Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Hosp Infect ; 95(3): 245-252, 2017 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27658666

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is frequently endemic in healthcare settings and may be transmitted by person-to-person spread. Asymptomatic MRSA carriers are potential, unsuspected sources for transmission and some of them may be identified by admission screening. AIM: To assess whether rapid point-of-care screening (POCS) for MRSA at hospital admission may be associated with a reduction in MRSA acquisition rates when compared with slower laboratory-based methods. METHODS: A cluster-randomized cross-over trial was conducted in four admission wards of an acute London tertiary care hospital. Polymerase chain reaction-based POCS screening was compared with conventional culture screening. Patients were screened on ward admission and discharge, and the MRSA acquisition rate on the admission wards was calculated as the primary outcome measure. RESULTS: In all, 10,017 patients were included; 4978 in the control arm, 5039 in the POCS arm. The MRSA carriage rate on admission was 1.7%. POCS reduced the median reporting time from 40.4 to 3.7 h (P < 0.001). MRSA was acquired on the admission wards by 23 (0.46%) patients in the control arm and by 24 (0.48%) in the intervention arm, acquisition rates of 5.39 and 4.60 per 1000 days respectively. After taking account of predefined confounding factors, the adjusted incidence rate ratio (IRR) for change in trend for MRSA acquisition was 0.961 (95% confidence interval: 0.766-1.206). The adjusted IRR for step change for MRSA acquisition was 0.98 (0.304-3.162). CONCLUSION: POCS produces a significantly faster result but has no effect on MRSA acquisition on admission wards compared with culture screening. Where compliance with infection prevention and control is high and MRSA carriage is low, POCS has no additional impact on MRSA acquisition rates over the first one to four days of admission compared with conventional culture screening.


Assuntos
Portador Sadio/diagnóstico , Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina/métodos , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/isolamento & purificação , Sistemas Automatizados de Assistência Junto ao Leito , Infecções Estafilocócicas/diagnóstico , Adulto , Idoso , Técnicas Bacteriológicas/métodos , Portador Sadio/microbiologia , Estudos Cross-Over , Feminino , Humanos , Londres , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Fatores de Tempo
2.
J Hosp Infect ; 83(2): 114-21, 2013 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23313028

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: There is debate over the optimal policy for detecting meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) colonization at hospital admission. The emergence of community-associated (CA)-MRSA may compromise targeted screening strategies based on risk factors for healthcare-associated (HA)-MRSA. AIM: To determine the prevalence of MRSA colonization at admission, and the genotype and molecular epidemiology of the strains involved. METHODS: A 12-month observational study was performed at a 1200-bed London tertiary referral hospital from 1 April 2008 to 1 March 2009. All available MRSA isolates were genotyped by spa and staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) typing. FINDINGS: The overall MRSA colonization rate was 2.0% of 28,892 admissions (range 6.6% in critical care to 0.8% in obstetrics/gynaecology/neonatology). The overall frequency of previously unknown carriage of MRSA on admission was 1.4%. Most colonizing strains were epidemic HA-MRSA-15 and -16. However, heterogeneous CA strains accounted for 18% of recovered isolates, including 37.5% of MRSA from accident and emergency and 23.1% of MRSA from surgery. The CA-MRSA strain types had significantly different epidemiological associations from the HA-MRSA strains, so risk factors used for the identification of HA-MRSA may not detect CA-MRSA reliably. CONCLUSION: The low rate of HA-MRSA in the UK increases the relative proportion due to CA-MRSA, for which conventional risk-factor-based screening strategies may be less effective. Cost-benefit analyses of universal MRSA admission screening will need to take account of this new epidemiology.


Assuntos
Portador Sadio/epidemiologia , Portador Sadio/microbiologia , Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina/métodos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/isolamento & purificação , Infecções Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Portador Sadio/diagnóstico , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Genótipo , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Londres/epidemiologia , Masculino , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/classificação , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/genética , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Epidemiologia Molecular , Tipagem Molecular , Admissão do Paciente , Prevalência , Fatores de Risco , Infecções Estafilocócicas/diagnóstico , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA