RESUMO
Objectives: The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of iron overload and the real-world clinical effectiveness of the iron chelation therapies (ICTs) in Syrian patients with transfusion-dependent beta thalassemia major (BTM) prior to and during the ongoing Syrian conflict. Methods: This single-center, two-stage observational study was conducted at Homs National Thalassemia Center (HNTC) prior to (2009) and during (2019) the armed conflict. The prevalence and the severity of iron overload, as well as the effectiveness of four iron chelation regimens, were assessed using serum ferritin (SF) concentrations as a means of monitoring in two cohorts of BTM patients receiving deferoxamine (DFO), deferiprone (DFP), deferasirox (DFX), or a combination of DFO and DFP therapy in both years. Statistical analyses encompassed one-way ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney U, and chi-square (χ2) tests for the comparisons of the variables and the frequencies between the two cohorts and subgroups. Results: We included all eligible BTM patients at HNTC in 2009 (n = 205) and 2019 (n = 172). Only 84 patients from the 2009 cohort were accessible in 2019. Our findings revealed that 98% and 89% of the patients had iron overload (SF ≥ 1500 ng/mL) and comparable elevated median SF concentrations (3868 and 3757 ng/mL) in 2009 and 2019, respectively (P = 0.275). Furthermore, patients on DFO demonstrated the poorest control of iron overload and the highest SF concentrations (4319 and 5586 ng/mL), whereas those on DFX achieved superior outcomes and the lowest SF concentrations (3355 and 2152 ng/mL) in both years. Twenty-six patients from the 2019 cohort received no ICT for six years (from 2012 to 2018) and experienced extremely severe iron overload with SF levels ranging between 4481 and 16,000 ng/mL. Conclusions: Our findings prove a high prevalence of iron overload and suboptimal chelation outcomes in Syrian BTM patients, both prior to and during the ongoing armed conflict, despite the provision of free ICTs at HNTC. Poor adherence and older age of patients may explain the unfavorable outcomes of DFO and (DFO+DFP) regimens, whereas younger age and higher socioeconomic status may have contributed to the lowest SF and superior outcomes in patients on DFX. This study also demonstrates the crucial role of the National Thalassemia Centers, namely HNTC, in providing health services to BTM patients in times of peace and conflict.