How to treat chronic pain in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs) - A pharmacological review.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic pain is a common symptom of rheumatic diseases that impacts patients' quality of life. While non-pharmacological approaches are often recommended as first-line treatments, pharmacological interventions are important for pain management. However, the effectiveness and safety of different pharmacological treatments for chronic pain in rheumatic diseases are unclear. METHODS: This review critically synthesizes the current evidence base to guide clinicians in selecting appropriate pharmacological treatments for their patients, considering the expected benefits and potential risks and side effects. RESULTS: For osteoarthritis, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), acetaminophen, opioids, and antidepressants are commonly used, with NSAIDs being the most recommended. In addition, topical agents, such as topical NSAIDs, are recommended for localized pain relief. For fibromyalgia, amitriptyline, serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), and gabapentinoids are commonly used, with SNRIs being the most recommended. For back pain, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), acetaminophen, opioids are used only for acute of flare-up pain, whereas neuropathic pain drugs are only used for chronic radicular pain. For inflammatory rheumatic diseases, disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and biological agents are recommended to slow disease progression and manage symptoms. CONCLUSION: While DMARDs and biological agents are recommended for inflammatory rheumatic diseases, pharmacological treatments for other rheumatic diseases only alleviate symptoms and do not provide a cure for the underlying condition. The use of pharmacological treatments should be based on the expected benefits and evaluation of side effects, with non-pharmacological modalities also being considered, especially for fibromyalgia.

Management perspectives from patients with fibromyalgia experiences with the healthcare pathway: a qualitative study.

Background: Fibromyalgia is a prevalent condition affecting 1-2% of the general population and can result in significant disability. Physicians and patients frequently encounter challenges in managing this condition. Aim: The aim of this study was to explore novel management approaches through a qualitative analysis of the doctor-patient relationship. Design and setting: Telephonic interviews were conducted with fibromyalgia patients to investigate their healthcare experiences. Methods: Qualitative analysis was performed on patients' narratives using interpretative phenomenological analysis, a methodology that delves into each individual's subjectivity. Results: A total of 19 adult patients with fibromyalgia, primarily middle-aged women (84% women, mean age 49.8 years), recruited from two university centers in Paris, were included in the study. The narratives of participants revealed substantial suffering and considerable functional impairment, which is paradoxical for a condition often considered benign. They reported an ongoing sense of loss of control, exacerbated by an imbalanced patient-doctor relationship. Patients constantly feared not being heard or believed, and they frequently sought attention from their caregivers. Most participants displayed significant ambivalence toward the nature of their condition and actively sought causal links. Patients' adaptive strategies sometimes worsened their symptoms, as in the case of muscular deconditioning. The healthcare system appeared deficient in managing these patients, characterized by a lack of health professional training, frequent inappropriate responses from healthcare providers, and stigmatization of psychological conditions. Conclusion: Despite its perceived benign nature, fibromyalgia should be regarded as a severe condition due to its substantial long-term consequences. Participants reported a challenging experience with the doctor-patient relationship, marked by a strong sense of dependence and a lack of recognition. The care pathway for these patients appeared unsuitable and disorderly, potentially resulting in iatrogenic consequences. The management of patients with fibromyalgia should be enhanced and directed toward a patient-centered approach. The study provides practical recommendations regarding communication methods and patient care.

"FastSchool": A single session of an interprofessional pain management program for chronic pain patients inspired by cognitive behavioral therapy.

OBJECTIVES: Multidisciplinary approaches to treating chronic pain have been proven effective. Currently, chronic pain patients face lengthy waitlists in pain medicine departments. To overcome this problem, we developed the "FastSchool" program to educate patients about pain management and treatment. In this study, we evaluated the benefit of a "FastSchool" session on pain and catastrophizing in chronic pain patients. METHODS: Included patients had chronic non-cancer pain, no more than 2 visits to a pain medicine department. Patients attended a single 3-hour session, conducted by an interprofessional team. Four topics were addressed: chronic pain mechanisms, pharmacological therapies, physical activity, and the management of analgesics. Patients completed questionnaires at baseline and at 3 months post-session to assess pain interference, pain intensity, and catastrophizing. RESULTS: The study population included 88 patients; 71 completed the follow-up questionnaires. Pain interference (p = 0.002), average pain intensity (p = 0.013), and catastrophizing (p < 0.001) decreased 3 months after FastSchool. At M3, 35 % of patients felt their pain had improved based on the Patient Global Impression of Change. CONCLUSION: FastSchool, an innovative short-term educational program inspired by cognitive behavioral therapy, showed positive results in reducing pain impact. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Implementation of FastSchool in pain medicine departments would reduce waitlist times for non-pharmacological treatment.

Lifestyle and chronic pain: double jeopardy?

Given the often disappointing results of pharmacotherapy, many patients with chronic pain seek to modify their lifestyle. Some lifestyle factors, such as the consumption of alcohol, tobacco, cannabis, or psychostimulants, are deleterious in this context, whereas others, such as physical activity and a balanced diet, are considered beneficial, but these require substantial effort on the part of patients. In all cases, it is important to analyse lifestyle factors in patients with chronic pain, without stigmatisation, as the co-existence of pain and inappropriate behaviour can be seen as double jeopardy in patients with pain.

Is Europe also facing an opioid crisis?-A survey of European Pain Federation chapters.

BACKGROUND: There is considerable public interest in whether Europe is facing an opioid crisis comparable to the one in the United States and the contribution of opioid prescriptions for pain to a potential opioid crisis. METHODS: A task force of the European Pain Federation (EFIC) conducted a survey with its national chapter representatives on trends of opioid prescriptions and of drug-related emergency departments and substance use disorder treatment admissions and of deaths as proxies of opioid-related harms over the last 20 years. RESULTS: Data from 25 European countries were received. In most European countries opioid prescriptions increased from 2004 to 2016. The levels of opioid consumption and their increase differed between countries. Some Eastern European countries still have a low opioid consumption. Opioids are mainly prescribed for acute pain and chronic noncancer pain in some Western and Northern European countries. There was a parallel increase in opioid prescriptions and some proxies of opioid-related harms in France, Finland and the Netherlands, but not in Germany, Spain and Norway. In United Kingdom, opioid overdose deaths, but not opioid prescriptions increased between 2016 and 2018. There are no robust data available on whether prescribed opioids for pain patients contributed to opioid-related harms. CONCLUSIONS: There are marked differences between European countries in trends of opioid prescribing and of proxies for opioid-related harms. Europe as a whole is not facing an opioid crisis. Discussions on the potential harms of opioids should not obstruct their prescription for cancer pain and palliative care. SIGNIFICANCE: Europe as a whole is not facing an opioid crisis. Some Eastern European countries have limited access to opioid medicines. Discussions on the potential harms of opioid medicines for noncancer pain should not obstruct opioid therapy for cancer therapy and palliative care.

Analgesic opioid use disorders in patients with chronic non-cancer pain: A holistic approach for tailored management.

Chronic pain is a major public health issue that frequently leads to analgesic opioid prescriptions. These prescriptions could cause addiction issues in high-risk patients with associated comorbidities, especially those of a psychiatric, addictive, and social nature. Pain management in dependent patients is complex and is yet to be established. By combining the views of professionals from various specialties, we conducted an integrative review on this scope. This methodology synthesizes knowledge and results of significant practical studies to provide a narrative overview of the literature. The main results consisted in first proposing definitions that could allow shared vocabulary among health professionals regardless of their specialties. Next, a discussion was conducted around the main strategies for managing prescription opioid dependence, as well as pain in the context of opioid dependence and associated comorbidities. As a conclusion, we proposed to define the contours of holistic management by outlining the main guidelines for creating a multidisciplinary care framework for multi-comorbid patients with chronic pathologies.

Opioid epidemic: Does rheumatological practice favors risk for patients? National survey on rheumatologists' opioid prescriptions and compliance to guidelines for strong opioid prescription.

OBJECTIVES: Given the scope of rheumatology and its prevalence of pain, it seems needed that a study should focus on prescription habits, in the midst of the international opioid epidemic and given the moderate efficacy of strong opioids in chronic musculoskeletal conditions. We compared rheumatologists' opioid prescribing patterns in non-cancer pain with recommended practice. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study of the French health insurance database, including all patients aged 16 years or over reimbursed for at least one strong opioid prescription from a rheumatologist in 2015. A nationwide survey of all registered rheumatologists in France was performed with a 47-item questionnaire in June 2015. RESULTS: Only 2.4% of the patients receiving a strong opioid in 2015 (n=700,946) had at least one prescription from a rheumatologist. Rheumatologists prescribed mostly morphine, and significantly less oxycodone and fentanyl (P<0.00001) than other specialists. Rheumatologists prescribed a mean of 35.8mg morphine equivalent/day. A response rate of 33.7% was obtained to the questionnaire. Acute musculoskeletal pain was the principal condition for strong opioids prescription, with 94.5% re-evaluating opioid treatment within two weeks of initiation. For efficacy, 80% said that they stopped treatment if no benefit was observed after a test period (mean=1.2 months). Rheumatologists with pain management training were significantly more likely to evaluate pain before prescribing strong opioids (P=0.001), evaluate efficacy within three months (P=0.01) and screen for risk factors for misuse at initiation (P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: For non-cancer pain, rheumatologists generally prescribe opioids for short periods, at low doses, mostly according to national recommendations. Pain education strongly affected opioid prescription by rheumatologists.

Part of pain labelled neuropathic in rheumatic disease might be rather nociplastic.

Pain in rheumatic diseases is primarily due to mechanical or inflammatory mechanism, but neuropathic pain (NP) component is also occurring in many conditions and is probably underdiagnosed. The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of prevalence, pathophysiological and currently available treatment of NP in rheumatic diseases. When associated with clinical evaluation assessing neurological clinical signs and neuroanatomical distribution, Douleur Neuropathique 4 Questions, painDETECT, Leeds assessment of neuropathic symptoms and signs and Neuropathic Pain Questionnaire can detect NP component. Inflammatory or connective diseases, osteoarthritis, back pain or persistent pain after surgery are aetiologies that all may have a neuropathic component. Unlike nociceptive pain, NP does not respond to usual analgesics such as paracetamol and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Entrapment neuropathy, peripheral neuropathy or small-fibre neuropathy are different aetiologies that can lead to NP. A part of the pain labelled neuropathic is rather nociplastic, secondary to a central sensitisation mechanism. Identifying the right component of pain (nociceptive vs neuropathic or nociplastic) could help to better manage pain in rheumatic diseases with pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments.

New concepts of pain.

Active research is being conducted on musculoskeletal pain, and recent concepts will help clinicians and researchers to develop better approaches: -the new pain taxonomy recently has been modified with a third descriptor with the concept of nociplastic pain. -the latest International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) includes an IASP task force that developed a new classification system for pain. In this new classification, one can differentiate primary musculoskeletal pain including fibromyalgia and low back pain and secondary musculoskeletal pain related to specific etiologies. -the concept of central sensitization in inflammatory rheumatic diseases is increasingly discussed. In these conditions, even with very active biological treatment, almost a third of patients are still complaining of persisting pain. These persisting pain states under adequate treatment, without any sign of inflammation, led researchers to look for evidence of central sensitization states.

Functional and histological improvements of small nerve neuropathy after high-concentration capsaicin patch application: A case study.

INTRODUCTION: Small fiber neuropathy has been found to occur in a large variety of pathological onditions, and the gold standard for diagnosis of small fiber neuropathy is skin biopsy. Sudorimetry is now considered an accurate technique to evaluate small fiber function with a good sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of small fiber neuropathy. Capsaicin high-concentration patch is approved for the treatment of peripheral neuropathic pain in adults either alone or in combination with other medicinal products for pain. METHODS: We describe the case of a 50-year-old woman diagnosed with small fiber neuropathy. After 2 previous treatment failures, she was proposed a treatment with high-dose capsaicin patches on the sole of her foot. The patient experienced an important diminution of her neuropathic pain. There was a 50% decrease in the pain numeric scale. Electrochemical skin conductance and skin biopsy were repeated 3 months after patch application. RESULTS: At 3 months, the patient then experienced an important diminution of her neuropathic pain, electrochemical skin conductance had normalized both in the hands and feet and intraepidermal nerve fiber density at distal leg increased almost reaching normal range. CONCLUSION: This case report shows the correlation between clinical improvement, electrochemical skin conductance normalization, and intraepidermal nerve fiber density improvement after a high-dose capsaicin patch in a patient with small fiber neuropathy.

The opioid epidemic: helping rheumatologists prevent a crisis.

An endemic increase in the number of deaths attributable to prescribed opioids is found in all developed countries. In 2016 in the USA, more than 46 people died each day from overdoses involving prescription opioids. European data show that the number of patients receiving strong opioids is increasing. In addition, there is an upsurge in hospitalisations for opioid intoxication, opioid abuse and deaths in some European countries. This class of analgesic is increasingly used in many rheumatological pathologies. Cohort studies, in various chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) (osteoarthritis, chronic low back pain, rheumatoid arthritis, etc), show that between 2% and 8% of patients are treated with strong opioids. In order to help rheumatologists prescribe strong opioids under optimal conditions and to prevent the risk of death, abuse and misuse, recommendations have recently been published (in France in 2016, the recommendations of the French Society of Study and Treatment of Pain, in 2017, the European recommendations of the European Federation of IASP Chapters and the American Society of International Pain Physicians). They agree on the same general principles: opioids may be of interest in situations of CNCP, but their prescription must follow essential rules. It is necessary to make an accurate assessment of the pain and its origin, to formulate therapeutic objectives (pain, function and/or quality of life), to evaluate beforehand the risk of abuse and to get a specialised opinion beyond a certain dose or duration of prescription.

Efficacy of Venlafaxine in Neuropathic Pain: A Narrative Review of Optimized Treatment.

PURPOSE: The prevalence of neuropathic pain is high in the general population, and high priority is given to the management of this pain condition. The treatment of neuropathic pain remains challenging, despite the publication of national and international recommendations. The purpose of this narrative review of venlafaxine (VLX) is to provide a better knowledge of the pharmacology of this drug and a clearer view of its efficacy and tolerability in neuropathic pain. METHODS: Two independent reviewers searched PubMed with the following search terms: serotonin and noradrenalin reuptake inhibitors OR VLX hydrochloride AND pain. The reviewers included all clinical studies that investigated VLX in neuropathic pain conditions and excluded animal studies, studies on fibromyalgia, studies that focused on the prevention of neuropathic pain, case reports, and studies that did not clearly describe neuropathic pain in the included patients. We describe the 13 studies that we analyzed. FINDINGS: Eleven were randomized clinical trials, and the comparator was placebo in 8 studies. Nine studies reported that VLX was effective against neuropathic pain. However, among the trials, only one against placebo included a large number of patients with >200 participants and one against prégabaline and carbamazepine had >200 patients. Most of the adverse events reported in the selected studies were consistent with known adverse events of VLX, and most were mild to moderate. However, most studies were of very short duration. IMPLICATIONS: Most of the clinical studies found that VLX was effective and well tolerated. However, given the limited number of study and the limitations of all these studies, further large clinical trials are needed. Currently, considering the limited therapeutic options for treating neuropathic pain and the highly variable nature of responses to all drugs, VLX has a place as a treatment option for neuropathic pain.

[Use of strong opioids in chronic non-cancer pain in adults. Evidence-based recommendations from the French Society for the Study and Treatment of Pain]. / Utilisation des opioïdes forts dans la douleur chronique non cancéreuse chez l'adulte. Recommandations françaises de bonne pratique clinique par consensus formalisé (SFETD).

OBJECTIVES: An urgent need is to improve the efficacy and safety of use of strong opioids in chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) through responsible prescription rules supported by scientific evidence. METHODS: Clinical questions addressing the indication, the benefice, the risk and the precautions were formulated. A task force composed of physicians from several medical specialties involved in managing CNCP was charged to elaborate evidence-based recommendations. A systematic literature search was performed using CENTRAL, MEDLINE and EMBASE databases. The approach of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation was applied to evaluate outcomes. RESULTS: We selected 21 meta-analyses and 31 cohort studies for analysis. Fifteen recommendations are provided. Strong opioids are not recommended in fibromyalgia and primary headaches. Strong opioids have been shown to be moderately effective against CNCP due to osteoarthritis of the lower limbs, and for back pain and neuropathic pain. Their introduction is advised only after the failure of first-line treatments, combined with patient care, provided that the patient is made aware of the advantages and risks. It is not advisable to continue strong opioids treatment for longer than three months if no improvement in pain, function or quality of life is observed. It is also recommended not to prescribe doses exceeding 150mg/day morphine equivalent. Misuse risk factors should be investigated before prescription and misuse should be assessed at each renewal. Priority should be given to extended-release forms. It is recommended not to use transmucosal rapid-release forms of fentanyl for the management of CNCP. CONCLUSION: These recommendations are intended for all doctors needing to prescribe strong opioids in CNCP.

Analgesic effect of sacroplasty in osteoporotic sacral fractures: a study of six cases.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the short-term analgesic effect of sacroplasty in patients with osteoporotic sacral fractures. METHODS: Single-center retrospective observational study of all patients managed with sacroplasty for osteoporotic sacral fractures between October 2008 and November 2009. For each patient, symptom duration, pain intensity, and analgesic consumption were recorded. Sacroplasty was performed under local analgesia, in the prone position, with computed tomography guidance. The long-axis approach was sued to introduce the needles and polymethylmethacrylate cement along the fracture line(s). Pain was evaluated on a 10-point visual analog scale (VAS) 24 hours before sacroplasty then at the time of weight-bearing resumption 24 hours after the procedure. Hospital stay length before and after the procedures were recorded. RESULTS: We identified six patients (five women and one man) with a mean age of 83.2 years. All six patients presented with low back pain and four also had buttock pain. The interval from pain onset to diagnosis ranged from 1 month to 1 year. All patients reported that pain onset followed a fall. The mean VAS pain score was 8.2 before sacroplasty and decreased by 7.6 points 24 hours after the procedure (with four patients having a score of 0). Mean hospital stay length were 12 days before and 4 days after sacroplasty. All patients required opioid analgesics before sacroplasty. At discharge, analgesic requirements were a step II analgesic in one patient, acetaminophen in one patient, and no analgesics in four patients. No adverse events were recorded. DISCUSSION: The findings from our small population are consistent with a recent literature review of 15 case-series studies showing a significant analgesic effect of sacroplasty. The rapid effect of sacroplasty allows prompt ambulation, thus avoiding complications related to immobility. CONCLUSION: Sacroplasty is effective in relieving pain due to sacral insufficiency fractures.

Receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand and osteoprotegerin: maintaining the balance to prevent bone loss.

Bone remodeling requires a precise balance between resorption and formation. It is a complex process that involves numerous factors: hormones, growth factors, vitamins, and cytokines, and notably osteoprotegerin (OPG) and receptor activator for nuclear factor-κB (RANK) ligand. The signaling pathway OPG/RANK/RANKL is key to regulation for maintaining the balance between the activity of osteoblasts and osteoclasts in order to prevent bone loss and ensure a normal bone turnover. In this review, the RANK/RANKL/OPG pathway is described. The multiple interactions of various factors (hormones, cytokines, growth factors, and vitamins) with the OPG/RANK/RANKL pathway are also commented on. Finally, the effects of denosumab, a human monoclonal antibody that binds to RANKL and thereby inhibits the activation of osteoclasts, and of strontium ranelate are also described. Indeed, these two new drugs afford appreciable assistance in daily care practice, helping to prevent bone loss in patients with osteoporosis.