
BMC Surg ; 23(1): 38, 2023 Feb 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36803511

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Patients with normal preoperative serum albumin still suffer from a significant reduction in serum albumin after major abdominal surgery. The current study aims to explore the predictive value of ∆ALB for AL in patients with normal serum albumin and examine whether there is a gender difference in the prediction of AL. METHODS: Medical reports of consecutive patients undergoing elective sphincter-preserving rectal surgery between July 2010 and June 2016 were reviewed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was adopted to examine the predictive ability of ∆ALB and determine the cut-off value according to the Youden index. The logistic regression model was performed identify independent risk factors for AL. RESULTS: Out of the 499 eligible patients, 40 experienced AL. Results of the ROC analyses showed that ΔALB displayed a significant predictive value for females, and the AUC value was 0.675 (P = 0.024), with a sensitivity of 93%. In male patients, the AUC was 0.575 (P = 0.22), but did not reach a significant level. In the multivariate analysis, ∆ALB ≥ 27.2% and low tumor location prove to be independent risk factors for AL in female patients. CONCLUSIONS: The current study suggested that there may be a gender difference in the prediction of AL and ∆ ALB can serve as a potential predictive biomarker for AL in females. A cut-off value of the relative decline in serum albumin can help predict AL in female patients as early as postoperative day 2. Although our study needs further external validation, our findings may provide an earlier, easier and cheaper biomarker for the detection of AL.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório , Neoplasias Retais , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Fístula Anastomótica/diagnóstico , Fístula Anastomótica/etiologia , Albumina Sérica/análise , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório/efeitos adversos , Biomarcadores , Curva ROC , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgia , Neoplasias Retais/complicações , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco
12.
Ann Surg ; 277(1): 1-6, 2023 01 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35815886

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine the morbidity, mortality, and pathologic outcomes of transanal total mesorectal resection (taTME) versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (laTME) among patients with rectal cancer with clinical stage I to III rectal cancer below the peritoneal reflection. BACKGROUND: Studies with sufficient numbers of patients allowing clinical acceptance of taTME for rectal cancer are lacking. Thus, we launched a randomized clinical trial to compare the safety and efficacy of taTME versus laTME. METHODS: A randomized, open-label, phase 3, noninferiority trial was performed at 16 different hospitals in 10 Chinese provinces. The primary endpoints were 3-year disease-free survival and 5-year overall survival. The morbidity and mortality within 30 days after surgery, and pathologic outcomes were compared based on a modified intention-to-treat principle; this analysis was preplanned. RESULTS: Between April 13, 2016, and June 1, 2021, 1115 patients were randomized 1:1 to receive taTME or laTME. After exclusion of 26 cases, modified intention-to-treat set of taTME versus laTME groups included 544 versus 545 patients. There were no significant differences between taTME and laTME groups in intraoperative complications [26 (4.8%) vs 33 (6.1%); difference, -1.3%; 95% confidence interval (CI), -4.2% to 1.7%; P =0.42], postoperative morbidity [73 (13.4%) vs 66 (12.1%); difference, 1.2%; 95% CI, -2.8% to 5.2%; P =0.53), or mortality [1 (0.2%) vs 1 (0.2%)]. Successful resection occurred in 538 (98.9%) versus 538 (98.7%) patients in taTME versus laTME groups (difference, 0.2%; 95% CI, -1.9% to 2.2%; P >0.99). CONCLUSIONS: Experienced surgeons can safely perform taTME in selected patients with rectal cancer.


