Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Status and Correlates Among Mid-Adult Women: Connecticut, USA, 2016-2019.

Background: In 2019, the CDC expanded their recommendations for human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination beyond age 26 years to include shared clinical decision-making (SCDM) among adults aged 27-45 years ("mid-adults"). The purpose of this study was to describe HPV vaccination status among mid-adult women before the implementation of SCDM for HPV vaccination. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted during 2016-2019 in Connecticut, United States, and enrolled women born in 1981 or later (birth cohorts eligible for HPV vaccination). This analysis was restricted to participants aged 27 years and older at the time of the survey. Correlates of vaccination status, sources of vaccine information, and reasons for not receiving the vaccine were examined. Results: Among 298 participants, 64.4% had not received HPV vaccine. Other than age (younger age was associated with being vaccinated), no other demographic or behavioral correlates were associated with vaccination. Compared with unvaccinated women, vaccinated women were more likely to have heard about the HPV vaccine from a doctor (odds ratio [OR] = 3.45, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.00-5.88) and less likely to have heard about it from television (OR = 0.23, 95% CI: 0.13-0.41). The main reasons for not being vaccinated were "vaccine not offered" (48%) and "too old" (40%). Conclusions: A majority of mid-adult women in this study were not previously vaccinated against HPV, signaling the large opportunity for SCDM with this population. This may be facilitated by ensuring health care providers and mid-adult women know about the availability and potential benefits of HPV vaccination to inform decision making.

Messaging of Different Disease Outcomes for Human Papillomavirus Vaccination: A Systematic Review.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this systematic review was to assess how messaging for human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination to prevent different health outcomes (sexually transmitted infection, anogenital warts ([AGW], and/or cancer) influences intentions or initiation for the vaccine series. METHODS: We searched PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase databases for all previously published articles with an evaluation, discussion, or comparison of messages containing content about HPV infections, AGW, precancers, or cancer through June 3, 2021. Results about messages were summarized by study population and design. RESULTS: We identified 25 studies evaluating or comparing messages containing content about HPV-associated outcomes. Study designs included randomized trials (n = 12), cross-sectional surveys (n = 8), and qualitative approaches (n = 5). Few studies directly compared different messages using randomized designs or included vaccination uptake as the outcome. While many studies found support for cancer prevention messages, some studies also found equal or greater support for messages focusing on prevention of sexually transmitted infection/AGW. Variability was observed within and between studied populations (parents/adults, adolescents, young adults, healthcare providers, and adult males) and gender (male and female adolescents). DISCUSSION: A greater understanding and deeper attention to myriad health outcomes of HPV infections could increase vaccination uptake in a variety of populations for health promotion across the lifespan.

Patterns of recommended vaccine receipt among women ages 24-45 years: a cross-sectional analysis.

BACKGROUND: Vaccine receipt among mid-adults remains low, with only one quarter of adults being up to date for all recommended vaccines. It is important to understand the myriad factors that influence vaccine receipt among mid-adult women to address these low rates. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of data from women ages 24-45 years collected as part of an ongoing case-control study of the effectiveness of HPV vaccine. We examined associations between demographic characteristics and healthcare utilization and receipt of individual vaccines and combinations of multiple vaccines using logistic regression analyses for three routinely recommended vaccines: tetanus, influenza and HPV. RESULTS: Among the 309 women enrolled in the study, only 19 (6.2%) were up to date for all three recommended vaccines and 41 (13.3%) had not received any of the recommended vaccines. A greater number of health care visits in the past year was associated with receipt of influenza (aOR = 6.37, 95% CI = 2.53, 16.1) and tetanus (aOR = 2.17, 95% CI = 1.14, 4.12) vaccines. White women were more likely to have received HPV vaccine (aOR = 2.39, 95% CI = 1.07, 5.36). CONCLUSIONS: Uptake of recommended vaccines is low among young and mid-adult women. There is a need for greater understanding of the underlying factors influencing vaccine receipt in this population.

Inpatient Immunization With HPV Vaccine: A Qualitative Study With Postpartum Women.

INTRODUCTION: Rates of immunization with human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine among adolescent and young adult females remain suboptimal. There is a continued need to focus on catch-up immunization. Some hospitals in the United States have implemented inpatient postpartum HPV immunization programs (IPP-HPV) as part of a strategy to improve rates of catch-up immunization. Patients' perspectives are critical to facilitating broad adoption of IPP-HPV. The objectives of this study were to understand the experiences and perspectives of postpartum women recommended to receive HPV vaccine before hospital discharge and to identify facilitators of and barriers to program implementation. METHODS: We conducted in-depth semistructured interviews with postpartum women eligible for IPP-HPV. We used purposive sampling to ensure representation across race, ethnicity, and language. Interviews were analyzed using an iterative thematic approach. RESULTS: The median age of participants (n = 24) was 22 years (range, 15-26 years), and six had declined the inpatient dose of HPV vaccine. Overall, women viewed IPP-HPV favorably. Facilitators of program implementation included viewing HPV vaccine as prevention, normalization of the vaccine, convenience of IPP-HPV, and the experience of a patient-centered approach. Barriers included the peripartum environment and associated stress, vaccine hesitancy, and a lack of both awareness of and knowledge about HPV vaccine. CONCLUSIONS: IPP-HPV immunization is a strategy well-received by women for improving rates of catch-up immunization. The implementation of such programs may be optimized by increasing awareness that the vaccine is available and recommended for postpartum women, and by using a patient-centered approach that is sensitive to the needs of postpartum patients.

Evaluation of an Inpatient Postpartum Human Papillomavirus Immunization Program.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the result of an inpatient postpartum human papillomavirus (HPV) immunization pilot program in a diverse, low-income patient population from an urban, hospital-based obstetrics and gynecology clinic. METHODS: In this cohort study, we present results from the first 2 years of the inpatient postpartum HPV immunization program, in which vaccine-eligible postpartum women were identified and immunized during their hospital stays. The program was implemented after educational outreach with prenatal and postpartum clinicians and nurses. Associations between receipt of the HPV vaccine as an inpatient and the characteristics of patients, and the likelihood of and missed opportunities for receiving a subsequent dose of the HPV vaccine as an outpatient were determined using logistic regression, time-to-event analyses, chi-squared tests and t-tests. RESULTS: From April 11, 2017, to April 10, 2019, 394 (59.2%) of 666 postpartum women were eligible for the inpatient postpartum HPV immunization program. The majority (265/394, 67.3%) received the immunization pilot program HPV dose; 36 of those 265 (13.6%) completed the series with that dose. Among women due for additional doses after hospital discharge, those who received the inpatient dose were more likely to receive a subsequent outpatient dose (138/229) than were those who did not receive an inpatient dose (39/129; hazard ratio 2.51, 95% CI 1.76-3.58). On average, there were 30.7 fewer (95% CI 5.8-55.6, P<.02) missed opportunities for subsequent outpatient doses for every 100 eligible visits among women who received the inpatient dose, compared with women who did not. By the end of the study, the proportion of women who had completed the vaccine series was higher among women who received the inpatient dose (95/265, 35.8%) than in those who did not (12 out 129, 9.3%; odds ratio 5.45, 95% CI 2.86-10.38). CONCLUSION: The inpatient postpartum HPV immunization program was associated with increased rates of immunization and addressed a previously missed opportunity. Inpatient immunization programs can serve as a critical way to address gaps in vaccine uptake.