An in vivo investigative protocol for HDR prostate brachytherapy using urethral and rectal thermoluminescence dosimetry.

PURPOSE: To develop an in vivo dosimetry based investigative action level relevant for a corrective protocol for HDR brachytherapy boost treatment. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The dose delivered to points within the urethra and rectum was measured using TLD in vivo dosimetry in 56 patients. Comparisons between the urethral and rectal measurements and TPS calculations showed differences, which are related to the relative position of the implant and TLD trains, and allowed shifts of implant position relative to the prostate to be estimated. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of rectal dose measurements is consistent with implant movement, which was previously only identified with the urethral data. Shift corrected doses were compared with results from the TPS. Comparison of peak doses to the urethra and rectum has been assessed against the proposed corrective protocol to limit overdosing these critical structures. An initial investigative level of 20% difference between measured and TPS peak dose was established, which corresponds to 1/3 of patients which was practical for the caseload. These patients were assessed resulting in corrective action being applied for one patient. Multiple triggering for selective investigative action is outlined. The use of a single in vivo measurement in the first fraction optimizes patient benefit at acceptable cost.

Dose distribution and morbidity after high dose rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer: influence of V150 and V200 parameters.

The purpose of this study is to identify factors predicting morbidity in patients undergoing high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy boost with external beam irradiation for prostate cancer. Acute and late morbidity data were collected for 104 prostate cancer patients treated with an HDR boost together with external beam radiotherapy. Significant urinary and rectal morbidity were correlated with urethral and rectal point doses, and the proportions of the target volume receiving 100%, 150% and 200% (V200) or more of the prescribed dose. Rectal or urethral point doses did not predict morbidity. By contrast, the V200 was significantly higher for patients experiencing either acute or late urinary morbidity. The cut-off V200 was 15% of the target volume. Although theoretically beneficial for tumour cell kill, the treatment of significant proportions of the prostate to high dose might be associated with increased morbidity, and should preferably be avoided.