Assuntos
Laparoscopia , Neoplasias Retais , Cirurgia Endoscópica Transanal , Humanos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Cirurgia Endoscópica Transanal/efeitos adversos , Duração da Cirurgia , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgia , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Morbidade , Reto/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento
13.
Langenbecks Arch Surg ; 407(7): 2959-2967, 2022 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35802267

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Currently, the relationship between temporary stoma reversal and the severity of postoperative complications (POCs) after the index surgery based on the Clavien-Dindo classification has not yet been explored. METHODS: From July 2010 to June 2016, 380 patients undergoing sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer with a temporary stoma in our hospital were included. Temporary stoma nonclosure rates, disease-free survival rates, and overall survival rates were estimated utilizing the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Of all the 380 patients, primary stomas were created in 335 patients and secondary stomas in 45 patients. After the index surgery, 36.6% (139/380) of patients developed at least one postoperative complication. In the first analysis, which included all the patients, 24.7% of temporary stomas remained unclosed. In the second analysis for 335 patients with a primary stoma, 23.3% were left with unclosed stomas. After the COX regression analysis, both major POCs and minor POCs were found to be independent risk factors for the permanent stoma, and there was an increasing tendency toward the risk of permanent stoma with the increase in POC severity. CONCLUSION: POCs are independent predictors of permanent stoma after rectal cancer surgery. Even minor POCs may affect the outcome, while there is a clear direct relationship between POC severity and permanent stoma rates.


Assuntos
Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Neoplasias Retais , Estomas Cirúrgicos , Humanos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgia , Fatores de Risco , Estomas Cirúrgicos/efeitos adversos
14.
Int J Surg ; 104: 106718, 2022 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35724803

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Recent interest in laparoscopic right colectomy with D3 lymphadenectomy for right colon cancer, has raised renewed attention to the anatomic variations of the gastrocolic trunk of Henlé (GTH). Understanding the vascular structure of the GTH region for individual patients should improve surgical outcomes. The goal of this nationwide multicenter study (Anatomical Classification of Henlé's Trunk in Laparoscopic Right Hemi-colectomy (HeLaRC) trial) was to study the anatomic patterns of the GTH region, to clarify the implications of GTH in laparoscopic right colectomy with D3 lymphadenectomy (D3-RC) and analyze their clinical significance. METHODS: We enrolled 583 patients from 26 centers across China who underwent D3-RC. The number of tributaries, length and types of GTH constitutions and their influence on intra-operative data were investigated. A nomogram score (based on the length of GTH, body mass index (BMI), tumor location, T stage and type of GTH (type I vs. non-type I) was established to assess the potential hazard of bleeding. RESULTS: The GTH was found in 567 patients (97.3%). The distribution of GTH types was 0 (14.1%, n = 80), I (53.3%, n = 302), II (27.0%, n = 153), III (5.6%, n = 32). Of note, the type I GTH, T1 stage and tumor location at ileocecal or ascending colon were correlated with shorter exposure time of the GTH region (P < 0.0001). Short length of GTH (P = 0.002) and tumor location (transverse colon vs. non transverse colon) (P = 0.003) were correlated with the amount of GTH bleeding during the surgery. Nomogram discrimination was good (C-index: 0.72 (95% CI: 0.64, 0.80)). The dissection plane was better in patients with type I GTH than with other types (P = 0.023). CONCLUSION: GTH pattern variations may affect surgical outcomes in patients undergoing D3-RC. Better recognition of GTH anatomy might lead to a safer operation with better oncologic quality.


Assuntos
Colo Transverso , Neoplasias do Colo , Laparoscopia , Colectomia , Humanos , Excisão de Linfonodo
15.
BMC Surg ; 22(1): 164, 2022 May 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35538516

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Preserving the left colic artery (LCA) during anterior resection for rectal cancer is controversial, and robust evidence of the outcomes of LCA preservation plus apical lymph node dissection is lacking. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of LCA preservation plus apical lymph node dissection surgery on anastomotic leakage and number of harvested lymph nodes. METHODS: Patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic anterior resection for rectal cancer between September 2017 and May 2020 were retrospectively assessed. The patients were categorized into two groups: preservation of LCA and nonpreservation of LCA. A one-to-one propensity score-matched analysis was performed to decrease confounding. The primary outcome was anastomotic leakage within 30 days after surgery. The secondary outcomes were number of harvested lymph nodes, 3-year overall survival, and 3-year disease-free survival. RESULTS: A total of 216 patients were eligible for this study, and propensity score matching yielded 60 patients in each group. Anastomotic leakage in the LCA preservation group was significantly lower than that in the LCA nonpreservation group (3.3% vs. 13.3%, P = 0.048). No significant differences were observed in blood loss, operation time, intraoperative complications, splenic flexure mobilization, total number of harvested lymph nodes, number of positive lymph nodes, time to first flatus, or postoperative hospital stay. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed a 3-year disease-free survival of 85.7% vs. 80.5% (P = 0.738) and overall survival of 92.4% vs. 93.7% (P = 0.323) for the preservation and nonpreservation groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: LCA preservation plus apical lymph node dissection surgery for rectal cancer may help reduce the incidence of anastomotic leakage without impairing the number of harvested lymph nodes. Preliminary results suggest that 3-year disease-free survival and overall survival rates may not differ between the two types of surgery, but studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm these conclusions. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03776370. Registered 14 December 2018-Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov .


Assuntos
Laparoscopia , Neoplasias Retais , Fístula Anastomótica/etiologia , Humanos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Excisão de Linfonodo/métodos , Linfonodos/patologia , Artéria Mesentérica Inferior/cirurgia , Pontuação de Propensão , Neoplasias Retais/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos
18.
Surg Obes Relat Dis ; 18(4): 475-483, 2022 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34969592

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Reducing the risk of death due to cardiovascular disease (CVD) is an important direction for diabetes prevention and treatment. The Chinese population with type 2 diabetes (T2D) has a high risk of developing CVD at relatively low body mass index (BMI) levels. Currently, no studies have evaluated the effect of bariatric surgery versus medical therapy on long-term CVD risk in patients with T2D and low BMI. OBJECTIVES: To compare bariatric surgery versus medical therapy for long-term CVD risk in Chinese patients with T2D and low BMI by using the China Prediction for ASCVD Risk equations and the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study risk engine. SETTING: University hospital, China. METHODS: Medical records of patients with T2D with a BMI <35 kg/m2 undergoing bariatric surgery or medical therapy from May 2010 to December 2018 were reviewed. A 1:1 propensity score matching was performed by using 7 preoperative characteristics. Variables for calculating CVD risk scores over the 5-year follow-up were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 684 patients with T2D underwent bariatric surgery (n = 75) or medical therapy (n = 609), and 52 pairs of matched subjects were selected from both groups after propensity score matching. The 10-year and lifetime atherosclerotic CVD risk by using the China Prediction for ASCVD Risk equation at 5 years follow-up period in the bariatric surgery group improved significantly compared with the medical therapy group. In the fifth year of follow-up, the 10-year risk of coronary heart disease, fatal coronary heart disease, stroke, and fatal stroke by using the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study risk engine were much lower in the bariatric surgery group than in the medical therapy group (10.37 ± 5.64% versus 27.25 ± 7.28%, P = .004; 6.3 ± 4.5% versus 22.3 ± 7.35%, P = .002; 4.97 ± 3.73% versus 15.05 ± 3.63%, P = .001; .59 ± .45% versus 1.52 ± .14%, P < .001. respectively). The use of glucose-lowering medications, including insulin, was reduced from baseline in both groups, and patients in the bariatric surgery group required significantly fewer of these medications than those in the medical therapy group. CONCLUSION: Bariatric surgery in patients with T2D and low BMI conferred a lower calculated risk of CVD compared with medical therapy over 5 years of follow-up.


Assuntos
Cirurgia Bariátrica , Doenças Cardiovasculares , Doença das Coronárias , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Índice de Massa Corporal , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/etiologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco de Doenças Cardíacas , Humanos , Pontuação de Propensão , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Redução de Peso
19.
JAMA Surg ; 156(12): 1151-1158, 2021 12 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34613330

RESUMO

Importance: Preventing anastomotic leakage (AL) is crucial for colorectal surgery. Some studies have suggested a positive role of transanal drainage tubes (TDTs) in AL prevention after low anterior resection, but this finding is controversial. Objective: To assess the effect of TDTs in AL prevention after laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter randomized clinical trial with parallel groups (TDT vs non-TDT) was performed from February 26, 2016, to September 30, 2020. Participants included patients from 7 different hospitals in China who were undergoing laparoscopic low anterior resection with the double-stapling technique for mid-low rectal cancer; 576 patients were initially enrolled in this study, and 16 were later excluded. Ultimately, 560 patients were randomly divided between the TDT and non-TDT groups. Interventions: A silicone tube was inserted through the anus, and the tip of the tube was placed approximately 5 cm above the anastomosis under laparoscopy at the conclusion of surgery. The tube was fixed with a skin suture and connected to a drainage bag. The TDT was scheduled for removal 3 to 7 days after surgery. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was the postoperative AL rate within 30 days. Results: In total, 576 patients were initially enrolled in this study; 16 of these patients were excluded. Ultimately, 560 patients were randomly divided between the TDT group (n = 280; median age, 61.5 years [IQR, 54.0-68.8 years]; 177 men [63.2%]) and the non-TDT group (n = 280; median age, 62.0 years [IQR, 52.0-69.0 years]; 169 men [60.4%]). Intention-to-treat analysis showed no significant difference between the TDT and non-TDT groups in AL rates (18 [6.4%] vs 19 [6.8%]; relative risk, 0.947; 95% CI, 0.508-1.766; P = .87) or AL grades (grade B, 14 [5.0%] and grade C, 4 [1.4%] vs grade B, 11 [3.9%] and grade C, 8 [2.9%]; P = .43). In the stratified analysis based on diverting stomas, there was no significant difference in the AL rate between the groups, regardless of whether a diverting stoma was present (without stoma, 12 [5.8%] vs 15 [7.9%], P = .41; and with stoma, 6 [8.3%] vs 4 [4.5%], P = .50). Anal pain was the most common complaint from patients in the TDT group (130 of 280, 46.4%). Accidental early TDT removal occurred in 20 patients (7.1%), and no bleeding or iatrogenic colonic perforations were detected. Conclusions and Relevance: The results from this randomized clinical trial indicated that TDTs may not confer any benefit for AL prevention in patients who undergo laparoscopic low anterior resection for mid-low rectal cancer without preoperative radiotherapy. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02686567.


Assuntos
Fístula Anastomótica/prevenção & controle , Drenagem/instrumentação , Laparoscopia , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgia , Idoso , China , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
20.
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne ; 16(1): 129-138, 2021 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33786126

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Although laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is still widely accepted as a valid procedure in the treatment of obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), there continues to be a significant controversy about how long the Roux and biliopancreatic limb should be bypassed for optimum results. AIM: To assess the effect of a longer biliopancreatic limb (BPL) length on glycemic control after RYGB in T2DM patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eighty-four patients with uncontrolled T2DM who underwent RYGB between May 2010 and April 2017 were collected from the prospectively designed database. Forty patients (S-BPL group) received BPL lengths ≤ 50 cm, including 30 cm (n = 1), 40 cm (n = 1), and 50 cm (n = 38). Forty-four patients (L-BPL group) received 100 cm BPL. Anthropometry, serum glucose and lipid metabolic parameters were measured at baseline and 1, 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months after surgery. RESULTS: Comparing the two groups, there were no significant differences in anthropometric and biochemical measures, except the weight and body mass index, which were higher in the S-BPL group (85.91 ±20.32 vs. 76.25 ±16.99, p = 0.038; 31.87 ±6.61 vs. 28.7 ±4.29, p = 0.005) compared to the L-BPL group. The body weight, glucose and lipid metabolic parameters decreased over time and then remained essentially stable from the first year in both groups. Two years after surgery, the remission (HbA1c% ≤ 6%) of T2DM was 31.2% in the S-BPL group and 37.5% in the L-BPL group (p = 0.685). CONCLUSIONS: With consistent total small bowel bypass (AL + BPL) lengths, lengthening of the BPL from 30 to 100 cm did not affect the post-RYGB glycemic control and weight loss.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA