Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Clin Genitourin Cancer ; 21(3): e166-e174, 2023 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36610891

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The long-term clinical outcomes of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) and a complete response (CR) to the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) sunitinib are poorly known. The characteristics of these patients could reveal previously undetected associations with clinical variables. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This observational, retrospective study (ATILA) used data from a registry of patients with mRCC who had received first-line sunitinib and had achieved CR from 2007 to 2018 in Spain. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients with CR were included; 48 patients (77.4%) received sunitinib in monotherapy and 14 (22.6%) combined with or followed by local treatment. Median age was 58.5 years (range, 32-81). Most patients (79.0%) had clear cell histology and had undergone previous nephrectomy (90.3%). The majority (70.2%) had an intermediate IMDC prognosis, 23% favorable and 7.0% poor. The median time on treatment with sunitinib was 28.2 months (IQR, 16.7-41.0) and the median time to CR was 10.9 months (IQR, 7.2-19.3). After a median follow-up of 8 years (range, 3-13 years), the median PFS was not reached. The overall median duration of complete response was 64.1 months (IQR, 32.2-99.4). The tolerance and safety profile of sunitinib was consistent with previous reports. CONCLUSION: Durable CR to sunitinib was observed in patients regardless the prognosis group, metastasis site or histology type, with 75% of patients remaining in CR after 10 years. CLINICALTRIALS: gov: NCT03916458.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos , Carcinoma de Células Renais , Neoplasias Renais , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sunitinibe/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma de Células Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Renais/secundário , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Indóis/uso terapêutico , Pirróis/uso terapêutico
2.
Anticancer Res ; 35(12): 6941-50, 2015 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26637920

RESUMO

AIM: To evaluate factors associated with the selection of first-line bevacizumab plus chemotherapy and clinical response in HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in clinical practice in Spain. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All consecutive adult female patients with HER2-negative MBC who had received first-line bevacizumab plus chemotherapy for at least 3 months were enrolled in the present study. RESULTS: A total of 292 evaluable patients were included; 25% had triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and 75% had hormone receptor-positive breast cancer (HRPBC). Nearly 40% of patients had ≥3 metastatic sites, mainly located in the bone (48%) and liver (40%). Bevacizumab was mostly combined with paclitaxel (67.1%). ER-positive tumors were only identified as an independent factor associated with the choice of treatment (odds ratio (OR): 0.538; p=0.02). The overall response rate (ORR) was 63.7% (TNBC: 57.5%; HRPBC: 65.9%). Patients aged 36-50 years (OR: 3.03; p=0.028) and those with metastases at sites other than the bone (OR: 0.38; p=0.001) and ≥3 metastatic sites (OR: 1.41; p=0.018) were more likely to achieve objective responses. CONCLUSION: First-line bevacizumab plus chemotherapy, mainly paclitaxel, is an effective and well-tolerated treatment option for HER2-negative MBC, particularly in more aggressive disease.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Bevacizumab/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Receptor ErbB-2/metabolismo , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Metástase Neoplásica , Paclitaxel/administração & dosagem , Qualidade de Vida , Neoplasias de Mama Triplo Negativas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias de Mama Triplo Negativas/patologia
3.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 14(3): 183-9, 2012 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22374421

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Lung cancer chemotherapy decisions in patients ≥ 70 years old are complex because of toxicity, comorbidity and the limited data on patient preferences. We examined the relationships between preferences and chemotherapy use in this group of patients. METHODS AND PATIENTS: We used a questionnaire describing four hypothetical lung cancer treatment options. Eighty-three elderly (≥ 70 years old) lung cancer patients were informed about their diagnosis and therapeutic choices and then asked to choose one of the four options. Patients had previously been included in a prospective study to explore geriatric evaluation in an oncology unit and all had given written informed consent. RESULTS: Older patients (n=83) diagnosed with lung cancer (non-small- and small-cell lung cancer) from January 2006 to February 2008 were recruited from a single centre. The mean patient age was 77 years (range: 70-91). Eighty-one patients (97.6%) were men. Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was the diagnosis in 63 patients (76%). Most patients selected active treatment (38.6% most survival benefit, 18% less survival benefit) and 31.3% selected no active treatment. Elderly lung cancer patients were significantly more likely to accept aggressive treatments despite high reported toxicities. Although most of the patients were symptomatic at diagnosis, the "symptom relief" option was chosen less frequently than the options that could prolong survival. Factors significantly related to patients' attitude toward chemotherapy were age (p<0.001), frailty (p=0.0039), depression and poor performance status (PS). CONCLUSION: Elderly lung cancer patients want to be involved in the decision-making process. Survival was the main treatment objective for more than half of the patients in this study. We have not found other published studies about elderly lung cancer patients' decisions about chemotherapy.


Assuntos
Idoso , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/tratamento farmacológico , Tomada de Decisões , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Preferência do Paciente , Relações Médico-Paciente , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/psicologia , Comportamento de Escolha/fisiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/psicologia , Masculino , Cuidados Paliativos/psicologia , Cuidados Paliativos/estatística & dados numéricos , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Inquéritos e Questionários
4.
Lung Cancer ; 72(1): 108-13, 2011 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20727613

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Mean age of patients with lung cancer rises as a result of increasing life expectancy. So, the proportion of patients with serious comorbidity also increases [1,2]. Lung cancer treatment is characterized by a narrow therapeutic index. When life expectancy is short and therapeutic benefit is limited, it is of paramount importance to know the specific cause of death. Comorbidity is understood as a competing cause of death, and is the main exclusion criterion for lung cancer clinical trials. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of comorbidity in elderly lung cancer patients seen in an outpatient oncology department and to determine its correlation with survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2006 and February 2008, 83 untreated lung cancer patients over the age of 70 years were enrolled in the study. Comorbidity was evaluated according to the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) [3] and the simplified comorbidity score (SCS) [4]. RESULTS: 83 patients (97.6% men, mean age 77 years) were studied. Comorbidities: tobacco consumption (94.6%), cardiovascular diseases (65%), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (59%). Mean CCI was 3 (range 0-9). Mean SCS was 9 (range 4-19), and 47% of patients had an SCS>9. Comorbidity was fairly well correlated with age, ADL, IADL, and stage. Neither the CCI nor the SCS was related to survival (p: 0.47 and p: 0.24, log rank, respectively). Median survival was 326 days (95% CI, 259-393 days; or 10.8 months, 95% CI 8.6-13.1 months). Main cause of death was lung cancer disease progression (69.5%, 57 patients), with 20 patients (25%) dying of other non-neoplastic causes. Stage was significantly associated with survival (log rank: p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Although there was a high prevalence of comorbidity in our population, comorbidity was not related to survival. Comorbidity is one of the main reasons for undertreatment of elderly lung cancer patients, but this study indicates that this undertreatment may not be warranted given that those comorbidities may not cause a patient's death. Our data generated more of a hypothesis than a conclusion. Comorbidity should be an impetus for treatment design instead of an exclusion criterion for oncologic treatment.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Pulmonares , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Causas de Morte , Comorbidade , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidade , Masculino , Prevalência , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Análise de Sobrevida
5.
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol ; 73(3): 236-45, 2010 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19748793

RESUMO

UNLABELLED: Advancing age is a major risk factor for breast cancer. Long-term follow-up is recommended after diagnosis and treatment of early breast cancer. With older age, the risk of comorbid conditions and functional impairment increases. A useful tool in the management and follow-up of these elderly patients could be a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA). PURPOSE: A descriptive, transversal study was carried out of the prevalence of other comorbidities and of the functional impairment in elderly patients on follow-up after curative treatment of early breast cancer. PATIENTS: Women aged> or =70 at diagnosis; early breast cancer treated surgically. No disease recurrence allowed. METHODS: CGA was conducted in an oncology unit using screening instruments (activities of daily living [ADL]; instrumental activities of daily living [IADL]; body mass index [BMI]; geriatric depression scale [GDS]). Cognitive status was reported by the patient. Comorbidity was classified using the Charlson score. RESULTS: From January 2005 to June 2006 91 patients were seen. Mean age at surgery: 76 (70-92). Mean age at CGA: 80 (71-95). Aged population (almost 25% were more than 84 at the time of CGA). Median follow-up: 5 years (range 1-12). Good performance status (PS) in most (only 9% PS 2). Eighty-three percent were fully independent for ADL and 71% for IADL. IADL most affected was the ability to drive/use public transport. Twenty-eight percent had geriatric syndromes and 23% were classified as "frail". Increased age was associated with worsening PS (p=0.0001) and worsening function (ADL p<0.0001 and IADL p<0.0001). The study is remarkable for the high comorbidity index found in the elderly survivors. Median Charlson score was 2 (1-6). More than 75% of the series had a score >/=4. Cardiovascular disease (hypertension) was the most prevalent comorbid condition. As an effect of this, the majority of patients were polymedicated (75% took more than six drugs). Comorbidity was independent of functionality and age. CONCLUSIONS: Older patients with early breast cancer on follow-up have a high prevalence of comorbidity. In our series, function and independence were maintained. A selection bias cannot be excluded, as the fitter patients are those who usually continue with the follow-up, while those frail patients who do not continue because of their functional impairment are usually lost.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , Avaliação Geriátrica , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Comorbidade , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA