All-Cause, Cardiovascular, and Stroke Mortality Among Foreign-Born Versus US-Born Individuals of African Ancestry.

Background Little is known about the effect of region of origin on all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and stroke mortality among Black individuals. We examined associations between nativity and mortality (all-cause, cardiovascular, and stroke) in Black individuals in the United States. Methods and Results Using the National Health Interview Service 2000 to 2014 data and mortality-linked files through 2015, we identified participants aged 25 to 74 years who self-identified as Black (n=64 717). Using a Cox regression model, we examined the association between nativity and all-cause, cardiovascular, and stroke mortality. We recorded 4329 deaths (205 stroke and 932 cardiovascular deaths). In the model adjusted for age and sex, compared with US-born Black individuals, all-cause (hazard ratio [HR], 0.44 [95% CI, 0.37-0.53]) and cardiovascular mortality (HR, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.44-0.87]) rates were lower among Black individuals born in the Caribbean, South America, and Central America, but stroke mortality rates were similar (HR, 1.01 [95% CI, 0.52-1.94]). African-born Black individuals had lower all-cause mortality (HR, 0.43 [95% CI, 0.27-0.69]) and lower cardiovascular mortality (HR, 0.42 [95% CI, 0.18-0.98]) but comparable stroke mortality (HR, 0.48 [95% CI, 0.11-2.05]). When the model was further adjusted for education, income, smoking, body mass index, hypertension, and diabetes, the difference in mortality between foreign-born Black individuals and US-born Black individuals was no longer significant. Time since migration did not significantly affect mortality outcomes among foreign-born Black individuals. Conclusions In the United States, foreign-born Black individuals had lower all-cause mortality, a difference that was observed in recent and well-established immigrants. Foreign-born Black people had age- and sex-adjusted lower cardiovascular mortality than US-born Black people.

Health Equity and Actionable Disparities in Stroke: 2022 Update.

There are stark inequities in stroke incidence, prevalence, care, and outcomes. This issue of Stroke features manuscripts from the third annual HEADS-UP (Health Equity and Actionable Disparities in Stroke: Understanding and Problem-Solving) symposium, which took place the day before the International Stroke Conference in February 2022. The 2022 HEADS-UP symposium focused on clinical trials to address stroke inequities. The 2022 Edgar J. Kenton III award was awarded to Moira Kapral. In Kenton Award Lecture-Stroke Disparities Research: Learning from the Past, Planning for the Future, Kapral details 10 key considerations for researchers interested in addressing inequities in stroke. These considerations provide an insightful, evidence-based roadmap for the future of stroke inequities research. In the article, Care Transition Interventions to Improve Stroke Outcomes, Reeves et al highlight barriers faced by historically disenfranchised populations navigating transitions in the stroke continuum of care; summarize clinical trials aimed at enhancing transitions in care, particularly in historically marginalized populations; and stress the importance of co-designing future interventions with patient populations to address inequities. In Telehealth Trials to Enhance Health Equity for Patients With Stroke, Sharrief et al detail how telehealth interventions have the potential to address inequities if they are implemented in a thoughtful manner, addressing the potential factors than can exacerbate a digital divide. Finally, in Polypill Programs to Prevent Stroke and Cut Costs in Low Income Countries: From Clinical Efficacy to Implementation, Sarfo et al review the evidence for polypill strategies in primary and secondary cardiovascular disease prevention in low- and middle-income countries, who bear the majority of the worldwide burden of stroke.

Effect of a Coordinated Community and Chronic Care Model Team Intervention vs Usual Care on Systolic Blood Pressure in Patients With Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack: The SUCCEED Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Few stroke survivors meet recommended cardiovascular goals, particularly among racial/ethnic minority populations, such as Black or Hispanic individuals, or socioeconomically disadvantaged populations. Objective: To determine if a chronic care model-based, community health worker (CHW), advanced practice clinician (APC; including nurse practitioners or physician assistants), and physician team intervention improves risk factor control after stroke in a safety-net setting (ie, health care setting where all individuals receive care, regardless of health insurance status or ability to pay). Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical trial included participants recruited from 5 hospitals serving low-income populations in Los Angeles County, California, as part of the Secondary Stroke Prevention by Uniting Community and Chronic Care Model Teams Early to End Disparities (SUCCEED) clinical trial. Inclusion criteria were age 40 years or older; experience of ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) no more than 90 days prior; systolic blood pressure (BP) of 130 mm Hg or greater or 120 to 130 mm Hg with history of hypertension or using hypertensive medications; and English or Spanish language proficiency. The exclusion criterion was inability to consent. Among 887 individuals screened for eligibility, 542 individuals were eligible, and 487 individuals were enrolled and randomized, stratified by stroke type (ischemic or TIA vs hemorrhagic), language (English vs Spanish), and site to usual care vs intervention in a 1:1 fashion. The study was conducted from February 2014 to September 2018, and data were analyzed from October 2018 to November 2020. Interventions: Participants randomized to intervention were offered a multimodal coordinated care intervention, including hypothesized core components (ie, ≥3 APC clinic visits, ≥3 CHW home visits, and Chronic Disease Self-Management Program workshops), and additional telephone visits, protocol-driven risk factor management, culturally and linguistically tailored education materials, and self-management tools. Participants randomized to the control group received usual care, which varied by site but frequently included a free BP monitor, self-management tools, and linguistically tailored information materials. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was change in systolic BP at 12 months. Secondary outcomes were non-high density lipoprotein cholesterol, hemoglobin A1c, and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, body mass index, antithrombotic adherence, physical activity level, diet, and smoking status at 12 months. Potential mediators assessed included access to care, health and stroke literacy, self-efficacy, perceptions of care, and BP monitor use. Results: Among 487 participants included, the mean (SD) age was 57.1 (8.9) years; 317 (65.1%) were men, and 347 participants (71.3%) were Hispanic, 87 participants (18.3%) were Black, and 30 participants (6.3%) were Asian. A total of 246 participants were randomized to usual care, and 241 participants were randomized to the intervention. Mean (SD) systolic BP improved from 143 (17) mm Hg at baseline to 133 (20) mm Hg at 12 months in the intervention group and from 146 (19) mm Hg at baseline to 137 (22) mm Hg at 12 months in the usual care group, with no significant differences in the change between groups. Compared with the control group, participants in the intervention group had greater improvements in self-reported salt intake (difference, 15.4 [95% CI, 4.4 to 26.0]; P = .004) and serum CRP level (difference in log CRP, -0.4 [95% CI, -0.7 to -0.1] mg/dL; P = .003); there were no differences in other secondary outcomes. Although 216 participants (89.6%) in the intervention group received some of the 3 core components, only 35 participants (14.5%) received the intended full dose. Conclusions and Relevance: This randomized clinical trial of a complex multilevel, multimodal intervention did not find vascular risk factor improvements beyond that of usual care; however, further studies may consider testing the SUCCEED intervention with modifications to enhance implementation and participant engagement. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01763203.

Results of a Pilot Trial of a Lifestyle Intervention for Stroke Survivors: Healthy Eating and Lifestyle after Stroke.

OBJECTIVES: Although healthy lifestyle practices mitigate recurrent stroke risk and mortality, few stroke survivors adhere to them, particularly among socioeconomically disadvantaged communities. We developed and pilot tested a occupational therapy-based lifestyle management intervention, Healthy Eating And Lifestyle after Stroke (HEALS), to improve stroke survivors' self-management skills relating to diet and physical activity and evaluated it in a diverse safety-net population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred English- or Spanish-speaking participants with stroke or transient ischemic attack were randomized to a 6-week occupational therapist-led group lifestyle intervention vs. usual care. Each of the six 2-h group sessions included didactic presentations on diet and physical activity, peer exchange, personal exploration with goal setting, and direct experience through participation in a relevant activity. Primary outcomes at 6 months were change in body mass index, fruit/vegetable intake, and physical activity. Secondary outcomes included change in waist circumference, smoking, blood pressure, high-density lipoprotein, low-density lipoprotein, triglyceride, total cholesterol, glycosylated hemoglobin levels, quality of care, and perceptions of care. Effect sizes were determined in preparation for a larger randomized controlled trial powered to detect a difference in primary outcomes. A nested formative evaluation assessed facilitators and barriers to implementation, acceptance, and intervention adherence. RESULTS: There were no significant changes in primary or secondary outcomes at 6 months. Effect sizes for all outcomes were small (< 0.2). Focus group participants recommended extending the intervention program duration with more sessions, additional information on stroke and vascular risk factors, an interdisciplinary approach, additional family involvement, and incentives. Providers recommended longer program duration, more training, fidelity checks to ensure standardized program delivery, and additional incentives for participants. CONCLUSIONS: The HEALS intervention was feasible in a safety-net setting, but effect sizes were small. A longer-duration intervention, with intervener fidelity checks may be warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01550822.

Derivation and Application of a Tool to Estimate Benefits From Multiple Therapies That Reduce Recurrent Stroke Risk.

Background and Purpose- Lowering blood pressure and cholesterol, antiplatelet/antithrombotic use, and smoking cessation reduce risk of recurrent stroke. However, gaps in risk factor control among stroke survivors warrant development and evaluation of alternative care delivery models that aim to simultaneously improve multiple risk factors. Randomized trials of care delivery models are rarely of sufficient duration or size to be powered for low-frequency outcomes such as observed recurrent stroke. This creates a need for tools to estimate how changes across multiple stroke risk factors reduce risk of recurrent stroke. Methods- We reviewed existing evidence of the efficacy of interventions addressing blood pressure reduction, cholesterol lowering, antiplatelet/antithrombotic use, and smoking cessation and extracted relative risks for each intervention. From this, we developed a tool to estimate reductions in recurrent stroke risk, using bootstrapping and simulation methods. We also calculated a modified Global Outcome Score representing the proportion of potential benefit (relative risk reduction) achieved if all 4 individual risk factors were optimally controlled. We applied the tool to estimate stroke risk reduction among 275 participants with complete 12-month follow-up data from a recently published randomized trial of a healthcare delivery model that targeted multiple stroke risk factors. Results- The recurrent stroke risk tool was feasible to apply, yielding an estimated reduction in the relative risk of ischemic stroke of 0.36 in both the experimental and usual care trial arms. Global Outcome Score results suggest that participants in both arms likely averted, on average, 45% of recurrent stroke events that could possibly have been prevented through maximal implementation of interventions for all 4 individual risk factors. Conclusions- A stroke risk reduction tool facilitates estimation of the combined impact on vascular risk of improvements in multiple stroke risk factors and provides a summary outcome for studies testing alternative care models to prevent recurrent stroke. Registration- URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT00861081.

Less Than Ideal: Trends in Cardiovascular Health Among US Stroke Survivors.

Background and Purpose- The American Heart Association's Life's Simple 7 (LS7) defines ideal cardiovascular health by 7 metrics: not smoking, regular physical activity, normal body mass index, blood pressure, plasma glucose, and total cholesterol levels, and a healthy diet. We assessed prevalence and predictors of ideal LS7 among US stroke survivors. Methods- Among 67 514 participants in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys from 1988 to 1994 and 1999 to 2014, 1597 adults (≥18 years) had self-reported history of stroke. LS7 metrics were categorized as poor, intermediate, and ideal; ideal LS7 scores were calculated (1 point for each ideal metric met). Trends in poor, intermediate, and ideal cardiovascular health were assessed. Odds of low (0-1) versus high (≥4) ideal LS7 scores were assessed according to sex, race, poverty income ratio, and education level, before and after adjusting for covariates. Results- Only 1 participant met all ideal LS7 metrics. The proportion with low LS7 score increased from 17.9% in 1988 to 1994 to 35.4% in 2011 to 2014 (P<0.001). Over that time frame, prevalence of poor blood pressure (≥140/90 mm Hg) and poor cholesterol (≥240 mg/dL) decreased (45.2%-26.5% and 37.2%-10.3%), whereas prevalence of poor body mass index (≥30 kg/m2), poor diet (healthy eating index score <50), and poor physical activity (0 minutes moderate/vigorous activity per week) increased (26.9%-39.0%; 14.2%-50.6%; 44.6%-70.9%; all P<0.05). After adjustment, black race (odds ratio, 2.29; 95% CI, 1.17-4.48), poverty income ratio ≤200% (odds ratio, 2.20, 95% CI, 1.11-4.36), and ≤12th grade education (odds ratio, 4.50; 95% CI, 2.27-8.92) were associated with low ideal LS7 scores. Conclusions- Over the past 3 decades, blood pressure and cholesterol control among stroke survivors improved, but rates of obesity, poor diet, and physical inactivity increased. Stroke survivors who are black, poor, or less educated are less likely to have ideal cardiovascular health.

Efficacy of a Chronic Care-Based Intervention on Secondary Stroke Prevention Among Vulnerable Stroke Survivors: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Disparities of care among stroke survivors are well documented. Effective interventions to improve recurrent stroke preventative care in vulnerable populations are lacking. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a randomized controlled trial, we tested the efficacy of components of a chronic care model-based intervention versus usual care among 404 subjects having an ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack within 90 days of enrollment and receiving care within the Los Angeles public healthcare system. Subjects had baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥120 mm Hg. The intervention included a nurse practitioner/physician assistant care manager, group clinics, self-management support, report cards, decision support, and ongoing care coordination. Outcomes were collected at 3, 8, and 12 months, analyzed as intention-to-treat, and used repeated-measures mixed-effects models. Change in SBP was the primary outcome. Low-density lipoprotein reduction, antithrombotic medication use, smoking cessation, and physical activity were secondary outcomes. Average age was 57 years; 18% were of black race; 69% were of Hispanic ethnicity. Mean baseline SBP was 150 mm Hg in both arms. SBP decreased to 17 mm Hg in the intervention arm and 14 mm Hg in the usual care arm; the between-arm difference was not significant (-3.6 mm Hg; 95% confidence interval, -9.2 to 2.2). Among secondary outcomes, the only significant difference was that persons in the intervention arm were more likely to lower their low-density lipoprotein <100 md/dL (2.0 odds ratio; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-3.5). CONCLUSIONS: This intervention did not improve SBP control beyond that attained in usual care among vulnerable stroke survivors. A community-centered component could strengthen the intervention impact. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00861081.

Race-Ethnic Disparities in Cardiometabolic Risk Profiles among Stroke Survivors with Undiagnosed Diabetes and Prediabetes in the United States.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Up to 25% of the U.S. population has undiagnosed diabetes. Diabetes and stroke both disproportionately afflict race/ethnic minorities. We assessed race/ethnic differences in the prevalence of undiagnosed diabetes, prediabetes, and cardiometabolic risk profiles among stroke survivors in the United States. METHODS: The prevalence of diabetes and prediabetes among adults (≥20 years) with a self-reported history of stroke was assessed using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) from 1999 to 2010. Cardiometabolic risk factors across race/ethnic groups were compared using linear and logistic regression before and after adjusting for covariates. RESULTS: From 1999 to 2010, 1070 individuals who participated in NHANES had a self-reported history of stroke. Among stroke survivors without a formal diagnosis of diabetes and prediabetes, 233 (32%) had undiagnosed prediabetes and 27 (3.7%) had undiagnosed diabetes. The prevalence of undiagnosed diabetes and prediabetes was the highest among non-Hispanic (NH) blacks (8% and 38%) compared with Mexican Americans (4% and 26%) and NH whites (3% and 32%). Compared with NH whites, NH blacks were significantly younger, more likely to take antihypertensive medications, more likely to smoke, and have poorly controlled diabetes. NH blacks were twice as likely as NH whites to have poorly controlled blood pressure, after adjustment for sociodemographic and vascular risk factors. CONCLUSION: In the United States, NH black stroke survivors have the highest rates of undiagnosed diabetes and prediabetes, and have poorer cardiometabolic risk factor control than their NH white counterparts.

Randomized controlled trial of a coordinated care intervention to improve risk factor control after stroke or transient ischemic attack in the safety net: Secondary stroke prevention by Uniting Community and Chronic care model teams Early to End Disparities (SUCCEED).

BACKGROUND: Recurrent strokes are preventable through awareness and control of risk factors such as hypertension, and through lifestyle changes such as healthier diets, greater physical activity, and smoking cessation. However, vascular risk factor control is frequently poor among stroke survivors, particularly among socio-economically disadvantaged blacks, Latinos and other people of color. The Chronic Care Model (CCM) is an effective framework for multi-component interventions aimed at improving care processes and outcomes for individuals with chronic disease. In addition, community health workers (CHWs) have played an integral role in reducing health disparities; however, their effectiveness in reducing vascular risk among stroke survivors remains unknown. Our objectives are to develop, test, and assess the economic value of a CCM-based intervention using an Advanced Practice Clinician (APC)-CHW team to improve risk factor control after stroke in an under-resourced, racially/ethnically diverse population. METHODS/DESIGN: In this single-blind randomized controlled trial, 516 adults (≥40 years) with an ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack or intracerebral hemorrhage within the prior 90 days are being enrolled at five sites within the Los Angeles County safety-net setting and randomized 1:1 to intervention vs usual care. Participants are excluded if they do not speak English, Spanish, Cantonese, Mandarin, or Korean or if they are unable to consent. The intervention includes a minimum of three clinic visits in the healthcare setting, three home visits, and Chronic Disease Self-Management Program group workshops in community venues. The primary outcome is blood pressure (BP) control (systolic BP <130 mmHg) at 1 year. Secondary outcomes include: (1) mean change in systolic BP; (2) control of other vascular risk factors including lipids and hemoglobin A1c, (3) inflammation (C reactive protein [CRP]), (4) medication adherence, (5) lifestyle factors (smoking, diet, and physical activity), (6) estimated relative reduction in risk for recurrent stroke or myocardial infarction (MI), and (7) cost-effectiveness of the intervention versus usual care. DISCUSSION: If this multi-component interdisciplinary intervention is shown to be effective in improving risk factor control after stroke, it may serve as a model that can be used internationally to reduce race/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in stroke in resource-constrained settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01763203 .

Association of Secondhand Smoke With Stroke Outcomes.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Approximately half of never smokers are exposed to secondhand smoke (SHS). Smoking is a well-established stroke risk factor, yet associations between SHS, stroke, and poststroke mortality remain uncertain. We aimed to determine the prevalence of exposure to SHS among those with and without stroke and its impact on mortality. METHODS: Data were obtained from the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys for 27 836 never smokers with/without self-reported stroke aged ≥18 years, sampled from 1988 to 1994 and 1999 to 2012, with linked mortality through 2010. Household exposure to SHS was determined by self-report; exposure severity was quantified by serum cotinine level. Independent relationships between SHS and all-cause mortality were assessed using Cox regression models, before and after adjusting for sociodemographics and comorbidities. RESULTS: From 1988 to 1994 to 1999 to 2012, age-adjusted prevalence of exposure to SHS declined from 11.5% to 6.6% among survivors of stroke (P=0.08), and 14.6% to 5.9% among persons without stroke (P<0.01). Factors associated with high exposure to SHS were male sex, black race, ≤12th-grade education, poverty income ratio ≤200%, high alcohol intake, and history of myocardial infarction (all P<0.05). High exposure to SHS was associated with higher odds of previous stroke (odds ratio, 1.46; P=0.026). There was a dose-dependent relationship between exposure to SHS and all-cause mortality after stroke. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with previous stroke have 50% greater odds to have been exposed to SHS; SHS is associated with a 2-fold increase in mortality after stroke. This study highlights the importance of obtaining exposure to SHS history and counseling patients and their families on the potential impact of SHS on poststroke outcomes.

Key Factors Associated with Major Depression in a National Sample of Stroke Survivors.

BACKGROUND: Depression, one of the most common complications encountered after stroke, is associated with poorer outcomes. The aim of this study was to determine the factors independently associated with and predictive of poststroke depression (PSD). METHODS: We assessed the prevalence of depression (Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ-8] score >10) among a national sample of adults (≥20 years) with stroke who participated in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys from 2005 to 2010. Logistic regression and random forest models were used to determine the factors associated with and predictive of PSD, after adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical factors. RESULTS: Of the 17,132 individuals surveyed, 546 stroke survivors were screened for depression, and 17% had depression, corresponding to 872,237 stroke survivors with depression in the United States. In the logistic regression model, after adjustment for sociodemographic variables, poverty (poverty index <200% versus ≥200%, odds ratio [OR] 2.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.23-5.53) and 3 or more medical comorbidities (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.01-2.49) were associated with higher odds of PSD; increasing age was associated with lower odds of PSD (per year OR .95, 95% CI .94-.97). In the random forest model, the 10 most important factors predictive of PSD were younger age, lower education level, higher body mass index, black race, poverty, smoking, female sex, single marital status, lack of cancer history, and previous myocardial infarction (specificity = 70%, sensitivity = 64%). CONCLUSION: Although numerous factors were predictive of developing PSD, younger age, poverty, and multiple comorbidities were strong and independent factors. More aggressive screening for depression in these individuals may be warranted.

"Life's Simple 7" and Long-Term Mortality After Stroke.

BACKGROUND: The American Heart Association developed criteria dubbed "Life's Simple 7" defining ideal cardiovascular health: not smoking, regular physical activity, healthy diet, maintaining normal weight, and controlling cholesterol, blood pressure, and blood glucose levels. The impact of achieving these metrics on survival after stroke is unknown. We aimed to determine cardiovascular health scores among stroke survivors in the United States and to assess the link between cardiovascular health score and all-cause mortality after stroke. METHODS AND RESULTS: We assessed cardiovascular health metrics among a nationally representative sample of US adults with stroke (n=420) who participated in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys in 1988-1994 (with mortality assessment through 2006). We determined cumulative all-cause mortality by cardiovascular health score under the Cox proportional hazards model after adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics and comorbidities. No stroke survivors met all 7 ideal health metrics. Over a median duration of 98 months (range, 53-159), there was an inverse dose-dependent relationship between number of ideal lifestyle metrics met and 10-year adjusted mortality: 0 to 1: 57%; 2: 48%; 3: 43%; 4: 36%; and ≥5: 30%. Those who met ≥4 health metrics had lower all-cause mortality than those who met 0 to 1 (hazard ratio, 0.51; 95% confidence interval, 0.28-0.92). After adjusting for sociodemographics, higher health score was associated with lower all-cause mortality (trend P-value, 0.022). CONCLUSIONS: Achieving a greater number of ideal cardiovascular health metrics is associated with lower long-term risk of dying after stroke. Specifically targeting "Life's Simple 7" goals might have a profound impact, extending survival after stroke.

Factors influencing the decline in stroke mortality: a statement from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Stroke mortality has been declining since the early 20th century. The reasons for this are not completely understood, although the decline is welcome. As a result of recent striking and more accelerated decreases in stroke mortality, stroke has fallen from the third to the fourth leading cause of death in the United States. This has prompted a detailed assessment of the factors associated with the change in stroke risk and mortality. This statement considers the evidence for factors that have contributed to the decline and how they can be used in the design of future interventions for this major public health burden. METHODS: Writing group members were nominated by the committee chair and co-chair on the basis of their previous work in relevant topic areas and were approved by the American Heart Association Stroke Council's Scientific Statements Oversight Committee and the American Heart Association Manuscript Oversight Committee. The writers used systematic literature reviews, references to published clinical and epidemiological studies, morbidity and mortality reports, clinical and public health guidelines, authoritative statements, personal files, and expert opinion to summarize evidence and to indicate gaps in current knowledge. All members of the writing group had the opportunity to comment on this document and approved the final version. The document underwent extensive American Heart Association internal peer review, Stroke Council leadership review, and Scientific Statements Oversight Committee review before consideration and approval by the American Heart Association Science Advisory and Coordinating Committee. RESULTS: The decline in stroke mortality over the past decades represents a major improvement in population health and is observed for both sexes and for all racial/ethnic and age groups. In addition to the overall impact on fewer lives lost to stroke, the major decline in stroke mortality seen among people <65 years of age represents a reduction in years of potential life lost. The decline in mortality results from reduced incidence of stroke and lower case-fatality rates. These significant improvements in stroke outcomes are concurrent with cardiovascular risk factor control interventions. Although it is difficult to calculate specific attributable risk estimates, efforts in hypertension control initiated in the 1970s appear to have had the most substantial influence on the accelerated decline in stroke mortality. Although implemented later, diabetes mellitus and dyslipidemia control and smoking cessation programs, particularly in combination with treatment of hypertension, also appear to have contributed to the decline in stroke mortality. The potential effects of telemedicine and stroke systems of care appear to be strong but have not been in place long enough to indicate their influence on the decline. Other factors had probable effects, but additional studies are needed to determine their contributions. CONCLUSIONS: The decline in stroke mortality is real and represents a major public health and clinical medicine success story. The repositioning of stroke from third to fourth leading cause of death is the result of true mortality decline and not an increase in mortality from chronic lung disease, which is now the third leading cause of death in the United States. There is strong evidence that the decline can be attributed to a combination of interventions and programs based on scientific findings and implemented with the purpose of reducing stroke risks, the most likely being improved control of hypertension. Thus, research studies and the application of their findings in developing intervention programs have improved the health of the population. The continued application of aggressive evidence-based public health programs and clinical interventions is expected to result in further declines in stroke mortality.

Fifteen-year trends in awareness of heart disease in women: results of a 2012 American Heart Association national survey.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate trends in awareness of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk among women between 1997 and 2012 by racial/ethnic and age groups, as well as knowledge of CVD symptoms and preventive behaviors/barriers. METHODS AND RESULTS: A study of awareness of CVD was conducted by the American Heart Association in 2012 among US women >25 years of age identified through random-digit dialing (n=1205) and Harris Poll Online (n=1227), similar to prior American Heart Association national surveys. Standardized questions on awareness were given to all women; additional questions about preventive behaviors/barriers were given online. Data were weighted, and results were compared with triennial surveys since 1997. Between 1997 and 2012, the rate of awareness of CVD as the leading cause of death nearly doubled (56% versus 30%; P<0.001). The rate of awareness among black and Hispanic women in 2012 (36% and 34%, respectively) was similar to that of white women in 1997 (33%). In 1997, women were more likely to cite cancer than CVD as the leading killer (35% versus 30%), but in 2012, the trend reversed (24% versus 56%). Awareness of atypical symptoms of CVD has improved since 1997 but remains low. The most common reasons why women took preventive action were to improve health and to feel better, not to live longer. CONCLUSIONS: Awareness of CVD among women has improved in the past 15 years, but a significant racial/ethnic minority gap persists. Continued effort is needed to reach at-risk populations. These data should inform public health campaigns to focus on evidenced-based strategies to prevent CVD and to help target messages that resonate and motivate women to take action.

Impact of a healthy lifestyle on all-cause and cardiovascular mortality after stroke in the USA.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the effects of a healthy lifestyle on mortality after stroke. This study assessed whether five healthy lifestyle factors had independent and dose dependent associations with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality after stroke. METHODS: In a nationally representative sample of the US population (n=15,299) with previous stroke (n=649) followed from survey participation (1988-1994) through to mortality assessment (2000), the relationship between five factors (eating ≥5 servings of fruits/vegetables per day, exercising >12 times/month, having a body mass index of 18.5-29.9 mg/kg(2), moderate alcohol use [1 drink/day for women and 2 drinks/day for men] and not smoking) and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality was assessed. RESULTS: Mean age was 67.0 years (SE 1.1 years) and 53% were women. After adjusting for covariates, abstaining from smoking (HR 0.57, CI 0.34 to 0.98) and exercising regularly (HR 0.66, CI 0.44 to 0.99) were associated with lower all-cause mortality but no individual factors had independent associations with cardiovascular mortality. All-cause mortality decreased with higher numbers of healthy behaviours (1-3 factors vs none: HR 0.12, CI 0.03 to 0.47; 4-5 factors vs none: HR 0.04, CI 0.01 to 0.20; 4-5 factors vs 1-3 factors: HR 0.38, CI 0.22 to 0.66; trend p=0.04). Similar effects were observed for cardiovascular mortality (4-5 factors vs none: HR 0.08, CI 0.01 to 0.66; 1-3 factors vs none: HR 0.15, CI 0.02 to 1.15; 4-5 factors vs 1-3 factors: HR 0.53, CI 0.28 to 0.98; trend p=0.18). CONCLUSIONS: Regular exercise and abstinence from smoking were independently associated with lower all-cause mortality after stroke. Combinations of healthy lifestyle factors were associated with lower all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in a dose dependent fashion.

Stroke declines from third to fourth leading cause of death in the United States: historical perspective and challenges ahead.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Stroke recently declined from the third to the fourth leading cause of death in the United States, its first rank transition among sources of American mortality in nearly 75 years. METHODS: This is a narrative review supplemented by new analyses of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Vital Statistics Reports from 1931 to 2008. RESULTS: Historically, stroke transitioned from the second to the third leading cause of death in the United States in 1937, but stroke death rates were essentially stable from 1930 to 1960. Then a long, great decline began, moderate in the 1960s, precipitous in the 1970s and 1980s, and moderate again in the 1990s and 2000s. By 2008, age-adjusted annual death rates from stroke were three fourths less than the historic 1931 to 1960 norm (40.6 versus 175.0 per 100,000). Total actual stroke deaths in the United States declined from a high of 214,000 in 1973 to 134,000 in 2008. Improved stroke prevention, through control of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and tobacco, contributed most greatly to the mortality decline with a lesser but still substantial contribution of improved acute stroke care. Persisting challenges include race-ethnicity, sex, and geographic disparities in stroke mortality; the burden of stroke disability; the expanding obesity epidemic and aging of the US population; and the epidemic of cerebrovascular disease in low- and middle-income countries worldwide. CONCLUSIONS: The recent rank decline of stroke among leading causes of American death is testament to a half century of societal progress in cerebrovascular disease prevention and acute care. Renewed commitments are needed to preserve and broaden this historic achievement.

Persistent sex disparity in midlife stroke prevalence in the United States.

BACKGROUND: A recent study found that US women aged 45-54 years in 1999-2004 were twice as likely as men to report previous stroke. The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity of this finding by assessing the sex-specific midlife stroke prevalence in the most recent nationally representative, cross-sectional sample of US individuals. METHODS: Sex-specific stroke prevalence, sex-specific vascular risk factor prevalence and sex-specific independent predictors of stroke were assessed among 35- to 64-year olds who participated in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys in 2005-2006 (n = 2,274). RESULTS: Women aged 35-64 years were almost 3 times more likely than men to report prior stroke (2.90 vs. 1.07%; p < 0.001). This disparity was driven by the 45- to 54-year age group, where women had thrice the odds of prior stroke compared with men (OR 3.12, 95% CI 1.30-7.50). Among 45- to 54-year olds, men were more likely than women to have a history of smoking, elevated homocysteine and elevated triglyceride levels, but less likely to be abdominally obese (p < 0.001). Independent stroke risk factors among women aged 35-64 years were a homocysteine level >8.5 µmol/l (OR 6.19, 95% CI 2.57-14.93), a history of myocardial infarction (OR 5.35, 95% CI 1.09-26.27) and diabetes mellitus (OR 6.63, 95% CI 2.47-17.81). CONCLUSION: The midlife sex disparity in US stroke prevalence persists. Greater emphasis on prompt recognition and treatment of cardiovascular risk factors among young and middle-aged women may ameliorate this worrisome trend.

Insulin resistance, obesity, metabolic syndrome, and lifestyle modification.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: : This article provides an overview of the effects of obesity, metabolic syndrome, and insulin resistance on stroke risk; outlines the association between healthy lifestyle habits and stroke; and summarizes features of effective lifestyle interventions. RECENT FINDINGS: : General obesity, abdominal obesity, insulin resistance, and the metabolic syndrome are all independently linked with stroke risk and may worsen outcomes after stroke. Five key lifestyle factors-regular exercise, abstinence from smoking, a diet rich in fruits and vegetables, a body mass index of 18.5 to 24.9 kg/m, and moderate alcohol use-have been shown to lower the risk of stroke. Collaborative, multidisciplinary, intensive, patient-centered interventions tend to be the most effective for lifestyle change. SUMMARY: : Mounting obesity rates are threatening the gains that have been made in reducing stroke incidence through traditional risk factor control. In order to mitigate the burden of stroke, physicians need to regularly address lifestyle factors when caring for patients.

Pronounced association of elevated serum homocysteine with stroke in subgroups of individuals: a nationwide study.

BACKGROUND: Although the original homocysteine hypothesis for atherothrombotic disease is falling out of favor, prior studies did not comprehensively adjust for confounders or explore specific subgroups of patients who may benefit from serum homocysteine-lowering. We aimed to determine (1) if elevated total homocysteine (tHcy) affects odds of prevalent stroke after adjusting for a broad array of pertinent covariates and (2) whether particular vascular risk factors amplify the effect of high homocysteine on prevalent stroke. METHODS: The independent and interactive effects of elevated tHcy (≥10 µmol/L) on likelihood of prevalent stroke was assessed in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, a nationally representative cross-sectional sample of the US population conducted from 1999 to 2004 (n=12,683). RESULTS: After adjusting for 17 covariates, those with elevated tHcy were more likely to have prevalent stroke vs. those without elevated tHcy (OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.01-2.29; p=0.045). Individuals with a combination of elevated tHcy and hypertension were substantially more likely to have prevalent stroke compared to individuals without either condition (OR 12.02, 95% CI 6.36-22.73 for men and OR 17.34, 95% CI 10.49-28.64 for women). The association of tHcy with prevalent stroke was strongest in younger individuals and declined linearly with increasing age. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated tHcy independently increases odds of prevalent stroke. Younger individuals and those with concomitant hypertension may particularly benefit from tHcy-lowering.

Therapeutic milestone: stroke declines from the second to the third leading organ- and disease-specific cause of death in the United States.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Stroke mortality rates declined for much of the second half of the 20th century, but recent trends and their relation to other organ- and disease-specific causes of death have not been characterized. METHODS: Using the National Center for Health Statistics mortality data, leading organ- and disease-specific causes of death were assessed for the most recent 10-year period (1996 to 2005) in the United States with a specific focus on stroke deaths. RESULTS: Age-adjusted stroke death rates declined by 25.4%; as a result, lung cancer (which only declined by 9.2%) surpassed stroke as the second leading cause of death in 2003. Despite a 31.9% decline in age-adjusted ischemic heart disease death rates, it remains the leading cause of death. Stroke is now the fifth leading cause of death in men and the fourth leading cause of death in whites but remains the second leading cause of death in women and blacks. CONCLUSIONS: With stroke death rates decreasing substantially in the United States from 1996 to 2005, stroke moved from the second to the third leading organ- and disease-specific cause of death. Women and blacks may warrant attention for targeted stroke prevention and treatment because they continue to have disproportionately high stroke death rates.